Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Dizhechko Semyonovich: on 4/7/17 at 9:19am UTC, wrote Dear Sirs! Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of...

Graham Cookson: on 4/3/17 at 11:28am UTC, wrote John O. Campbell, Your essay was very interesting. However, I think you...

James Hoover: on 3/16/17 at 20:19pm UTC, wrote John, An interesting and well-thought-out read. You say that existence is...

Conrad Johnson: on 3/16/17 at 16:07pm UTC, wrote John – I was initially put off by your title, since “intending to...

Satyavarapu Gupta: on 3/8/17 at 7:24am UTC, wrote Nice essay Campbell, Your ideas and thinking are very nice….. 1. In...

Joe Fisher: on 3/7/17 at 17:13pm UTC, wrote Dear Researcher John O. Campbell, Please excuse me for I have no...

Attay Kremer: on 3/5/17 at 10:20am UTC, wrote Dear John Campbell, I enjoyed reading your essay, and found your ideas to...

George Ellis: on 3/3/17 at 15:01pm UTC, wrote Dear John Campbell you were doing great until you brought in Dawkin's...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Edwin Pole II: "Sorry for elementary question. Trying to understand quantum theory. Basic..." in Ed Witten on the Nature...

John Taylor: "Tell me what you think of this thought experiment: How significant are..." in Physics of the Observer...

Steve Dufourny: "Hello all, Congratulations to winners and thanks to FQXi for this..." in What Is Fundamental? –...

Hector Zenil: "Thanks. Yes, that link shows the prerequisites. I can add that at times..." in New Online Course:...

Laverne Klein: "Nice one" in FQXi's New Large Grant...

Yahoo support: "I actually did not understand the blog what the author wants to convey, so..." in Co-Travelers

reseller propolis: "Khasiat Propolis Brazil Khasiat Propolis Brazil Khasiat Propolis Brazil ..." in DNA Dust

reseller propolis: "Khasiat Propolis Brazil Khasiat Propolis Brazil Khasiat Propolis Brazil ..." in Is the world made of...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Fuzzballs v Black Holes
A radical theory replaces the cosmic crunchers with fuzzy quantum spheres, potentially solving the black-hole information paradox and explaining away the Big Bang and the origin of time.

Whose Physics Is It Anyway? Q&A with Chanda Prescod-Weinstein
Why physics and astronomy communities must take diversity issues seriously in order to do good science.

Why Time Might Not Be an Illusion
Einstein’s relativity pushes physicists towards a picture of the universe as a block, in which the past, present, and future all exist on the same footing; but maybe that shift in thinking has gone too far.

The Complexity Conundrum
Resolving the black hole firewall paradox—by calculating what a real astronaut would compute at the black hole's edge.

Quantum Dream Time
Defining a ‘quantum clock’ and a 'quantum ruler' could help those attempting to unify physics—and solve the mystery of vanishing time.


FQXi FORUM
May 26, 2018

CATEGORY: Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017) [back]
TOPIC: The Intention to Exist by John O. Campbell [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author John O. Campbell wrote on Mar. 2, 2017 @ 20:20 GMT
Essay Abstract

Abstract This essay argues that existence is a rare and fragile state; existence requires both design and intention. Concepts drawn from Darwinian theory, Information theory, Bayesian inference, the free energy principle and gauge theory are used to develop a paradigm of 'inferential systems' which evolve to occupy new states of existence. This widespread process clearly involves intention and may be described by well developed mathematics.

Author Bio

John O. Campbell is an independent researcher who has written about universal Darwinism and Bayesian inference for many years.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Member George F. R. Ellis wrote on Mar. 3, 2017 @ 15:01 GMT
Dear John Campbell

you were doing great until you brought in Dawkin's gene-based view of biology. The business of personifying genes as if they are autonomous agents is kinda weird, it simply ignores the multilevel nature of selection in real biological systems, and it is based on ignoring the understanding of evo-devo and epigenetics that has been garnered in the last 20 years, as set out for example in the books by Denis Noble, Andreas Wagner, and the book by Oyama, Griffiths, and Gray on developmental systems theory site.

Your paper does not need this gene centric view, and would be stronger without it. The rest of the argument is spot on.

Regards

George Ellis

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Attay Kremer wrote on Mar. 5, 2017 @ 10:20 GMT
Dear John Campbell,

I enjoyed reading your essay, and found your ideas to be very interesting and thought provoking.

I - perhaps only through misunderstanding - believe that you do not define existence explicitly. This - to me - seems quite problematic, it is then the claim that biological life requires purpose - that is to say, that purpose is inherent to life - or that existence in a metaphysical sense relies on purpose.

This second claim is quite similar to one of the possibilities I present in my essay -http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2828. I hope that you find the time to read it, and discuss these ideas.

Regards,

Attay.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe Fisher wrote on Mar. 7, 2017 @ 17:13 GMT
Dear Researcher John O. Campbell,



Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

I merely wish to point out that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 8, 2017 @ 07:24 GMT
Nice essay Campbell,

Your ideas and thinking are very nice…..

1. In this essay I suggest that intentionality is a prerequisite for existence This intention to exist is not an abstract or metaphysical intentionality, it comes complete with the physical machinery necessary to make intentions manifest.

2. Only recently has natural selection been given a rigorous mathematical...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Conrad Dale Johnson wrote on Mar. 16, 2017 @ 16:07 GMT
John –

I was initially put off by your title, since “intending to exist” struck me as a meaningless phrase. But I find your essay gives a remarkably coherent account of what you mean by it, and you show convincingly how it may apply over the whole range of natural science. And like you, I have a sense that the word “existence” points to something very “rare and fragile”...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


James Lee Hoover wrote on Mar. 16, 2017 @ 20:19 GMT
John,

An interesting and well-thought-out read. You say that existence is a rare and fragile state requiring both design and intention. You don't mention Dawkins in your abstract so I'm assuming his reference was describing a passing phase that you probably should have described as such. You seem to be saying that the design came before intention could begin: "near the beginnings of life, genetic machinery began operating ... each variant expressing an intention to exist."

I'm not sure where mindless math laws enter in the picture. Like you, I feel the design comes first enabling the intention of agents. I see the role of entropy in all things and specifically wonder if it is a goal for the animate and the inanimate like Jeremy England's theory based of the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

I would be interested in your thoughts on my essay.

Jim Hoover

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Graham Walker Cookson wrote on Apr. 3, 2017 @ 11:28 GMT
John O. Campbell,

Your essay was very interesting. However, I think you should have qualified your use of the term ‘existence’. Mathematics also exists. You might find my model of a Binary Reflective Field as an ‘inferential system’ interesting. If interested, see my essay Our Emergent Universe. I would be interested in your reaction. I gave your essay a 10. Thank you and good luck with your essay, Graham W. Cookson

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich wrote on Apr. 7, 2017 @ 09:19 GMT
Dear Sirs!

Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use «spam».

New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.

New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.

Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.

Sincerely,

Dizhechko Boris

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.