CATEGORY:
Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017)
[back]
TOPIC:
The reason of self-organization systems of matter is quantum parametric resonance and the formation of solitons by Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov
[refresh]
Login or
create account to post reply or comment.
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Feb. 28, 2017 @ 20:29 GMT
Essay AbstractHow the ideal properties of matter and fields give rise to unfounded generalizations, to meaningless mathematical laws, to goals and to intentions. How are created self-organizing systems? Structure of electron and of de Broglie waves. How it works. Where are can observe real gravitational waves, strings and quantum loop. What do opened in projects LIGO and LISA.
Author BioVladimir Fedorov graduated from the Krasnoyarsk Polytechnic Institute in Russia, the mechanical engineer, the radio engineer, Graduate School Research Institute of Intrascopy in Moscow, devices of non-destructive testing and structural analysis. Vladimir worked in the Siberian Federal University. He has developed the simple and effective device for the detection of gravitational waves and got very interesting results. His current research interests include the foundations of physics, cosmology and the theory of everything. Vladimir lives in Bulgaria and glad to meet with like-minded people for applications.
Download Essay PDF File
Joe Fisher wrote on Mar. 4, 2017 @ 15:50 GMT
Dear Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov,
Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.
I merely wish to point out that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.
Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.
The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.
A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.
Joe Fisher, Realist
report post as inappropriate
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 2, 2017 @ 12:21 GMT
Ladies and gentlemen,
In the course of the discussion it became clear that the addresses mentioned in the reference [20], in the text of my essay, do not always adequately reflect the entire text of my article
"The deterministic gravitational waves". Therefore, I give two direct links to download the file in pdf format.
Gravitational waves v01.pdf Gravitational waves v01.pdf I apologize for the inconvenience, and hope for understanding.
Vladimir Fedorov
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 4, 2017 @ 04:39 GMT
Ladies and gentlemen,
In the course of the discussion it became clear that the addresses mentioned in the reference [20], in the text of my essay, do not always adequately reflect the entire text of my article "The deterministic gravitational waves". Therefore, I give two direct links to download the file in pdf format.
Hyperlinks are distorted by the system, so I give symbolic link addresses
https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&confirm=no_antiv
irus&id=0B1MvF-AefpMmU3hTSWtQTWUtRTg
https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B1MvF-AefpMm
U3hTSWtQTWUtRTg
I apologize for the inconvenience, and hope for understanding.
Vladimir Fedorov
Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 5, 2017 @ 11:10 GMT
Nice essay Fedorov,
Your ideas and thinking are excellent , “1. If to use the analogies instead of abstractions and do not use ideal properties of matter and fields, we will have not abstract vacuum, but viscous medium of the physical vacuum with turbulence.
………………….. You are correct, Aether was not found.
2. The vortices of turbulence there are the toroidal...
view entire post
Nice essay Fedorov,
Your ideas and thinking are excellent , “1. If to use the analogies instead of abstractions and do not use ideal properties of matter and fields, we will have not abstract vacuum, but viscous medium of the physical vacuum with turbulence.
………………….. You are correct, Aether was not found.
2. The vortices of turbulence there are the toroidal quantum vortexes formed from vortices of deeper level of matter. Vortices are material toroidal gravitational waves de Broglie and Compton and are the deterministic elements of multi level and fractal of the physical vacuum medium.
………………….. Do you mean these ‘vortices of deeper level of matter’ have no relation with Gravitational waves….?
3. Toroidal vortices this are natural particle accelerators, the source of motion in the universe, and they only one essence from which the universe is forming
…………… I think these pairs of vortices are rotating in opposite directions. What do you say….?
4. You have developed the simple and effective device for the detection of gravitational waves and got very interesting results.
………… What are your results….? "
For your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other.
Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example ‘Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary’ (1994) , ‘Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe’, About “SITA” simulations, ‘Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required’, “New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations”, “Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background”, “Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.”, in 2015 ‘Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, ‘Explaining Pioneer anomaly’, ‘Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets’, ‘Observation of super luminal neutrinos’, ‘Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up’, “Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto” etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.
With axioms like… No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.
Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain
Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and its blog also where all my books and papers are available for free downloading…
http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/
Be
st wishes to your essay.
For your blessings please…………….
Spacibo….
=snp. gupta
view post as summary
report post as inappropriate
John-Erik Persson wrote on Mar. 5, 2017 @ 12:32 GMT
Vladimir
Your essay seems very interesting. However, as an amateur, I only can understand a small part of it, but I like that part.
Regards _______________ John-Erik
report post as inappropriate
Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich wrote on Mar. 5, 2017 @ 18:53 GMT
Dear Vladimir, great! Vortices and more time Vortices!
This essentially Photons are solitons which forcibly moving in its own wave of elasticity like a warp-engine.
It means that there are no fundamental particles of electronic level of matter with a greater mass than the electron. Therefore, the Planck mass and Planck length waves, the event horizon and the black holes are not sufficiently substantiated the abstract generalizations, which have no physical meaning. – Excellent!
I agree with your idea of the fractal matter, it is in good agreement with the densest hexagonal packing. However, New Cartesian Physic, which is based on the equivalence of space-matter, considers that the physical vacuum is the state of moving space. The concept is Very Good (ether) are not required.
The concept of moving space-matter helped me:
- To transform the uncertainty principle Heisenberg in the principle of definiteness of points of space-matter;
- Open the law of the constancy of the flow of forces through a closed surface space-matter;
- To formulate the law of gravitation Lorentz;
- Give the formula for the pressure of the Universe;
- To reveal the essence of gravitational mass as the flow vector of the centrifugal acceleration across the surface of the corpuscles, etc.
From New Cartesian Physic great potential in understanding the world. To show this potential in his essay I gave materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural. Inmay, I made a mistake that has bound New Cartesian physiks with the paranormal and supernatural, because it does not attract the attention of others. Visit my essay and you will find something in it about New Cartesian Physic. Note the drawing of the geometric ratios of the s atom.
Sincerely, Boris Dizhechko.
report post as inappropriate
Koorosh Shahdaei wrote on Mar. 5, 2017 @ 21:28 GMT
Dear Vladimir,
I have been very interested in LIGO and LISA projects, I read an article last year from Russian scientist that predicted that the gravitational waves that were detected recently, would happen about couple of hundred times per year,
As Japanese, Chinese German and Italian scientist are building or improving their antennas to be more sensitive for gravitational waves, and I really hope that all these stations would grab these waves simultaneously, what is your opinion??
Kind regards
Koorosh
report post as inappropriate
George Kirakosyan wrote on Mar. 6, 2017 @ 06:00 GMT
Thank you, Dear Vladimir Nikolayevich, for your kindly attention on my work and for favorable words.
I have read your nice article also and fully agreed with you in many points. I especially like your vortex - toroidal structures that can form elementary particles. So, we can welcome each to other as realistically thinking engineers.
