Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Kamal Rajpal: on 2/20/18 at 17:59pm UTC, wrote Dear Professor Richard Conn Henry, I enjoyed reading your Essay and...

Peter Jackson: on 2/10/18 at 13:53pm UTC, wrote Dear Professor Henry, A short & sweet essay. I'm interested in your...

Joe Fisher: on 1/29/18 at 16:26pm UTC, wrote Dear Fellow Essayists This will be my final plea for fair treatment., ...

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 1/25/18 at 14:39pm UTC, wrote Respected Prof Richard Conn Henry I conjecture that, when found, the...

a l: on 1/24/18 at 19:20pm UTC, wrote Dear Prof. Henry, thank you for sharing your view about what you deem to...

Joe Fisher: on 1/15/18 at 19:53pm UTC, wrote Dear Professor Richard Conn Henry, My research has concluded that Nature...

Joe Fisher: on 1/15/18 at 19:52pm UTC, wrote My research has concluded that Nature must have devised the only permanent...

Richard Henry: on 1/9/18 at 20:53pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract I conjecture that, when found, the topology of...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Robert McEachern: ""all experiments have pointed towards this and there is no way to avoid..." in Review of "Foundations of...

Joe Fisher: "Dear Steve Agnew, Naturally provided VISIBLE realty am not a silly humanly..." in Can Time Be Saved From...

James Putnam: "Light bends because it is accelerating. It accelerates toward an object..." in Black Hole Photographed...

Steve Agnew: "Stringy and loop quantum are the two big contenders, but neither has a..." in Can Time Be Saved From...

Robert McEachern: "Lorenzo, The nature of "information" is well understood outside of..." in Review of "Foundations of...

Georgina Woodward: "Steve, Lorraine is writing about a simpler "knowing " rather than the..." in The Nature of Time

Steve Agnew: "Knowing information necessarily means neural action potentials. Atom and..." in The Nature of Time


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

Dissolving Quantum Paradoxes
The impossibility of building a perfect clock could help explain away microscale weirdness.


FQXi FORUM
May 20, 2019

CATEGORY: FQXi Essay Contest - Spring, 2017 [back]
TOPIC: What is Fundamental by Richard Conn Henry [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Richard Conn Henry wrote on Jan. 9, 2018 @ 20:53 GMT
Essay Abstract

I conjecture that, when found, the topology of 4-spacetime will conclude theoretical physics.

Author Bio

Dick Henry, at 78, is an Academy Professor at The Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



a l wrote on Jan. 24, 2018 @ 19:20 GMT
Dear Prof. Henry,

thank you for sharing your view about what you deem to be fundamental, We can only regret that you have been so laconic.

Best,

a.l.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Peter Jackson wrote on Feb. 10, 2018 @ 13:53 GMT
Dear Professor Henry,

A short & sweet essay. I'm interested in your failure to produce the QM Hamiltonian. Indeed as one astronomer to another I'd like to ask your assistance.

I think I may have uncovered an additional set of inverse momenta with an orthogonal cos distribution and complementarity with conventional OAM. While apparently guilty of thinking classically it none the less appears to work, producing a CSHS >2 (and required detection steering inequality).

I'm not a mathematician, but I suggest this may allow the Hamiltonian. I know if it does it may be 'proving yourself wrong', but you know that's the aim of all good scientists!

First I hope you'll read my strictly ontological essay giving the mechanism, invoking Maxwell to replace Bohr's 'no assumption' for pair morphology - Inverse Cos proved with a simple physical experiment representing one of 2 exchanges of momenta. (the model also classically derives non-integer spin - see the short video). Declan Traill's then gives the matching computer code and Cos^2 plot in his essay.

Another collaborator is optics man John Minkowski, ex of Baltimore, but it's mainly not his field, and we need a top math man able to handle the Lagrangian - Hamiltonian proof - if now possible. Or to say if it's still not and why.

Hope you can help.

Very best

Peter

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Kamal L Rajpal wrote on Feb. 20, 2018 @ 17:59 GMT
Dear Professor Richard Conn Henry,

I enjoyed reading your Essay and suggest that you read Dark Matter: http://vixra.org/pdf/1303.0207v3.pdf

Quantum Mechanics claims that an electron can be both spin-up and spin-down at the same time. In my conceptual physics Essay on Electron Spin, I have proved that this is not true. Please read: https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3145 or https://fqxi.org/data/essay-contest-files/Rajpal_1306.0141v3
.pdf

Kamal Rajpal

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.