Time is not a dimension. Time is an evolution parameter. Time is modeled as a dimension only in some theories that avoid the true nature of time, including its characteristic arrow. But those limited theories cannot describe irreversible phenomena.

"The interpretation of quantum mechanics that takes position as the only observable is the Bohmian interpretation of quantum mechanics". Not...

view entire post

Time is not a dimension. Time is an evolution parameter. Time is modeled as a dimension only in some theories that avoid the true nature of time, including its characteristic arrow. But those limited theories cannot describe irreversible phenomena.

"The interpretation of quantum mechanics that takes position as the only observable is the Bohmian interpretation of quantum mechanics". Not true. First, there are many observables in Bohmian mechanics; they are often denotes as "O" in the literature. Second, it is possible to formulate Bohmian mechanics in the momentum representation.

"One thing it is of central importance, the object has a wavefuction." Not only this is of no importance (it is possible to formulate quantum theory without wavefunctions), but wavefunctions only exist for certain systems (non-open) and states (pure).

The geometrical model of time used is only an approximation. Those closed curves don't exist.

Dark matter isn't "a CTM (membrane)" neither "a relic of the inflation". Dark matter is a fictitious distribution of matter added to gravitational theories that don't accurately describe the gravitational interactions at galactic scale. We can explain the same phenomena without any need of dark matter.

"The Krasnikov tube system has become a time machine". For a science-fiction movie. The Krasnikov tube system is fiction, but not by "CTC" but because the whole description of the tube system is confounding time with clocks, ignoring the arrow of time, and even ignoring basic laws of conservation.

"Coming back to Bohmian mechanics, it is noticeable that it is hard to come up with a relativistic version of the theory, as it is difficult to find a preferential time slice." There is nothing noticeable here; quantum mechanics is incompatible with relativity; as is well-known, there is no consistent and complete relativistic quantum mechanics. The problem is not in finding "a preferential time slice", but quantum and relativity treating causality and time in different, incompatible ways.

"Entropic Gravity" --as "spacetime thermodynamics", "black-hole thermodynamics", and other recent developments-- is based in a completely misunderstanding of what is thermodynamics, gravity, or entropy and on superficial analogies.

"It is evident that this evokes the idea of pilot wave theory, where you have a non-local and determinist span of the universe." Only when one ignores measurements and other irreversible processes.

view post as summary

Dear Daniel

If you are looking for another essay to read and rate in the final days of the contest, will you consider mine please? I read all essays from those who comment on my page, and if I cant rate an essay highly, then I don’t rate them at all. Infact I haven’t issued a rating lower that ten. So you have nothing to lose by having me read your essay, and everything to...

view entire post

Dear Daniel

If you are looking for another essay to read and rate in the final days of the contest, will you consider mine please? I read all essays from those who comment on my page, and if I cant rate an essay highly, then I don’t rate them at all. Infact I haven’t issued a rating lower that ten. So you have nothing to lose by having me read your essay, and everything to gain.

Beyond my essay’s introduction, I place a microscope on the subjects of universal complexity and natural forces. I do so within context that clock operation is driven by Quantum Mechanical forces (atomic and photonic), while clocks also serve measure of General Relativity’s effects (spacetime, time dilation). In this respect clocks can be said to possess a split personality, giving them the distinction that they are simultaneously a study in QM, while GR is a study of clocks. The situation stands whereby we have two fundamental theories of the world, but just one world. And we have a singular device which serves study of both those fundamental theories. Two fundamental theories, but one device? Please join me and my essay in questioning this circumstance?

My essay goes on to identify natural forces in their universal roles, how they motivate the building of and maintaining complex universal structures and processes. When we look at how star fusion processes sit within a “narrow range of sensitivity” that stars are neither led to explode nor collapse under gravity. We think how lucky we are that the universe is just so. We can also count our lucky stars that the fusion process that marks the birth of a star, also leads to an eruption of photons from its surface. And again, how lucky we are! for if they didn’t then gas accumulation wouldn’t be halted and the star would again be led to collapse.

Could a natural organisation principle have been responsible for fine tuning universal systems? Faced with how lucky we appear to have been, shouldn’t we consider this possibility?

For our luck surely didnt run out there, for these photons stream down on earth, liquifying oceans which drive geochemical processes that we “life” are reliant upon. The Earth is made up of elements that possess the chemical potentials that life is entirely dependent upon. Those chemical potentials are not expressed in the absence of water solvency. So again, how amazingly fortunate we are that these chemical potentials exist in the first instance, and additionally within an environment of abundant water solvency such as Earth, able to express these potentials.

My essay is attempt of something audacious. It questions the fundamental nature of the interaction between space and matter Guv = Tuv, and hypothesizes the equality between space curvature and atomic forces is due to common process. Space gives up a potential in exchange for atomic forces in a conversion process, which drives atomic activity. And furthermore, that Baryons only exist because this energy potential of space exists and is available for exploitation. Baryon characteristics and behaviours, complexity of structure and process might then be explained in terms of being evolved and optimised for this purpose and existence. Removing need for so many layers of extraordinary luck to eventuate our own existence. It attempts an interpretation of the above mentioned stellar processes within these terms, but also extends much further. It shines a light on molecular structure that binds matter together, as potentially being an evolved agency that enhances rigidity and therefor persistence of universal system. We then turn a questioning mind towards Earths unlikely geochemical processes, (for which we living things owe so much) and look at its central theme and propensity for molecular rock forming processes. The existence of chemical potentials and their diverse range of molecular bond formation activities? The abundance of water solvent on Earth, for which many geochemical rock forming processes could not be expressed without? The question of a watery Earth? is then implicated as being part of an evolved system that arose for purpose and reason, alongside the same reason and purpose that molecular bonds and chemistry processes arose.

By identifying atomic forces as having their origin in space, we have identified how they perpetually act, and deliver work products. Forces drive clocks and clock activity is shown by GR to dilate. My essay details the principle of force dilation and applies it to a universal mystery. My essay raises the possibility, that nature in possession of a natural energy potential, will spontaneously generate a circumstance of Darwinian emergence. It did so on Earth, and perhaps it did so within a wider scope. We learnt how biology generates intricate structure and complexity, and now we learn how it might explain for intricate structure and complexity within universal physical systems.

To steal a phrase from my essay “A world product of evolved optimization”.

Best of luck for the conclusion of the contest

Kind regards

Steven Andresen

Darwinian Universal Fundamental Origin

view post as summary