Nice essay Andresen,

Your ideas and thinking are excellent for eg…

What is the multiverse hypothesis, beyond attempt to explain the unlikely universal circumstances that enabled life to emerge? The answer is, it has proven to be not much more than. It is a mathematical trick of infinities, that makes inevitabilities of the most unlikely. A fascinating possibility and discussion I...

view entire post

Nice essay Andresen,

Your ideas and thinking are excellent for eg…

What is the multiverse hypothesis, beyond attempt to explain the unlikely universal circumstances that enabled life to emerge? The answer is, it has proven to be not much more than. It is a mathematical trick of infinities, that makes inevitabilities of the most unlikely. A fascinating possibility and discussion I will not contest, but don’t you think an extreme measure to invent numberless universes, to place an evidence-less band aid over our incomplete universal comprehensions.

The question of the emergence of goals and intentions, for the most part is not a question of how biology achieved it, but rather how a non-biological universal order and structure, achieve biology?

A Good idea, I fully agree with you…………

………………… At this point I want you to ask you to please have a look at my essay, where ……………reproduction of Galaxies in the Universe is described. Dynamic Universe Model is another mathematical model for Universe. Its mathematics show that the movement of masses will be having a purpose or goal, Different Galaxies will be born and die (quench) etc…just have a look at my essay… “Distances, Locations, Ages and Reproduction of Galaxies in our Dynamic Universe” where UGF (Universal Gravitational force) acting on each and every mass, will create a direction and purpose of movement…..

I think intension is inherited from Universe itself to all Biological systems

For your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other.

Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example ‘Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary’ (1994) , ‘Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe’, About “SITA” simulations, ‘Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required’, “New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations”, “Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background”, “Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.”, in 2015 ‘Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, ‘Explaining Pioneer anomaly’, ‘Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets’, ‘Observation of super luminal neutrinos’, ‘Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up’, “Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto” etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.

With axioms like… No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.

Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain

Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and its blog also where all my books and papers are available for free downloading…

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/

Be
st wishes to your essay.

For your blessings please…………….

=snp. gupta

view post as summary

show all replies (23 not shown)

hide replies

show all replies (1 not shown)

hide replies

Dear Steven

I fully agree with you in the problem you raise and how you identify and characterize it. Namely, I fully agree that “ The question of the emergence of goals and intentions, for the most part is not a question of how biology achieved it, but rather how a non-biological universal order and structure, achieve biology?” I also agree that “...the universe and everything within...

view entire post

Dear Steven

I fully agree with you in the problem you raise and how you identify and characterize it. Namely, I fully agree that “ The question of the emergence of goals and intentions, for the most part is not a question of how biology achieved it, but rather how a non-biological universal order and structure, achieve biology?” I also agree that “...the universe and everything within it has one original cause, emergent from a simplest configuration and progressed towards a more advanced state.”

I have been analyzing the problem during all my life and I found solutions for many of the issues related with this magnum problem. For instance, the reason for the apparent “fine-tuning” is just that the universe evolves. As I mention in my essay, the cause of the apparent space expansion is the phenomenon no one though of, a kind of Columbus’ egg: it is not the space that expands but the matter that decreases in size, therefore standard length unit is decreasing. Although this may seem odd at first, it is easy to conclude that it is so and that current space expansion model is just a modern version of Ptolemy model, i.e., a model of what we observe assuming the invariance of an observer that is not invariant. Naturally, there are no such things as dark matter or dark energy, as there are no celestial spheres or epicycles.

This evolution of the universe implies also an evolution of Earth's climate and a very different – and better – understanding of what is required by life. What the values of constants imply is not this exact universe but an universe that evolves and passes by the present state. I don’t claim that the problem of the fine tuning is solved but it is transported to a more sophisticated level. The universe is much more sophisticated than we have been considering and we can only reach it by subtle reasoning, not by complex mathematics.

I appreciated very much the courage with which you dared to face the problem and the clarity of your analysis of it. My solution for it is totally different from yours (maybe you would like to see it) but my vote reflects the first part because that is the critical part, without recognizing the problem no solution to it can be presented.

All the best

Alfredo

view post as summary

Hi Steven,

I have read with much attention your well written contribution.

Some points that I liked to comment on :

Indeed the extreme measure to "create" a new universe any moment a decision is made is also in my opinion toooooo much. I made a new interpretation regarding this choices in my work. The eternal availability of Eternal Now Moments in Total...

view entire post

Hi Steven,

I have read with much attention your well written contribution.

