Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest

Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

Previous Contests

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American


How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help


John Merryman: "The problem is that we do experience reality as those discrete flashes of..." in The Quantum...

Thomas Ray: "(reposted in correct thread) Lorraine, Nah. That's nothing like my view...." in 2015 in Review: New...

Lorraine Ford: "Clearly “law-of-nature” relationships and associated numbers represent..." in Physics of the Observer -...

Lee Bloomquist: "Information Channel. An example from Jon Barwise. At the workshop..." in Physics of the Observer -...

Lee Bloomquist: "Please clarify. I just tried to put a simple model of an observer in the..." in Alternative Models of...

Lee Bloomquist: "Footnote...for the above post, the one with the equation existence =..." in Alternative Models of...

Thomas Ray: "In fact, symmetry is the most pervasive physical principle that exists. ..." in “Spookiness”...

Thomas Ray: "It's easy to get wound around the axle with black hole thermodynamics,..." in “Spookiness”...

click titles to read articles

Why Time Might Not Be an Illusion
Einstein’s relativity pushes physicists towards a picture of the universe as a block, in which the past, present, and future all exist on the same footing; but maybe that shift in thinking has gone too far.

The Complexity Conundrum
Resolving the black hole firewall paradox—by calculating what a real astronaut would compute at the black hole's edge.

Quantum Dream Time
Defining a ‘quantum clock’ and a 'quantum ruler' could help those attempting to unify physics—and solve the mystery of vanishing time.

Our Place in the Multiverse
Calculating the odds that intelligent observers arise in parallel universes—and working out what they might see.

Sounding the Drums to Listen for Gravity’s Effect on Quantum Phenomena
A bench-top experiment could test the notion that gravity breaks delicate quantum superpositions.

March 17, 2018

CATEGORY: Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017) [back]
TOPIC: There can be only One! Wandering Toward a Goal by James Edward Beichler [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author James Edward Beichler wrote on Mar. 3, 2017 @ 17:29 GMT
Essay Abstract

Science does not “wander”, it is not like the proverbial drunken sailor who let go of the light pole that is holding him up and tries to walk away, and it certainly does not wander toward any ‘specific’ goal. Science does not ‘specifically’ know what hand nature will deal it in the future explorations. The general goal, if it can be called that, is to describe nature as truthfully as possible. Science goes where nature and the universe lead and explains what nature and the universe present to science. Science is a straightforward logical process by which human thought evolves and sometimes revolutionizes how we view our world, while mathematics is a product of the aims and intention of science. In general, the only thing that could be construed as a goal in science is a complete understanding of how nature works and presents itself to us. In other words, science answers to nature, nature does not answer to science and especially not to any specific goal in the minds of scientists or others. Given this, once the obtuse nature of the given question is determined and the given question is translated into common English, the answer is just as easy as the question is ridiculous. The answer is simply that mathematical laws cannot give rise to aims and intentions which are normally considered aspects of consciousness. However, this raises the new question of why the given question is so obtuse in nature and needs to be translated to an answerable question, while answering this new question is significantly telling.

Author Bio

Professor Beichler taught Physics, Consciousness Studies, Mathematics, the History and Philosophy of Science and European History as well as other related subjects at the university and college levels for more than three decades before recently retiring. He has traveled around the world and taught in several different countries, but mostly within the United States. He earned his PhD in 1999 from the Union Institute and University in Paraphysics, a new and highly controversial branch of theoretical physics. His is the only such degree from an accredited university in the world.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share

Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 9, 2017 @ 10:24 GMT
Nice essay Prof Beichler,

Your ideas and thinking are excellent for example your starting sentences…. “

1. There are no such things as natural mathematical laws; mathematics is based on logical mental systems which were originally abstracted from nature and our experiences of the external world. Mathematicians have purified and distanced their subject from nature, physics and...

view entire post

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Joe Fisher wrote on Mar. 9, 2017 @ 16:45 GMT
Dear Professor James Edward Beichler,

Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

I merely wish to point out that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Héctor Daniel Gianni wrote on Mar. 11, 2017 @ 23:25 GMT
Dear James Edward Beichler

I invite you and every physicist to read my work “TIME ORIGIN,DEFINITION AND EMPIRICAL MEANING FOR PHYSICISTS, Héctor Daniel Gianni ,I’m not a physicist.

How people interested in “Time” could feel about related things to the subject.

