If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.
Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.
Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.
Contests Home
Previous Contests
What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss • winners
Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discuss • winners
Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discuss • winners
The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discuss • winners
Previous Contests
What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss • winners
Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discuss • winners
Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discuss • winners
The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discuss • winners
Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use
RSS feed | RSS help
Introduction
Terms of Use
Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.
By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC
Jonathan David: on 4/5/18 at 10:58am UTC, wrote Essay Writers Uk
Jonathan David: on 4/5/18 at 10:51am UTC, wrote Rather than alt-right actualities that weld worldview to dream, calm lushes...
Dizhechko Semyonovich: on 4/7/17 at 3:41am UTC, wrote Dear Sirs! Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of...
Satyavarapu Gupta: on 3/17/17 at 7:29am UTC, wrote Nice essay James, I want you to ask you to please have a look at my...
Joe Fisher: on 3/15/17 at 16:22pm UTC, wrote Dear Dr. Kevin James, Please excuse me for I have no intention of...
Kevin James: on 3/13/17 at 1:02am UTC, wrote Peter, thank you for your comments. After reading your essay I would beg to...
Peter Jackson: on 3/12/17 at 21:35pm UTC, wrote Kevin, I cannot but agree that far too habitually; "we give artifacts...
Kevin James: on 3/10/17 at 16:39pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract This is a narrative, to be sure, for those who are...
RECENT FORUM POSTS
Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...
Robert McEachern: ""all experiments have pointed towards this and there is no way to avoid..." in Review of "Foundations of...
Joe Fisher: "Dear Steve Agnew, Naturally provided VISIBLE realty am not a silly humanly..." in Can Time Be Saved From...
James Putnam: "Light bends because it is accelerating. It accelerates toward an object..." in Black Hole Photographed...
Robert McEachern: "Lorenzo, The nature of "information" is well understood outside of..." in Review of "Foundations of...
Georgina Woodward: "Steve, Lorraine is writing about a simpler "knowing " rather than the..." in The Nature of Time
Steve Agnew: "Knowing information necessarily means neural action potentials. Atom and..." in The Nature of Time
RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles
Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.
Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.
Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.
Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.
Dissolving Quantum Paradoxes
The impossibility of building a perfect clock could help explain away microscale weirdness.
Jonathan David: on 4/5/18 at 10:58am UTC, wrote Essay Writers Uk
Jonathan David: on 4/5/18 at 10:51am UTC, wrote Rather than alt-right actualities that weld worldview to dream, calm lushes...
Dizhechko Semyonovich: on 4/7/17 at 3:41am UTC, wrote Dear Sirs! Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of...
Satyavarapu Gupta: on 3/17/17 at 7:29am UTC, wrote Nice essay James, I want you to ask you to please have a look at my...
Joe Fisher: on 3/15/17 at 16:22pm UTC, wrote Dear Dr. Kevin James, Please excuse me for I have no intention of...
Kevin James: on 3/13/17 at 1:02am UTC, wrote Peter, thank you for your comments. After reading your essay I would beg to...
Peter Jackson: on 3/12/17 at 21:35pm UTC, wrote Kevin, I cannot but agree that far too habitually; "we give artifacts...
Kevin James: on 3/10/17 at 16:39pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract This is a narrative, to be sure, for those who are...
RECENT FORUM POSTS
Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...
Robert McEachern: ""all experiments have pointed towards this and there is no way to avoid..." in Review of "Foundations of...
Joe Fisher: "Dear Steve Agnew, Naturally provided VISIBLE realty am not a silly humanly..." in Can Time Be Saved From...
James Putnam: "Light bends because it is accelerating. It accelerates toward an object..." in Black Hole Photographed...
Robert McEachern: "Lorenzo, The nature of "information" is well understood outside of..." in Review of "Foundations of...
Georgina Woodward: "Steve, Lorraine is writing about a simpler "knowing " rather than the..." in The Nature of Time
Steve Agnew: "Knowing information necessarily means neural action potentials. Atom and..." in The Nature of Time
RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles
Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.
Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.
Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.
Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.
Dissolving Quantum Paradoxes
The impossibility of building a perfect clock could help explain away microscale weirdness.
