Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Vladimir Fedorov: on 2/24/18 at 13:44pm UTC, wrote Dear Marc, I highly appreciate your well-written essay in an effort to...

Steven Andresen: on 2/23/18 at 13:35pm UTC, wrote Dear Marc If you are looking for another essay to read and rate in the...

Peter Jackson: on 2/22/18 at 13:25pm UTC, wrote Marc, Nice unique layout & format plus very clear explanations, much of...

marc fleury: on 1/31/18 at 17:02pm UTC, wrote Thanks for reading and the kind feedback. Yes the Schrodinger cat finds...

George Gantz: on 1/31/18 at 16:47pm UTC, wrote Marc - A fascinating essay, thanks! I particularly like the paragraph on...

Joe Fisher: on 1/31/18 at 16:23pm UTC, wrote Dear Fellow Essayists This will be my final plea for fair treatment., ...

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 1/30/18 at 18:20pm UTC, wrote Hi Dr Marc fleury.... Is Aether required for explaining Universe...

marc fleury: on 1/24/18 at 14:13pm UTC, wrote Thanks I'll take a look


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Georgina Woodward: "Thinking observers are going to notice their own and the other's arms..." in Bonus Koan: Distant...

Georgina Woodward: "The acrobats central to the rotation of a platform, share the same type of..." in Bonus Koan: Distant...

Lorraine Ford: "Ian, I’m sorry for going overboard on the “physicists think that”..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...

andrea gonzalez: "Interesting stuff to read. Keep it up. If want to collect free gift card..." in Memory, Causality and...

Ian Durham: "Well, Lorraine, if you insist on seeing it that way, I doubt anything I say..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...

Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in First Things First: The...

Poker Online: "https://www.jakartapoker.net/" in Downward causation:...

Enquire us: "Your Ro system desires regular maintenance to confirm it’s continually in..." in Agency in the Physical...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
August 24, 2019

CATEGORY: FQXi Essay Contest - Spring, 2017 [back]
TOPIC: Emergent SR in Fundamental Aether by marc fleury fleury [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author marc fleury fleury wrote on Jan. 17, 2018 @ 21:53 GMT
Essay Abstract

We hypothesize a fundamental aether and derive the emergence of Special Relativity

Author Bio

Dr Marc Fleury has a Ph.D. in Theoretical Physics from the Ecole Polytechnique in Paris for research he did at MIT. After a decade spent as an entrepreneur building open source middleware software (JBoss, acquired by RedHat in 2007) Marc retired and went back to study, including physics, finance, crypto and music. His current research interest include software simulations of walkers, Bell violations, and experimental studies of entangled Bell photons.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Author marc fleury fleury wrote on Jan. 19, 2018 @ 18:50 GMT
Yes, I aimed for a rumination and detailed path work on a possible formal proof of emergence of SR from condensed matter treatments and something we have abandoned since Michelson and Morley null results.

Illumination on the nature of space in a AETHER.

Bookmark and Share


Gremaud Gérard replied on Jan. 23, 2018 @ 07:17 GMT
Dear Marc,

I enjoyed very much your essay, and thank you for your numerous citations of my work "Universe and Matter Conjectured as a 3-Dimensional Lattice with Topological Singularities". Several of your assertions are effectively deduced from my work, and I should like here to give more informations related to it, which can be obtained at the following adresses:

Website: http://gerardgremaud.ch/

Article: G. Gremaud, « Universe and Matter conjectured as a 3-dimensional Lattice with Topological Singularities », July 2016, Journal of Modern Physics, 7, 1389-1399 , DOI 10.4236/jmp.2016.712126

Article: G. Gremaud, « Maxwell’s equations as a special case of deformation of a solid lattice in Euler’s coordinates », September 2016, arXiv :1610.00753 [physics.gen-ph]

Book: G. Gremaud, « Universe and Matter conjectured as a 3-dimensional Lattice with Topological Singularities », translated by Marc Fleury,that can be obtained on:

https://www.amazon.com/Universe-conjectured-3-dimensional-To
pological-Singularities/dp/2839919346/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=
UTF8&qid=1468498525&sr=1-2&keywords=g%C3%A9rard+gremaud

