CATEGORY:
Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017)
[back]
TOPIC:
New physics for a new goal, by DURGA DAS DATTA.
[refresh]
Login or
create account to post reply or comment.
Author DURGA DAS DATTA. wrote on Jan. 27, 2017 @ 17:03 GMT
Essay AbstractEmergent gravity mechanism with fermion graviton and boson graviton will give us insight into a new physics ,
Author BioDirector of Gnan systems LLP,
Download Essay PDF File
Joe Fisher wrote on Jan. 30, 2017 @ 17:29 GMT
Dear Director Datta,
Please excuse me for I do not wish to be too critical of your fine essay.
Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.
One real visible Universe must have only one reality. Simple natural reality has nothing to do with any abstract complex musings about imaginary invisible gravitational forces.
The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.
A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and comment on its merit.
Joe Fisher, Realist
report post as inappropriate
Harry Hamlin Ricker III wrote on Jan. 31, 2017 @ 14:42 GMT
Hi, I was unable to discern how this essay had any relation to the topic of the essay contest.
report post as inappropriate
Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Feb. 7, 2017 @ 14:46 GMT
Dear Datta,
Very nice Essay sir, many present day unsolved questions were asked in your short essay. After reading your essay, I felt, you are also looking for a solution.
If you don’t mind, I want to tell you that the dark energy, dark matter and black holes are not required in Dynamic Universe Model. I want to tell you a bit about this new model of cosmology……
This...
view entire post
Dear Datta,
Very nice Essay sir, many present day unsolved questions were asked in your short essay. After reading your essay, I felt, you are also looking for a solution.
If you don’t mind, I want to tell you that the dark energy, dark matter and black holes are not required in Dynamic Universe Model. I want to tell you a bit about this new model of cosmology……
This Model is new Cosmological model fundamentally and mathematically different from Bigbang, Steady state model etc. Dynamic Universe Model is based on laws of Newtonian dynamics. It is a simple multi-body problem solution. This Dynamic Universe Model is a singularity free and body-body collision free n-body problem solution based on UGF acting on each and every body with some mass in the Universe. In this model “time” moves in one direction i.e. into future only. 133 masses were used in this setup, and the “same setup” was used for last 25 years on a simple PC without any problem in its SITA simulations. Its SITA simulations can solve many unsolved cosmological problems and successfully published solutions to vast variety of present day scientific problems.
This new type of Tensor Mathematics as in Dynamic Universe Model is different from earlier Newtonian two body problem that used differential equations, and Einstein’s general theory of relativity that used tensors which in turn unwrap into differential equations. There are no differential or integral equations here. This new Math approach was published as a paper in the journal of Tensor society of India. This Dynamic Universe Model approach solves many unsolved problems
Dynamic Universe Model of Cosmology is a singularity free N-body solution. It uses Newton’s law of Gravitation without any modification. The initial coordinates of each mass with initial velocities are to be given as input. It finds XYZ coordinates, velocities and accelerations of each mass UNIQUELY after every time-step at that moment, and can create graphs for required masses. Here the solution is based on linear tensors instead of usual differential and integral equations. This solution was stable, didn’t diverge, did not give any singularity or divided by zero errors during the last 25 years, in solving various physical problems. The calculations can be done over the particle’s entire path throughout time. These calculations can go into future for making predictions. With this model, it was found with uniform mass distribution in space, the masses will colloid. But there are no singularities. With non-uniform mass densities, the masses trend to rotate about each other after some time-steps and they don’t colloid. SITA is a simple computer implementable solution of Dynamic Universe Model. An arbitrary number of 133 masses were taken in SITA simulations using the same framework in solving various problems. Its many predictions came true like existence Blueshifted Galaxies in the universe. Its prediction that there is no dark-matter was experimentally proved later . Other variety of simulations like SAVITRI and SUBBARAO were also published. These other simulations addressed many other different problems like multiple bending of light etc. Here Cartesian co-ordinates did not give any problem. In this model Cartesian co-ordinates were used upto 10^55 meters, two or three times larger than our visible universe.