Of course, we can have some disagreements also what we have actually. The matter is you are a mechanical engineer and I am a poor electrical engineer only. That is why we must always to fight on the question - which principles should be in the base of formation the primordial substance of matter - is this should be mechanical or the electrical?
I see you are silently - intuitively inclined on the mechanical side that is why you cannot be free from the environment (I mean the physical vacuum with its special, different properties).
Here I have nothing to tell you, but only I will ask to you to listening advice of old man - try to build everything from the beginning without using any of hypothetical (unproven) things. (Let me tell only that it is really is possible!)
To help you somewhat, I will tell you that the physical vacuum is the same undetectable ether that was silently renamed, to be solve the huge problems in the microcosm for this time. You and I have big respects to Einstein. His first greatest merit was that he realized whole unnecessary of physical environment (that we can call the ether, physical vacuum or other) and he try remove it out from physics. Moreover, there is the proven kind of physical reality that can exist and work itself – without any environment, which are the electromagnetic field. The second greatest merit of Einstein (in my view) is that he says; everything can be build from this single kind of reality only that is the electromagnetic field! So, try please to work without physical vacuum!
With all this, I see your work as a good significant.
I wish you successes!
report post as inappropriate
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Mar. 6, 2017 @ 10:48 GMT
Dear Gupta
«………………….. Do you mean these ‘vortices of deeper level of matter’ have no relation with Gravitational waves….?»
Yes, you are right, vortices rotate in pairs in opposite directions. Pairs of vortexes are formed simultaneously, to compensate for the torque. They are only in pairs can quantum-parametrically converted, often through a phase of photons....
view entire post
Dear Gupta
«………………….. Do you mean these ‘vortices of deeper level of matter’ have no relation with Gravitational waves….?»
Yes, you are right, vortices rotate in pairs in opposite directions. Pairs of vortexes are formed simultaneously, to compensate for the torque. They are only in pairs can quantum-parametrically converted, often through a phase of photons.
«…………… I think these pairs of vortices are rotating in opposite directions. What do you say….?»
"Vortices of deeper level of matter" are the same as gravity waves (vortices), but of deeper level of matter. There are many levels of matter, so do not call them a specific name. To each level of matter corresponds its fundamental interaction.
We know three fundamental interactions from set. A fourth weak interaction is not interaction, this merely phase transition of the electron from orbit of neutron on orbit of hydrogen atom. I.e., the neutron contains the electron-positron pair and converted into the proton. Electromagnetic fundamental interaction should be divided into two fundamental interactions - magnetic and electric, they are substantially different in propagation speed of interaction.
«………… What are your results….?»
Description and summary results are shown in 2 last paragraphs of my essay.
These
results confirm the validity of the
experiments of Michelson and Morley In experiments it was found that interaction of the fundamental gravitational involved at least two levels of matter. One of them is the level of quark matter, other
preon level of matter [Section 2.2., Figure 13.].
My comments about your essay will be on your forum thread.
Kind regards,
Vladimir Fedorov
view post as summary
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Mar. 6, 2017 @ 11:32 GMT
Dear Boris Semyonovich
Thank you for your kind words.
With regard to the supernatural, it is necessary to call all their names. And Einstein's theory of relativity and the quantum mechanics are using abstract and ideal (supernatural) properties of matter and fields. I would have called the theories as "general the Bible of relativity, " and "the bible of quantum mechanics", this is, in my opinion, better reflects their nature. This is what would smile.
My comments about your essay will be on your forum thread.
Kind regards,
Vladimir Fedorov
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Mar. 7, 2017 @ 08:30 GMT
Dear Koorosh
I apologize for the delay in the response, I havenot enough time to process the information.
It's great that you are interested in a very interesting topic about LIGO and LISA.
In the Earth's magnetosphere often occur conversion powerful toroidal gravitational waves. In this case, there are intense bursts of electromagnetic radiation over a wide frequency...
view entire post
Dear Koorosh
I apologize for the delay in the response, I havenot enough time to process the information.
It's great that you are interested in a very interesting topic about LIGO and LISA.
In the Earth's magnetosphere often occur conversion powerful toroidal gravitational waves. In this case, there are intense
bursts of electromagnetic radiation over a wide frequency range and recorded the characteristic signals of gravitational waves LIGO project, that unreasonably taken as the signals from the "binary pulsars".
At the end of my
essay , I briefly described the simple and very sensitive setup I implemented for registering gravitational waves that actually record directed fluxes of gravitons. More details can be found in my article
"Deterministic Gravitational Waves" in Section 2. In Section 5.7. is described a lot of toroidal gravitational waves (tedious), related to the Earth, which are registered by all gravitational and electromagnetic devices.
In the Earth's gravisphere there is a constant process of energy circulation by the formation of toroidal gravitational waves, their transformation into electromagnetic waves and back.
We can place on Earth and in space thousands of simple instruments for recording gravitational and electromagnetic waves and to process information.
And is posible also visually observe toroidal gravitational waves by photographing with various filters, including polarization ones. Gravitational waves deflect, change brightness and change the polarization of optical waves. The imposition of images with some combination of filters gives a visual image of toroidal gravitational waves. For example, images of toroidal gravitational waves of the Solar system
Voyager-1 were obtained, In particular, the orbital toroidal gravitational wave of the Earth.
Directly on the surface of the Earth, one can obtain an image of toroidal gravitational waves that are
perpendicular to the surface , like coronal loops on the Sun (the same toroidal gravitational waves). This image was obtained frosty night near Moscow. Such neutrino toroidal gravitational waves pierce us on Earth and form the force of gravity.
The system of visualization of toroidal gravitational waves would be very useful for aviation navigation, warning pilots of aircraft about powerful air pits from the action of toroidal gravitational waves.
My comments about your essay will be on your forum thread.
Kind regards,
Vladimir Fedorov
view post as summary
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Mar. 7, 2017 @ 11:52 GMT
Dear George Kirakosyan
Many thanks for the criticism, for me it is very important.
I have no doubt in the big importance of your work.
I agree with you that there are significant differences between our views, but that's okay.
I do not think that we can achieve full understanding now, now is important exchang of information and a long process of reflection. Each of us must move by a parallel course in chosen direction.
Kind regards,
Vladimir Fedorov
Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Mar. 10, 2017 @ 08:52 GMT
1
Dear Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov
Thank you for such nice post on my paper.
Thank you for all observations...
Thank you very much for your encouraging support.....
You wrote a big post with large number of different subjects! So I am dividing the whole post into
15 small posts, so that individual posts can be discussed separately and easily. Probably you will not mind it.
2
Your words……………
Excellent essay about the dynamic universe, it is so close to me.
You very correctly said that
«Ours is single universe and is a closed one. In other words, our Universe reproduces its Galaxies, as and when light and other electromagnetic radiation condenses to form enough matter».
I completely agree with you, although we use different terms.
Reply……….