1) Intellectuals interested in Time issues usually have a nice and creative wander for the unknown.

2) They usually enjoy this wander of their searches around it.

3) For millenniums this wander has been shared by a lot of creative people around the world.

4) What if suddenly, something considered quasi impossible to be found or discovered such as “Time” definition and experimental meaning confronts them?

5) Their reaction would be like, something unbelievable,… a kind of disappointment, probably interpreted as a loss of wander…..

6) ….worst than that, if we say that what was found or discovered wasn’t a viable theory, but a proved fact.

7) Then it would become offensive to be part of the millenary problem solution, instead of being a reason for happiness and satisfaction.

8) The reader approach to the news would be paradoxically adverse.

9) Instead, I think it should be a nice welcome to discovery, to be received with opened arms and considered to be read with full attention.

11)Time “existence” is exclusive as a “measuring system”, its physical existence can’t be proved by science, as the “time system” is. Experimentally “time” is “movement”, we can prove that, showing that with clocks we measure “constant and uniform” movement and not “the so called Time”.

12)The original “time manuscript” has 23 pages, my manuscript in this contest has only 9 pages.

I share this brief with people interested in “time” and with physicists who have been in sore need of this issue for the last 50 or 60 years.


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Peter Jackson wrote on Mar. 13, 2017 @ 19:04 GMT

Brilliant essay. Well arranged and written, interesting, important and a pleasure to read. I have no idea why it's at the bottom, well I probably do! and we claim we're an intelligent species!

Of course it does help that it's consistent;: with evidence, logic and my own work, though consistency mostly seems to count too little.

I've pulled out a few lines I applauded;

" mathematics is based on logical mental systems which were originally abstracted from nature and our experiences

mathematics could not possibly provide the final answers to the scientific quest to understand and explain nature let alone “give rise to aims and intention”.

Science is instead based on explanatory hypotheses and theories that are also internally consistent, but can never be ‘proven’, only verified

although there are flaws in relativity theory, under these condition quantum theory has been the real ‘fly in the ointment’ as far as unification is concerned

all that is necessary to unify all of physics is merely noting that discrete points in the quantum absolute space are equivalent to 0-D point/twist Voids in the Riemannian relative space-time continuum.

mathematics cannot be used as the basis for a model of consciousness (aims and intentions) although a physical model of consciousness can be developed and stated mathematically

relativity and the quantum theory can be shown to be completely compatible and thus unifiable."

Very well done and best of luck.


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Member Rick Searle wrote on Mar. 20, 2017 @ 01:01 GMT
Hello James,

Nice essay, and I largely agree with what I take to be your main point- that speculative mathematics has become disconnected from physics in such a way that it keeps Unification hidden while it’s right under our nose.

Please check out my more literary essay if you get the chance.

Best of luck,

Rick Searle

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Member Rick Searle replied on Mar. 20, 2017 @ 01:03 GMT
Oh, and I especially liked The Highlander reference in the title. :>)

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author James Edward Beichler replied on Apr. 7, 2017 @ 21:37 GMT
I thought the Higlander referene was better than a Lord of the Rings reference - One ring to find them, one ring to bind them - since the one ring was evil.

Bookmark and Share

Al Schneider wrote on Mar. 21, 2017 @ 22:35 GMT
Thanks for this essay. The phrase "...their mentally derived ‘mathematical laws’ rule the universe rather than simply observing the universe..." jumped out to me.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Don Limuti wrote on Mar. 30, 2017 @ 19:36 GMT
Hi James,

I appreciate you dose of sanity concerning this essay.

Please let me quote you: "The question “how can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention” appears to turn nature on its head in its inference that consciousness (in the form of aims and intents) must either be a product of, if not emerge from, natural mathematical laws and that is just Bad Science (BS)." And if I may add with a bold and capital BS.

The BS went right by me and I answered what I thought was the question: "How can we have free will while surrounded by a deterministic physics (described by mathematics)."

James, do yourself a favor and:

1. Visit my essay and comment.

2. Visit my webpage The section on HUP will interest you.

3. Then look at:

I should not have been able to make this calculation of Mercury's precession....and I think a physicist can make more sense of it than I can.

My hope is that it may help with your concepts. I think your work here is underappreciated!


Don Limuti

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich wrote on Apr. 7, 2017 @ 08:41 GMT
Dear Sirs!

Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use «spam».

New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.

New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.

Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.


Dizhechko Boris

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.