If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at
forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.
Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the
"Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the
"Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.
Contests Home
Current Essay Contest
Previous Contests
Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability Essay Contest
December 24, 2019 - April 24, 2020Contest Partners: Fetzer Franklin Fund, and The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss
•
winners
What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss
•
winners
Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discuss
•
winners
Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and MathematicsContest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American
read/discuss
•
winners
How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss
•
winners
It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss
•
winners
Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discuss
•
winners
Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discuss
•
winners
What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discuss
•
winners
The Nature of Time
August - December 2008read/discuss
•
winners
Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use
Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.
By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide
by the Terms of Use
RSS feed | RSS help
FQXi FORUM
January 19, 2021
CATEGORY:
The Nature of Time Essay Contest (2008)
[back]
TOPIC:
Clock boundary principle with respect to the role of time in laws of physics and its application to special relativity by Srdjan Mijatovic
[refresh]
Login or
create account to post reply or comment.
Srdjan Mijatovic wrote on Nov. 10, 2008 @ 14:45 GMT
Essay AbstractTime measurement plays a crucial role in special relativity (SR in further text). Time is measured with clocks and this paper will examine the role of clocks in general and as it pertains to SR. The examination will focus on physical reality of clocks and newly established principle of clock boundary. The topic of this paper is not to dispute Einstein's SR - for the purposes of argument it is assumed to be correct as it has been accepted in its logic and verified in experiment. We will examine the role of time in relation to that of clocks. A term 'time' is often used interchangeably with that of a 'clock', at least when it comes to representation of physical reality of it that we experience. We will provide more rigorous distinction between the two and examine the effects to SR. The conclusions will not negate SR but will open new avenues for it and its application to reality. We will provide some new predictions that do not invalidate SR - however they do find SR to be a special case of a larger perspective.
Author BioSrdjan Mijatovic is a principal engineer with a leading Silicon Valley technology firm.
Download Essay PDF File
Login or
create account to post reply or comment.