Thank you for your Blessings…. Lets Discuss….
3
……… Your words……….………………..
The energy of gravitational waves is circulating in the Dynamic Universe. ……
………….. Reply ……The concept of Gravitational waves is not required in dynamic Universe Model
…………….Your words……..Galaxies emit electromagnetic waves, and the intergalactic medium…………..Reply……………….
Aether was not found
I am giving 3 posts here for your information
Best regards
=snp.
report post as inappropriate
Héctor Daniel Gianni wrote on Mar. 11, 2017 @ 23:54 GMT
Dear Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov
I invite you and every physicist to read my work “TIME ORIGIN,DEFINITION AND EMPIRICAL MEANING FOR PHYSICISTS, Héctor Daniel Gianni ,I’m not a physicist.
How people interested in “Time” could feel about related things to the subject.
1) Intellectuals interested in Time issues usually have a nice and creative wander for the unknown.
2) They usually enjoy this wander of their searches around it.
3) For millenniums this wander has been shared by a lot of creative people around the world.
4) What if suddenly, something considered quasi impossible to be found or discovered such as “Time” definition and experimental meaning confronts them?
5) Their reaction would be like, something unbelievable,… a kind of disappointment, probably interpreted as a loss of wander…..
6) ….worst than that, if we say that what was found or discovered wasn’t a viable theory, but a proved fact.
7) Then it would become offensive to be part of the millenary problem solution, instead of being a reason for happiness and satisfaction.
8) The reader approach to the news would be paradoxically adverse.
9) Instead, I think it should be a nice welcome to discovery, to be received with opened arms and considered to be read with full attention.
11)Time “existence” is exclusive as a “measuring system”, its physical existence can’t be proved by science, as the “time system” is. Experimentally “time” is “movement”, we can prove that, showing that with clocks we measure “constant and uniform” movement and not “the so called Time”.
12)The original “time manuscript” has 23 pages, my manuscript in this contest has only 9 pages.
I share this brief with people interested in “time” and with physicists who have been in sore need of this issue for the last 50 or 60 years.
Héctor
report post as inappropriate
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Mar. 12, 2017 @ 12:22 GMT
Dear Héctor,
Thank you for the invitation to your essey, I posted the answer on your forum thread.
I liked your essay, especially the phrase
«I can easily explain that “time dilation” is a physically inexistent phenomenon, because is just inertia or gravity “clocks slowing” and also can show in detail that twin paradox». I congratulate you with interesting thoughts and wish you every success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Vladimir
Vladimir Rogozhin wrote on Mar. 12, 2017 @ 09:10 GMT
Dear Vladimir,
I read with great interest your deep analytical essay with ideas and conclusions that will help us overcome the crisis of understanding in fundamental science through the creation of a new comprehensive picture of the world, uniform for physicists and
lyrics filled with meanings of the "LifeWorld" (E.Husserl). FQXI Contests are first of all new ideas - "crazy ideas" (N.Bohr). You give such ideas. I have one question: What is the ontological status of "the physical vacuum medium"? Yours faithfully, Vladimir
report post as inappropriate
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Mar. 13, 2017 @ 11:55 GMT
Dear Vladimir Rogozhin
Thank you very much for evaluating my essay and an interesting question.
"Scientists consider physical vacuum to be a special state of matter that claims to be the foundation of the world."
When I write about the environment of a physical vacuum, from an ontological point of view, I emphasize its real energy and material basis of the world, instead...
view entire post
Dear Vladimir Rogozhin
Thank you very much for evaluating my essay and an interesting question.
"Scientists consider physical vacuum to be a special state of matter that claims to be the foundation of the world." When I write about the environment of a physical vacuum, from an ontological point of view, I emphasize its real energy and material basis of the world, instead of an abstract foundation, in the form of emptiness, as well as virtual and quasiparticles.
For example, phonons are generally considered quasiparticles, which form photons that carry real energy. I believe that such supernatural, phantom and abstract concepts should not be in science. All particles are real. If a photon is fixed, this means that in the physical vacuum environment there was a pair of real particles.
On the one hand, matter consists of energy, on the other hand, it is energy that forms the mass. Mass derived from energy, it can be formed, under certain conditions, and may not be formed.
For example, an electron-positron pair is actually a phonon (it is not a quasiparticle) that has energy and mass. "Annihilation" of the electron-positron pair leads to the formation of a pair of massless photons. Each photon carries half the energy of the electron-positron pair. In fact, one photon is the pure kinetic energy of an electron-positron pair. The potential energy of the electron-positron pair is a pair of vast gravispheres from the medium of the physical vacuum, which includes a set of de Broglie waves. Gravispheres form a mass, and their energy is parametrically transformed into a second photon during the "annihilation" process.
Thus, the electron-positron pair has a mass, while the photon has no mass and its temperature is close to zero. At the same time, in the process of "annihilation" only the structure of the elements of matter has changed. For example, for an electron - the toroidal structure has turned into a cylindrical spiral. The electron, as consisted of a nematic sequence of 137 quarks, continues to consist of 137 quarks in the photon. In this case, the cross section of the interaction of a photon with the medium of a physical vacuum decreased by a factor of 137, in comparison with the electron-positron pair. Therefore, a photon is a pair of elements (a pair of baryons) of a deeper neutrino and quark level of the fractal structure of matter. Therefore, an electron in the Cooper pair can move in the equilibrium superconducting state only at a speed 43.6 times slower than the speed of light, and the photons move at the speed of light. A boson from a pair of quarks is a graviton (gluon).
An electron-positron pair can be formed only from a photon with an energy of 1023 keV.
The inverse transformation of photons with an energy of 511 keV into a pair of particles with an energy of 256 keV leads to the absorption of energy from the medium of the physical vacuum for constructing their gravispheres and mass formation. Therefore, laser cooling will allow cooling of the body, practically to zero temperature.
In fact, "annihilation" of particles is the process of their division on the second subharmonic of a parametric transformation with the release of energy, which can be used to synthesize heavier particles with energy absorption.
Thus, the process of division and synthesis of the elements of the physical vacuum environment is the main process of energy circulation in the universe, which leads to parametric resonance and solitons. Phase transformation of the elements of the physical vacuum environment is the cause of self-organization of matter according to the principles of the heat pump. This is the answer to the main question of this essay contest.
Kind regards,
Vladimir Fedorov
view post as summary
Vladimir F. Tamari wrote on Mar. 14, 2017 @ 08:06 GMT
Dear Vladimir
I have read your fascinating essay full of your confident statements and calculations. I liked the small icons links to full size illustrations I should try that method in my future essays! The idea of hydrodynamical-like vortices forming matter in a universal fluid is intriguing. In my
Beautiful Universe Model the universal lattice is formed of rotating dielectric nodes. A vortex has opposite spin direction if you look at its axis from different direction, and these spins may be the equivelant of the + and - poles of the proposed dipole building blocks. The electromagnetic right- hand rule must derive from such primitive spins. You frequently mention deBroglie waves surroundng matter. I totally agree that such wave constitute the gravitational field. Beyond these remarks I am not technically qualified to comment on your essay. For example of the many equations you present I am not sure which are your own proposals and which are commonly accepted ones.I wish you good luck! Have fun with physics.
