If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Previous Contests

**What Is “Fundamental”**

*October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018*

*Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation*

read/discuss • winners

**Wandering Towards a Goal**

How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?

*December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017*

Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

read/discuss • winners

**Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics**

*Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation*

Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discuss • winners

**How Should Humanity Steer the Future?**

*January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014*

*Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American*

read/discuss • winners

**It From Bit or Bit From It**

*March 25 - June 28, 2013*

*Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American*

read/discuss • winners

**Questioning the Foundations**

Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?

*May 24 - August 31, 2012*

*Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American*

read/discuss • winners

**Is Reality Digital or Analog?**

*November 2010 - February 2011*

*Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American*

read/discuss • winners

**What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?**

*May - October 2009*

*Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams*

read/discuss • winners

**The Nature of Time**

*August - December 2008*

read/discuss • winners

Previous Contests

read/discuss • winners

How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?

Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

read/discuss • winners

Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

Forum Home

Introduction

Terms of Use

RSS feed | RSS help

Introduction

Terms of Use

*Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.*

RSS feed | RSS help

RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

**Dariusz Krzywicki**: *on* 5/31/18 at 8:57am UTC, wrote Updated version of my work (May 2018)

**Dariusz Krzywicki**: *on* 4/2/18 at 11:14am UTC, wrote Updated version of my work (April)

**Dariusz Krzywicki**: *on* 3/11/18 at 8:42am UTC, wrote New version of my work

**Dariusz Krzywicki**: *on* 2/17/18 at 9:01am UTC, wrote New version of my work, with some additional content about market.

**Dariusz Krzywicki**: *on* 2/16/18 at 21:17pm UTC, wrote I am sorry for bad formatting, in the attachment is everything in this post...

**Dariusz Krzywicki**: *on* 2/16/18 at 21:02pm UTC, wrote MEET 5. The Arrow-Pratt measure of the risk - aversion would remain the...

**Ulla Mattfolk**: *on* 2/2/18 at 18:12pm UTC, wrote Hi, Have you seen this? https://physics.aps.org/articles/v9/148 Seems...

**Joe Fisher**: *on* 1/30/18 at 16:46pm UTC, wrote Dear Fellow Essayists This will be my final plea for fair treatment., ...

RECENT FORUM POSTS

**Georgina Woodward**: "Hi Ian, I've been thinking about choice of carrot or pepper. Behaving in a..."
*in* Measuring Free Will: Ian...

**Lorraine Ford**: "(continued) 3. “…so this is what defines a free choice : the Zeta..."
*in* Measuring Free Will: Ian...

**Georgina Woodward**: "What is happening in material reality provides the connection to inertia...."
*in* Bonus Koan: Distant...

**Georgina Woodward**: ""We saw early on that as conformed by countless experiment, there is no..."
*in* Bonus Koan: Distant...

**andrea gonzalez**: "Interesting stuff to read. Keep it up. If want to collect free gift card..."
*in* Memory, Causality and...

**Joe Fisher**: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..."
*in* First Things First: The...

**Poker Online**: "https://www.jakartapoker.net/"
*in* Downward causation:...

**Enquire us**: "Your Ro system desires regular maintenance to confirm it’s continually in..."
*in* Agency in the Physical...

RECENT ARTICLES

*click titles to read articles*

**First Things First: The Physics of Causality**

Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

**Can Time Be Saved From Physics?**

Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

**Thermo-Demonics**

A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

**Gravity's Residue**

An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

**Could Mind Forge the Universe?**

Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

RECENT FORUM POSTS

RECENT ARTICLES

Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

FQXi FORUM

August 25, 2019

CATEGORY:
FQXi Essay Contest - Spring, 2017
[back]

TOPIC: One-dimensional quasicrystal of the whole by Dariusz Krzywicki [refresh]

TOPIC: One-dimensional quasicrystal of the whole by Dariusz Krzywicki [refresh]

We all work in terms of effective theories. The discovery of quasicrystals is a black swan for all local rationality. We present a dynamical quasicrystal on the level of morphisms rather than objects. Universum, cell division, market crashes... and your life have the same fundamental group, first homology group, eigenvalues, and Nielsen number. The notion of representation is a potencially fundamental of a unifying theorethical framework, with respect to software and hardware of the whole.

I am a mathematician. I don't believe in conventional mathematics. Only primitive recurrence has deep consequence.

Hi Dariusz Krzywicki

“We present a dynamical quasicrystal on the level of morphisms rather than objects. Universum, cell division, market crashes... and your life have the same fundamental group, first homology group, eigenvalues, and Nielsen number” dear Dariusz Krzywicki .Yours is a very nice idea…. I highly appreciate your essay and hope for reciprocity.

I request you please...

view entire post

“We present a dynamical quasicrystal on the level of morphisms rather than objects. Universum, cell division, market crashes... and your life have the same fundamental group, first homology group, eigenvalues, and Nielsen number” dear Dariusz Krzywicki .Yours is a very nice idea…. I highly appreciate your essay and hope for reciprocity.

I request you please...

view entire post

report post as inappropriate

Dear Fellow Essayists

This will be my final plea for fair treatment.,

FQXI is clearly seeking to find out if there is a fundamental REALITY.

Reliable evidence exists that proves that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his utterly complex finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface. It logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of earth allowable.

All objects, be they solid, liquid, or vaporous have always had a visible surface. This is because the real Universe must consist only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

Only the truth can set you free.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate

This will be my final plea for fair treatment.,

FQXI is clearly seeking to find out if there is a fundamental REALITY.

Reliable evidence exists that proves that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his utterly complex finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface. It logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of earth allowable.