Some points that I liked to comment on :

Indeed the extreme measure to "create" a new universe any moment a decision is made is also in my opinion toooooo much. I made a new interpretation regarding this choices in my work. The eternal availability of Eternal Now Moments in Total Simultaneity.

The anthropic principle is very acceptable for humanity because of the fact that our senses are receiving information that only human beings are able to receive, the information that we cannot receive we cannot be implemented. See my Subjective Simultaneity Sphere.

About Complexity: The more information we are receiving for example of a billiard ball, the more complex it becomes. It is our consciousness that is arguing about information received, and our reality is becoming more and more complex each moment. Science is one of the reasons of consciouss complexity. The data received on our Subjective Simultaneity Spheres that were before not even perceived are becoming "recognisable".But the complexity always was there.

We have to try to find our consciouss way in this emerging complexity.

The origin of this complexity of our NOW lies in our consciousness. We are aware of a flow of time through our memory. The past is done and contains all the information , but it is just a MOMENT.

The reality is an emergent phenomenon that can change each Eternal NOW Moment. The closed system you mention is in my perception your consciousness.

The Darwinian approach is one of many and in my perception "truth" is only existing in each individual mind. The FINAL TRUTH we will maybe never be able to perceive but it is a goal, just like searching for the Reference of reference.

I liked very much your approach so I lifted you up a little in the list. I also hope that the above points will lead you to have a look, read and aso comment and rate my esay : The Purpose of Life" that gives another view on our emerging reality.

best regards and good luck

Wilhelmus de Wilde

view post as summary

show all replies (3 not shown)

hide replies

Dear Sirs!

Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use «spam».

New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which...

view entire post

Dear Sirs!

Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use «spam».

New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.

New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.

Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.

Sincerely,

Dizhechko Boris

view post as summary

show all replies (1 not shown)

hide replies

Dear Pavel and Marcelo

This video is a wonderful discovery. So impressed by Pavel Kroupa’s cosmological work, that every once and awhile I punch his name into the search engine to see if anything new is available. And so having found this video I’m introduced to Marcelo Gleiser, another wonderful thinker who’s work I must investigate. Nice to meet you Marcelo.

I have...

view entire post

Dear Pavel and Marcelo

This video is a wonderful discovery. So impressed by Pavel Kroupa’s cosmological work, that every once and awhile I punch his name into the search engine to see if anything new is available. And so having found this video I’m introduced to Marcelo Gleiser, another wonderful thinker who’s work I must investigate. Nice to meet you Marcelo.

I have something I would very much like to communicate to both of you, I hope you are paying attention to these video comments? I’ll post it below soon

There are many mysteries of the world still beyond explanation. Of those attempting to progress our awareness of the world, I think there are few doing it as effective as Pavel Kroupa. Why is he effective? I think he has done a better job than most in rationalizing conventional scientific understandings for himself, is better aware of the theoretical shortcomings, and is therefore more willing than most to second guess preconceived scientific ideas.

Pavel, please give the following more than just a passing glance. I know there is a lot of noise on the net, vying for our, your attention. Just how I might introduce you to an idea that you will recognise a value, I can only guess. But I’ve decided that the question of how fundamental forces exist and operate, while convention assigns no theoretical cause for them? This question becomes particularly interesting in respect of fundamental forces being considered energy conserved systems, when they are clearly imparting a work effort in the world. Molecular bonds are a good example of this work effort, because we can appreciate their properties at the human scale in terms of them binding objects together, which we can then wrap our own hands around and directly sense their ability to resist pressures we can place against them. Is it reasonable that a system can conserve its energy state while imparting force to the world, as a free or causeless by product? So I hope you will appreciate the value of that question, that you will take the time to hear what I have to say on the subject.

The concept of “fundamental forces” the strong nuclear force and or electromagnetic force for example, is flawed in terms of them being considered energy conserved systems which can miraculously undertake work effort, and while no cause being assigned. Moving along, the question of what the nature of the interaction is that exists between space and matter, that would marry quantum mechanics and general relativity, might have the same answer as the question "what is the prior cause for the fundamental forces that enables their work effort? Could it be that photon and gluon activity is the “product” of the interaction with space, and that the terms of Guv and Tuv sharing equality is evidence of this relationship? An energy transfer and conversion for which an element inhabiting space is paying the cost. So matter being in the business of consuming an Auv elemental field of space that enables Tuv photon activity, dictating the variable rate of causality which we interpret as times passage. This being how environments of space correspond to the theory of spacetime.

