If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.
Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.
Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.
Contests Home
Previous Contests
What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss • winners
Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discuss • winners
Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discuss • winners
The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discuss • winners
Previous Contests
What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss • winners
Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discuss • winners
Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discuss • winners
The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discuss • winners
Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use
RSS feed | RSS help
Introduction
Terms of Use
Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.
By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC
Dariusz Krzywicki: on 5/31/18 at 8:57am UTC, wrote Updated version of my work (May 2018)
Dariusz Krzywicki: on 4/2/18 at 11:14am UTC, wrote Updated version of my work (April)
Dariusz Krzywicki: on 3/11/18 at 8:42am UTC, wrote New version of my work
Dariusz Krzywicki: on 2/17/18 at 9:01am UTC, wrote New version of my work, with some additional content about market.
Dariusz Krzywicki: on 2/16/18 at 21:17pm UTC, wrote I am sorry for bad formatting, in the attachment is everything in this post...
Dariusz Krzywicki: on 2/16/18 at 21:02pm UTC, wrote MEET 5. The Arrow-Pratt measure of the risk - aversion would remain the...
Ulla Mattfolk: on 2/2/18 at 18:12pm UTC, wrote Hi, Have you seen this? https://physics.aps.org/articles/v9/148 Seems...
Joe Fisher: on 1/30/18 at 16:46pm UTC, wrote Dear Fellow Essayists This will be my final plea for fair treatment., ...
RECENT FORUM POSTS
Georgina Woodward: "Hi Ian, I've been thinking about choice of carrot or pepper. Behaving in a..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...
Lorraine Ford: "(continued) 3. “…so this is what defines a free choice : the Zeta..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...
Georgina Woodward: "What is happening in material reality provides the connection to inertia...." in Bonus Koan: Distant...
Georgina Woodward: ""We saw early on that as conformed by countless experiment, there is no..." in Bonus Koan: Distant...
andrea gonzalez: "Interesting stuff to read. Keep it up. If want to collect free gift card..." in Memory, Causality and...
Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in First Things First: The...
Poker Online: "https://www.jakartapoker.net/" in Downward causation:...
Enquire us: "Your Ro system desires regular maintenance to confirm it’s continually in..." in Agency in the Physical...
RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles
First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.
Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.
Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.
Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.
Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.
Dariusz Krzywicki: on 5/31/18 at 8:57am UTC, wrote Updated version of my work (May 2018)
Dariusz Krzywicki: on 4/2/18 at 11:14am UTC, wrote Updated version of my work (April)
Dariusz Krzywicki: on 3/11/18 at 8:42am UTC, wrote New version of my work
Dariusz Krzywicki: on 2/17/18 at 9:01am UTC, wrote New version of my work, with some additional content about market.
Dariusz Krzywicki: on 2/16/18 at 21:17pm UTC, wrote I am sorry for bad formatting, in the attachment is everything in this post...
Dariusz Krzywicki: on 2/16/18 at 21:02pm UTC, wrote MEET 5. The Arrow-Pratt measure of the risk - aversion would remain the...
Ulla Mattfolk: on 2/2/18 at 18:12pm UTC, wrote Hi, Have you seen this? https://physics.aps.org/articles/v9/148 Seems...
Joe Fisher: on 1/30/18 at 16:46pm UTC, wrote Dear Fellow Essayists This will be my final plea for fair treatment., ...
RECENT FORUM POSTS
Georgina Woodward: "Hi Ian, I've been thinking about choice of carrot or pepper. Behaving in a..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...
Lorraine Ford: "(continued) 3. “…so this is what defines a free choice : the Zeta..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...
Georgina Woodward: "What is happening in material reality provides the connection to inertia...." in Bonus Koan: Distant...
Georgina Woodward: ""We saw early on that as conformed by countless experiment, there is no..." in Bonus Koan: Distant...
andrea gonzalez: "Interesting stuff to read. Keep it up. If want to collect free gift card..." in Memory, Causality and...
Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in First Things First: The...
Poker Online: "https://www.jakartapoker.net/" in Downward causation:...
Enquire us: "Your Ro system desires regular maintenance to confirm it’s continually in..." in Agency in the Physical...
RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles
First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.
Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.
Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.
Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.
Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.
FQXi FORUM
August 25, 2019
CATEGORY:
FQXi Essay Contest - Spring, 2017
[back]
TOPIC: One-dimensional quasicrystal of the whole by Dariusz Krzywicki [refresh]
TOPIC: One-dimensional quasicrystal of the whole by Dariusz Krzywicki [refresh]
Essay Abstract
We all work in terms of effective theories. The discovery of quasicrystals is a black swan for all local rationality. We present a dynamical quasicrystal on the level of morphisms rather than objects. Universum, cell division, market crashes... and your life have the same fundamental group, first homology group, eigenvalues, and Nielsen number. The notion of representation is a potencially fundamental of a unifying theorethical framework, with respect to software and hardware of the whole.
Author Bio
I am a mathematician. I don't believe in conventional mathematics. Only primitive recurrence has deep consequence.
Download Essay PDF File
We all work in terms of effective theories. The discovery of quasicrystals is a black swan for all local rationality. We present a dynamical quasicrystal on the level of morphisms rather than objects. Universum, cell division, market crashes... and your life have the same fundamental group, first homology group, eigenvalues, and Nielsen number. The notion of representation is a potencially fundamental of a unifying theorethical framework, with respect to software and hardware of the whole.
Author Bio
I am a mathematician. I don't believe in conventional mathematics. Only primitive recurrence has deep consequence.
Download Essay PDF File
Hi Dariusz Krzywicki
“We present a dynamical quasicrystal on the level of morphisms rather than objects. Universum, cell division, market crashes... and your life have the same fundamental group, first homology group, eigenvalues, and Nielsen number” dear Dariusz Krzywicki .Yours is a very nice idea…. I highly appreciate your essay and hope for reciprocity.
I request you please...
view entire post
“We present a dynamical quasicrystal on the level of morphisms rather than objects. Universum, cell division, market crashes... and your life have the same fundamental group, first homology group, eigenvalues, and Nielsen number” dear Dariusz Krzywicki .Yours is a very nice idea…. I highly appreciate your essay and hope for reciprocity.
I request you please...
view entire post
Dear Fellow Essayists
This will be my final plea for fair treatment.,
FQXI is clearly seeking to find out if there is a fundamental REALITY.
Reliable evidence exists that proves that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his utterly complex finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface. It logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of earth allowable.
All objects, be they solid, liquid, or vaporous have always had a visible surface. This is because the real Universe must consist only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.
Only the truth can set you free.
Joe Fisher, Realist
report post as inappropriate
This will be my final plea for fair treatment.,
FQXI is clearly seeking to find out if there is a fundamental REALITY.
Reliable evidence exists that proves that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his utterly complex finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface. It logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of earth allowable.
All objects, be they solid, liquid, or vaporous have always had a visible surface. This is because the real Universe must consist only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.
Only the truth can set you free.
Joe Fisher, Realist
Hi,
Have you seen this? https://physics.aps.org/articles/v9/148
Seems some fundamentals will be changed?
My essay is a bit alike. https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3093
Enjoy :)
I am no math people, but we have the same frame. I learn from you, as instance I have never thought of the dark sektor related to our ordinary matter the way you show, so simple... congrats.
Ulla Mattfolk
report post as inappropriate
Have you seen this? https://physics.aps.org/articles/v9/148
Seems some fundamentals will be changed?
My essay is a bit alike. https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3093
Enjoy :)
I am no math people, but we have the same frame. I learn from you, as instance I have never thought of the dark sektor related to our ordinary matter the way you show, so simple... congrats.
Ulla Mattfolk
MEET 5.
The Arrow-Pratt measure of the risk - aversion would remain the same
even after an affine transformation of the utility function.
[equation]$A(x) = -frac{u^{''}(x)}{u^{'}(x)}$[equation]For global perspective
u(x)=x² − 20x − 8 we get: [equation]$A(10 + 6sqrt{3}) = -frac{1}{6sqrt{3}}$[equation]For SP&500 we have timing: 24 March 2000, 11 October 2007, 26 January
2018:
[equation]$$2754 + 3762 rightarrow 6sqrt{3}*265 + 6sqrt{3}*362$$
[equation]$$frac{362}{265} rightarrow frac{1+sqrt{3}}{2}$$[equation]MEET 6.