All objects, be they solid, liquid, or vaporous have always had a visible surface. This is because the real Universe must consist only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

Only the truth can set you free.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate

Hi,

Have you seen this? https://physics.aps.org/articles/v9/148

Seems some fundamentals will be changed?

My essay is a bit alike. https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3093

Enjoy :)

I am no math people, but we have the same frame. I learn from you, as instance I have never thought of the dark sektor related to our ordinary matter the way you show, so simple... congrats.

Ulla Mattfolk

report post as inappropriate

Have you seen this? https://physics.aps.org/articles/v9/148

Seems some fundamentals will be changed?

My essay is a bit alike. https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3093

Enjoy :)

I am no math people, but we have the same frame. I learn from you, as instance I have never thought of the dark sektor related to our ordinary matter the way you show, so simple... congrats.

Ulla Mattfolk

report post as inappropriate

MEET 5.

The Arrow-Pratt measure of the risk - aversion would remain the same

even after an affine transformation of the utility function.

[equation]$A(x) = -frac{u^{''}(x)}{u^{'}(x)}$[equation]For global perspective

u(x)=x² − 20x − 8 we get: [equation]$A(10 + 6sqrt{3}) = -frac{1}{6sqrt{3}}$[equation]For SP&500 we have timing: 24 March 2000, 11 October 2007, 26 January

2018:

[equation]$$2754 + 3762 rightarrow 6sqrt{3}*265 + 6sqrt{3}*362$$

[equation]$$frac{362}{265} rightarrow frac{1+sqrt{3}}{2}$$[equation]MEET 6.

Wiliam Lamb using the new technology, which come up during the war

measure atomic levels extremal accurately. The Lamb shift represents a

correction to spectrum (double top in spectrum and problem of

proximity). The Lamb shift for hydrogen: 1000 Mz - experimental results,

1040 Mz - Hans Bethe theorectical insight.

IN THE GUTENBERG GALAXY A BASIC PROBLEM IS NOT PHYSICAL SEPARATION BUT

SEPARATION FROM AN ARBITRARY CHOICE.

The Lamb shift for DJA timing (for bear market). 1039, 1000 (14 January

2000, 10 October 2002).

[equation]$frac{1039}{1000} rightarrow frac{6sqrt{3}}{10}$[equation]We work in

discrete proximity spaces (see work of Smirnov). If (X, d) is a metric

space (continuum), x is proximite y implies the d(x, y)=0. For discrete

set of operation A is proximite B implies A ∩ B = ∅.

Fusion of Lamb shift, Pisot numbers and Meyer’s motive (month timing)

for 3 September 1929, 11 January 1973 and 26-31 January 2018:

[equation]$1060 = 520 + 540 rightarrow (5 + 3sqrt{3})^3$[equation]The Lamb shift in quadratic fields have a double top and its falls

quickly.

The Arrow-Pratt measure of the risk - aversion would remain the same

even after an affine transformation of the utility function.

[equation]$A(x) = -frac{u^{''}(x)}{u^{'}(x)}$[equation]For global perspective

u(x)=x² − 20x − 8 we get: [equation]$A(10 + 6sqrt{3}) = -frac{1}{6sqrt{3}}$[equation]For SP&500 we have timing: 24 March 2000, 11 October 2007, 26 January

2018:

[equation]$$2754 + 3762 rightarrow 6sqrt{3}*265 + 6sqrt{3}*362$$

[equation]$$frac{362}{265} rightarrow frac{1+sqrt{3}}{2}$$[equation]MEET 6.

Wiliam Lamb using the new technology, which come up during the war

measure atomic levels extremal accurately. The Lamb shift represents a

correction to spectrum (double top in spectrum and problem of

proximity). The Lamb shift for hydrogen: 1000 Mz - experimental results,

1040 Mz - Hans Bethe theorectical insight.

IN THE GUTENBERG GALAXY A BASIC PROBLEM IS NOT PHYSICAL SEPARATION BUT

SEPARATION FROM AN ARBITRARY CHOICE.

The Lamb shift for DJA timing (for bear market). 1039, 1000 (14 January

2000, 10 October 2002).

[equation]$frac{1039}{1000} rightarrow frac{6sqrt{3}}{10}$[equation]We work in

discrete proximity spaces (see work of Smirnov). If (X, d) is a metric

space (continuum), x is proximite y implies the d(x, y)=0. For discrete

set of operation A is proximite B implies A ∩ B = ∅.

Fusion of Lamb shift, Pisot numbers and Meyer’s motive (month timing)

for 3 September 1929, 11 January 1973 and 26-31 January 2018:

[equation]$1060 = 520 + 540 rightarrow (5 + 3sqrt{3})^3$[equation]The Lamb shift in quadratic fields have a double top and its falls

quickly.

I am sorry for bad formatting, in the attachment is everything in this post (and more) as pdf.

attachments: part.pdf

attachments: part.pdf

New version of my work, with some additional content about market.

attachments: one_dimensional_quasicrystal_Dariusz_Krzywicki.pdf

attachments: one_dimensional_quasicrystal_Dariusz_Krzywicki.pdf

Updated version of my work (April)

attachments: Daiursz_Krzywicki_One-dimensional-quaiscrystal-of-the-whole-April.pdf

attachments: Daiursz_Krzywicki_One-dimensional-quaiscrystal-of-the-whole-April.pdf

Updated version of my work (May 2018)

attachments: One_dimensional_quasicrystal_Dariusz_Krzywicki_minor_fix.pdf

attachments: One_dimensional_quasicrystal_Dariusz_Krzywicki_minor_fix.pdf

Login or create account to post reply or comment.