Hello Sergio...
Your Mathematical presentation rates a 4E... i.e. Explanation Elegantly Explicit to Equation.
Although I am not qualified to verify all your premises, or check your Math, the Spatial/geometry relationship expressions utilized ... e.g. the distance between 2 points... are apparently derived from the combined Cartesian/Radian coordinate system, and yes, with the...
view entire post
Hello Sergio...
Your Mathematical presentation rates a 4E... i.e. Explanation Elegantly Explicit to Equation.
Although I am not qualified to verify all your premises, or check your Math, the Spatial/geometry relationship expressions utilized ... e.g. the distance between 2 points... are apparently derived from the combined Cartesian/Radian coordinate system, and yes, with the equation craft mastery you demonstrate, one should be able to configure those relationships in a plethora of theories that verify C and G... i.e. C and G were derived utilizing a combined Cartesian/Radian coordinate system.
Transformations to any geometry "bench model" are essentially infinite, but inferences derived from transformations do not necessarily retain the constraints of the Spatial relationships of the "bench" geometry, and in a "fundamental" discussion, a distinction must be made between theoretical minimum units, and geometry "bench model" verifiable minimum units.
Although the Radian coordinate system facilitates point ray analysis, it eliminates the elegance of a unified Spatial volume unit CAD environment/quantization.
REF:
Graphic Illustration of Radian/Cartesian/UQS Geometry Comparative http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com
The Cartesian coordinate system supports unified Spatial volume unit quantization... i.e. Cartesian Spatial quantization is infinitely divisible by scaled Cubic units as the Base Volume units of the Cartesian geometry quantization, but not all logic derived Spatial points can be projected onto a 3 axis-dimensional Cartesian coordinate grid.
A Cube unit has no centroid to facilitate an Origin Singularity... i.e. Energy point source that expands in all directions equally... and therefor a Cartesian CAD
environment/quantization cannot support Spatially defined unified minimum units of Space (QI) and Energy (QE) required for analysis of Origin QE/QI Emission and subsequent Distribution.
Although the Radian coordinate system facilitates point ray analysis, it eliminates the elegance of a unified Spatial volume unit CAD environment/quantization.
REF:
Graphic Illustration of Radian/Cartesian/UQS Geometry Comparative http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com
Also it should be noted that not all Spatial volume unit quantization's that have a centroid to facilitate an Origin Singularity, support unified minimum units of Space (QI), required for Emission Distribution equal in all directions from a single point.
REF:
UQS Origin Singularity Geometry http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQST-TVNH.php
Why would particles not be comprised of the same fundamental unit of Space as are the Avatars?
If info requires a Spatial definition, there can be no point particles, only interaction Event Points (IEP) on a Node Network (NN) channel... i.e. points/nodes/vertices have location but no spatial definition in which to contain Energy Information choreographies.
To fundamentally relate distance and time as speed, the geo-coordinate system underlying the Space/Time relationships must have a geometry coordinate verifiable
minimum unit of Space and Time... i.e. a minimum unit of Space (QE) and minimum unit of Time (QT) must be supported by the "bench" geo-coordinate system used in the analysis.
If event Spatial effect is a factor of accumulated QE/QI Information Energy choreographies contributing, at Point Interaction Event, at specified QT, there can be no limit to speed w/o verifying a limitation of QE/QI.
As per my interpretation of World Science Festival:
Topic: "Limits of Understanding" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfY-DRsE86s,
the instability w/ current Space/Energy/Time/Info Physics, is as a consequence of the current instability of Mathematics.
My assessment is that the APPARENT current instability of Math is as a consequence of a geometry coordinate system, in which the fundamental Spatial relationships of the geometry do not support application of minimum units of Energy/Space/Time/Info, to Space/Energy/Time/Info analysis.
Thanks Sergio, for sharing your insights and thus making an opportunity for comment... I would read with attention your comments on my essay entry Title: Knowledge Base (KB) Access as Fundamental to Info Processor Intelligence.
Will return to rate after I read as many essays as I have time.
S. Lingo
UQS Author/Logician
www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com
view post as summary
Thank you for your insights!