Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American


How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

Sharon: on 10/21/09 at 2:31am UTC, wrote Dr. Benzahra is full of crap. This man should not be allowed to teach in...

Cristi Stoica: on 12/26/08 at 10:55am UTC, wrote Dear Dr. Benzahra, Beautiful and very equidistant meditation about time in...

Eckard Blumschein: on 12/11/08 at 15:01pm UTC, wrote I read your essay late because I am someone who asks for serious...

F. Le Rouge: on 11/25/08 at 9:46am UTC, wrote In my French opinion, US Citizens do believe in Time as a Goddess. This is...

Sidi Cherkawi Benzahra: on 11/3/08 at 10:38am UTC, wrote Essay Abstract Here, I investigate if time has a physical property...


Robert McEachern: "Consciousness forges our perception of the universe, not the universe..." in Could Consciousness Forge...

Robert McEachern: "On the issues: (1) The nature of the quantum to classical transition: It..." in YouTube Video Lectures:...

Wahed BANNOURI: "Good afternoon, After all someone understand !!!! ..." in YouTube Video Lectures:...

Georgina Woodward: "I think that pluripotent quality of independent (of the mind) existing..." in Could Consciousness Forge...

Eckard Blumschein: "Georgina, Meanwhile, you and all others careful and honest readers of the..." in Dissolving Quantum...

rosie mary: "I enjoyed the lessons from FQXi Farzad Nekoogar. thank you for sharing! ..." in Multiversal Journeys: The...

tovar linda: "I have ordered your book, it's great! angry birds" in Quickfire Cosmo Qs

rosie mary: "To prove this, this is definitely a difficult job! wuxiaworld" in Is the Past Infinite?

click titles to read articles

Could Consciousness Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

Dissolving Quantum Paradoxes
The impossibility of building a perfect clock could help explain away microscale weirdness.

Constructing a Theory of Life
An all-encompassing framework of physics could help to explain the evolution of consciousness, intelligence, and free will.

Usurping Quantum Theory
The search is on for a fundamental framework that allows for even stranger links between particles than quantum theory—which could lead us to a theory of everything.

Fuzzballs v Black Holes
A radical theory replaces the cosmic crunchers with fuzzy quantum spheres, potentially solving the black-hole information paradox and explaining away the Big Bang and the origin of time.

January 22, 2019

CATEGORY: The Nature of Time Essay Contest (2008) [back]
TOPIC: Philosophical Quest for the Reality of Time by Sidi Cherkawi Benzahra [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Sidi Cherkawi Benzahra wrote on Nov. 3, 2008 @ 10:38 GMT
Essay Abstract

Here, I investigate if time has a physical property like matter.

Author Bio

Sidi Cherkawi Benzahra is a professor of physics at the Joint Science Department of the Claremont Colleges. He obtained his PhD in high energy physics from the University of Minnesota in 2001 and taught physics at Wittenberg University, North Dakota State University, California polytechnic State University, and at the Claremont Colleges.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share

F. Le Rouge wrote on Nov. 25, 2008 @ 09:46 GMT
In my French opinion, US Citizens do believe in Time as a Goddess. This is why I was wondering if I would find here somebody at last recalling that 'Time algebraic standardization' made of a dot on a line or a circle is just an 'approximation', a tool, and has no physical basis. And you are not far away. The more obvious 'Time ideology' is in 'Probability Theory' on which Quanta Physics is grounded.

In my own essay ('Square Wheels or Real Dynamics') I am logically concluding that the today gigantic Large Hadron Collider experience has more to do with this Religion of Time than with Science, that the mystic 'Wave' (Here Algebra is coming back to Poetry from where it comes) of the particle has nothing to do with material things.

What is rather funny to me is what you say about R. Descartes. His statement about Infinity is only a memory of what he learned at School of La Flèche in his young years because all his 'algebraic Geometry' (as he says) is based on the Infinity idea.

And therefore you are criticizing Descartes exactly on the key point where you both are wrong! Because your 'pizza example' proves that 'Infinity' and 'very big number' is the same for you as it was for Descartes. For example Descartes does not make the difference between 'absolute' (infinite) speed of Moonlight and very very high speed of Moonlight.

And here we are! Because here is the 'tangent' between Matter and Idea and the reason why nearly four centuries after the paralogism of a particle made of both wave and material is 'logic'. Everything was in Descartes books already: 'Quantas physics', that is to say a new attempt to square the circle, paradox of a light that has a speed but has not, and even 'string theory'.

Bookmark and Share

Eckard Blumschein wrote on Dec. 11, 2008 @ 15:01 GMT
I read your essay late because I am someone who asks for serious consequences rather than philosophical eels.

I will read it very carefully again because it complements my suspicions. If something is definitely wrong, then it must not be justified by seemingly compelling but wrongly founded interpretations of experimental "evidence".

If my essay cannot persuade you, I offer providing more unpublished details on a private basis.

Eckard Blumschein

Bookmark and Share

Cristi Stoica wrote on Dec. 26, 2008 @ 10:55 GMT
Dear Dr. Benzahra,

Beautiful and very equidistant meditation about time in Physics.

Best wishes,

Cristi Stoica

Bookmark and Share

Sharon wrote on Oct. 21, 2009 @ 02:31 GMT
Dr. Benzahra is full of crap. This man should not be allowed to teach in any situation. Egotism is ugly and serves no purpose to the open mind.

Bookmark and Share

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.