Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Robert Sadykov: on 12/17/08 at 7:49am UTC, wrote Dear Jose Curiel, The essay The Theory of Time, Space and Gravitation is...

matthew kolasinski: on 11/26/08 at 7:10am UTC, wrote Hello Mr. Curiel, i see that the structure you set up for recording...

JOSE CURIEL: on 11/25/08 at 23:24pm UTC, wrote MR MATT KOLASINSKI: THANKS FOR YOUR INTERESTING COMMENT.I DERIVE THE...

matthew kolasinski: on 11/23/08 at 23:52pm UTC, wrote Dear Mr. Curiel, i found your paper interesting. first reaction was...

JOSE J CURIEL: on 11/19/08 at 9:36am UTC, wrote Essay Abstract THIS ESSAY DEALS WITH SOME PARADOXES REGARDING THE...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Lorraine Ford: "Georgina, 1. What “emerges” from cellular automata algorithms only..." in Agency in the Physical...

Lorraine Ford: "When will people [1] grow up and get over their absurd ideas about..." in Agency in the Physical...

Joe Fisher: "The sad fact is that no physicist has ever studied actual visible physical..." in SciMeter: A New Way to...

My Emilly: "Nice post,i like your article,great way of explanation.Looking for more..." in Collapsing Physics: Q&A...

Chris Roger: "Hi, thanks for your nice article. It's really detailed and helpful gmail..." in What Is Fundamental? –...

Chris Roger: "Superb Information, I really appreciated with it, This is fine to read and..." in SciMeter: A New Way to...

Philip Chester: "Good post. I find out something new and challenging on articles I..." in New Online Course:...

Joe Fisher: "Dear FQXi.org Members, Reality am fundamental. Reality am not..." in Ed Witten on the Nature...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Usurping Quantum Theory
The search is on for a fundamental framework that allows for even stranger links between particles than quantum theory—which could lead us to a theory of everything.

Fuzzballs v Black Holes
A radical theory replaces the cosmic crunchers with fuzzy quantum spheres, potentially solving the black-hole information paradox and explaining away the Big Bang and the origin of time.

Whose Physics Is It Anyway? Q&A with Chanda Prescod-Weinstein
Why physics and astronomy communities must take diversity issues seriously in order to do good science.

Why Time Might Not Be an Illusion
Einstein’s relativity pushes physicists towards a picture of the universe as a block, in which the past, present, and future all exist on the same footing; but maybe that shift in thinking has gone too far.

The Complexity Conundrum
Resolving the black hole firewall paradox—by calculating what a real astronaut would compute at the black hole's edge.


FQXi FORUM
July 21, 2018

CATEGORY: The Nature of Time Essay Contest (2008) [back]
TOPIC: TIME PARADOXES by JOSE J CURIEL [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

JOSE J CURIEL wrote on Nov. 19, 2008 @ 09:36 GMT
Essay Abstract

THIS ESSAY DEALS WITH SOME PARADOXES REGARDING THE NATURE OF TIME LIKE: 1-ITS VERY EXISTENCE 2-POSSIBLE TRANSFORMATION OF ENERGY INTO SPACE TIME AND VICE VERSA 3-A SECOND TIME 4-BACKWARD TIME

Author Bio

JOSE CURIEL IS A CIVIL ENGINEER WITH A MASTERS DEGREE IN HYDRAULICS AND HYDROLOGY FROM STANFORD UNIVERSITY, CALIFORNIA. HAS DEDICATED MANY YEARS TO THE STUDY OF PHYSICS AND PARAPSYCHOLOGY.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



matthew kolasinski wrote on Nov. 23, 2008 @ 23:52 GMT
Dear Mr. Curiel,

i found your paper interesting. first reaction was actually a wish that you might have said even more, but i'm glad you've said what you have.

re:

"According to this the elementary entities may operate in a three dimensional space and in a plane of time, instead of the linear time that we perceive."

something like this seems quite...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share



JOSE CURIEL wrote on Nov. 25, 2008 @ 23:24 GMT
MR MATT KOLASINSKI:

THANKS FOR YOUR INTERESTING COMMENT.I DERIVE THE PROCEDURE REGARDING THE PRECOGNITION PROCESS FROM MY OWN PERSONAL EXPERIENCE:1-I FILLED A NOTE BOOK WITH MY DREAMS,DATES,

APPROXIMATE HOURS AND WITH THE RESPECTIVE CONFIRMATIONS,

LIKE NEWSPAPER NOTES,THAT HAPPENED NORMALLY 2 TO 3 DAYS AFTER

(FOR EXAMPLE PLANE ACCIDENTS,ETC).UNFORTUNATELY I LOST IT

2-I DEVELOP A SYSTEM TO WIN THE LOTTO MACHINES, THAT HAVE

1 MILLION OF POSSIBILITIES ( FROM 000000 TO 999999).

I PLAYED 20 TIMES AND WON 10 TIMES, CASHING APPROXIMATELY

80,000 $.BY THE CONTRARY WHEN I PLACED A RANDOM NUMBER I

NEVER WON.THE SYSTEM IS SUMMARIZED IN THE LAST PART OF THE

ESSAY (BACKWARD TIME):BEFORE GOING TO SLEEP I ASSURE MYSELF THAT I WILL WIN AND PLACE MY MIND IN BLANK.2-AFTER AWAKENING

I TAKE NOTE OF THE DIFFERENT IMAGES DREAMED IN SEQUENCE

3-I DIVIDE THE DREAM IN SIX DIFFERENT IMAGES AND ASSIGN

A NUMBER TO EACH ONE FROM 0 TO 9, ACCORDING TO THE LIKENESS

OF THE IMAGE WITH THE IMAGE-NOT THE MEANING-OF A NUMBER,

FOR EXAMPLE A DUCK MAY BE THE NUMBER 2.4-I FORM A SIX FIGURES NUMBER AND PLAY IT,FOR EXAMPLE THE FIRST TIME THAT

I USED THIS METHOD I WON 8,000 $ WITH THE NUMBER 808111.

I DREAMED THAT MYSELF(0) WAS SURROUNDED BY FAT BLACK PERSONS

(8) AND AT DISTANCE MANY SKINNY(1) HYNDU PERSONS VERE

LOOKING AT ME.SO 808111.THANKS.JOSE CURIEL

Bookmark and Share



matthew kolasinski wrote on Nov. 26, 2008 @ 07:10 GMT
Hello Mr. Curiel,

i see that the structure you set up for recording precog. dreams and for 'programming' an intent for the dreams would both be fairly effective, as well as your approach to interpretation of the data - a very clever approach to addressing numbers. my compliments on that.

thank you for sharing your experiences and normally i'd be more than happy to chat about such things, but have a strong preference here for staying closer to the topic of time and the significance precognition has for how we think about time.

thanks again,

matt kolasinski

Bookmark and Share



Robert Sadykov wrote on Dec. 17, 2008 @ 07:49 GMT
Dear Jose Curiel,

The essay The Theory of Time, Space and Gravitation is the interesting alternative to the special and general theory of relativity. I regret, but time paradoxes and any other paradoxes there are absent.

Regards,

Robert Sadykov

Bookmark and Share



Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.