Vladimir
report post as inappropriate
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Mar. 15, 2017 @ 12:11 GMT
Dear Vladimir F. Tamari
Many thanks for the kind words about my essay.
My equation for the de Broglie waves is derived from the conventional equation and the momentum conservation law. In the conventional equation, it is unreasonably assumed that one can put any mass in the denominator and obtain, for example, the Planck mass and the Planck wavelength, as a de Broglie wave....
view entire post
Dear Vladimir F. Tamari
Many thanks for the kind words about my essay.
My equation for the de Broglie waves is derived from the conventional equation and the momentum conservation law. In the conventional equation, it is unreasonably assumed that one can put any mass in the denominator and obtain, for example, the Planck mass and the Planck wavelength, as a de Broglie wave. However, I have shown that the existence of an element of the electronic level of matter with a greater mass than an electron is not possible. This also confirms the example given with the calculation of the Planck mass and length.
Indeed, how can in conventional equation for the de Broglie wave put any mass, for example, the mass of the Earth? The angular momentum of the Earth is not equal to the angular momentum of one electron (Planck's constant).
And with my equation it is easy to calculate the orbits of planets through the radius of inertia. For some of the planets, the discrepancy is 2 times greater, or less. This indicates that the orbits of planets are formed on harmonics or subharmonics of parametric resonance and means that quantum phenomena occur in the macro world also. Consequently, de Broglie waves are always larger in size than Compton waves.
My second equation is the decoding of the gravitational coefficient through the physical parameters of the planetary system. The calculation of the gravitational coefficient includes the ratio for Kepler's third law, as constant, and mass of the central body of the planetary system. This second equation is a criterion for the possibility of using the gravitational coefficient to calculate practical problems. Therefore, it is argued that the arbitrary use of the gravitational coefficient is unacceptable - it is not a fundamental constant for all cases, it is valid only for the solar system.
Kind regards,
Vladimir Fedorov
view post as summary
Christian Corda wrote on Mar. 20, 2017 @ 10:33 GMT
Dear Vladimir,
You wrote an interesting and provocative Essay. Despite I disagree with some of your claims, in particular the ones on gravitation and gravitational waves, I feel that some of your ideas deserve more attention by the scientific community. Thus, I will give you the highest score in order to help you to better spread them. Good luck in the Contest, I hope that you will have a chance to read
our Essay, which, instead, discusses "traditional" gravitational waves.
Cheers, Ch.
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2862
report post as inappropriate
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Mar. 22, 2017 @ 07:00 GMT
Dear Christian,
I pleasure read your essay, gave him high mark, and understood why many people have questions to him.
But I'm not embarrassed
«confused about the relevance of this essay». This dispute about gravity and gravitational waves has the deep roots of the dispute between Descartes and Newton and the dispute is still not resolved.
"Today it is hard to believe, but contemporaries accused Newton that his theory "returns science in the Middle Ages" Thomas S. Kuhn The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (1970) . If the bodies are attracted one toonher, then they should spend energy, but from the theory it is not visible, where does the energy come from and how does it replenish? ... There was no (and is no now) a cycle of energy in the theory, and this happened after Descartes, After Descartes introduced the principle of conservation of momentum, which natural science took literally as a life-giving sip of water." L.E. Fedulayev (2009). The dispute that you raised about the gravitational waves will allow adequately answer the questions of this contest. The theory of gravitational waves is the key theory of self-organization of matter, therefore we observe gravitational attraction as a mechanism for its realization, which is still to be understood in detail.
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Vladimir
Gary D. Simpson wrote on Mar. 24, 2017 @ 03:10 GMT
Vladimir,
There are a lot of Vladimirs in this contest:-)
This is an interesting essay. You present many novel ideas, perhaps even too many for a single essay. I suspect you could go into greater detail and make 3 or 4 essays from this subject matter. This is not a bad thing. It simply means you are very enthusiastic about your work.
Some of your ideas I am agreeable with....
view entire post
Vladimir,
There are a lot of Vladimirs in this contest:-)
This is an interesting essay. You present many novel ideas, perhaps even too many for a single essay. I suspect you could go into greater detail and make 3 or 4 essays from this subject matter. This is not a bad thing. It simply means you are very enthusiastic about your work.
Some of your ideas I am agreeable with. Some of the ideas I am less clear about.
The third paragraph of the Introduction clearly states the many difficulties that plague Physics in its present form.
I too am a believer that the vacuum is some type of medium ... I'm simply less clear regarding what its properties must be. I do think there is a scalar term present such as h/(2*pi) that accounts for vacuum energy and the lowest energy level of the electron.
You mention photons travelling for billions of years and suggest that they lose energy to the vacuum. This idea is frequently refered to as "tired light" ... i.e., the light is tired because it has lost energy due to the distance and time it has traveled. I'm less clear regarding this since I know of no evidence that the vacuum has any kind of viscosity. Even if the argument is made that there is a small amount of hydrogen present in interstellar and intergalactic space, it would not result in viscosity. It would behave like an extremely rarefied gas. Aerospace engineers have to deal with this type of analysis for airplanes that fly very high ... also for spacecraft in the upper atmosphere.
I like your idea of resonance and vortices. If you watch a fire, you will see lots of tiny spinning vortices in the flames. They flitter in an out pretty fast but sometimes they are stable. I think that nature prefers structures that are stable and this is one such possibility.
I am not familiar with the Mathieu Equation. You reference it several times.
A soliton is a very stable wave that does not interact with other waves. It does not act like a heat pump or any such analogy. Trust me on this. I'm a chemical engineer and we know heat pumps.
There is a way of eliminating some of the mathematical singularities that you mention. Milo Wolff did so in his Wave Structure of Matter theory. The essence is that the wave-function is a solution to the spherical wave equation and that solution is of the form (1/r)*sin(r). At r = 0, the value is one.
I like your analogy between gravity and the Lorentz Force. I have thought along that line of reasoning myself although I attribute it to a blend of absolute motion and relative motion. For me, the sun's motion through space creates the gravitation that keeps the planets and such in their orbits. This is what I mean by so many ideas .... just the idea of Lorentz type gravity could be a whole essay:-)
I have never thought about the speed of gravity as you describe. I do not think gravity propagates at light speed as is required by General Relativity. This is supported by the fact that orbit calculations are performed using the actual position of objects rather than the apparent position based upon light speed.
I've already written a lengthy response to your essay and I could easily go one. Let me simply close by stating that you have many novel and useful ideas that can be further developed. Just remember Occam's Razor ... The simplest idea is the best idea, but it must explain all that is observed. Well done!!
