Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest

Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fnd.

Previous Contests

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fnd.

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American


How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help


Thomas Ray: "(reposted in correct thread) Lorraine, Nah. That's nothing like my view...." in 2015 in Review: New...

Lorraine Ford: "Clearly “law-of-nature” relationships and associated numbers represent..." in Physics of the Observer -...

Lee Bloomquist: "Information Channel. An example from Jon Barwise. At the workshop..." in Physics of the Observer -...

Lee Bloomquist: "Please clarify. I just tried to put a simple model of an observer in the..." in Alternative Models of...

Lee Bloomquist: "Footnote...for the above post, the one with the equation existence =..." in Alternative Models of...

Thomas Ray: "In fact, symmetry is the most pervasive physical principle that exists. ..." in “Spookiness”...

Thomas Ray: "It's easy to get wound around the axle with black hole thermodynamics,..." in “Spookiness”...

Joe Fisher: "It seems to have escaped Wolpert’s somewhat limited attention that no two..." in Inferring the Limits on...

click titles to read articles

The Complexity Conundrum
Resolving the black hole firewall paradox—by calculating what a real astronaut would compute at the black hole's edge.

Quantum Dream Time
Defining a ‘quantum clock’ and a 'quantum ruler' could help those attempting to unify physics—and solve the mystery of vanishing time.

Our Place in the Multiverse
Calculating the odds that intelligent observers arise in parallel universes—and working out what they might see.

Sounding the Drums to Listen for Gravity’s Effect on Quantum Phenomena
A bench-top experiment could test the notion that gravity breaks delicate quantum superpositions.

Watching the Observers
Accounting for quantum fuzziness could help us measure space and time—and the cosmos—more accurately.

January 23, 2018

CATEGORY: Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017) [back]
TOPIC: Wu by George Bizadellis [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author George Bizadellis wrote on Mar. 14, 2017 @ 15:59 GMT
Essay Abstract

It was sometime within the last two million years that something unique and wondrous came into being. It was the chance convergence of a multitude of causal improbabilities, the contemplation of which brings one to the summit of the sublime. Awareness made a great leap forward from its starting point in the Phanerozoic Eon and became aware of itself. Thus, a power was unleashed unlike any other. It was the faculty of reason, a power that has the potential to harness all other cosmic forces. But as Nietzsche wrote, “Man is an unfinished animal”, and so, the true scope and full application of reason remain a mystery waiting to be solved by those who possess it.

Author Bio

George Bizadellis is a retired Vice President & CMO. He is also a CPA and has held positions in corporate finance and in public accounting. He has been an instructor of accounting and a subject matter expert on strategy, both at the university level.

Download Essay PDF File

Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich wrote on Mar. 15, 2017 @ 17:12 GMT
Dear, George Bizadellis

I inform all the participants that use the electronic translator, therefore, my essay is written badly. I participate in the contest to familiarize English-speaking scientists with New Cartesian Physic, the basis of which the principle of identity of space and matter. Combining space and matter into a single essence, the New Cartesian Physic is able to integrate modern physics into a single theory. Let FQXi will be the starting point of this Association.

Don't let the New Cartesian Physic disappear! Do not ask for himself, but for Descartes.

New Cartesian Physic has great potential in understanding the world. To show potential in this essay I risked give "The way of The materialist explanation of the paranormal and the supernatural" - Is the name of my essay.

Visit my essay and you will find something in it about New Cartesian Physic. After you give a post in my topic, I shall do the same.


Dizhechko Boris

report post as inappropriate

Author George Bizadellis wrote on Mar. 17, 2017 @ 14:20 GMT
Boris, sorry it took a while to get back to you.

There’s no need to apologize for your English, especially when dealing with such technical philosophical issues that are in your essay. Your English is definitely better than my Russian, which is non-existent!

A Russian saying I’ve always loved is: “Izvestia nye Pravda, y Pravda nye Izvestia”

I found your essay very interesting. It contains a lot of significant information.

I will, however, have to read and reread it over a period of time to get a fuller understanding. It will be a wonderful learning experience, so I thank you.

I do agree with your approach to address physics in the context of philosophy.



Joe Fisher replied on Mar. 17, 2017 @ 16:02 GMT
Dear George Bizadellis,

Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

I merely wish to point out that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

report post as inappropriate

Author George Bizadellis replied on Mar. 17, 2017 @ 16:22 GMT
Joe, please don’t worry about disparagement.

I sincerely think that valid criticism makes a person smarter and better. (Of course, praise received is always the best!)

I will read your essay and post a comment for you by tomorrow.



Author George Bizadellis replied on Mar. 18, 2017 @ 20:57 GMT
Joe, thank you for pointing me to your essay. I always enjoy perspectives that are different than mine.