Many papers and books were published by the author, for example ‘Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary’ (1994), ‘Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe’, About “SITA” simulations ], ‘Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required’ , “New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations” , “Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background” in FQXi, “Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.”, in 2015 ‘Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model , ‘Explaining Pioneer anomaly’ , ‘Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets’, ‘Observation of super luminal neutrinos’, ‘Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up’, “Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto” etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free , Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model . Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe .
Main foundational points of Dynamic Universe Model: No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No C reation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.
All these books and papers can be downloaded from freely from Dynamic Universe Model Blog or viXra
I want your esteemed opinion and valuable comments…
view post as summary
report post as inappropriate
David Pinyana replied on Mar. 21, 2017 @ 22:27 GMT
Most of the unsolved questions are solved in my essay: THE SCALES LANDSCAPES OF THE UNIVERSE" !
Here you have a framework to develop and that will be the future of Cosmology the next 100 years !
report post as inappropriate
Peter Jackson wrote on Feb. 24, 2017 @ 09:36 GMT
Durga,
Your start point and other propositions are good; with only 5% 'matter' we should be far more serious about 'the rest'. It's also and interesting as the first proposition I've seen with 'two kinds' of gravity or 'gravitons'. We know that fermions (mainly in space plasma) have a small gravitational potential and are indeed finding far higher densities than old assumptions suggested.
As an astronomer I can say you're certainly correct about galaxies effectively rotation 'as a super fluid disk'. Even Sci-Am has pointed this out (being 'in lockstep') but too much theory and theorization fails to recognise or account for this key fact.
I also agree a cosmic recycling 'big bounce' model at more than one scale (producing a temporal galaxy evolution sequence too) and have published a paper describing it.
The essay seems like a good 'first effort' but needed rather more organization and development, which you may see done well in some others. It also needed to be related a little more to the topic. It was however original and interesting and I shall be applying more than the 1's it has so far.
I hope you'll read some of the others. Indeed preferably read and score mine of course, which I hope you'll find makes simple sense of presently confused and nonsensical theory. Certainly some quite new physics and thinking is needed!
Good effort.
Peter
report post as inappropriate
David Pinyana replied on Mar. 21, 2017 @ 22:24 GMT
Scale Factor is the future to develop in Cosmology !
It open new approaches and options to develop !
report post as inappropriate
Bishal Banjara wrote on Mar. 10, 2017 @ 08:45 GMT
Dear Durga,
The core aim of your essay deserve the Reformation of MOND that may be any way as described in your essay...but I think such MOND is 100% of essence within classical context besides the way of quantum or relativistic approach...and what is all about my essay deals with...please read once-'Newtonian Dynamics:An explicit diversion from reality'... I have seen the questions you raised in your essay may have optimum solutions from the view at root level.
Best regards from Nepal
report post as inappropriate
Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich wrote on Mar. 12, 2017 @ 21:57 GMT
Dear ДУРГА дас ДАТТА!
I invite you to familiarize yourself with New Cartesian Physic
I appreciate your essay. You spent a lot of effort to write it.
If you believed in the principle of identity of space and matter of Descartes, then your essay would be even better.
I wish to see your criticism on the New Cartesian Physic, the founder of which I call myself.
The concept of moving space-matter helped me:
- The uncertainty principle Heisenberg to make the principle of definiteness of points of space-matter;
- Open the law of the constancy of the flow of forces through a closed surface is the sphere of space-matter;
- Open the law of universal attraction of Lorentz;
- Give the formula for the pressure of the Universe;
- To give a definition of gravitational mass as the flow vector of the centrifugal acceleration across the surface of the corpuscles, etc.
New Cartesian Physic has great potential in understanding the world. To show this potential in his essay I gave The way of The materialist explanation of the paranormal and the supernatural . Visit my essay and you will find something in it about New Cartesian Physic. Note my statement that our brain creates an image of the outside world no inside, and in external space. Hope you rate my essay as high as I am yours. I am waiting your post.
Sincerely,
Dizhechko Boris
report post as inappropriate
Bayarsaikhan Bayarsaikhan Choisuren wrote on Mar. 17, 2017 @ 13:26 GMT
Dear Durgadas Datta,
I like these questions you asked that
Can we say that dark energy is having direct link with gravity mechanism?
Do we have to revise atomic model without strong force?
Then can we prove that all remaining three forces are electromagnetic due to mono magnetic coupling in dark energy gravitons?