Best Regards and Good Luck,
Gary Simpson
view post as summary
report post as inappropriate
Gary D. Simpson wrote on Mar. 24, 2017 @ 03:15 GMT
Vladimir,
BTW, I rated your essay after a cursory reading several weeks ago ... The score was between a 5 and 10 ... I don't want to tell you too much because people should not trade votes.
Best Regards and Good Luck,
Gary Simpson
report post as inappropriate
Vladimir Rodin wrote on Mar. 25, 2017 @ 12:06 GMT
Dear Vladimir Nikolaevich,
First of all I'd like to notice that it's very worthy work deserving undoubtedly high score.
I've found a lot of interesting and deep thoughts in your essay, some of which correspond to my approach in an explanation of space, time, a matter etc. With some I don't agree. For example I have other conception about the electron structuring or atom formation. Nevertheless, I've found in you more an adherent than the opponent.
I wish you the further creative successes!
Vladimir Rodin
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2752
report post as inappropriate
Bayarsaikhan Bayarsaikhan Choisuren wrote on Mar. 27, 2017 @ 06:05 GMT
Dear Dr. Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov,
As you said “The physical vacuum medium - there is the material, non-linear, multi-level and fractal medium.” I agree with it, but to my opinion, it is that
Ultimate foundation of the nature of the large scale structure of the Universe is that elementary particles or a physical vacuum medium?
I think, you should to define it in more detail.
If someone consider whether the foundation of the nature is a physical vacuum medium or an elementary particle, it must be defined more definitely, as close as possible to the reality of nature.
Of course, it is a big question.
“Law of gravity is valid only near the surfaces of celestial bodies of the solar system”, but it is impossible to be definable at plank scale and around supermassive black holes in the center of many galaxies, unless an exact mechanism of gravitational interaction is discovered.
As taking into consideration the electron–positron annihilation and the de Broglie wave, your hypothetical helicoidal vortex ring and vortex ball rotating may cause to produce elementary particles and virtual particles. But, I think that there a cause to generate the vortices is that a “critical flow speed” of the physical vacuum medium. In other words, the speed of light may become a key property for this.
“Unfounded generalizations and frequency of parametric resonance” is very interesting for me, while associating with an equilibrium condition and being without energy dissipation.
For that “The medium of physical vacuum, together with the earth, is moving at a speed in spherical gravisphere of sun”, I think “The medium of physical vacuum, together with the earth" may take a place only within the Hill sphere.
With Best Regards,
Ch.Bayarsaikhan
report post as inappropriate
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Mar. 27, 2017 @ 07:40 GMT
Dear Vladimir Rodin,
Thank you for your kind words.
With great interest I read your essay.
Your essay allowed to consider us like-minded people.
I'm going to write a comment on your work in your forum thread.
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Vladimir Fedorov
Anonymous wrote on Mar. 27, 2017 @ 12:23 GMT
Dear Gary,
Thank you very much for a very large and interesting comment in my forum thread. I do not think that now there is time for lengthy discussions, time will come in the middle of April.
Nevertheless, I will try to briefly answer the questions that have arisen with you.
With
"tired light" is associated one of my recommended research principles is associated...
view entire post
Dear Gary,
Thank you very much for a very large and interesting comment in my forum thread. I do not think that now there is time for lengthy discussions, time will come in the middle of April.
Nevertheless, I will try to briefly answer the questions that have arisen with you.
With
"tired light" is associated one of my recommended research principles is associated with the impossibility of abstract and ideal properties of matter and fields. I can imagine that photons move exactly at the speed of light, hence, they interact with the physical vacuum. This interaction is necessarily associated with energy dissipation. But how photons carry real energy for many billions of years without losses, I can not imagine it. And this question is individual and connected with subjectivity. Whether the researcher allows supernatural properties of matter and fields or not, everyone should answer this question himself. I do not insist, but it is always necessary to think, but are there analogs to this phenomenons?
«I too am a believer that the vacuum is some type of medium ... I'm simply less clear regarding what its properties must be.» In my essay I tried to show that the medium is multilevel, fractal, nonlinear and consists of electron-positron pairs and their de Broglie waves, including waves formed on the harmonics of the Compton waves of an electron, (analogous in structure to the electron), from pairs of d quarks and their de Broglie waves, from pairs of preons and their de Broglie waves, etc.
The de Broglie waves have energy, mass, and they are connected with their Compton waves. They are designed to create conditions for the stability of Compton waves. The waves of de Broglie form other waves of de Broglie, etc. If Compton waves are limiting elements and are stable, then de Broglie waves are dynamic and much more often change their parameters by means of quantum parametric resonance.
Thus, the medium of the physical vacuum, first of all, is a dynamic nonlinear medium that easily changes phase state of its elements.
The Mathieu equation is used to solve parametric resonance problems in classical mechanics, the energy dissipation function is always involved in it and nonlinear properties of elements or medium participate.
In radio engineering, using the Mathieu equation, a parametric generator is calculated. The values of the Mathieu equation can be obtained by substituting the solution in the form of an expansion in the Fourier series. I.e. the elements of the medium, in the form of de Broglie waves, are deterministic elements.
The condition for the formation of self-organizing solitons is the nonlinear properties of the medium of a physical vacuum with high-Q elements. Solitons can interact through their de Broglie waves only if the frequencies coincide or are close to the harmonics and subharmonics of quantum parametric resonance. Therefore, chemical bonds are so selective, and self-organizing structures of matter are repeated.
Another very important property is the high rigidity of the medium of the physical vacuum and the speed of propagation of interaction in each level of matter. For example, photons are spiral elements from quarks. A pair of spiral elements of the quark matter level is screwed into the medium of the physical vacuum and moves in equilibrium in the de Broglie's own wave of elasticity, like a warp motor. This is analogous to the pairs of Cooper electrons moving in eddy currents in equilibrium in the state of superconductivity, but 43.6 times slower than the speed of light, because they are elements of a higher level of matter and have 137 times the cross section of interaction.
«I have never thought about the speed of gravity as you describe. I do not think gravity propagates at light speed» My statements about the speed of gravity are based on my own experiment. At the end of my essay, I gave the results of an experiment on recording the orbital toroidal gravitational wave of the Earth. The signal of the gravitational wave is very distorted, but, nevertheless, the period of 52 minutes of the action of the Earth's orbital gravitational wave is viewed. This means that the speed of propagation of the main gravitational wave of the quark matter level, along the Earth's orbit, is equal to the speed of light.
In addition, at the maximum intensity of the variations, often, the lines become wide. If the scale is stretched, then an oscillatory process is observed with a period of about 72 seconds. In my work
«Deterministic gravitational waves» , reference [20] gives the corresponding spectra of these oscillatory processes. From these my experiments it follows that there is a second gravitational wave in the Earth's orbit of the preon level of matter, which has a propagation velocity 43.6 times faster of the speed of light. I have no doubt that in this way it is possible to register gravitational waves of many levels of the fractal matter.