With my best regards

Gérard Gremaud

attachments: Is_the_Universe_a_Lattice.pdf

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Edwin Eugene Klingman wrote on Jan. 19, 2018 @ 23:02 GMT
Dear Marc Fleury,

I very much enjoyed your essay as we tackle the same problem in much the same way. In my endnotes I mentioned that condensed matter 'ether' of the Volovik-type picture [my ref 21], while my simpler basic postulate is to let local gravity behave as ether. I place this in the historic context of Hertz and Einstein and focus on contrasting space-time derivation of Lorentz in two inertial frames with energy-time derivation of Lorentz in one inertial frame. I do not treat the Riemannian metric in 3D as you do on page 5, but I am in general agreement with your approach. I avoid quantum issues in my current essay; your scope in your essay is vastly larger than mine. You attempt to apply your model of ether in all current fields of physics [in 9 pages!], and you do an admirable job in this. I focus primarily on the ramifications of ether on the nature of time.

Congratulations on an impressive essay. I invite you to read my essay and welcome your comments.

My best regards,

Edwin Eugene Klingman

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author marc fleury fleury replied on Jan. 20, 2018 @ 20:07 GMT
thank you for the kind comments, Edwin.

Bookmark and Share



Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich wrote on Jan. 22, 2018 @ 17:15 GMT
Dear Marc Fleury, the fundamental must be simple, visible and understandable to spare our thinking. The idea of the ether taken from mythology and not suitable for this. I'm here to say to all: "Replace the Aether on concept of physical space!" Descartes idea of identity of space and matter is stronger than the idea of ether, which he filled the spaces between the large particles to the space without voids. He said that the void space is filled instantly. Taking into account modern views, we must say that void in space filled with the speed of light and so they do not disappear and the matter (space) move forever.

Take a look at my essay in which I cited examples of the effectiveness of New Cartesian physics and give a comment.

With respect. Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author marc fleury fleury replied on Jan. 24, 2018 @ 14:13 GMT
Thanks I'll take a look

Bookmark and Share



John C Hodge wrote on Jan. 24, 2018 @ 04:05 GMT
Marc:

Your aether is my plenum.

Compare the STOE model of the trajectory of photons in the silgle slit, diffraction experiment (Fig. 1 of "Diffraction experiment and its STOE photon simulation program rejects wave models of light": http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1603 )with a walker diffraction experiment (Fig. 5.c. of "A new waveof pilot-wave theory" J.W.M. Bush, Physics Today, 68 (8), 47-53, 2015).

The STOE paper also shows the result of a laser diffraction experiment with a varying intensity across the slit. Thisprovidesa link of the walker experiments with the actual difraction with a result that rejects the Huygens Fresnel model.

photon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMAjKk6k6-k

Hodge Exp: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A07bogzzMEI

STOE model of the universe http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1648

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Jan. 30, 2018 @ 18:20 GMT
Hi Dr Marc fleury....

Is Aether required for explaining Universe properties? Dynamic Universe Model dont use the concept of aether.... I request you to please have look...

Some of the Main foundational points of Dynamic Universe Model :

-No Isotropy

-No Homogeneity

-No Space-time continuum

-Non-uniform density of matter, universe is...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe Fisher wrote on Jan. 31, 2018 @ 16:23 GMT
Dear Fellow Essayists

This will be my final plea for fair treatment.,

FQXI is clearly seeking to find out if there is a fundamental REALITY.

Reliable evidence exists that proves that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his utterly complex finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface. It logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of earth allowable.

All objects, be they solid, liquid, or vaporous have always had a visible surface. This is because the real Universe must consist only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

Only the truth can set you free.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


George Gantz wrote on Jan. 31, 2018 @ 16:47 GMT
Marc - A fascinating essay, thanks! I particularly like the paragraph on Schrodinger's cat. A good addition to your zoological theme. As for the turtles, I'm still hoping to find the first turtle - but alas I fear we will always be stuck with axioms, and Godel.

