Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Leo Vuyk: on 2/28/18 at 14:12pm UTC, wrote See perhaps also: http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0379v2.pdf

Leo Vuyk: on 2/28/18 at 14:09pm UTC, wrote Dear Ulla , for Axion Higgs particle splitting big bang, see:...

Leo Vuyk: on 2/28/18 at 14:06pm UTC, wrote Dear Ulla, For explantion of the dead zone around currents in a wire, see:...

Ulla Mattfolk: on 2/26/18 at 20:32pm UTC, wrote I have not Heard of axion-Higgs splitting and did a search, found this....

Ulla Mattfolk: on 2/26/18 at 20:19pm UTC, wrote Hi, Leo. What do you mean with "Magnetic Monopole Test to Demonstrate the...

Steven Andresen: on 2/23/18 at 13:49pm UTC, wrote Dear Leo If you are looking for another essay to read and rate in the...

Joe Fisher: on 1/31/18 at 16:16pm UTC, wrote Dear Fellow Essayists This will be my final plea for fair treatment., ...

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 1/29/18 at 21:28pm UTC, wrote Hi Leo Vuyk, A very Good idea “This conscious string theory also called...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

George Musser: "Imagine you could feed the data of the world into a computer and have it..." in Will A.I. Take Over...

Steve Dufourny: "Personally Joe me I see like that ,imagine that this infinite eternal..." in First Things First: The...

Steve Dufourny: "Joe it is wonderful this,so you are going to have a nobel prize in..." in First Things First: The...

Robert McEachern: ""I'm not sure that the 'thing as it is' is irrelevant." It is not. It is..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Steve Dufourny: "lol Zeeya it is well thought this algorythm selective when names are put in..." in Mass–Energy Equivalence...

Steve Dufourny: "is it just due to a problem when we utilise names of persons?" in Mass–Energy Equivalence...

Georgina Woodward: "I suggested the turnstiles separate odd form even numbered tickets randomly..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
October 17, 2019

CATEGORY: FQXi Essay Contest - Spring, 2017 [back]
TOPIC: Quantum FFF Theory, a Conscious String Theory based on 8 or even 12 entangled CP Symmetric Copy Universes. by Leo Vuyk [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Leo Vuyk wrote on Jan. 12, 2018 @ 19:45 GMT
Essay Abstract

Abstract This conscious string theory also called Quantum FFF Theory, (FFF = Function Follows Form) is a semi classical theory based on a symmetrical cold Big Bang evaporation into 8 or 12 CP ( Charge Parity) symmetric copy (anti) material universes. It can be called a semi classical theory because it describes reality by the real collision and shape transformation processes of real sub quantum shaped rigid stringy entangled particles. Each particle is supposed to be conscious by its entanglement with 7 or 11 CP symmetric copy particles located inside the other 7 or 11 CP symmetric universal bubbles at long distance with raspberry shape. The Q-FFF theory is called Semi classical because in addition to the ring shaped transformable rigid string particles, all universal bubbles are assumed to be each others Charge Parity (CP) mirror symmetric universal bubbles which are assumed to be instant entangled down to each individual string particle created out of the Axion Higgs splitting cold Big Bang. So each particle has to compete for wavefunction collapse with 7 or 11 anti copy particles and each person’s choice ( free will) also. So: we live inside 8 or 12 quantum particle based instant entangled pinball machines making choices for our own reptile brain based flash intuition down to single particle slit interference. However our frontal cortex seems to be able to make social corrections (Vetos) within 300 msec. The sheer simplicity of such a system is perhaps the reason that I could not find comparable proposals for other theories.