I'm sorry that I can not explain briefly.
I found a strange phenomenon, as soon as my rating rises, then immediately it falls sharply. Therefore, I am convinced that it is necessary to give grades at the last moment.
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Vladimir
view post as summary
report post as inappropriate
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Mar. 28, 2017 @ 13:42 GMT
Dear Bayarsaikhan,
Thank you very much for comment to my essay.
«but to my opinion, it is that Ultimate foundation of the nature of the large scale structure of the Universe is that elementary particles or a physical vacuum medium?» The separation of matter on the medium of the physical vacuum and a particle is conditional. On the one hand, the medium of the...
view entire post
Dear Bayarsaikhan,
Thank you very much for comment to my essay.
«but to my opinion, it is that Ultimate foundation of the nature of the large scale structure of the Universe is that elementary particles or a physical vacuum medium?»
The separation of matter on the medium of the physical vacuum and a particle is conditional. On the one hand, the medium of the physical vacuum consists of particles. On the other hand, all particles consist of elements of the medium of the physical vacuum. On the third side, both particles and atoms, and stars, and quasars are elements of the medium of a physical vacuum of different levels of fractal matter.
For example, the density of the atomless medium of a physical vacuum on the surface of the Sun is close to the maximum. In the chromosphere of the Sun, conditions are created with the help of natural particle accelerators (spicules, toroidal gravitational waves from limiting elements with a radius of about 18,000 km), to form Hydrogen atoms from the elements of the medium of the physical vacuum.
In each level of matter, there are limiting elements that determine the gravitational shell of separation of levels of fractal matter. Planetary systems of all levels are nested into each other like nesting dolls.
For example, the electron and the positron are the limiting elements of the electronic level of matter, their size determines the boundary of the planetary system of the atomic nucleus (the quark matter level) and of the planetary system of electron shells of atoms (on the electronic level of matter).
Another example is the largest limiting element, a macro structure available for observation, which determines the size of large galaxies and quasars. For example, the radius of such the limiting element is about one third of the distance to Andromeda. Those. Our galaxy (with a lot of galaxies-satellites) and Andromeda are interconnected and are analogous to the nucleus of the helium atom, or to alpha particle in the complex nucleus.
Cells with r=152 million ly in the cellular structure of the Universe are in 137 times larger in size than the largest limiting element of the observed structure and is analogous to the outer electron shell of the atom. Then the entire universe visible to us is an analog of a molecule from a set of atoms.
Thus, this "Of course, it is a big question" seems to me a settled question. All the elements of the medium of the physical vacuum of all levels of matter are strictly determined and are confirmed by investigation from quarks to the macro structure of the universe. More details can be found in my article
"Deterministic Gravitational Waves" in Section 5.
«“Law of gravity is valid only near the surfaces of celestial bodies of the solar system”, but it is impossible to be definable at plank scale and around supermassive black holes in the center of many galaxies, unless an exact mechanism of gravitational interaction is discovered.»
"The exact mechanism of gravitational interaction" is defined in my example on the interaction of satellites of Saturn. This interaction mechanism is associated with energy circulation in toroidal gravitational waves and thus a long-standing dispute between Newton and Descartes is resolved in favor of Descartes (see my commentary for Christian Corda).
You're right «But, I think that there a cause to generate the vortices is that a “critical flow speed” of the physical vacuum medium. In other words, the speed of light may become a key property for this.»
The critical speed of stream in the superfluid medium of the physical vacuum is achieved at minimum speed of stream (Reynolds number is very large).
«The vortexes of turbulence formed in accordance with the laws of hydrodynamics, and they there are main self-organizing process of the material system. Even at the minimum speed of the body in superfluid medium, the turbulence vortexes are formed with minimum characteristic cross section and with maximum speed of matter in the center of the vortex, which is close to the speed of propagation of interaction.»
«“Unfounded generalizations and frequency of parametric resonance” is very interesting for me, while associating with an equilibrium condition and being without energy dissipation.»
Parametric resonance, in fact, forms a soliton in which the dissipation of energy is minimized and equilibrium sets in, but the energy circulation in the soliton and energy dissipation remain always at a minimum and the interaction force is minimized. The dissipation of energy is the cause of the self-organization of matter.
«I think “The medium of physical vacuum, together with the earth" may take a place only within the Hill sphere.»
It is believed that the Hill sphere is confined to the nearest points of Lagrange. But in the conventional concept there is no understanding of the gravisphere, and that the Lagrangian points are gravity couplers in the interaction of toroidal gravitational waves, about which there is as yet no understanding. And that the forces of attraction of cosmic bodies and their centrifugal inertia are also minimized in gravisphers, there is no understanding.
In my concept, the Earth's gravisphere extends to the middle of the distance to the orbit of Venus. Analogously to the Earth's gravisphere, the Sun's gravi-sphere extends, approximately, to the middle of the distance to the nearest star. It is in the gravisphere of the Sun that a microwave background with an optical thickness of several light years is formed. The radiation power of the microwave background and the Sun is easily calculated.
Unfortunately, the modern concept of science allows abstract and ideal properties of matter and fields, this assumption of supernatural properties does not allow to see not sufficiently substantiated generalizations in science and does not allow adequately to answer the questions of this contest.
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Vladimir
view post as summary
Alexander M. Ilyanok wrote on Mar. 30, 2017 @ 09:59 GMT
Dear Vladimir,
Thank you for the warm feedback on my essay.
With pleasure I read your essay and voted. I found that we are in even more agreement than usual.
I have considered a number of similar problems in my articles
«Fundamental atom-molecular engineering». Part 1. Model of electron Metagalactic Galactic Internet Good luck and victory.
Best wishes
report post as inappropriate
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 1, 2017 @ 08:20 GMT
Dear Alexander,
Also thank you for the warm response about my essay.
I will certainly read your articles in mid-April and of course there are already questions.
You can also read more in my work
"Deterministic Gravitational Waves" .
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Vladimir
Robert Groess wrote on Mar. 31, 2017 @ 17:51 GMT
Dear Vladimir Fedorov,
Thank you for your kind comments on my essay. I wanted to let you know I have in the meantime also read your detailed and wide reaching treatise on fundamental physics, complete with delightful thumbnail illustrations. I am intrigued if there is a specific link you make connecting our physical world with the notion of intentionality? Perhaps I have missed something important while enjoying your essay.
Regards,
Robert
report post as inappropriate
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Apr. 1, 2017 @ 07:11 GMT
Dear Robert,
Thank you very much for your interest in my modest work.
You asked
«I am intrigued if there is a specific link you make connecting our physical world with the notion of intentionality?»
You, basically, answered this question
«We consider as an example the case of irreversible free expansion and inject intent in form of Maxwell’s...
view entire post
Dear Robert,
Thank you very much for your interest in my modest work.
