You are welcome Mr Yee,

If you want,I will be happy,with pleasure,I search answers :) and I like study news ideas and works about this weakest quant force.The paradox is that this force is in the same time the strongest when we consider that this standard model is encircled by this cold gravitation if I can say.In fact I consider even that a photon is a spheron coded ,like if this thermo...

view entire post

You are welcome Mr Yee,

If you want,I will be happy,with pleasure,I search answers :) and I like study news ideas and works about this weakest quant force.The paradox is that this force is in the same time the strongest when we consider that this standard model is encircled by this cold gravitation if I can say.In fact I consider even that a photon is a spheron coded ,like if this thermo was coded by this gravity implying electromagnetic and thermodynamical properties.I search a kind of primordial serie of spherical volumes.This quantum serie in its uniqueness like a spheron is the same number than our cosmological serie ,from 1 the central singularity sothe serie is between 1 and x in logic .I have superimposed to our standard model particles encoded like photons but with l the spherons with force weaker than photons and electromagnetims.I have also inserted a seri of quantum BHs with a central sphere for the singularity,gravitational, and so these forces them are stronger than our quarks gluons nuclear forces.l is proportional witht the spherical volumes where they are produced.So we have a superimposing of gravitational aethers Inside the gravitational aether.the luminiferous aeter is Inside and is jus a photonic sphere.My second equation mlosV=constant must be improved but we have the 3 motions of 3D sphères s spinal velocity,o orbital velocity, l linear velocity,V volume and m mass.I don't know if the o and s must be considered.

l is the the linear velocity of particles of gravitation,the dark matter,cold, the spherons.l is not constant and these particles and correlated wacves are speeder than c.l is simply their linear velocity like c but at the difference that l is proportional with the supermassive BHs for exmaple in sphericzal volume.That is why l tends to infinity like this gravity and that aethjer is gravitational from the central cosm singularity,the biggest spherical volumes,the biggest BHs.So more a BH is important in volumes, speeder is the particles produced.Hope that helps :)

all the best,

view post as summary

Dear Jeff,

I am very glad that you interested in my work.

In the "The limiting elements of matter" section of my essay essay in the second paragraph (before the quark table) on page 7, the ratios of all the basic parameters of the limit elements are given.

Formulas for calculating the basic parameters of the limit elements (33) - (40) are placed in my first version of a...

view entire post

Dear Jeff,

I am very glad that you interested in my work.

In the "The limiting elements of matter" section of my essay essay in the second paragraph (before the quark table) on page 7, the ratios of all the basic parameters of the limit elements are given.

Formulas for calculating the basic parameters of the limit elements (33) - (40) are placed in my first version of a large still unedited work by reference [20] «Deterministic gravitational waves» in Section 5. «Fractal structure of the matter», на стр. 77 – 79.

Your question

«But if it is 137 quarks, how would it explain that the electron's mass is much smaller than the proton's mass, which has 3 quarks?»...

I apologize for my English and for the fact that I could not explain clearly in the essay, many questions, including this one.

I did not accidentally draw attention in an essay on the effect of Josephson. In it clearly is shown that the de Broglie wave of an electron can have any energy, but it is always less than the energy of an electron. Before becoming a photon, the de Broglie wave of an electron exists as a particle, which is a pair of toroidal gravitational waves. The electron itself is the limiting particle of the electron level of matter, which can form a multitude of particles of the electronic level of matter. For example, an atom, not empty, but contains a medium of physical vacuum from a multitude of particles of the electronic level of matter, which form the spectral lines of the atom.

Similarly to an electron, at the quark level of matter there is a limiting element d-quark, whose energy is 13.9 times larger than the electron. The d-quark can form a multitude of particles in the form of its "de Broglie waves", which are now called gluons.

The electron consists of 137 quarks, which are strictly synchronized de Broglie waves of the d-quark.

The main question of the essay contest, I associate with the clarification of the cause of self-organization of matter, first into particles.

Therefore, your work at the peak of this issue is very important.

In my opinion, it is important to understand that in the fractal structure of matter, all particle formation processes are menaged by parametric resonance and solitons that form the potential wells of stability of all elements of matter.

Each fundamental particle is a high-Q resonator having a plurality of resonant frequencies. Interactions between particles are possible only at their common resonant frequencies. At resonant frequencies of parametric resonance, de Broglie waves form. The interaction between particles, atoms and bodies is realized at the resonant frequencies of their de Broglie waves (particles from micro to macro scale).

All the limiting elements of fractal matter are interconnected by common grid of resonance frequencies, which is related with the stable speed of the propagation of the interaction. Therefore, we see and explore our strictly repeating world from the same set: particles, atoms, molecules and cosmic bodies. For example, of the eight planets of the solar system, there are two, practically identical in size pairs, Venus and Earth, Uranus and Neptune. The pairs are in the same quantum states and are not accidentally neighbors.

For you, the important question is how the particles from their entire zoo are arranged.

This is a very difficult question, because most of the particles under investigation are not fundamental, but are planetary systems and can consist of a set of planetary systems of different levels of matter. The example of such particle is the neutron.

The complexity of particles is comparable to the structure of complex molecules, but particle accelerators are just a miserable similarity of instrument for studying the structure of molecules.

It's like judging the laws of formation of music during dropping of the pianos with big high. For me in the first approximation only pions and muons are understandable so far.

As for the tables, then, obviously, this is also a difficult question. For example, probably the analogue of a neutron and a proton, in the next deeper level of matter, are stable hyperons whose energy is at least 13.9 times larger than a proton and a neutron. However, it is possible that the measured hyperon energies do not correspond to their true energy and can include neutrino elements of a deeper level of matter that can reduce the interaction energy.

Particles, in the energy range from a neutron to a stable hyperon, perhaps many of them are atomic nuclei, or parts of the atomic nuclei, and therefore form some part of your table, similar to the table of chemical elements. Such atomic nuclei can be charged or neutral, without a complex planetary system of electrons, such as a neutron, which can turn into a proton and a Hydrogen atom.

The structure of the nuclei of complex atoms has recently been established. I assume that the nuclei of complex atoms from elementary particles are analogues of molecules from atoms. The simple principles for constructing the fundamental elements of matter I have proposed are only a tool for in-depth research.

Most likely, in order to investigate the fractal structure of particles, we must direct our gaze into cosmos and into the structure of molecules, and also look for analogies. Therefore, in my great work, I began to study all possible limiting elements from the macro-scale to the honeycomb structure of the universe.

Then I understood the structure of the elements of the medium of the physical vacuum with 6 observed Planck spectra of its radiation starting from 3 MHz.

I wish you every success in your interesting and necessary work.

Kind regards,

Vladimir

view post as summary