Cheers - George Gantz

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author marc fleury fleury replied on Jan. 31, 2018 @ 17:02 GMT
Thanks for reading and the kind feedback.

Yes the Schrodinger cat finds an interesting paradox solving in the non-linear narrative. As explained in the paper, you can turn to chaos theory as arising in non-linear dynamics (for example the hydrodynamic walkers of Prof Couder) to find emergent deterministic chaos, where every step remains deterministic but for all practical purposes (to use a John Bell favorite expression) the outcome of the dynamics needs a statistical description and you lose determinism and recover the 1-N mappings.

In this narrative the cat always dies for 1/ we don't have a reversible transition 2/ we will at some point intermit (in the parlance of chaos theory) to the dead state.

Since you seem interested in these topics, I highly recommend the reference of http:// chaosbook.org in the essay. Prof Predrag Cvitanovic at Georgia Tech in Atlanta (where I live) and his team have put together quite the monograph on the topic.

I took his graduate level class (as an auditor) and collaborated with his team on the subject of quantum walkers and some of the research I chronicle in the essay (specifically the last part on Lorentz contraction of orbits). Ironically the great man himself shies away from talking about QM in general. This topic of emergent QM seems to really scare people.

SR remains the dominant taboo in the research field so I thought reconciling the notions of SR (Lorentz time dilation and space contraction) with an hypothetical aethyr would prove entertaining and enlightening. Not everyone seems to share our need for this mechanical and realist explanation as someone actually took the time to rate this essay 1/10 :)

Bookmark and Share



Peter Jackson wrote on Feb. 22, 2018 @ 13:25 GMT
Marc,

Nice unique layout & format plus very clear explanations, much of which I agree with (though some I don't) and have analysed in detailed in prev. finalist essays.

I found a lot to like; I pick out some highlights;

Gravity, as a force, results from density gradients in the aether.

Quantum Mechanics. We move to classify the paradox as a mis-category.

QM dynamics stop when measured in destructive ways

This spin result appears extrinsic as a dynamic result of measure not an intrinsic property to the electron

helicity either clockwise or counterclockwise and with the same angular velocity. We also see spin reversal. In this picture, the ‘spin’ emerges as physical quantized angular momentum.

...their respective field gives each other the dominant contribution, or the spin emergence we mentioned where particles all turn the same way with the same radius and the same velocity

...undergoes a contraction in the direction of displacement by the Doppler effect.

This gives us the proper numerical spatial Lorentz contraction of the field. The field takes on the shape of an oval,
(I add; equiv to 'Elliptical polarity')

If you'd like to check through a full classical mechanism producing QM's predictions from different assumptions do read my essay (carefully!) I've just found Poincares Sphere confirming my 'doublet states' starting assumption. The EPR paradox dissipated as Bell anticipated. Shocking, but Declan Traill's matching code & plot shows the CHSH >2. (Of course I suspect such heresy will never overcome belief!)

Well done for yours Your score is too low so mine will help.

Very best.

Peter

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Steven Andresen wrote on Feb. 23, 2018 @ 13:35 GMT
Dear Marc

If you are looking for another essay to read and rate in the final days of the contest, will you consider mine please?

A couple of days in and semblance of my essay taking form, however the house bound inactivity was wearing me. I had just the remedy, so took off for a solo sail across the bay. In the lea of cove, I had underestimated the open water wind strengths. My sail...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Feb. 24, 2018 @ 13:44 GMT
Dear Marc,

I highly appreciate your well-written essay in an effort to understand.

It is so close to me. «Similarly, in the classical realm without QM, when the Newtonian apple falls down to earth, by what mechanism does momentum actually increase?» «Tesla thought the fabric of space sometimes behaved like a solid and sometimes behaved like a liquid. An unknown material». «To that end, we consider a speculative type of material: a compressible superfluid of sorts, like a very particular cosmic liquid crystal».

In my opinion, this is a liquid of nematic crystals.

I hope that my modest achievements can be information for reflection for you.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.