Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Mark Pharoah: on 4/5/17 at 19:38pm UTC, wrote Peter Thanks for your positive feedback. I will endeavour to lookat your...

Peter Jackson: on 4/5/17 at 12:59pm UTC, wrote Mark, A very good essay, all a good essay should be plus an insightful and...

Mark Pharoah: on 4/4/17 at 18:50pm UTC, wrote Giovanni, Yes, I went to look at your essay and realised I had already...

Giovanni Prisinzano: on 4/4/17 at 11:00am UTC, wrote Dear Mark, As for the mathematical background, mine too has its limits! By...

Mark Pharoah: on 4/3/17 at 19:17pm UTC, wrote Giovanni Thanks for your encouraging comments. I'm not sure that the...

Mark Pharoah: on 4/3/17 at 18:48pm UTC, wrote Ed, I have read your essay and made notes on it. I am away from home but...

Giovanni Prisinzano: on 4/3/17 at 9:47am UTC, wrote Dear Mark, I read with interest your essay, and I appreciate its...

Edward Kneller: on 3/7/17 at 20:32pm UTC, wrote Mark, Thanks for the well written essay on the Hierarchical Construct...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...

Jorma Seppaenen: "Dear Georgina, I think you are perfectly right about the estimate of age..." in Why Time Might Not Be an...

Joe Fisher: "Dear Dr. Kuhn, Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this..." in Can Time Be Saved From...

Georgina Woodward: "Yes. The estimate of age of the visible universe, and age of stars, other..." in Why Time Might Not Be an...

akash hasan: "Some students have an interest in researching and space exploration. I..." in Announcing Physics of the...

Michael Jordan: "Excellent site. Plenty of helpful information here. I am sending it to some..." in Review of "Foundations of...

Anonymous: "Excellent site. Plenty of helpful information here. I am sending it to some..." in Constructing a Theory of...

Robert McEachern: ""all experiments have pointed towards this and there is no way to avoid..." in Review of "Foundations of...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

Dissolving Quantum Paradoxes
The impossibility of building a perfect clock could help explain away microscale weirdness.


FQXi FORUM
May 25, 2019

CATEGORY: Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017) [back]
TOPIC: Newtonian bodies and consciousness - Hierarchical Construct Theory by Mark Pharoah [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Mark Pharoah wrote on Feb. 27, 2017 @ 17:16 GMT
Essay Abstract

Hierarchical Construct Theory advances the thesis that the maintenance of stability through the acquisition of an equilibrium state is a fundamental characteristic of physical interaction. It proposes that Newton’s application of this principle to material bodies of mass is limited in scope and can be further applied to other classes of physical interaction and dynamic bodies. The consequence of exploring this thesis is that it indicates that interaction leads to the evolution of form through the reacquisition of equilibria, and subsequently to the emergence of transcendent dynamic physical constructs that possess contrasting types of environmentally interactive mechanisms. These mechanisms inevitably evolve in a way that ultimately qualifies the qualitative significance of environmental particulars and even to subjective individuated identities. Each construct class in the hierarchy has its own evolutionary paradigm and characteristic behaviours. It is a simple and unified model that explains the dynamic that generates the phenomenon of experience, which humans call consciousness.

Author Bio

I have been working on this idea since 1986 and in that time have had the good fortune of discussing its concepts with distinguished academics including Peter Strawson, Daniel Dennett, Peter Carruthers and Ilya Prigogine. In the intervening years I have had a few careers including performing as a concert violinist throughout the world, teaching bridge and writing for the American Contract Bridge League. Despite my early interest in philosophy, it was not possible for me to pursue an academic career due to disability.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Joe Fisher wrote on Mar. 4, 2017 @ 15:41 GMT
Ignorance is bliss.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Mark Pharoah replied on Mar. 4, 2017 @ 18:39 GMT
Joe... "ignorance is bliss" is that right? We can analyse something at last:

You have left 4 posts on my essay thread. Have you actually read the essay? Prove it and make comment about it!

I have looked at your essay... I came to the conclusion you might be bipolar but thought I would not say as much because it would be inappropriate. But as you keep on pestering me with inane...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share



Bishal Banjara wrote on Mar. 7, 2017 @ 04:16 GMT
Dear Mark Pharoah,

I am the realist so,I believe in real facts and observation...though I should n't argue on others' philosophy but my post directly have a consequence on yours, dealing in terms of equilibrium or say state of inertia.. please read once my essay, you will be more conscious about the reality.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Edward Kneller wrote on Mar. 7, 2017 @ 20:32 GMT
Mark,

Thanks for the well written essay on the Hierarchical Construct Theory.