Author Bio

The author's main scientific interests are physics, astronomy and astrophysics anomaly interpretation along new directions out of the box like Qauntum function follows form relations.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Georgina Woodward wrote on Jan. 13, 2018 @ 04:23 GMT
Hi Leo, you mention in your abstract "The sheer simplicity of such a system...". I found even your basic elements complicated.I'll admit I haven't read the whole essay in depth.It is too technical and bizarre for me to concentrate on and extract meaning. I have no doubt a lot of thought has gone into this but applying Occam's razor, a far simpler concoction should suffice. Can it possibly be this complicated? I even see mention of ball lightning and micro comments as black holes. I can relate to that desire for a holistic model but that inclusiveness feels contrived rather than natural to me. Perhaps because I have not been immersed in the same ideas. I like that you start by introducing some of the inspiring ideas you have discovered. There is repetition of a paragraph between point 16 and 17 and after 22 starting "According to Max Tegmark: in an entangled multiverse we may ask: is there COPY PERSON over there, who is reading the same lines as I do?" Thanks for sharing your model. Kind regards Georgina

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Leo Vuyk replied on Jan. 13, 2018 @ 09:35 GMT
thanks Georgina

you wrote;

have no doubt a lot of thought has gone into this but applying Occam's razor, a far simpler concoction should suffice. Can it possibly be this complicated? I even see mention of ball lightning and micro comments as black holes very much for your serious section in depth.

My reaction;

THE MAIN CHANGES ARE; a new interference black hole,with fermion repelling horizon responsible for e.g.ball lighning.

second; DUAL PUSHING GRAVITY AN DUAL FEYNMAN DIAGRAMS .

With these elements physics is able to explain a whole bunch of anomalies

Bookmark and Share


Georgina Woodward replied on Jan. 13, 2018 @ 11:28 GMT
Hi Leo -You have misquoted me. Also I have noticed a typo in my own comment to you. I meant to say - I even see mention of ball lightning and micro comets as black holes. Not sure how that became 'comments' perhaps it was an unchecked incorrect spellcheck correction. The "very much for your serious section in depth." is your own words included in the quote.

Are you saying that black holes and duel pushing gravity are fundamental? or that they are fundamental in particular circumstances? How is it the horizon repels fermions, I thought they were gravitational attracted to black holes or are these anti-black holes? How does having the phenomena you mention affect the rest of physics? Kind regards Georgina

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Leo Vuyk replied on Jan. 13, 2018 @ 12:37 GMT
Hi Georgina,

Thank you for your extensive questions.

In my model all black holes are Fermion Repelling black holes because fermions are all propeller shaped particles able to keep their nose into their absolute direction through the oscillating vacuum lattice by their entanglement relation in the samethoughts of Bohm and Vigier suggested.

see perhaps also: http://vixra.org/pdf/1801.0040v2.pdf or my whole refrence list:

http://vixra.org/author/leo_vuyk

Bookmark and Share



Andrew Beckwith wrote on Jan. 14, 2018 @ 08:07 GMT
8: Black Holes produce Plasma direct out of the Higgs field because two rigid massless but

mutable Higgs particles are convertible into symmetric electron and positron (or even dual

quark-) propellers (by BH horizon fluctuations)

????????????????????????

Evidence ?

Sorry, but I do not understand this at all.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Leo Vuyk replied on Jan. 14, 2018 @ 11:40 GMT
Dear Andrew, for plasma production around BHs see:

An Alternative Stringy Black Hole nucleus with Entropy Decrease and Plasma Creation.

http://vixra.org/pdf/1103.0011v3.pdf

Bookmark and Share



Author Leo Vuyk wrote on Jan. 15, 2018 @ 16:25 GMT
see also: https://www.facebook.com/leo.vuyk?lst=100002068560151%3A1000
02068560151%3A1516033091

and:

Bookmark and Share


Author Leo Vuyk replied on Jan. 15, 2018 @ 16:27 GMT
and this one: https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/

Bookmark and Share



Author Leo Vuyk wrote on Jan. 18, 2018 @ 09:31 GMT
I have concluded that the universe is conscious as a whole!see:

Panpsychism.

https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.
nl/2018/01/is-universe-conscious.html

Bookmark and Share



Joe Fisher wrote on Jan. 19, 2018 @ 16:32 GMT
Dear Leo Vuyk,

In qualifying the aim of the ‘What is Fundamental?’ essay contest, Dr. Brendan Foster, the FQXi.org Science Projects Consultant wrote: “We invite interesting and compelling explorations, from detailed worked examples through thoughtful rumination, of the different levels at which nature can be described, and the relations between them.