This raises the question, if space possesses a physical resource matter is dependent upon to maintain activity, then how can the resource remain persistent over time. Why is it not finite and subject to depletion? Auv cosmological emergence of space provides a possible solution. I cannot present the physics that would answer the how of Auv's continual emergence, but I can point to the observation and values attributed to its emergence, and the equality they share with universal values of Guv and Tuv. That their equality is highly suggestive they share a relationship that is causal, and the possibility outlined as above is not excluded from. That Auv is a renewable resource which enables gluon and photon activity, and that Auv and Tuv are both elements of a universal system that is continually regenerated, allowing for compounded changes and evolved purposeful structure and complexities to emerge. That all the activities and structures on both atomic and cosmological scales, are evolved and optimized for their reason for existence, which is for efficiency of interaction between the Auv elemental field of space, and Tuv matter. This will sound like a stretch on first appraisal, however I’ve had time to tease out possible interpretations that correspond to the real world, which are available for your assessment.

Give nature an energy potential and it will invent a Darwinian circumstance of emergence. Early oceanic life for example, algae invents a way to exploit the suns energy in a process of Photosynthesis, which then foundations the base of a food chain that blossoms through evolution of diversified range of organisms of increasing levels of character and complexity. Krill that eat the algae, in turn eaten by small fish, eaten by bigger fish and squid, eaten by tuna, sharks, birds, dolphins and whales. Natures organisational principle that builds articulated complexity.

Auv cosmological emergence is clearly associated with some kind of natural energy potential, which conceivably may be the bases for a circumstance of Darwinian emergence that leads to complex structure building. Like the algae, this Auv elemental field of space foundations the base of a system that compounds ever higher levels of universal order and complexity, in the form of atomic and cosmological structure. This is how elaborate Gluon and photon characteristics may have come to emerge in the universe, and the circumstance whereby their activity is enabled by a metabolism of an Auv elemental field of space.

The varied associations drawn above are reasonable. It enables us to make statements like, the property of gluonic mass is an evolved purposeful function of matter that builds cosmological structure, planets, stars, galaxies, with the theme of purposeful and efficient interaction with Auv. Its ability to undertake work functions accounted for in terms of cause and effect, by the Auv elemental field of space, rather than resorting to the causeless theory of fundamental forces. Similarly, we can point to molecular bonds and the functions of chemistry that build them, as evolved properties of matter with the purpose of cementing objects together. Creating optimised structures that persist in a highly kinetically energetic universe.

I could move in the direction of any number of tangents at this point, but I want to indicate something of possible value. So I give you a possable antidote for anomalous galaxy motions.

A key insight presented here within, is that gluon and photon activity are dependent on the variable energy density of their environment of space Auv. Gluons are generators of force that gives the property mass, so gluon variable activity theory, is a variable baryonic mass theory. What’s more, there is a function of proportionality evident between gluon variable activity and volume of space.

Based on luminosity profiles it is judged that an average galaxy possesses a star density profile that declines by square of the radius from galaxy centre. So we assume a galaxies baryonic mass distribution follows like kind. However the observed galaxy rotation curves operate in such a way as to indicate, the galaxy mass distribution is constant from centre to rim. To precisely remedy this situation, we invoke a function whereby variable gluon activity (mass) is coupled, proportionate to volume of Space. The magic becomes apparent when you conceptually add additional masses within a given volume of space, and you hypothesis that gluon activity (mass) declines proportionately. In the case of a galaxy whereby star density declines by square of the radius from galaxy centre, it prescribes an increasing gluon activity (mass) by square of the radius from galaxy centre, redistributing galaxy mass in such a way that predicts galaxy rotation curves.

This theory honours the measured values of Auv = Guv = Tuv, provides a contextual explanation that relates them to one another in terms of cause and effect, that portrays meaning and purpose, as well as moving beyond the idea that fundamental forces can act without cause. Explains how purposeful structures and complexities can arise within a system that regenerates and compounds change, evolves. And it provides a prospective simple formula relating variable mass and volume of space, that might be easily tested against observed anomalous galaxy motions. A variable baryonic mass theory.