Wiliam Lamb using the new technology, which come up during the war
measure atomic levels extremal accurately. The Lamb shift represents a
correction to spectrum (double top in spectrum and problem of
proximity). The Lamb shift for hydrogen: 1000 Mz - experimental results,
1040 Mz - Hans Bethe theorectical insight.
IN THE GUTENBERG GALAXY A BASIC PROBLEM IS NOT PHYSICAL SEPARATION BUT
SEPARATION FROM AN ARBITRARY CHOICE.
The Lamb shift for DJA timing (for bear market). 1039, 1000 (14 January
2000, 10 October 2002).
[equation]$frac{1039}{1000} rightarrow frac{6sqrt{3}}{10}$[equation]We work in
discrete proximity spaces (see work of Smirnov). If (X, d) is a metric
space (continuum), x is proximite y implies the d(x, y)=0. For discrete
set of operation A is proximite B implies A ∩ B = ∅.
Fusion of Lamb shift, Pisot numbers and Meyer’s motive (month timing)
for 3 September 1929, 11 January 1973 and 26-31 January 2018:
[equation]$1060 = 520 + 540 rightarrow (5 + 3sqrt{3})^3$[equation]The Lamb shift in quadratic fields have a double top and its falls
quickly.
The Arrow-Pratt measure of the risk - aversion would remain the same
even after an affine transformation of the utility function.
[equation]$A(x) = -frac{u^{''}(x)}{u^{'}(x)}$[equation]For global perspective
u(x)=x² − 20x − 8 we get: [equation]$A(10 + 6sqrt{3}) = -frac{1}{6sqrt{3}}$[equation]For SP&500 we have timing: 24 March 2000, 11 October 2007, 26 January
2018:
[equation]$$2754 + 3762 rightarrow 6sqrt{3}*265 + 6sqrt{3}*362$$
[equation]$$frac{362}{265} rightarrow frac{1+sqrt{3}}{2}$$[equation]MEET 6.
Wiliam Lamb using the new technology, which come up during the war
measure atomic levels extremal accurately. The Lamb shift represents a
correction to spectrum (double top in spectrum and problem of
proximity). The Lamb shift for hydrogen: 1000 Mz - experimental results,
1040 Mz - Hans Bethe theorectical insight.
IN THE GUTENBERG GALAXY A BASIC PROBLEM IS NOT PHYSICAL SEPARATION BUT
SEPARATION FROM AN ARBITRARY CHOICE.
The Lamb shift for DJA timing (for bear market). 1039, 1000 (14 January
2000, 10 October 2002).
[equation]$frac{1039}{1000} rightarrow frac{6sqrt{3}}{10}$[equation]We work in
discrete proximity spaces (see work of Smirnov). If (X, d) is a metric
space (continuum), x is proximite y implies the d(x, y)=0. For discrete
set of operation A is proximite B implies A ∩ B = ∅.
Fusion of Lamb shift, Pisot numbers and Meyer’s motive (month timing)
for 3 September 1929, 11 January 1973 and 26-31 January 2018:
[equation]$1060 = 520 + 540 rightarrow (5 + 3sqrt{3})^3$[equation]The Lamb shift in quadratic fields have a double top and its falls
quickly.
I am sorry for bad formatting, in the attachment is everything in this post (and more) as pdf.
attachments: part.pdf
attachments: part.pdf
New version of my work, with some additional content about market.
attachments: one_dimensional_quasicrystal_Dariusz_Krzywicki.pdf
attachments: one_dimensional_quasicrystal_Dariusz_Krzywicki.pdf
Updated version of my work (April)
attachments: Daiursz_Krzywicki_One-dimensional-quaiscrystal-of-the-whole-April.pdf
attachments: Daiursz_Krzywicki_One-dimensional-quaiscrystal-of-the-whole-April.pdf
Updated version of my work (May 2018)
attachments: One_dimensional_quasicrystal_Dariusz_Krzywicki_minor_fix.pdf
attachments: One_dimensional_quasicrystal_Dariusz_Krzywicki_minor_fix.pdf
Login or create account to post reply or comment.