Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation

Previous Contests

Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest
December 24, 2019 - April 24, 2020
Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Steven Andresen: on 2/22/18 at 9:06am UTC, wrote Dear Joo If you are looking for another essay to read and rate in the...

Kamal Rajpal: on 2/14/18 at 17:58pm UTC, wrote Dear J S Kim, I have read your essay and suggest that you read EPR Paradox...

Robert Sadykov: on 2/14/18 at 13:07pm UTC, wrote Dear Joo Kim, You write: "Space always varies". In this case, it is...

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 2/5/18 at 23:07pm UTC, wrote Dear Joo Soak, thank you for your nice work "A geometric flaw on this will...

peter cameron: on 2/2/18 at 15:29pm UTC, wrote Hello JooSoak, What you're doing appears interesting and useful, to seek...

Christophe Tournayre: on 1/28/18 at 21:39pm UTC, wrote Hi JooSoak, I like your approach on questioning the nature of things...

Joe Fisher: on 1/25/18 at 16:47pm UTC, wrote Dear Wolfgang Baer, Reliable evidence exists that proves that the surface...

Joe Fisher: on 1/25/18 at 16:44pm UTC, wrote Dear Eckard Blumschein Reliable evidence exists that proves that the...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Joe Fisher: "All visible humanly contrived information contains supposedly finite..." in Time to Think

Noah Isabella: "You can either choose both Box A and B, or just Box B. But here's the..." in Outside the Box

Steve Dufourny: "Here is my equation improved hypothetical considering the 3 main spacetimes..." in The Noise of Gravitons

Steve Dufourny: "John, Steve, Like I am not only focused on my own works, I discussed on..." in The Noise of Gravitons

PRASAD DIVATE: "Hi all, I just read that there are 64 dimensions in the universe and God..." in AI, Consciousness,...

Steve Dufourny: "sure, without doubting ,we must doubt :) I make the same for all my model..." in AI, Consciousness,...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Time to Think
Philosopher Jenann Ismael invokes the thermodynamic arrow of time to explain how human intelligence emerged through culture.

Lockdown Lab Life
Grounded physicists are exploring the use of online and virtual-reality conferencing, and AI-controlled experiments, to maintain social distancing. Post-pandemic, these positive innovations could make science more accessible and environmentally-friendly.

Is Causality Fundamental?
Untangling how the human perception of cause-and-effect might arise from quantum physics, may help us understand the limits and the potential of AI.

Building Agency in the Biology Lab
Physicists are using optogenetics techniques to make a rudimentary agent, from cellular components, which can convert measurements into actions using light.

Think Quantum to Build Better AI
Investigating how quantum memory storage could aid machine learning and how quantum interactions with the environment may have played a role in evolution.


FQXi FORUM
September 23, 2020

CATEGORY: FQXi Essay Contest - Spring, 2017 [back]
TOPIC: Contradictions Inherent in Special Relativity by Joo Soak Kim [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Joosoak Kim wrote on Jan. 23, 2018 @ 19:56 GMT
Essay Abstract

Special relativity has changed the fundamental view on space and time since Einstein introduced it in 1905. It substitutes four dimensional spacetime for the absolute space and time of Newtonian mechanics. It is believed that the validities of Lorentz invariants are fully confirmed empirically for the last one hundred years and therefore its status are canonical underlying all physical principles. However, spacetime metric is a geometric approach on nature when we interpret the natural phenomenon. A geometric flaw on this will be exhibited and the alternative is suggested. The reasonable geometric model of space and time is a three dimensional space which is translating along the time direction. This model legitimately represents the true characteristic of nature.

Author Bio

JooSoak Kim is interested in nature and humans, and has a degree from the University of Nottingham in UK. He has studied these subjects over the last 20 years to find the consistent insight which penetrate them. He has studied physical subjects, such as classical mechanics, thermodynamics, electromagnetics, quantum mechanics, and theory of relativity with the related mathematics. He has also studied other disciplines like philosophy, language, and mathematical logic, all of which are related to human reasoning process. He has find that many paradoxical aspects are originated from the lack of insight and intuition.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share


Eckard Blumschein wrote on Jan. 23, 2018 @ 21:57 GMT
Hi Joosak Kim,

May I recommend to you reading the essays by Klingman, by Kadin, and by myself? While we are no presentists, you might feel confirmed to some extent.

