If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.
Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.
Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.
Contests Home
Previous Contests
What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss • winners
Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discuss • winners
Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discuss • winners
The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discuss • winners
Previous Contests
What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss • winners
Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discuss • winners
Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discuss • winners
The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discuss • winners
Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use
RSS feed | RSS help
Introduction
Terms of Use
Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.
By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC
Dizhechko Semyonovich: on 4/7/17 at 11:02am UTC, wrote Dear Sirs! Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of...
George Gantz: on 4/4/17 at 18:44pm UTC, wrote PS - I was so sorry you did not continue the monkeys banging on typewriters...
George Gantz: on 4/4/17 at 18:42pm UTC, wrote Michael - I enjoyed your rambling and quite interesting essay. I hope...
Bayarsaikhan Choisuren: on 3/23/17 at 13:36pm UTC, wrote Dear Michael Muteru, In your essay that it is very interesting for me. ...
Héctor Gianni: on 3/11/17 at 23:57pm UTC, wrote Dear Michael Muteru I invite you and every physicist to read my work...
Joe Fisher: on 3/3/17 at 16:55pm UTC, wrote Dear Michael muteru, Please excuse me for I have no intention of...
John Hodge: on 3/2/17 at 1:51am UTC, wrote You might also try https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0603140 Hodge
Steve Dufourny: on 3/1/17 at 22:06pm UTC, wrote Hello Mr Muteru , I liked, thanks for sharing.Relevant general analyse. ...
RECENT FORUM POSTS
Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...
Hanvi jobs: "Yes i am totally agreed with this article and i just want say that this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...
Robert McEachern: ""all experiments have pointed towards this and there is no way to avoid..." in Review of "Foundations of...
James Putnam: "Light bends because it is accelerating. It accelerates toward an object..." in Black Hole Photographed...
Robert McEachern: "Lorenzo, The nature of "information" is well understood outside of..." in Review of "Foundations of...
Georgina Woodward: "Steve, Lorraine is writing about a simpler "knowing " rather than the..." in The Nature of Time
Steve Agnew: "Knowing information necessarily means neural action potentials. Atom and..." in The Nature of Time
RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles
Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.
Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.
Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.
Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.
Dissolving Quantum Paradoxes
The impossibility of building a perfect clock could help explain away microscale weirdness.
Dizhechko Semyonovich: on 4/7/17 at 11:02am UTC, wrote Dear Sirs! Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of...
George Gantz: on 4/4/17 at 18:44pm UTC, wrote PS - I was so sorry you did not continue the monkeys banging on typewriters...
George Gantz: on 4/4/17 at 18:42pm UTC, wrote Michael - I enjoyed your rambling and quite interesting essay. I hope...
Bayarsaikhan Choisuren: on 3/23/17 at 13:36pm UTC, wrote Dear Michael Muteru, In your essay that it is very interesting for me. ...
Héctor Gianni: on 3/11/17 at 23:57pm UTC, wrote Dear Michael Muteru I invite you and every physicist to read my work...
Joe Fisher: on 3/3/17 at 16:55pm UTC, wrote Dear Michael muteru, Please excuse me for I have no intention of...
John Hodge: on 3/2/17 at 1:51am UTC, wrote You might also try https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0603140 Hodge
Steve Dufourny: on 3/1/17 at 22:06pm UTC, wrote Hello Mr Muteru , I liked, thanks for sharing.Relevant general analyse. ...
RECENT FORUM POSTS
Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...
Hanvi jobs: "Yes i am totally agreed with this article and i just want say that this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...
Robert McEachern: ""all experiments have pointed towards this and there is no way to avoid..." in Review of "Foundations of...
James Putnam: "Light bends because it is accelerating. It accelerates toward an object..." in Black Hole Photographed...
Robert McEachern: "Lorenzo, The nature of "information" is well understood outside of..." in Review of "Foundations of...
Georgina Woodward: "Steve, Lorraine is writing about a simpler "knowing " rather than the..." in The Nature of Time
Steve Agnew: "Knowing information necessarily means neural action potentials. Atom and..." in The Nature of Time
RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles
Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.
Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.
Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.
Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.
Dissolving Quantum Paradoxes
The impossibility of building a perfect clock could help explain away microscale weirdness.
FQXi FORUM
May 22, 2019
CATEGORY:
Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017)
[back]
TOPIC: EXISTENCE – THE ART OF BEING by Michael muteru [refresh]
TOPIC: EXISTENCE – THE ART OF BEING by Michael muteru [refresh]
Essay Abstract
How many monkeys endlessly banging on a Typewriter would it take to create a Hamlet? How can order arise from disarray? How do entities in a Brownian type system make sense of their environment, using the Boltzmann paradox? I ponder how determinism may have emerged from chaos and what makes it tick
Author Bio
Michael Muteru is a Theoretical physicist with an immense devotion to decoding natures ultimate secrets.currently working on application of Quantum mechanics to the universe and the human brain.i have a solved m -Theory and have a fractal model here-http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/search?q=michael+muteru&su
bmit.x=0&submit.y=0&sort=rlv&t=doc.I am currently seeking a science writer to help in outreach and doing a book on the universe.feel free to contact me at muteruw05@gmail.com
Download Essay PDF File
How many monkeys endlessly banging on a Typewriter would it take to create a Hamlet? How can order arise from disarray? How do entities in a Brownian type system make sense of their environment, using the Boltzmann paradox? I ponder how determinism may have emerged from chaos and what makes it tick
Author Bio
Michael Muteru is a Theoretical physicist with an immense devotion to decoding natures ultimate secrets.currently working on application of Quantum mechanics to the universe and the human brain.i have a solved m -Theory and have a fractal model here-http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/search?q=michael+muteru&su
bmit.x=0&submit.y=0&sort=rlv&t=doc.I am currently seeking a science writer to help in outreach and doing a book on the universe.feel free to contact me at muteruw05@gmail.com
Download Essay PDF File
Michael, thanks for a surprising journey through a miscellany of thoughts on various subjects.
There is no predictability, let alone certainty, of the outcome of a butterfly flap in another distant location.
Typo '.. that I hope provides a glimmer of hoe ...
Enjoyable style. Regards Georgina
report post as inappropriate
There is no predictability, let alone certainty, of the outcome of a butterfly flap in another distant location.
Typo '.. that I hope provides a glimmer of hoe ...
Enjoyable style. Regards Georgina
hi michael, love the typewriter-banging thing. question for you: "Competition gives rise to aims and intention." ... how do you arrive at that conclusion?
report post as inappropriate
Dear Mr. Michael Muteru
You say: The Here and Now state of the universe is 2.7 K. Why is it look here: http://vixra.org/abs/1602.0095
Best regards,
Branko Zivlak
report post as inappropriate
You say: The Here and Now state of the universe is 2.7 K. Why is it look here: http://vixra.org/abs/1602.0095
Best regards,
Branko Zivlak
Hello Mr Muteru ,
I liked, thanks for sharing.Relevant general analyse.
good luck and regards.
report post as inappropriate
I liked, thanks for sharing.Relevant general analyse.
good luck and regards.
Dear Michael muteru,
Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.
I merely wish to point out that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.
Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.
The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.
A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.
Joe Fisher, Realist
report post as inappropriate
Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.
I merely wish to point out that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.
Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.
The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.
A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.
Joe Fisher, Realist
Dear Michael Muteru
I invite you and every physicist to read my work “TIME ORIGIN,DEFINITION AND EMPIRICAL MEANING FOR PHYSICISTS, Héctor Daniel Gianni ,I’m not a physicist.
How people interested in “Time” could feel about related things to the subject.
1) Intellectuals interested in Time issues usually have a nice and creative wander for the unknown.
2) They usually enjoy this wander of their searches around it.
3) For millenniums this wander has been shared by a lot of creative people around the world.
4) What if suddenly, something considered quasi impossible to be found or discovered such as “Time” definition and experimental meaning confronts them?