How all the molecular couplings are same to cause equal fall of Galileo or equal number of molecules from Avogadro.
Is equivalence principle is local phenomena or universal?
Any correction required in number of quarks due to revision in standard model without strong force?
However you are explaining the gravity mechanism by a way of the hypothetical particle of graviton, your idea is somewhat similar to my idea.
I invite you to read my essay “A SPACE-TIME AS A PERFECT FLUID SINK FLOW” at the site of essay contest of FQXi, when you have a free time.
Ch.Bayarsaikhan
report post as inappropriate
David Pinyana wrote on Mar. 21, 2017 @ 22:19 GMT
Durca,
My opinion is that Dark Matter doesn´t exist at all... or at least i is not so much as 25% of our universe.
Scale Factor will explain in the future all these problems due to new interactions for higher scales (> 10 e+20 m) and smaller scales (< 10 e - 20 m).
We should understand better the different scale landscapes emergent concepts and laws...we (huaman) are not in the middle !!!
report post as inappropriate
Bayarsaikhan Bayarsaikhan Choisuren wrote on Mar. 23, 2017 @ 07:57 GMT
Dear Durgadas Datta,
We also know that none of the particles known to exist can be the dark matter particle. So it has to be a new particle of nature.
Remarkably, our most conservative hypothesis right now is that the dark matter is a new form of matter.
I like the questions that
Are we sure that there are six quarks downloaded from standard model?
Are we sure Higgs Boson derivation is correct from standard model?
I agree with your ideas that
Is it possible that our universe is electric with dark energy non isotropic field density soup of mono magnetic gravitons and anti gravitons swirling and whirling in galactic rotation revising Newton as..F=P.G.M.m/R.R where P is permeability factor of non-isotropic dark energy we also call ether.
So ether is mono magnetic non isotropic electrical where light is electromagnetic wave transmission and gravity is mono magnetic coupling of graviton component on matter molecular coupling causing equal fall of all molecules known to Galileo or equal molecules in Avogadro’s law when temp and pressure are same for the gases.
Now we have to find out these couplings from 100 TEV. LHC experiments to revise standard model for further research and to establish my ideas.
And also I have found the site that http://astronomy.net/ where supposed to be your articles.
Is it right?
Actually, I appreciate your idea on the dark matter, etc.
I would like to read more other your articles.
I wish you the best success,
Ch.Bayarsaikhan
report post as inappropriate
Don Limuti wrote on Mar. 30, 2017 @ 21:57 GMT
Dear Durga,
Some of the best essays are not getting any attention. Yours is one of them.
Please let me comment on some points you made:
1. Something is there like ether doing all these acts but whether isotropic throughout universe or what connection it may have with
gravity. YES, it is gravity caused by gravitons (with a new definition), and they are not isotropic!
2. New cosmology observations found dark pull and dark flow as if something is pulling from outside our universe. AS IF is correct, it is just normal gravity.... non-isotropic graviton mass accumulates on the periphery..pulling the inside out.
3. Are we sure that quantum physics is a calculus game? Calculus, is OK for some calculations, but not quantum mechanical ones!
4. Is it possible that our universe is electric with dark energy non isotropic field density soup. Yes, that is a good way of saying it!
5. This is a FERMION graviton having mass and qualifies for a candidate as a dark matter in itself. As such gravitons are dark matter in itself. YES, Yes, and yes! You may use the concept Fermion, I prefer to say the graviton is a Compton Wavelength....a very long one!
6. We can imagine the galaxies are rotating as a super fluid disk so that the gravitons are getting more and more dense from center of galaxy due to centrifuging action. Yes! although it is simpler than a super-fluid.
How did you ask these questions? and How did I answer them? It is noted that discoveries in physics converge from different points of views at once. Why? I do not know. But to see where I am coming from, and why I am so sure, see two papers:
http://prespacetime.com/index.php/pst/article/view/11
88/1163
http://prespacetime.com/index.php/pst/article/view/11
01/1089
This work is not complete (It never is), It is waiting for you to add your insights!
Thanks for your insightful essay, and yes I have a big ego.
Don Limuti
report post as inappropriate
Login or
create account to post reply or comment.