FQXi FORUM
May 22, 2019
CATEGORY:
Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017)
[back]
TOPIC: Alt-Radical Islam: A Critical Ontology by Kevin James [refresh]
TOPIC: Alt-Radical Islam: A Critical Ontology by Kevin James [refresh]
Essay Abstract
This is a narrative, to be sure, for those who are certain of the unseen intensities that shape law, aim, and intention. Laws coalesce around intuition then reason, so to regard the fruits of sense and thought as mindless lose sight of the root and branch of arboreal knowledge; the differential relations of mathemes precede the language of algorithms. Similarly, the dualism inherent in habitual practices of religion lack traction for a critical ontology of thought to subsume the metastasizing oncology of tribalism and violence that threaten our world. So unlike Radical Muslims who kill innocents for a past that never was and a future never to pass, Alt-Radical Muslims serve the sanctity of life that each moment exercises its universal power. In contrast to alt-right facts that weld world view to fantasy, sober drunkards imbibe the endless draught of Absolute Being’s non-identity to itself, an open totality of the differences in kind that originate and recreate the worlds of law, aim and intention. I begin by framing my radical introspection as a Muslim FDNY responder against the events of 9/11. From there I wander between epiphany and doubt, all in the shadow of radical finitude that render teleological goals meaningless. Indeed, it was in nihilism that I recognized an old foe in the FQXi theme, of alienated mindless laws little different from an arbitrary supreme lawmaker. I haven’t figured out my ending yet, and doubt I should or even could in a meaningful way for your story. I am indebted to Muhammad Asad’s translation and commentary on the Quran, Prophetic traditions (hadith), and numerous profound thinkers such as Gilles Deleuze and Mahmoud Taha.
Author Bio
The author is a former firefighter and supervising fire marshal with the New York City Fire Department who responded from home to ground zero on 9/11. He was one of several Muslim Americans profiled in the PBS Documentary Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet. After retiring from the FDNY in 2002 he was accepted into the Revson Fellows at Columbia University and later graduated from Columbia Law School as a Stone Scholar. He interned with the Center for Constitutional Rights as an Ella Baker Fellow in 2005 where he assisted the Vulcan Society with fighting racial discrimination in the FDNY.
Download Essay PDF File
This is a narrative, to be sure, for those who are certain of the unseen intensities that shape law, aim, and intention. Laws coalesce around intuition then reason, so to regard the fruits of sense and thought as mindless lose sight of the root and branch of arboreal knowledge; the differential relations of mathemes precede the language of algorithms. Similarly, the dualism inherent in habitual practices of religion lack traction for a critical ontology of thought to subsume the metastasizing oncology of tribalism and violence that threaten our world. So unlike Radical Muslims who kill innocents for a past that never was and a future never to pass, Alt-Radical Muslims serve the sanctity of life that each moment exercises its universal power. In contrast to alt-right facts that weld world view to fantasy, sober drunkards imbibe the endless draught of Absolute Being’s non-identity to itself, an open totality of the differences in kind that originate and recreate the worlds of law, aim and intention. I begin by framing my radical introspection as a Muslim FDNY responder against the events of 9/11. From there I wander between epiphany and doubt, all in the shadow of radical finitude that render teleological goals meaningless. Indeed, it was in nihilism that I recognized an old foe in the FQXi theme, of alienated mindless laws little different from an arbitrary supreme lawmaker. I haven’t figured out my ending yet, and doubt I should or even could in a meaningful way for your story. I am indebted to Muhammad Asad’s translation and commentary on the Quran, Prophetic traditions (hadith), and numerous profound thinkers such as Gilles Deleuze and Mahmoud Taha.
Author Bio
The author is a former firefighter and supervising fire marshal with the New York City Fire Department who responded from home to ground zero on 9/11. He was one of several Muslim Americans profiled in the PBS Documentary Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet. After retiring from the FDNY in 2002 he was accepted into the Revson Fellows at Columbia University and later graduated from Columbia Law School as a Stone Scholar. He interned with the Center for Constitutional Rights as an Ella Baker Fellow in 2005 where he assisted the Vulcan Society with fighting racial discrimination in the FDNY.
Download Essay PDF File
Kevin,
I cannot but agree that far too habitually;
"we give artifacts of the mind a life of their own be they expressed as law, aim, and intention; religion, teleology, and God’s will."
(preceded by);
"...until we can step outside of ourselves and experience the self-awareness of the ‘other’ of our self, we remain captives within the gravitational pull of solipsism. So long as we lack the capacity to enact our highest values by serving humanity; until we cherish the genesis of differences between us...