Eckard Blumschein

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate
Joe Fisher replied on Jan. 25, 2018 @ 16:41 GMT
Joo Soak Kim

Reliable evidence exists that proves that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his utterly complex finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface. It logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of earth allowable.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
post approved

Joe Fisher replied on Jan. 25, 2018 @ 16:44 GMT
Dear Eckard Blumschein

Reliable evidence exists that proves that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his utterly complex finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface. It logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of earth allowable.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe Fisher wrote on Jan. 24, 2018 @ 16:51 GMT
Dear Joo Soak Kim,

Reliable evidence exists that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface. It logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of earth allowable.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
post approved


Wolfgang Baer wrote on Jan. 25, 2018 @ 04:35 GMT
Dear Joo Soak Kim:

You make many good points and I am glad to see the limitations and perhaps facilities of what has become fundamental is being discussed. I congratulate you on making these contradictions the topic of your essay

However statements such as "We are living in a 3 dimensional

space. This is all what exist." suggest your alternative and therefore suggested correction is based on a pre Einstein and Pre Quantum concept of reality as being simply what we see here and now.

Surely what we see must be taken as evidence for what actually exists, and the ontology of that existence must be derived from that evidence.

Thank you for your thoughts

Wolfgang Baer

Bookmark and Share
post approved
Joe Fisher replied on Jan. 25, 2018 @ 16:42 GMT
Joo Soak Kim

Reliable evidence exists that proves that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his utterly complex finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface. It logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of earth allowable.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe Fisher wrote on Jan. 25, 2018 @ 16:41 GMT
Joo Soak Kim

Reliable evidence exists that proves that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his utterly complex finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface. It logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of earth allowable.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
post approved


Joe Fisher wrote on Jan. 25, 2018 @ 16:47 GMT
Dear Wolfgang Baer,

Reliable evidence exists that proves that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his utterly complex finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface. It logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of earth allowable.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
post approved


Christophe Tournayre wrote on Jan. 28, 2018 @ 21:39 GMT
Hi JooSoak, I like your approach on questioning the nature of things surrounding us. I would have enjoyed reading your views on a wider scope than only space/time, thought these two components are fundamentals. It makes it difficult for me to assess your essay. Kind regards, Christophe

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


peter cameron wrote on Feb. 2, 2018 @ 15:29 GMT
Hello JooSoak,

What you're doing appears interesting and useful, to seek to establish a clear understanding of the fundamentals of space and time. You might find the geometric interpretation of Clifford algebra helpful. It is an algebra not of numbers or symbols, but rather the fundamental geometric objects of physical space - point, line, plane, and volume elements. It defines something called the geometric product, how one multiplies these objects. For instance, the geometric product of two lines yields a point and a plane.

Clifford algebra is the language of the particle physicist, the Pauli and Dirac algebras in the more abstract matrix representation. The algebra is well grounded in the physical world.

if this sounds interesting try googling for 'geometric algebra'. The wikipedia entry is pretty good.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Feb. 5, 2018 @ 23:07 GMT
Dear Joo Soak,

thank you for your nice work "A geometric flaw on this will be exhibited and the alternative is suggested. The reasonable geometric model of space and time is a three dimensional space which is translating along the time direction. This model legitimately represents the true characteristic of nature.

" wonderful work...Best wishes for your essay...

Here in my...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Robert D. Sadykov wrote on Feb. 14, 2018 @ 13:07 GMT
Dear Joo Kim,

You write: "Space always varies". In this case, it is important to note what is changing in space. For example, in the context of the curvature of space-time, the variability of space means a change in its curvature caused by the displacement of various masses. Another quote: "The essences of space and time are an existence and the variations, respectively". This probably means that space is a substance with some special set of substantial properties, while time is not a substance, but is a consequence of a change in the state of various substances, including space. If in some area of space all local processes slow down, then this leads to the dilation of local time. I rate Your essay in 9 points. Some properties of space and time are presented in the essay "Double foundation of gravity".

Best wishes,

Robert Sadykov

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Kamal L Rajpal wrote on Feb. 14, 2018 @ 17:58 GMT
Dear J S Kim,

I have read your essay and suggest that you read EPR Paradox and Linear Polarization at: http://vixra.org/pdf/1303.0174v5.pdf

I also invite you to read my essay on wave-particle and electron spin at: https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3145 or https://fqxi.org/data/essay-contest-files/Rajpal_1306.0141v3
.pdf

Kamal Rajpal

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Steven Andresen wrote on Feb. 22, 2018 @ 09:06 GMT
Dear Joo

If you are looking for another essay to read and rate in the final days of the contest, will you consider mine please? I read all essays from those who comment on my page, and if I cant rate an essay highly, then I don’t rate them at all. Infact I haven’t issued a rating lower that ten. So you have nothing to lose by having me read your essay, and everything to...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.