You asked
«I am intrigued if there is a specific link you make connecting our physical world with the notion of intentionality?» You, basically, answered this question
«We consider as an example the case of irreversible free expansion and inject intent in form of Maxwell’s Demon. This provides a thermodynamic trail with implications sug-gestive of the computational nature of intent.» I just gave an analogy to the physical realization of Maxwell's Demon.
In my house in Bulgaria, I use an air conditioner - hyperinverter (heat pump with a coefficient of 5) which is an analogue of Maxwell's demon. This unit produces 3 kW of thermal power, cooling the atmosphere, with an electric power consumption of 0.6 kW.
The analogue of Maxwell's demon in the universe is the gravisphere from a dynamic medium of physical vacuum around particles and cosmic bodies. The attraction of bodies to the center of gravity in the universe is intended for gravitational separation - moving to the center of gravity of heavier dynamic elements of the medium. Heavier elements have a higher temperature.
Those, the variable temperature of the medium of the physical vacuum in the gravisphere is determined by the variable gravitational potential and the variable velocity of propagation of the gravitational interaction. The change in the propagation velocity of the interaction in the gravisphere (the derivative of spatial coordinates in time) corresponds to the distortion of space-time in Einstein's theory of relativity.
Thus, there is a mechanism of energy concentration in the center of gravity, which functions according to the principle of the action of the heat pump, due to a phase change in the elements of the medium of the physical vacuum. Gravisphere from the environment of the physical vacuum is a soliton. All processes of matter transformation are carried out with the help of
deterministic toroidal gravitational waves of de Broglie and Compton. Toroidal gravitational waves concentrate energy in the center of gravity, and the process of "annihilation" of toroidal gravitational waves leads to energy scattering in the form of photons.
The next important point for understanding the mechanism of intentionality is a single grid of resonant frequencies of the limiting elements of matter, analogous to an electron. In my work, I tried to explain the fractal principle of the construction of elements of matter, according to which elements with more energy than the electron are elements of a deeper level of matter. In the universe there is a constant circulation of energy and interaction between elements of different levels of matter, but using a single grid of parametric resonance frequencies.
That is why in the process of collisions of elementary particles the same particles are formed, and even atoms from matter and antimatter. That is why chemical bonds are so selective, and matter is stable and diverse.
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Vladimir
view post as summary
James Lee Hoover wrote on Apr. 1, 2017 @ 17:47 GMT
Vladimir,
My essay also relates to the fallacy of an abstract laboratory description of matter: "How the ideal properties of matter and fields give rise to unfounded generalizations, to meaningless mathematical laws, to goals and to intentions."
To dispel the abstract theoretical ideas of lab models and look at matter in the field of galaxies, I speculate about a dark matter interaction in galactic space. My speculation also relates to your "The vortexes of turbulence formed in accordance with the laws of hydrodynamics." I mention studies by Philip Marcus whose research described "vortices in turbulent fluids" and Michael Brenner (I misprinted Breemer) who spoke of "optimizing interaction energies to destabilize kinetic traps."
Your area of study regarding gravitational waves could be put to use near -- in our own galaxy -- and far -- to detect BB waves. Quite interesting.
Hope you get a chance to read and discharge your ideas on my essay.
Jim Hoover
report post as inappropriate
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 2, 2017 @ 04:58 GMT
Dear James,
Thank you for taking the time to read my essay as well as for your kind comments. I wanted to let you know I have in the meantime also read and rated your detailed essay and have posted a reply on your forum. Good luck in the contest.
Kind regards,
Vladimir
Colin Walker wrote on Apr. 1, 2017 @ 19:30 GMT
Dear Vladimir,
Your essay touches on many aspects of physics that I would like to learn more about, especially solitons and resonance.
Having read some of the material you cite, I think you are on to something fundamental - the vortexes you describe being related to the phenomenon of turbulence.
It all looks plausible to me, except for your home-made gravitational variometer. That's crazy for sure, but it is a craziness I share and appreciate, as someone who once tried to build a mechanical anti-gravity machine using gyroscopes. Whatever the outcome, these projects are fun.
Best to you,
Colin
report post as inappropriate
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 2, 2017 @ 12:43 GMT
Dear Colin,
Many thanks for the kind words about my
essay .
Of course, the experiment with gravity variometer was primarily intended for me, that would sort out the mechanism of gravity and answer the question, where to move in research?
I specifically gave a simple description of the gravity vario, that it would be of interest to someone to repeat this simple experiment on registering the variations of graviton fluxes that were discovered by Michelson and Morley.
This experiment seems insane, because is generally accepted that gravitational attraction is the "magic" property of the mass. And I'm interested in the physical mechanism of gravity and self-organization, which is actually devoted to my essay.
In my opinion, attraction is the property of moving bodies, similar to the attraction of repulsive electrons moving along parallel wires.
The bodies are attracted to each other on the Earth because there is a turbulent gravitational shell near the surface of the Earth. The bodies are pierced by gravitons fluxes in toroidal gravitational waves with an equivalent velocity of 8 km/s. Those. In fact, the stationary bodies on the Earth move parallel relatively to the environment of the physical vacuum at a speed of 8 km/s, and therefore attracted.
It is possible that such an explanation would not satisfy someone, for example, LIGO employees.
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Vladimir
Peter Jackson wrote on Apr. 1, 2017 @ 21:40 GMT
Vladimir,
Great essay. I'd made notes and thought I'd commented but I can't see it above.
Quite apart from self organizing systems the following is also so profound I wished I'd written it myself! (actually I have written similar or equivalent in papers and previous essays)
"The Earth's atmosphere is a transition layer with a variable speed of the physical vacuum medium relative to the Earth. Near of the surface of the Earth, where the turbulent gravitational shell is forming, the physical vacuum medium, practically, is stationary relative to the Earth",
AND; "It should be note that the speed of movement of elements of matter on the ring of each toroidal vortex gravitational wave de Broglie and Compton of electron is equal to the speed of light" Super job, top score coming now. Well derived and written.
Very best
Peter
report post as inappropriate
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 4, 2017 @ 04:26 GMT
Dear Peter,
Thanks for the positive assessment.
When there is time, I will certainly analyze the your interesting work.
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Vladimir
Declan Andrew Traill wrote on Apr. 1, 2017 @ 21:55 GMT
Hi Vladimir,
Thanks for leaving a comment on my essay. Your essay looks good and interesting. For some reason when I downloaded it using the link you provided in your comment, many of the equations in the essay displayed black or other types of graphic squares, making it difficult to read - I will try again later from the main site. I will give you a good rating too - thanks...
Regards,
Declan
report post as inappropriate
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Apr. 3, 2017 @ 13:15 GMT
Dear Declan,
Many thanks for the kind words about my
essay .
I give two direct links to download the file in pdf format with text of my article
"The deterministic gravitational waves". Gravitational waves v01.pdf Gravitational waves v01.pdf I apologize for the inconvenience, and hope for understanding.