Under the section ‘Law of Emotion’, a turn of phrase I really like, you state, “...all surface travels at the same speed…” Is this the same as saying all things travel through spacetime at the same speed, c?

Also, in Exodus, god identifies himself to Moses as ‘I am, that I am’. Is this the sense that you use the word ‘am’ instead of the word ‘is’?

Again, thanks for the different viewpoint.



Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 17, 2017 @ 22:27 GMT
Nice essay Bizadellis,

Your ideas and thinking are excellent for eg…

‘1. Lamarckian evolution, that led from a non-living, non-conscious abiotic environment to the conceptual consciousness of human beings.

2. Wu is a Buddhist concept that can be interpreted as reconsider the scope of the inquiry or withdraw the question. It comes into play when the complexity and...

view entire post

report post as inappropriate

Author George Bizadellis replied on Mar. 30, 2017 @ 13:19 GMT
SNP Gupta,

Thank you for pointing me towards your essay and sorry it took me so long to respond. The concept of DUM was very interesting.

Although I have contemplated the size of the universe, your essay really brought that home to me. And I do agree that “ours is single unit and is a closed one.” Therefore, there is no multiverse.

It’s an interesting concept...

view entire post

Author George Bizadellis wrote on Mar. 18, 2017 @ 21:34 GMT
SNP Gupta, thank you for the kind words. Your essay is very interesting and fun to read. It’s one from which I can learn a lot.

I’ve only done a couple of readings of it and will need to really review it further. There’s a lot there!

Give me a couple of days and I will get back to you. I would love to discuss time with you.

Again, a great job!



Willy K wrote on Mar. 27, 2017 @ 10:25 GMT
Hi George

There are a number of notable things about your essay which places it among the best I have seen in this contest. You bothered to look at the dictionary meaning of intelligence, and it gives the best definition I have seen till now! Your extensive treatment of ‘reason’ is quite exceptional. I wish I had thought about it as deeply as you have, since I too use the concept of reason as a crucial component of my essay. I like the distinction you draw between ‘conceptual awareness’ and the perceptual level below it. Like you, I too believe that this distinction might be crucial if we are to understand the functioning of reason.

Your discussion of time, mathematics and economics was just fantastic.

Since you are an admirer of Hayek, you might want to see how his work has been incorporated into the platform I developed in my essay. I agree on the ‘methodological individualism’ as an organizing paradigm of economics, although I couldn’t quite follow the reference to genetic-causal method of analysis.

Only quibble I have with your essay is that the concept of Wu did not really fit in with the essay. Perhaps it could have been developed a tad better. Nevertheless, I have no hesitation in rating your essay as one of the best I have come across.

Warm Regards, Willy

report post as inappropriate

Author George Bizadellis replied on Mar. 28, 2017 @ 13:19 GMT

Thank you very much for the kind words.

Hayek has always been one of my idols. His integrated understanding of economics, law, epistemology, and history is unprecedented in the modern world.

As to my title Wu, you are extremely perceptive. On the night just before the due date, I did a character count and found out I had over 37,000! I spent the night and much of the next day cutting and rearranging. Under the ‘Methodologies to Overcome’ section, for example, I eliminated a discussion of the misuse of terms (Idols of the Marketplace) such as ‘singularity’, ‘information’, ‘function’, ‘nothing’, and ‘equals’ that hamper understanding. Those changes, and some others, somewhat weakened the force of the title.

But I kept the title because it imparts an overarching sense of the way many fundamental questions are too often imprecisely phrased and framed, thus inhibiting progress in addressing the underlying issues.

Just to expand a little on a couple of items. When it comes to an analysis of exchange, Hayek and the other Austrian economists were aware that there is no equality in exchange. Each participant to an exchange makes the trade precisely because he thinks he will be better off after it. Incorrectly assuming that there is an equality in exchange has led Marxist, Keynesian, and neoclassical economists into inconsistencies, contradictions, and lacunas in their theories of value.

The genetic causal analytical framework postulates that market outcomes (and indeed all social structures) are the result of the purposeful actions of individuals, and to understand these outcomes, analyses must trace the logical consequences of processes that begin with and are put in motion by the choices of individuals.

Thank you again. I look forward to reading your essay and will get back to you within the next few days.

Highest regards,


Don Limuti wrote on Mar. 28, 2017 @ 00:58 GMT
Hello George,

Very good essay. Here are the highlights for me:

1. All societies dance, sing and create art. And laugh! (Will an advanced artificial intelligence be able to sing and dance and laugh?)