You present a logical argument that in some instances may parallel my essay, ‘The Cosmic Odyssey of Matter’. Specifically, the Hierarchical Construct Theory has broad similarities to the ‘Assembly of Precision Formations of Matter’ described in my essay. We also use similar terms: you use ‘replication’ to support your ‘stable structures’ argument, and I use ‘repeatability’ to support my ‘precise forms’ argument.

If you have a few minutes I would very much appreciate your review of my essay.

Regards, Ed Kneller

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Mark Pharoah replied on Apr. 3, 2017 @ 18:48 GMT
Ed,

I have read your essay and made notes on it. I am away from home but will look them up on my return

Bookmark and Share



Giovanni Prisinzano wrote on Apr. 3, 2017 @ 09:47 GMT
Dear Mark,

I read with interest your essay, and I appreciate its originality and richness of implications. I also saw the first of your videos on youtube and I'm going to see the other two. The attempt to link the laws of motion of Newton to the evolution of systems in terms of information and complexity seems fascinating. I do not know if you can fully prove it, but we know there are phenomena of interaction, even at the level of elementary particle physics (e.g. quantum entanglement), which, although well-known experimentally, have not yet been framed in a convincing theoretical context. I like the reference to Bertalanffy's general systems theory, that I have not yet studied very well, but that I see as an interesting alternative to the mechanistic and reductionist approach, which seems insufficient to explain the complexity of reality (natura non facit saltus).I find also convincing the connection you make, even in evolutionary terms, between language and self-awareness and, lastly, I cannot but appreciate your references to Kant, who explained in an exemplary manner the role that self-consciousness plays in the complex of cognitive activity, although not even he could solve the hard problem of how actually self-consciousness arises.

I wish you all the best,

Giovanni

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Mark Pharoah replied on Apr. 3, 2017 @ 19:17 GMT
Giovanni

Thanks for your encouraging comments.

I'm not sure that the youtube videos are going to be much help. I actually did them for an individual who had found my writing difficult to comprehend.

Interaction and entanglement... I've not explored this area mostly because I haven't the mathematical background. My ideas can be extrapolated to that discipline.though.

I haven't read your essay yet but intend to shortly.

Bookmark and Share


Giovanni Prisinzano replied on Apr. 4, 2017 @ 11:00 GMT
Dear Mark,

As for the mathematical background, mine too has its limits! By naming quantum entanglement, I just wanted to make an example of interaction between elementary particles, which does not seem to be explicable in terms of customary causal relationship, but would require somehow an immediate exchange of information.

By the way, you've already posted, about a month ago, an appropriate comment on my essay, which allowed me to clarify some aspects of my view. Perhaps you did not remember it, which is possible, given the great number of papars in the contest.

Thanks and and best regards again,

Giovanni

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Mark Pharoah replied on Apr. 4, 2017 @ 18:50 GMT
Giovanni,

Yes, I went to look at your essay and realised I had already read it and left a comment. I am glad you found it of help.

I am currently preparing a paper for peer-review on the subject of information. A tough subject to write about.

Bookmark and Share



Peter Jackson wrote on Apr. 5, 2017 @ 12:59 GMT
Mark,

A very good essay, all a good essay should be plus an insightful and well argued thesis. Your proposal isn't controversial or revolutionary at face value but very often looking afresh at something familiar and assumed self apparent leads to important new understandings. I think yours fall into that class.

I particularly liked the effective way you connected the fundamental interactions and effects with teleology. I also do that in mine but it's been too rare here so is well appreciated. Also worth good score I think.

I'm a fan of Daniel Dennetts work and we both also I think conform to his excellent foundational approach, valid equally for science and philosophy.

Mine also extends my previous essays to derive a classical reproduction of the predictions of QM via interactions, though I expect cognitive dissonance will prevent emergence for some time to come! I hope you may read, follow and comment on that.

Very best

Peter

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Mark Pharoah replied on Apr. 5, 2017 @ 19:38 GMT
Peter

Thanks for your positive feedback. I will endeavour to lookat your essay. I have been working my way through all the essays.

Bookmark and Share



Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.