Hi Shahdaei,

Nice suggestion on a new method of measurement of light.

Your proposed experiment is good. You said… ” An emitting source of light (emitting frame) which is the moving frame has a relative uniform velocity v with respect to the stationary frame. The measuring frame which comprising of measuring devices, is stationary relative to the emitting frame. Furthermore the...

view entire post

Hi Shahdaei,

Nice suggestion on a new method of measurement of light.

Your proposed experiment is good. You said… ” An emitting source of light (emitting frame) which is the moving frame has a relative uniform velocity v with respect to the stationary frame. The measuring frame which comprising of measuring devices, is stationary relative to the emitting frame. Furthermore the light is assumed to propagate in vacuum.”

Slight doubts are there… According to your experiment, Earth is stationary and rocket is moving with uniform velocity. But in our Dynamic Universe, both are moving on curves. Relative motion will never be linear. Probably you will have to make slight correction for that effect…. Hope you will discuss…

I request you to please have a look on my essay also….For your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other.

Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example ‘Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary’ (1994) , ‘Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe’, About “SITA” simulations, ‘Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required’, “New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations”, “Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background”, “Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.”, in 2015 ‘Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, ‘Explaining Pioneer anomaly’, ‘Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets’, ‘Observation of super luminal neutrinos’, ‘Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up’, “Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto” etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.

With axioms like… No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.

Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain

Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and its blog also where all my books and papers are available for free downloading…

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/

Be
st wishes to your essay.

For your blessings please…………….

=snp. gupta

view post as summary

Dear Koorosh,

Your work to develop a compact meter of variations in the speed of light is an interesting and important work.

I did not accidentally write about variations in the speed of light, because for the time being almost no one understands that during the measurement of the speed of light, the luminiferous medium moves with a very large variance of the speed of motion, due...

view entire post

Dear Koorosh,

Your work to develop a compact meter of variations in the speed of light is an interesting and important work.

I did not accidentally write about variations in the speed of light, because for the time being almost no one understands that during the measurement of the speed of light, the luminiferous medium moves with a very large variance of the speed of motion, due to the action of a set of gravitational waves in form of streams of gravitins. Some gravitational waves finish the action on the device, others start, and can act from different sides. Therefore strangely enough, but your device belongs to the class of an optical gravitational wave recorder, like LIGO and LISA projects, but it is much more compact and simpler.

An important advantage of your device is its lack of inertia, it does not have inert mass, but registers both low frequency and high-frequency variations of the action of gravitational waves by measuring of the speed of movement of the luminiferous medium. I hope that the sensitivity of the device will be much higher than the inertial devices.

Therefore, your work will allow to rethinking the mechanism of gravity, which determines the self-organization of matter and, thus, to get more accurate answers to the questions posed in the competition.

Everyone expected the Earth to move in the laminar flow of the luminiferous medium, but in fact, on its act turbulent streams of gravitons in the gravitational waves. The light-bearing medium is a superfluid medium in which there are practically no laminar streams.

Many tried to repeat the experiment of Michelson and Morley, somebody received a low speed of luminiferous medium, and someone did not get no speed , because the gravitational waves on the surface of the Earth operate mainly from 12 to 24 hours of solar time. Who and when measured speed - history is silent.

My essay states that Michelson and Morley were to get the averaged velocity of the Earth in a light-bearing medium of 8 km/s and they received it . The speed of motion of the light-bearing medium relative to the Earth is transformed in the first cosmic velocity of the Earth, the square of which determines the gravitational potential of the Earth's surface.

I.e., gravity has the dynamic cause; its mechanism is considered in my essay. By the simple detector of gravitational waves, I was able to also register the turbulence light medium register the turbulence light medium .

I wish you creative success.

Kind regards,

Vladimir Fedorov

view post as summary

Dear Koorosh,

Sorry, the previous message does not work links. I expose the message a second time.

Your work to develop a compact meter of variations in the speed of light is an interesting and important work.

I did not accidentally write about variations in the speed of light, because for the time being almost no one understands that during the measurement of the speed of...

view entire post

Dear Koorosh,

Sorry, the previous message does not work links. I expose the message a second time.