Real Nature has never had any abstract finite levels.

I have concluded from my deep research that Nature must have devised the only permanent real structure of the Universe obtainable for the real Universe existed for millions of years before man and his finite complex informational systems ever appeared on earth. The real physical Universe consists only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

Joe Fisher, ORCID ID 0000-0003-3988-8687. Unaffiliated

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Peter Jackson wrote on Jan. 19, 2018 @ 19:50 GMT
Leo,

Fascinating theory, certainly not overly tied to doctrinal physics! We surely do need such greater imagination to solve problems, as Bell identified. Some may suggest the Netherlands plentiful mind enhancing drugs may have helped! - but I know you have the visionary skills (and perhaps we should all be on drugs anyway!)

As you may know I keep well up to date on critical branches of science (apart from the 6 week focus on essays). I did go through carefully to try to 'pattern match'. Little did, but as we know most of what we 'know' is false so that may even bode well for your nicely inverse Roe van der Mies FFF! Nice diagrams too.

If constructively criticising I should comment that the format may have been a little to close to a series of statements than ideal for an essay, and I was hoping for more identification of novel findings and evidence. If you've read my essays you'll know I like stacks of consistent evidence. If I have any suggestion from my own preferences it may be that, though I know you do so a little more in some papers.

Thanks for that very fresh view. I do hope you understand the important findings in mine (also evidenced by Declan's).

Very best

Peter

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Leo Vuyk replied on Jan. 26, 2018 @ 15:44 GMT
Is the Universe Conscious? Yes. However, only at the cost of a mirror symmetric multiverse.

Experiments for multiverse support:

1: Bohmian Double Slit Interpretation by Dual Entangled Universes, and the Benjamin Libet Experiment.

Geplakt uit

2: Magnetic Monopole Test to Demonstrate the Existence of a Anti Maxwell Dead Zone Around a Current in a Wire.

Geplakt...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share


Author Leo Vuyk replied on Jan. 26, 2018 @ 15:49 GMT
Sorry for the lack of references. see below I hope this will do better.

Is the Universe Conscious? Yes. However, only at the cost of a mirror symmetric multiverse.

Experiments for multiverse support:

1: Bohmian Double Slit Interpretation by Dual Entangled Universes, and the Benjamin Libet Experiment.

See: http://vixra.org/abs/1704.0047

2: Magnetic Monopole Test to Demonstrate the Existence of a Anti Maxwell Dead Zone Around a Current in a Wire.

http://vixra.org/abs/1706.0413

3: New Physics by Table Top Experiments.

http://vixra.org/abs/1309.0081

4: Quantum FFF Theory Experiments, a Summary.

http://vixra.org/abs/1305.0140

5: New Dark Matter Black Holes and a New Dark Energy Higgs Field, Lead to a Bouncing CP Symmetrical Multiverse, and New Experiments.

http://vixra.org/abs/1209.0092

6: Experiments to Determine the Mass Related Lightspeed Extinction Volume

http://vixra.org/abs/1102.0056

Bookmark and Share



Author Leo Vuyk wrote on Jan. 25, 2018 @ 13:26 GMT
To Peter Jackson.

Hi Peter thanks you for your reaction. I must admit not all Dutchmen grow or blow weed.

IMHO, " the moon IS there when we stop looking! " because there are other copy moons looking down to every quantum of our moon. HOW?

According to my Quantum FFF Model, we live inside one of an even set of instant entangled symmetric copy universes. Based on a new particle...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share



Author Leo Vuyk wrote on Jan. 26, 2018 @ 15:57 GMT
To be a bit more prcise you can split the experiments into two groups:

A: experiments related to the mutiverse

B related to the new physics of Quantum FFF Theory:

A: Experiments for multiverse support:

1: Bohmian Double Slit Interpretation by Dual Entangled Universes, and the Benjamin Libet Experiment.

