Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation

Previous Contests

Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest
December 24, 2019 - April 24, 2020
Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Steven Andresen: on 2/22/18 at 7:39am UTC, wrote Dear Alex If you are looking for another essay to read and rate in the...

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 2/6/18 at 21:20pm UTC, wrote Respected Prof Alex Hankey You have very nicely started with...

Joe Fisher: on 1/28/18 at 22:00pm UTC, wrote Dear Fellow Essayists This will be my final plea for fair treatment., ...

Brian Josephson: on 1/28/18 at 16:03pm UTC, wrote Alex, since there was an enquiry in my own discussion as to suitable...

Brian Josephson: on 1/27/18 at 21:19pm UTC, wrote While there are some very nice ideas here, I find some ideas confusing, in...

Brian Josephson: on 1/27/18 at 20:46pm UTC, wrote For the record, Stuart Kauffman is a biologist and complex systems...

DIOGENES AYBAR: on 1/27/18 at 20:38pm UTC, wrote Dear Alex; Very refreshing, coming from a physicist. In complex systems...

Francesco D'Isa: on 1/27/18 at 17:28pm UTC, wrote Dear Alex Hankey, thank you for your essay, which I found very interesting...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

H.H.J. Luediger: "Even darker.... one can not easily downrate a racehorse to a donkey, but..." in Undecidability,...

Steve Agnew: "Well thank-you, you are very kind. I have come to appreciate the fact that..." in Quantum Dream Time

Samuel Parsons: "O also means a whole new universe in a box can be recreated a miniverse..." in Outside the Box

Samuel Parsons: "Is it 127? It's always comes back here. Just saying also I'm trying to..." in Outside the Box

Zeeya Merali: "INSPYRE, INternational School on modern PhYsics and REsearch, organized by..." in Welcome to INSPYRE 2020 -...

David Sloan: "Dear Alan, For any discussion regarding the essay contest, the contact..." in Undecidability,...

Jonathan Dickau: "Thank you Peter... For the kind words of explanation. It is looking like..." in From Cosmic Lighthouses...

Lawrence Crowell: "Tejinder, I was intrigued by your FQXi essay. Thanks for this reference to..." in Alternative Models of...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Building Agency in the Biology Lab
Physicists are using optogenetics techniques to make a rudimentary agent, from cellular components, which can convert measurements into actions using light.

Think Quantum to Build Better AI
Investigating how quantum memory storage could aid machine learning and how quantum interactions with the environment may have played a role in evolution.

Outside the Box
A proposed quantum set-up that could predict your game-playing strategy resurrects Newcomb’s classic quiz show paradox.

The Quantum Agent
Investigating how the quantum measurement process might be related to the emergence of intelligence, agency and free will.

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.


FQXi FORUM
May 25, 2020

CATEGORY: FQXi Essay Contest - Spring, 2017 [back]
TOPIC: A Place for Elements of Subjectivity in Cosmological Physics? by Alex Hankey [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Alex Hankey wrote on Jan. 26, 2018 @ 16:21 GMT
Essay Abstract

Hawking has referred to the initial singularity, from which our universe’s space-time manifold emerges, as the ‘God-point’, and pointedly quipped that no God can be found there. This may sound like a purely metaphysical question, on which no physics can shed light, and on which no scientific commentary can be made. This essay discusses a way in which complexity may be able to do so. Recent advances in our understanding of the physics of complexity biology have made it possible to identify a previously unsuspected way, in which subjective awareness couples to organisms: it does so at the critical instabilities that organisms choose to make the loci of control of their regulatory systems. Cogent arguments have been given why instabilities are preferred loci of control, and why the essentially non-linear physics of their mathematical singularities give rise to information states that support self-awareness. These states also reduce quantum wave-packets. What has not hitherto been noted is that conditions at the source of the inflationary process are very similar. The spontaneous breakdown of Grand Unified Symmetry involves an instability of considerable complexity. This essay suggests reasons why that initial singularity, from which space-time was created, is sufficiently complex to support a self-conscious awareness. Maybe our universe really is more like a ‘great thought’ than a ‘great machine’, as Jeans once suggested. Undoubtedly, these ideas could fruitfully be examined in much greater detail.