I hope I will be offered the opportunity by you, to add further justifications. I have many. And perhaps have your assistance in testing the idea.

Thank you for your consideration

Steve

view post as summary

Halton Arp's observations that demonstrate an association between quasars and a galaxy of their apparent origin. They are visually evident. At face value, its reminiscent of life's process of cellular division. Quark separation which spontaneously generates new quarks is also reminiscent of life's process of cellular division. Highly suggestive observations that imply matters ability to replicate...

view entire post

Halton Arp's observations that demonstrate an association between quasars and a galaxy of their apparent origin. They are visually evident. At face value, its reminiscent of life's process of cellular division. Quark separation which spontaneously generates new quarks is also reminiscent of life's process of cellular division. Highly suggestive observations that imply matters ability to replicate itself.

When cells divide in the process of replicating themselves, it allows for genetic drift, which compounds changes over many generations and allows for the process of natural selection and evolution. This is how highly complex systems emerge within biology. The question of complexity in physics is a huge problem to answer, and for which SMoC doesnt have the slightest grapple on. Thats why there is speculation about multiverses, to attempt explain complexity of the world. Could this be the mechanism that explains our fine tuned universe, and the emergence of articulated structure on atomic and cosmological scales? Let us dare to speculate.

Life on earth builds complex ecosystems, but all these ecosystems have one thing in common. It is the simplest life forms which tap into and exploit a "natural energy potential" which then becomes a food chain for organisms of increasing complexity. Such as oceanic Algae which exploits the suns energy potential, Algae eaten by krill, krill eaten by small fish, eaten by bigger fish and squid, and in tern eaten by highly complex organisms like tuna, sharks, dolphins, whales, birds etc etc. Give nature a natural energy potential and it will invent a circumstance of Darwinian emergence.

Now I jump to a concept that on first appraisal seams bonkers. But given a chance it achieves things you wouldnt expect.

I reiterate. Give nature a natural energy potential and it will invent a circumstance of Darwinian emergence. With this in mind, space is thought to contain an emergent energy, which takes its measure from cosmological redshift and referred to as Auv within theory of general relativity. Pop media refer to as mysterious Dark Energy. Presumably whatever Dark Energy is, it is exploiting a natural energy potential to preliterate itself. So let us speculate that DE might serve as the foundation of a system from which complexity has arisen, complexity in the form of the material baryonic universe that we are made of. If this were to be the case, then what clue can we assume from it that we might be able to conceptually test?

The link that stands unbroken between Algae and organisms of higher complexity within Earth ecosystems, is the passing of the suns energy from one organism to the next. One organism eats another, and I emphasize the term "metabolism" as the process that enables the energy transfer. So if we're looking at this circumstance with a view to obtaining insight that we might test, then let us test the idea that atomic forces are enabled by a process akin to "metabolism". A metabolism which converts Dark Energy into atomic activity. Could this be the nature of the interaction between space and matter that would marry quantum mechanics with general relativity? The conventional approach to atomic force is "fundamental force". The term "Fundamental" can be interpreted as "first cause" or "original cause" but of course there is no prior cause attributed to the work effort that fundamental forces are capable of. This amounts to it being a "causeless work effort". So by ascribing the ability for atomic forces to undertake work actions, to a process of interaction that is a metabolism between Dark Energy and Baryon matter, it gives us a concept to test further.

For this hypothesis to yield anything further of interest, it would have to be demonstrated that there was a prospective link between Auv and Tuv. That is to say, the value assigned to the emergence of space Auv, and the value assigned to universal Baryons Tuv. And whats amazing, is that this connection is clearly identifiable and has been known about for decades. But the conventional cosmological model couldn't make sense of these connections between the equality of Auv and Tuv, and so has been put aside as a mere curiosity. Rather than listen to me going on about them, here is a short 9 minute video of Paul Dirac making a muddle of these associations by trying to interpret them within the conventional model. But pay attention to where he derives the parameters of his hypothesis from and you will see they are indeed an indication of the associations needed if atomic forces originate from an interaction with space, that in term originates as Dark Energies emergence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-o8mUyq_Wwg

Give nature an energy potential and it will invent a circumstance of Darwinian emergence. Dark Energy might be the result of just such an energy potential, and which serves as the basis of an integrated system able to compound changes, leading to ever higher levels of order and complexity of the world. Atomic and cosmological structure provided an explanation.

view post as summary