See: http://vixra.org/abs/1704.0047

B: Experiments for New Physics of Quantum FFF Theory ( Function Follows Form)

2: Magnetic Monopole Test to Demonstrate the Existence of a Anti Maxwell Dead Zone Around a Current in a Wire.

http://vixra.org/abs/1706.0413

3: New Physics by Table Top Experiments.

http://vixra.org/abs/1309.0081

4: Quantum FFF Theory Experiments, a Summary.

http://vixra.org/abs/1305.0140

5: New Dark Matter Black Holes and a New Dark Energy Higgs Field, Lead to a Bouncing CP Symmetrical Multiverse, and New Experiments.

http://vixra.org/abs/1209.0092

6: Experiments to Determine the Mass Related Lightspeed Extinction Volume

http://vixra.org/abs/1102.0056

Bookmark and Share



Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Jan. 29, 2018 @ 21:28 GMT
Hi Leo Vuyk,

A very Good idea “This conscious string theory also called Quantum FFF Theory, (FFF = Function Follows Form) is a semi classical theory based on a symmetrical cold Big Bang evaporation into 8 or 12 CP ( Charge Parity) symmetric copy (anti) material universes.”…. Dear Leo Vuyk….

Best wishes or your essay….…..….. very nice idea…. I highly appreciate your...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe Fisher wrote on Jan. 31, 2018 @ 16:16 GMT
Dear Fellow Essayists

This will be my final plea for fair treatment.,

FQXI is clearly seeking to find out if there is a fundamental REALITY.

Reliable evidence exists that proves that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his utterly complex finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface. It logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of earth allowable.

All objects, be they solid, liquid, or vaporous have always had a visible surface. This is because the real Universe must consist only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

Only the truth can set you free.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Steven Andresen wrote on Feb. 23, 2018 @ 13:49 GMT
Dear Leo

If you are looking for another essay to read and rate in the final days of the contest, will you consider mine please?

A couple of days in and semblance of my essay taking form, however the house bound inactivity was wearing me. I had just the remedy, so took off for a solo sail across the bay. In the lea of cove, I had underestimated the open water wind strengths. My sail...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Ulla Marianne Mattfolk wrote on Feb. 26, 2018 @ 20:19 GMT
Hi, Leo.

What do you mean with "Magnetic Monopole Test to Demonstrate the Existence of a Anti Maxwell Dead Zone Around a Current in a Wire."?

Anti-Maxwell means negative energy. It is problematic.

Maybe instead the monopole has two 'poles' only United with almost no flux. As instance field lines goes through a center, and at the very center you cannot differ their direction, you get a quantum superposition of all states.

Someone claimed the Electric pole has a Landau pole because it is fermionic and do a 'jump'. Cannot say if true.

Good to see you here. I will rate you high.

Ulla Mattfolk.

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3093

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Ulla Marianne Mattfolk replied on Feb. 26, 2018 @ 20:32 GMT
I have not Heard of axion-Higgs splitting and did a search, found this. Strumia is a good one. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1208.6013.pdf

Ulla.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Leo Vuyk replied on Feb. 28, 2018 @ 14:06 GMT
Dear Ulla,

For explantion of the dead zone around currents in a wire, see: http://vixra.org/abs/1706.0413

Bookmark and Share



Author Leo Vuyk wrote on Feb. 28, 2018 @ 14:09 GMT
Dear Ulla , for Axion Higgs particle splitting big bang, see: https://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.nl/2018/02/quantum-gra
vity-pressure-differences.html

Bookmark and Share



Author Leo Vuyk wrote on Feb. 28, 2018 @ 14:12 GMT
See perhaps also:

http://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0379v2.pdf

Bookmark and Share



Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.