If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at
forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.
Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the
"Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the
"Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.
Contests Home
Current Essay Contest
Previous Contests
Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest
December 24, 2019 - April 24, 2020Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss
•
winners
What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss
•
winners
Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discuss
•
winners
Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and MathematicsContest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American
read/discuss
•
winners
How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss
•
winners
It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss
•
winners
Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discuss
•
winners
Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discuss
•
winners
What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discuss
•
winners
The Nature of Time
August - December 2008read/discuss
•
winners
Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use
Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.
By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide
by the Terms of Use
RSS feed | RSS help
CATEGORY:
The Nature of Time Essay Contest (2008)
[back]
TOPIC:
Time: Arrow or Boomerang? by Kenneth Bruce Lucas
[refresh]
Login or
create account to post reply or comment.
Kenneth Bruce Lucas wrote on Nov. 21, 2008 @ 10:17 GMT
Essay AbstractIs time an arrow or a boomerang? Time is extremely important for human society, but is what humans call "time" an aspect of physics other than a means of measuring the rate that physical processes occur. We measure time as cycles and perhaps that is all time is -- a series of interacting cycles. The universe may have had a beginning, but probably not in either the way supported by religious leaders or in exactly the manner described by most physicists. If the universe came from a black hole, it is more likely that the material left as jets of "lumpy" material instead of as separate subatomic particles. The gradual "loss" of energy into a state in which some energy no longer interacts with the universe is the only real indicator of an "arrow of time". A steady state universe would require that black holes, or some other physical phenomena, recycle this energy perhaps by absorbing low energy radiation and matter and then emitting both as jets capable of producing new stars. If time is a physical dimension, matter would probably not be able to travel backwards through time, but perhaps information could, especially if the human mind exists in a dimension above time. I don't claim to have the answers to these questions only speculation about what the answers might involve.
Author BioI've been interested in space-time since I discovered George Gamow in high school. I'm a mathematician with undergraduate work in the field of geometry of higher dimensions but my graduate work involved the study of human behavior. As a generalist I study all aspects of human behavior including how humans view and interact with physical reality. B.A. Oklahoma Baptist University. 100 hours beyond M.A. University of Kansas in a variety of fields including computer science. I'm an intellectual jack of all trades, master of none.
Download Essay PDF File
Login or
create account to post reply or comment.