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Vladimir
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 4, 2017 @ 04:43 GMT
Dear Declan,
Many thanks for the kind words about my
essay .
I give two direct links to download the file in pdf format with text of my article "The deterministic gravitational waves".
Hyperlinks are distorted by the system, so I give symbolic link addresses
https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&confirm=no_antiv
irus&id=0B1MvF-AefpMmU3hTSWtQTWUtRTg
https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B1MvF-AefpMm
U3hTSWtQTWUtRTg
I apologize for the inconvenience, and hope for understanding.
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Vladimir
Edwin Eugene Klingman wrote on Apr. 3, 2017 @ 22:15 GMT
Dear Vladimir Fedorov,
Thank you for your kind comments. Having now read your essay I see that we agree on much. I agree that vortical action plays a much greater role than is commonly recognized, and also that the deBroglie model is the correct basis of QM. What you label "soliton potential wells of stability", I tend to think of as a 'self-sustaining soliton', and relate this to deBroglie waves induced by ultradense particle momentum. After the contest is over you might find time to look at
The Nature of Quantum Gravity, which I think you will find interesting. But it does lead to a different model for the elementary particles than your model.
I believe that the density-based formulation of GR is a flat-space equivalent to curved space-time, which you seem to imply as well. However, you say that there are no particles with greater 'mass' then the electron, while I think that there are no particles with greater 'mass density' than the electron.
I am focused more on particles, so I cannot follow all your astronomical calculations, although I am impressed with the data set you have assembled and with your calculations. At this point I am still not entirely sure of your conception of gravity. In short, I agree with the essentials of vortical action, deBroglie-like solitons induced by particles, and gravity as fundamental, but our models of these particles diverge.
I think both of us wish to push mystical quantum mechanics in the direction of intuitive classical physics, which I address to some degree in my essay.
Thanks again for your comments and for contributing your ideas to the FQXi community.
My very best regards,
Edwin Eugene Klingman
report post as inappropriate
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Apr. 4, 2017 @ 09:41 GMT
Dear Edwin,
Thank you for your kind comments.
You understood me correctly
«that the density-based formulation of GR is a flat-space equivalent to curved space-time» The change in the propagation velocity of the gravitational interaction in the gravisphere (the derivative of spatial coordinates in time) corresponds to the distortion of space-time in Einstein's theory of relativity.
The square of this velocity is equal to the gravitational potential. This is very convenient for calculations and for an intuitive understanding of the mechanisms of gravity. Particularly contributing to the understanding of the mechanisms of gravity is the representation of the de Broglie and Compton waves as Wheeler's geons (waves closed by their own gravitational field), whose idea was formed by Wheeler as a result of disputes with Einstein.
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Vladimir
David Pinyana wrote on Apr. 6, 2017 @ 21:46 GMT
Vladimir,
I consider very interesting your conclusions:
- The physical vacuum medium - there is the material, non-linear, multi-level and fractal medium. All transformations and interactions of matter in the classical world are carriing out with help of the main universal process - with help of quantum parametric resonance in the physical vacuum medium - with forming soliton.
-The mass does not distort space-time, but it changes the spatial coordinates derived with respect to the velocity-time of propagation of the gravitational interaction and the speed of the physical processes in the vortex of the physical vacuum medium.
- Newton's law of gravity is valid only near the surfaces of celestial bodies of the solar system, similar to the Casimir effect, near the surfaces of the bodies. Newton's law of gravity is a particular solution of the general law of gravitation in the fundamental gravitational interaction, which has property to form the potential well of stability, as the strong interaction.
We should discuss and join our essays... I sent you my book by email... we are in contact !!
report post as inappropriate
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 8, 2017 @ 06:46 GMT
Dear David,
Thank you for the good evaluation of my essay.
I quickly read your book. I think that it is very useful and makes think differently about the universe.
I think that right now it is necessary to think about the next step - to fill the subsequent work by models, calculations, examples, experimental proofs and practical applications.
Kind regards,
Vladimir Fedorov
Jonathan J. Dickau wrote on Apr. 7, 2017 @ 06:18 GMT
Wow!
A lot of good content in the essay. It perhaps tried to squeeze in a bit too much general information on your work, but the parts that dealt with the assigned topic directly made a lot of sense. Overall; I liked this paper a lot, but it is decidedly not written in a conventional style. I like the fractal connection, and I too think DeBroglie has answers others often overlook. You bring so much to the table, Vlad, and it's easy to miss seeing which detail you want the reader to notice. These are first impressions and I'll have to leave a detailed comment after reading a few more. Good work!
All the Best,
Jonathan
report post as inappropriate
Don C Foster wrote on Apr. 7, 2017 @ 15:49 GMT
Vladimir,
Thank you so much for the interesting read. I am not qualified to judge the finer points of the physics, but appreciate the way you approach the questions. as you recall from conic sections, what you get depends on how you slice it. At some point we will find the right angle of approach and a new pattern will emerge.
Perhaps the pieces of the answer are all here in these essays and they simply require assembly.
Buoyancy,
Don Foster
report post as inappropriate
Don C Foster replied on Apr. 7, 2017 @ 15:53 GMT
Well, strange. I rated your essay but you still have two rather than three ratings. Maybe it needs to percolate. Hope it comes through. Best.
report post as inappropriate
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 9, 2017 @ 05:55 GMT
Dear Don,
Many thanks for the kind words about my essay and high rating.
I really hope that you are right
«At some point we will find the right angle of approach and a new pattern will emerge.» My very best regards,
Vladimir
Daniel de França Diniz Rocha wrote on Apr. 7, 2017 @ 16:11 GMT
Dear Vladimir,
due time constrains (besides, the voting ends today), I won't be able to properly comment your essay. It would take me a few more days for that, since right now By "properly", I mean, sharing some ideas and thoughts. I really enjoyed your essay. I hope we can keep in touch.
report post as inappropriate
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov replied on Apr. 9, 2017 @ 07:03 GMT
Dear Daniel,
Many thanks for the kind words about my essay and high rating.
Congratulations on the successful completion of the next stage of the contest.
I also
«hope we can keep in touch.» I wish you success in the contest.
Vladimir
Daniel de França Diniz Rocha replied on Apr. 9, 2017 @ 09:05 GMT
I didn't know I could post after April 7th... I guess I will be able to tell you something useful! :)
report post as inappropriate
Author Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov wrote on Apr. 9, 2017 @ 12:28 GMT
I think now there is a lot of time to think about the past discussion. In the course of the discussion, several tasks were realized, but there were no questions of principle to my work.
I felt that many did not agree with my point of view on the universe, but no one asked serious questions and did not explain why my point of view does not correspond to the theme of the contest.
I think that the format of the contest does not allow to discuss effectively the results until April 8.
Login or
create account to post reply or comment.