I know nothing of Islam, but it seems clear to me that whatever beliefs or religion any man follows we habitually make the mistake of using embedded 'pattern match' thinking and not stepping back from or ;'outside of' ourselves to allow better overview and understanding of the universe.
OK maybe your essay wasn't really on topic or what was 'expected' by most but I appreciated it's interesting, quite different and valuable perspective. Don't worry about the '1' score. Mine has has 6 of them! That just demonstrates mankinds failings.
Best wishes
Peter
report post as inappropriate
I cannot but agree that far too habitually;
"we give artifacts of the mind a life of their own be they expressed as law, aim, and intention; religion, teleology, and God’s will."
(preceded by);
"...until we can step outside of ourselves and experience the self-awareness of the ‘other’ of our self, we remain captives within the gravitational pull of solipsism. So long as we lack the capacity to enact our highest values by serving humanity; until we cherish the genesis of differences between us...
I know nothing of Islam, but it seems clear to me that whatever beliefs or religion any man follows we habitually make the mistake of using embedded 'pattern match' thinking and not stepping back from or ;'outside of' ourselves to allow better overview and understanding of the universe.
OK maybe your essay wasn't really on topic or what was 'expected' by most but I appreciated it's interesting, quite different and valuable perspective. Don't worry about the '1' score. Mine has has 6 of them! That just demonstrates mankinds failings.
Best wishes
Peter
Peter, thank you for your comments. After reading your essay I would beg to disagree: to the extent that Islam can best be characterized as a human faculty of intuition and reason, I would say that you are quite knowledgeable about Islam.
One of my 'goals' in submitting Alt-Radical Islam was to reframe its foreign feel to a familiar, inherently human attribute. I noticed that one of your commenters mentioned Edmund Husserl, whose notion of natural attitude seems to comport with Prophet Muhammad's characterization of Islam as one's natural disposition (Fitrah).
The ratings are secondary to just being able to participate and share ideas in the forum. After reading your comment I was struck by the beauty of FQXi enterprise on the whole. We are not much different from the chattering avian creatures who sought the fabled Simorgh in Attar's Conference of the Birds. Just as the being they sought consisted of the shadow they cast on the ground below when they flew in formation, so too our singular perspectives that coalesce around life's great paradoxes.
Good luck with your essay and future writings.
Kevin James
One of my 'goals' in submitting Alt-Radical Islam was to reframe its foreign feel to a familiar, inherently human attribute. I noticed that one of your commenters mentioned Edmund Husserl, whose notion of natural attitude seems to comport with Prophet Muhammad's characterization of Islam as one's natural disposition (Fitrah).
The ratings are secondary to just being able to participate and share ideas in the forum. After reading your comment I was struck by the beauty of FQXi enterprise on the whole. We are not much different from the chattering avian creatures who sought the fabled Simorgh in Attar's Conference of the Birds. Just as the being they sought consisted of the shadow they cast on the ground below when they flew in formation, so too our singular perspectives that coalesce around life's great paradoxes.
Good luck with your essay and future writings.
Kevin James
Dear Dr. Kevin James,
Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.
I merely wish to point out that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.
Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.
The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.
A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.
Joe Fisher, Realist
report post as inappropriate
Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.
I merely wish to point out that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.
Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.
The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.
A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.
Joe Fisher, Realist
Nice essay James,
I want you to ask you to please have a look at my essay, where ……………reproduction of Galaxies in the Universe is described. Dynamic Universe Model is another mathematical model for Universe. Its mathematics show that the movement of masses will be having a purpose or goal, Different Galaxies will be born and die (quench) etc…just have a look at my essay…...
view entire post
I want you to ask you to please have a look at my essay, where ……………reproduction of Galaxies in the Universe is described. Dynamic Universe Model is another mathematical model for Universe. Its mathematics show that the movement of masses will be having a purpose or goal, Different Galaxies will be born and die (quench) etc…just have a look at my essay…...
view entire post
Dear Sirs!
Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use spam.
New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.
New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.
Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.
Sincerely,
Dizhechko Boris
report post as inappropriate
Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use spam.
New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.
New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.
Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.
Sincerely,
Dizhechko Boris
Rather than alt-right actualities that weld worldview to dream, calm lushes guzzle the perpetual draft of Absolute Being's non-character to itself, an open totality of the distinctions in kind that begin and reproduce the universes of law, point, and expectation. Essay Writers Uk
report post as inappropriate
Login or create account to post reply or comment.