Author Bio

With a 1st Class Honours Degree from Cambridge, and a PhD in theoretical physics from M.I.T. under Nobel laureate Steven Weinberg and H.E. Stanley, Alex Hankey joined Maharishi University of Management (then MIU) Dept. of Physics in 1973. His work at MERU in 1975, setting up the Christmas conference with two Nobel laureates and a Fields Medallist is retold in the 2017 book by Rhoda Orme-Johnson. Having worked for that organisation for 30 years, he returned to research in 2002. His new theories of consciousness, Ayurveda and natural medicine are all based on his length study of Indian wisdom.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share


Jonathan J. Dickau wrote on Jan. 26, 2018 @ 18:04 GMT
Greetings Alex,

I am happy that my outreach to Brian also got you to submit an essay in this year's contest. From your background and the abstract; this one looks very interesting. I will have to swing back once I've caught up with the reading already in my bin. I wish you luck!

All the best,

Jonathan

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe Fisher wrote on Jan. 27, 2018 @ 16:55 GMT
Dear Dr Alex Hankey,

Reliable evidence exists that proves that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his utterly complex finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface. It logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of earth allowable.

All objects, be they solid, liquid, or vaporous have always had a visible surface. This is because the real Universe consists only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
post approved


Francesco D'Isa wrote on Jan. 27, 2018 @ 17:28 GMT
Dear Alex Hankey,

thank you for your essay, which I found very interesting and original – sadly I lack the scientific tools to better evaluate it, due my formation in philosophy.

> To summarise, the essentially non-linear physics of critical instabilities in complexity biology can give rise to information states that support self-awareness – the essence of our subjectivity.

The link that you establish between physics and the meditative states (of every tradition) is really interesting, and I find it close to my interests and studies. I didn't understood very well why a perfectly self-observing, internal, information loop is needed by the non-linearities of the system, but probably I should read the studies by Hankey that you quoted in the essay.

Thank you for sharing such an original work and good luck!

Francesco

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


DIOGENES AYBAR wrote on Jan. 27, 2018 @ 20:38 GMT
Dear Alex;

Very refreshing, coming from a physicist. In complex systems the inflexion point (the phase transition point) is the point where emergence is born. A physicist (Kauffman) embraced this idea. Life, in all its manifestations, embodies the phenomenon of Complexity; and epigenetics is the most beautiful expression of it.

When the interaction of known entities, following known...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Brian D. Josephson replied on Jan. 27, 2018 @ 20:46 GMT
For the record, Stuart Kauffman is a biologist and complex systems theorist, not a physicist. Perhaps you are mixing him up with quantum theorist Lou Kauffman.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Brian D. Josephson wrote on Jan. 27, 2018 @ 21:19 GMT
While there are some very nice ideas here, I find some ideas confusing, in particular the distinction between linear and nonlinear. All systems are linear in the limit of low amplitudes, and become significantly nonlinear at higher amplitudes. What is different in the critical region is that there is more nonlinearity there, and enough that complexity comes in, and also the universality of which you speak. It should be possible to integrate this approach with my own (also posted in this competition).

Re 'self-observing system', does this just mean that you have a loop, so it is like pointing a videocamera at a screen that is displaying the picture being videoed?

I'd recommend that you post your 2015 paper in some archive where people can view it without having to pay for it, as it contains a lot more details than in this essay. Elsevier allow you to post preprints in this way. I'd also recommend when you do this that you include links to such references that are available on the web, as you can't get them from the list in this essay.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Brian D. Josephson replied on Jan. 28, 2018 @ 16:03 GMT
Alex, since there was an enquiry in my own discussion as to suitable sources I've uploaded the 'Final preprint' of your paper that you sent me once to PhilPapers where it joins your earlier paper on the subject, so that people will be able to access it freely. It is at https://philpapers.org/rec/HANACB-4. If you want to change anything (e.g. add keywords), you can do this via 'edit this record'.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe Fisher wrote on Jan. 28, 2018 @ 22:00 GMT
Dear Fellow Essayists

This will be my final plea for fair treatment.,

Reliable evidence exists that proves that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his utterly complex finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface. It logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of earth allowable.

All objects, be they solid, liquid, or vaporous have always had a visible surface. This is because the real Universe consists only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

Only the truth can set you free.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
post approved


Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Feb. 6, 2018 @ 21:20 GMT
Respected Prof Alex Hankey

You have very nicely started with "Hawking"...... This may sound like a purely metaphysical question, on which no physics can shed light, and on which no scientific commentary can be made....... is exactly correct. After learning that you understood well of Indian system of Auyrveda and consciousness.... Hats off to you...Best wishes to your essay...

Here...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Steven Andresen wrote on Feb. 22, 2018 @ 07:39 GMT
Dear Alex

If you are looking for another essay to read and rate in the final days of the contest, will you consider mine please? I read all essays from those who comment on my page, and if I cant rate an essay highly, then I don’t rate them at all. Infact I haven’t issued a rating lower that ten. So you have nothing to lose by having me read your essay, and everything to...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.