5) Their reaction would be like, something unbelievable,… a kind of disappointment, probably interpreted as a loss of wander…..
6) ….worst than that, if we say that what was found or discovered wasn’t a viable theory, but a proved fact.
7) Then it would become offensive to be part of the millenary problem solution, instead of being a reason for happiness and satisfaction.
8) The reader approach to the news would be paradoxically adverse.
9) Instead, I think it should be a nice welcome to discovery, to be received with opened arms and considered to be read with full attention.
11)Time “existence” is exclusive as a “measuring system”, its physical existence can’t be proved by science, as the “time system” is. Experimentally “time” is “movement”, we can prove that, showing that with clocks we measure “constant and uniform” movement and not “the so called Time”.
12)The original “time manuscript” has 23 pages, my manuscript in this contest has only 9 pages.
I share this brief with people interested in “time” and with physicists who have been in sore need of this issue for the last 50 or 60 years.
Héctor
report post as inappropriate
I invite you and every physicist to read my work “TIME ORIGIN,DEFINITION AND EMPIRICAL MEANING FOR PHYSICISTS, Héctor Daniel Gianni ,I’m not a physicist.
How people interested in “Time” could feel about related things to the subject.
1) Intellectuals interested in Time issues usually have a nice and creative wander for the unknown.
2) They usually enjoy this wander of their searches around it.
3) For millenniums this wander has been shared by a lot of creative people around the world.
4) What if suddenly, something considered quasi impossible to be found or discovered such as “Time” definition and experimental meaning confronts them?
5) Their reaction would be like, something unbelievable,… a kind of disappointment, probably interpreted as a loss of wander…..
6) ….worst than that, if we say that what was found or discovered wasn’t a viable theory, but a proved fact.
7) Then it would become offensive to be part of the millenary problem solution, instead of being a reason for happiness and satisfaction.
8) The reader approach to the news would be paradoxically adverse.
9) Instead, I think it should be a nice welcome to discovery, to be received with opened arms and considered to be read with full attention.
11)Time “existence” is exclusive as a “measuring system”, its physical existence can’t be proved by science, as the “time system” is. Experimentally “time” is “movement”, we can prove that, showing that with clocks we measure “constant and uniform” movement and not “the so called Time”.
12)The original “time manuscript” has 23 pages, my manuscript in this contest has only 9 pages.
I share this brief with people interested in “time” and with physicists who have been in sore need of this issue for the last 50 or 60 years.
Héctor
Dear Michael Muteru,
In your essay that it is very interesting for me.
The blue line between modern science and human religion will blur out, Bridges will come up on the divide. Our thoughts will be eloquently based on nature as template.
For me, I think that something that people cannot understand belongs to God (Religions)
Is that right?
If you have a free time, would you explain me little bit?
Ch.Bayarsaikhan
report post as inappropriate
In your essay that it is very interesting for me.
The blue line between modern science and human religion will blur out, Bridges will come up on the divide. Our thoughts will be eloquently based on nature as template.
For me, I think that something that people cannot understand belongs to God (Religions)
Is that right?
If you have a free time, would you explain me little bit?
Ch.Bayarsaikhan
Michael - I enjoyed your rambling and quite interesting essay. I hope others give it a more careful read and bring your score up to where it should be! Indeed, this is a participatory contest - just as the universe is a participatory universe. I agree that we humans are in a middle place - knowing, yet ignorant. We have to feel our way.
Regards - George Gantz (The How and The Why of Emergence and Intention)
report post as inappropriate
Regards - George Gantz (The How and The Why of Emergence and Intention)
PS - I was so sorry you did not continue the monkeys banging on typewriters image that you had in your abstract. I made a big deal out of that image!
-George
report post as inappropriate
-George
Dear Sirs!
Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use «spam».
New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.
New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.
Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.
Sincerely,
Dizhechko Boris
report post as inappropriate
Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use «spam».
New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.
New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.
Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.
Sincerely,
Dizhechko Boris
Login or create account to post reply or comment.