Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest

Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

Previous Contests

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American


How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help


John Merryman: "The problem is that we do experience reality as those discrete flashes of..." in The Quantum...

Thomas Ray: "(reposted in correct thread) Lorraine, Nah. That's nothing like my view...." in 2015 in Review: New...

Lorraine Ford: "Clearly “law-of-nature” relationships and associated numbers represent..." in Physics of the Observer -...

Lee Bloomquist: "Information Channel. An example from Jon Barwise. At the workshop..." in Physics of the Observer -...

Lee Bloomquist: "Please clarify. I just tried to put a simple model of an observer in the..." in Alternative Models of...

Lee Bloomquist: "Footnote...for the above post, the one with the equation existence =..." in Alternative Models of...

Thomas Ray: "In fact, symmetry is the most pervasive physical principle that exists. ..." in “Spookiness”...

Thomas Ray: "It's easy to get wound around the axle with black hole thermodynamics,..." in “Spookiness”...

click titles to read articles

Why Time Might Not Be an Illusion
Einstein’s relativity pushes physicists towards a picture of the universe as a block, in which the past, present, and future all exist on the same footing; but maybe that shift in thinking has gone too far.

The Complexity Conundrum
Resolving the black hole firewall paradox—by calculating what a real astronaut would compute at the black hole's edge.

Quantum Dream Time
Defining a ‘quantum clock’ and a 'quantum ruler' could help those attempting to unify physics—and solve the mystery of vanishing time.

Our Place in the Multiverse
Calculating the odds that intelligent observers arise in parallel universes—and working out what they might see.

Sounding the Drums to Listen for Gravity’s Effect on Quantum Phenomena
A bench-top experiment could test the notion that gravity breaks delicate quantum superpositions.

March 18, 2018

CATEGORY: Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017) [back]
TOPIC: A Letter from God by Richard P Dolan [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Richard P Dolan wrote on Feb. 17, 2017 @ 20:42 GMT
Essay Abstract

Fed up with physicists lamenting their inability to achieve the next big breakthrough while looking at the world backwards, God lets us know that it’s not mindless mathematical laws that give rise to everything, but consciousness, aka existence.

Author Bio

Richard P. Dolan Dick Dolan is a retired electrical engineer, former editor of the late Hewlett-Packard Journal, and author of Dick’s Reality—A Physics Blog (

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share

William Walker wrote on Feb. 17, 2017 @ 22:29 GMT
Hey Richard!.. I mean Dick (Breakfast Club... get it? ;)...

Loved the paper! especially the ending... just wait until you see my paper...;)

Will I AM Walker

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Feb. 17, 2017 @ 23:40 GMT
Dear Richard P Dolan,

Good essay on Freewill...

Your (Gods) words are nice... "“What about free will? Don’t humans have free will?” Well, since I never change, free will is meaningless to me. "

Have look at my essay also…

Best Wishes..

=snp. gupta

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Edwin Eugene Klingman wrote on Feb. 18, 2017 @ 03:47 GMT
Dear Dick Dolan,

Very, very nice essay. You are right, of course, but on a higher level than is typically the content of these essays. If you haven't read Alan Watts (This is It, The Book, etc.) you might enjoy him. He wrote your essay in the 70s.

I think you say just about all it's possible to say, but since people here are looking for math or physics explanations, you probably won't win the big prize!

A number of us agree that "mindless mathematical laws don't give rise to anything", but a surprising number don't.

Welcome to the fray (or play as you more wisely put it.)

I invite you to read my essay, but you won't learn anything you don't already know.

Thanks for most informative and entertaining essay.

Best regards,

Edwin Eugene Klingman

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Joe Fisher wrote on Feb. 18, 2017 @ 15:54 GMT
Dear Editor Dolan,

Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

I merely wish to point out that “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.”

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

sridattadev kancharla wrote on Feb. 20, 2017 @ 22:30 GMT
Dear Richard,

Yes indeed absolute consciousness is the GOD. Know thyself to know it all.



Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

sridattadev kancharla wrote on Feb. 20, 2017 @ 22:41 GMT
Oh my GOD, absolutely brilliant letter, loved it, i hope you will love this one too from your alternate self, GOD there are no goals it's all play.


atemporal i aka GOD.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Sylvain Poirier wrote on Feb. 23, 2017 @ 12:30 GMT
Hello. I see this as the best essay I saw so far in this year's contest; still in details I have some disagreements (so yes this means I generally see others I looked at as rubbish; I won't even care to comment on details).