Your work to develop a compact meter of variations in the speed of light is an interesting and important work.

I did not accidentally write about variations in the speed of light, because for the time being almost no one understands that during the measurement of the speed of light, the luminiferous medium moves with a very large variance of the speed of motion, due to the action of a set of gravitational waves in form of streams of gravitins. Some gravitational waves finish the action on the device, others start, and can act from different sides. Therefore strangely enough, but your device belongs to the class of an optical gravitational wave recorder, like LIGO and LISA projects, but it is much more compact and simpler.

An important advantage of your device is its lack of inertia, it does not have inert mass, but registers both low frequency and high-frequency variations of the action of gravitational waves by measuring of the speed of movement of the luminiferous medium. I hope that the sensitivity of the device will be much higher than the inertial devices.

Therefore, your work will allow to rethinking the mechanism of gravity, which determines the self-organization of matter and, thus, to get more accurate answers to the questions posed in the competition.

Everyone expected the Earth to move in the laminar flow of the luminiferous medium, but in fact, on its act turbulent streams of gravitons in the gravitational waves. The light-bearing medium is a superfluid medium in which there are practically no laminar streams.

Many tried to repeat the experiment of Michelson and Morley, somebody received a low speed of luminiferous medium, and someone did not get no speed , because the gravitational waves on the surface of the Earth operate mainly from 12 to 24 hours of solar time. Who and when measured speed - history is silent.

My essay states that Michelson and Morley were to get the averaged velocity of the Earth in a light-bearing medium of 8 km/s and they received it . The speed of motion of the light-bearing medium relative to the Earth is transformed in the first cosmic velocity of the Earth, the square of which determines the gravitational potential of the Earth's surface.

I.e., gravity has the dynamic cause; its mechanism is considered in my essay. By the simple detector of gravitational waves, I was able to also register the turbulence light medium register the turbulence light medium .

I wish you creative success.

Kind regards,

Vladimir Fedorov

view post as summary

Kooroosh.

Off topic but worthy of comment. I've studied this issue for some time and agree that better experiments are required as theory and analysis are incorrect, that yours is reasonable set-up, but also that the findings will be analysed as finding precisely 'c'. Are you familiar for instance with Lodges 'spinning glass disc' experiments? and Ruyon Wang's recent advanced 'Sagnac'...

view entire post

Kooroosh.

Off topic but worthy of comment. I've studied this issue for some time and agree that better experiments are required as theory and analysis are incorrect, that yours is reasonable set-up, but also that the findings will be analysed as finding precisely 'c'. Are you familiar for instance with Lodges 'spinning glass disc' experiments? and Ruyon Wang's recent advanced 'Sagnac' experiments? i.e.Modified Sagnac experiment etc.

Lodge and other key experimental analysis to inform new experimental set ups are in my own joint papers here; Stellar Aberration & paradox free SR, and with full interferometer analysis here Resolving emission theory anomalies; http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.7163

Lastly my 2010 finalist essay here fully addressed the topic and describing the only coherent and consistent solution matching ALL the evidence; 2020 Vision.

We also need to refine your specification. When you write; "The measuring frame which comprising of measuring devices, is stationary relative to the emitting frame" that by convention means it is NOT IN RELATIVE MOTION with respect to (wrt) the emitter rest frame. But I see that is not what you meant, so it should strictly read; 'at rest in the stationary frame.' However it'd be better to define the frames as K1 and K2 because EITHER could be arbitrarily considered 'stationary', unless you assign some frame K to the vacuum (which is reasonable, but you don't).

Now a question. If your 'light detectors' have a glass lens with a free electron surface structure and dense medium with refractive index 'n' at what speed wrt the lens rest frame would you expect light to pass through? Now lets take TWO lenses with one in motion at 0.1c towards the emitter and one at 0.1c away from it. Would you expect light to pass through the glass lenses at different speeds? of course not, and in experiments we always find c/n, but with Doppler shifts. So what may that be telling us?

I hope you understand all that. Do challenge or ask if you don't.

Very best,

Peter

view post as summary