2. Lamarck is gaining on Darwin.

3. To quote Albert Einstein, "Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution."

4. And most importantly: Mathematics is not goal-free. No human endeavor is goal-free.

If you like take a look at my entry. I concentrate on the phenomena of choice in a short dialog (koan).

Thanks for your fine essay. I rate it highly.

Don Limuti

report post as inappropriate

Author George Bizadellis replied on Mar. 29, 2017 @ 13:40 GMT
Don, I can see by your essay that you are indeed involved with communications. This essay is a gem!

In one short dialogue, you were able to both express the difficulty with resolving the conflict between determinism and free will and the fun in trying to do so.

Don used his “mind to understand and plan and choose”. And while he held steadfast and translated his intention into a goal and an action plan, Lexi ended up wandering to her goal.

You also introduced emotion in an interesting way with A.I., as well as subtlety introducing the arrow of time in planning for the next FQXi contest.

Your essay was a joy. By only regret is that Don and Lexi didn’t continue their conversation for a couple of more pages!

I will rate it highly. (Continue to sing and dance and laugh with all your future writings.)

Highest regards,


Branko L Zivlak wrote on Apr. 2, 2017 @ 14:18 GMT

report post as inappropriate

Peter Jackson wrote on Apr. 5, 2017 @ 16:13 GMT

Very novel and unique approach. I even followed most of it (I think!) I think we should adopt Wu for the English language, it definitely seems to need more words to effectively describe 'science'.

Favourite line? ; "It wasn’t mathematics that led Einstein to his theories of relativity. It was the syllogism…and…imagination!" Extra points for that!

I found using that approach could solve QM with a classical mechanism too. Shocking, but isn't life!? Do take a look & tell me if I'm crazy.

Very best


report post as inappropriate

Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich wrote on Apr. 7, 2017 @ 03:01 GMT
Dear Sirs!

Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use spam.

New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.

New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.

Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.


Dizhechko Boris

report post as inappropriate

Inox Mau Sai gon wrote on Apr. 16, 2017 @ 15:49 GMT
Được làm từ nguyên liệu thô nhiều hơn & dùng Mangan thay thế cho niken nên giá thành thép không gỉ 201 thấp hơn nhiều so với các loại inox 304 hay 403. Cũng chính vì vậy mà loại inox này là lựa chọn tuyệt vời để sản xuất những mặt hàng phổ biến như dụng cụ nhà bếp, hàng tiêu dùng,…

Về thành phần, trong inox chứa hơn 11% chrom giúp chống ăn mòn tốt & cho khả năng định hình tuyệt vời.

Với mọi kích thước, tấm inox 201 luôn có giá thấp hơn hẳn inox 304. Lưu ý: giá cả thay đổi theo thị trường

Tham khảo giá inox 201 tại website Inox Màu

report post as inappropriate

Inox Mau Sai gon wrote on Apr. 19, 2017 @ 09:17 GMT

report post as inappropriate

Inox Mau Sai gon replied on Apr. 19, 2017 @ 09:18 GMT
Inox Mau Sai Gon

report post as inappropriate

micheal le wrote on Apr. 24, 2017 @ 10:40 GMT
nguoi ta noi, khi su dung cac loai kich thuoc thi chung ta nen su dung dung kich thuoc tieu chuan quy dinh tren toan the gioi. Nhugn hien nay, da so moi nguoi chua biet toi cac loai kich thuoc tieu chuan nay. Ma dac biet la cac laoi kich thuoc kho giay a2. Voi cac loai kho giay a2[/linl] nay chung ta luon su dung chung vao cac loai tai lieu lon nhu ban ve

report post as inappropriate

micheal le wrote on Apr. 24, 2017 @ 10:41 GMT
nguoi ta noi, khi su dung cac loai kich thuoc thi chung ta nen su dung dung kich thuoc tieu chuan quy dinh tren toan the gioi. Nhugn hien nay, da so moi nguoi chua biet toi cac loai kich thuoc tieu chuan nay. Ma dac biet la cac laoi kich thuoc kho giay a2. Voi cac loai kho giay a2 nay chung ta luon su dung chung vao cac loai tai lieu lon nhu ban ve

report post as inappropriate

le tuyet lam wrote on May. 11, 2017 @ 06:54 GMT
The good of each thing is based on its nature. Therefore, if we are confused about what is good for man it is because we are unclear about human nature. To understand human nature more clearly it is most useful to compare and contrast man with other natural creatures. Let us first examine the degree to which nature provides everything that animals and plants need for their good

e.html]ve may bay di da nang[/url]

gia-re.html]ve may bay di da lat[/url]

re.html]ve may bay di hue[/url]

e-gia-re.html]ve may di singapore[/url]

ai-lan-gia-re.html]ve may bay di thai lan[/url]

report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.