- It is a pity you just simply dismissed the topic of mathematics, hardly saying any word about the nature of mathematics and whether and how math may have anything to...

view entire post

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Richard P Dolan wrote on Feb. 23, 2017 @ 23:16 GMT
Hello Sylvain,

Thanks for the compliment and for your thoughtful comments. I’m sure you can appreciate that it’s impossible to anticipate every possible question about the universe in a short essay. For my thoughts on other points I refer you to my blog: < > and to my website: < >.



Bookmark and Share

Sylvain Poirier wrote on Mar. 5, 2017 @ 12:25 GMT
I just looked a little further at your writings and found your conception completely incoherent (in the light of what I know): you claim "Mindless mathematical laws don’t give rise to anything" and yet your theory of everything is all about purely mathematical entities giving rise to everything. By lack of expertise in the foundations of mathematics you assumed that the ideas of "existence" "concepts" or even "self-reference" were things on the side of consciousness beyond mathematics and thus could suffice to characterize consciousness beyond mathematics. They are not. More precisely, the words "existence" and "concept" are ambiguous. Indeed there are completely mathematical versions of these: ideas of "mathematical existence", "mathematical concepts" and even some kind of self-reference, can be studied as purely mathematical structures as I did it my work, thus just like any mathematical structures they are devoid of any consciousness in themselves.

The conscious version of "existence" and "concepts", on the other hand, have their own independent source. They have always been, since the "very beginning" (which isn't anything clear) existence and concepts of non-mathematical stuff (at least, non purely mathematical stuff).

Just now I stumbled on a seemingly true revealed description of the creation. It confirmed what I said, that is, there is no such thing as atemporal existence (only somehow mathematical objects, and also any remembered event aquired a sort of permanent existence as part of memory once it occurred).

It seems the people who received this revelation are not scientists but I find it very coherent with my rational analysis of metaphysics, the foundations of maths, and quantum physics which I explained in my essay.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Don Limuti wrote on Mar. 10, 2017 @ 06:14 GMT
Hi Dick,

Nice refreshing essay. I like it very much even though I find the term God awkward.

Personally, I like the triplet of Shankara:

1. Brahman alone is real 2. This world is an illusion 3. The individual person is no other than Brahman. Loopy enough to allow mathematics :)

Yes, you get a very good rating.

Thanks for your essay,

Don Limuti

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Jonathan Khanlian wrote on Mar. 12, 2017 @ 23:13 GMT
My new favorite quote from god:

"As I said before, if it’s possible, there’s a good chance I’ll create it. That’s what I do. If you don’t want to deal with something, you’ll have to make it impossible, or at least unlikely. Sorry, but that’s the way it is."

He/she doesn't seems like the kind of person who will get you out of bind, but more like a straight-shooting parent that prepares you for the real world. In fact, based on that last line about calling home, I'm guessing my mother actually wrote this letter just posing as god!

Please check out my essay and film. One is available on Amazon Prime and iTunes, and the other is available in this essay forum.



Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Alexey/Lev Burov wrote on Mar. 24, 2017 @ 00:56 GMT
Dear Richard,

It's a lovely essay, suggesting a nice introduction to some Vedanta ideas, I would say. Since introduction to great ideas is the hardest part of showing them, I am giving you a good credit for that. As to the critical points, I have two of them: apparently, neither ethics, nor aesthetics play any role in your picture. It looks too tautological. I will discuss your composition with my son Lev and then come back with our score. Meanwhile, you are cordially invited to read and comment our essay.

See you on our page,

Alexey Burov.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Peter Jackson wrote on Mar. 27, 2017 @ 13:43 GMT

Nice approach and a welcome relief from the ever deeper confusion arising from looking the wrong way, which I agree most of science does. Particular favourite truths?

"it’s not mindless mathematical laws that give rise to everything, but consciousness" and "existence self-organizes".

I also identify self organization as causal in my essay, and also conclude we can't scientifically exclude a God or greater intelligence. I wouldn't have minded one that COULD grant 3 wishes, but we can't have everything... ..can we??



Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.