Dear Dr. Yousef,

Please excuse me for I do not wish to be too critical of your fine posted comments.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

One real visible Universe must have only one reality. Simple natural reality has nothing to do with any abstract complex musings about the supposed constant speed of light.

The real...

view entire post

Dear Dr. Yousef,

Please excuse me for I do not wish to be too critical of your fine posted comments.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

One real visible Universe must have only one reality. Simple natural reality has nothing to do with any abstract complex musings about the supposed constant speed of light.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

view post as summary

Thank you dear realist Joe Fisher... I like serious critical comments, they are more useful, but I am not sure if you really read my article carefully because you seem to have posted the same comments to other articles as well.

Anyway, in general your conclusion is really correct: the reality of nature is so simple that a single cell amoeba could deal with it. Thus, nothing is more simple...

view entire post

Thank you dear realist Joe Fisher... I like serious critical comments, they are more useful, but I am not sure if you really read my article carefully because you seem to have posted the same comments to other articles as well.

Anyway, in general your conclusion is really correct: the reality of nature is so simple that a single cell amoeba could deal with it. Thus, nothing is more simple than a Single Monad, being a massless and dimensionless metaphysical essence from which all the multiplicity in nature is continuously emerging and spreading over the dimensions of space and time.

The complex physical particles and objects as well as all living creation are all the multiplication of this single entity, or its spatial and temporal images. This innovative concept is actually attributed to Enoch and it is rooted deep in the history of Sumerians and Babylonians and it has been inherited by the Greeks, namely: Parmenides, and then later transferred to many other philosophers and sages, though it had been widely misinterpreted. My role was only to analyze it and compare it with the recent experimental results and test it against the main problems in physics and cosmology. As far as I can see, it can solve and even eliminate many of the major problems, such as the problem of entropy and the arrow of time, dark matter and dark energy, and even the cosmological constant problem, to mention just a few.

view post as summary

Thank you dear Branko for the kind comments.

Originally my paper is about 30 pages, so I had to delete many sections and cut others in order to make it fit the FQXI contest rules. That is why I removed the historical introduction which included references to the works of philosophers. In fact I held the view that although Newton's laws and theory of gravity lead to great industrial...

view entire post

Thank you dear Branko for the kind comments.

Originally my paper is about 30 pages, so I had to delete many sections and cut others in order to make it fit the FQXI contest rules. That is why I removed the historical introduction which included references to the works of philosophers. In fact I held the view that although Newton's laws and theory of gravity lead to great industrial applications, but Leibniz monodology would have lead to quantum mechanics, and even quantum gravity, much earlier had it been given equal consideration. In some of the sections that I had to delete, I proved that monodology is the only way to explain E=mc^2 mathematically and philosophically, because it is based on discrete motion from zero to the speed of light (see E=mc^2).

To answer some of your other profound questions:

Yes I also believe that the cosmos is finite in all aspects, so there is no infinity or singularity, but the possibilities are infinite. So infinity may only be realized with the eternal flow of time, because the infinite possibilities may not exist at once or in finite time.

With longer discussion we can argue that the future is the vacuum with infinite possibilities that can be excited to the present, the present is energy or vibrations always moving at the speed of light, and the past is void with infinite mass that may never be excited again to the present. The limited energy and masses of particles and objects that we normally encounter are relative temporal excitations from the vacuum that are always collapsing again to the become void, though their apparent continuous presence is a result of them causing new excitations that appear very similar to them because of the conservation of energy, just like when we make a tone on a string: the first vibration ceases instantly but it causes a new vibration that takes the same form until it decay due external causes.

Therefore, you are absolutely right by saying that in practice there is no zero velocity, since there is always some motion. But also you should add that there is also no full speed of light, because it is always returning back to void by absorption for example, and that is why the speed of light in vacuum is 299792458 m/s, while I postulate that its full speed in absolute vacuum, or void, is exactly 300000000 m/s, because of the three dimensions of space to one dimension of time (I know you will say the meter and second are conventional, but this is a long argument).

So in in the ultimate metaphysical reality everything is instantly fluctuating between real rest and the real full speed of light, but in the measurable physical world neither limits are fully realized.

With my best Regards

view post as summary

Dear sir,

I hope you will get some time for your perusal on Dynamic Universe Model...

See the wiki page… for Neutrinos travelled faster than light….

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light_neu
trino_anomaly

… Said..”This comparison indicated neutrinos had arrived at the detector 57.8 nanoseconds faster than if they had been traveling at the speed of...

view entire post

Dear sir,

I hope you will get some time for your perusal on Dynamic Universe Model...

See the wiki page… for Neutrinos travelled faster than light….

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faster-than-light_neu
trino_anomaly

… Said..”This comparison indicated neutrinos had arrived at the detector 57.8 nanoseconds faster than if they had been traveling at the speed of light in vacuum.”

Your words…. “There is no single theory which incorporates objects or particles with superluminal speeds.”

Please use Dynamic Universe Model. This single theoretical model’s …

Prediction of existence of large number of Blue shifted Galaxies came true. Prediction of “no dark matter” came true.

I hope you will see work on Astronomical Jets. You take ray of light or flow of neutrinos, or alpha particles parallel to plane of the Galaxy. Allow it to travel towards center of Galaxy. When that reaches center….WOOOOSH !… suddenly it turns its direction perpendicular to Galaxy center. See this paper

Explaining formation of Astronomical Jets using Dynamic Universe Model

http://viXra.org/abs/1606.0219

I actually observed super luminal velocities in astronomical jets. See these papers…

Explaining near light velocities observed in Astronomical Jets using SITA simulations

http://viXra.org/abs/1606.0232

Dynamic Universe Model solves ‘Faster than Light Neutrinos’ riddle

http://viXra.org/abs/1608.0313

Dynamic Universe Model is really wonderful; you have to SEE yourself to believe it….

See for an introduction…

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/p
/blog-page_15.html

Jn Dynamic Universe Model….

……….No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.

Many results published…

Many papers and books were published on Dynamic universe Model by the author on unsolved problems (of Bigbang) of present day Physics, for example ‘Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary’ (1994) , ‘Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe’, About “SITA” simulations, ‘Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required’, “New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations”, “Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background”, “Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.”, in 2015 ‘Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, ‘Explaining Pioneer anomaly’, ‘Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets’, ‘Observation of super luminal neutrinos’, ‘Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up’, “Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto” etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe

Have a look at:

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/p/10-feb-201-
6-all-my-published-papers.html

Best Regards

=snp.gupta

view post as summary

The standard value of the speed of light in vacuum is now considered a universal physical constant, and its exact value is 299,792,458 meters per second. Since 1983, the length of the meter has been defined from this constant as well as the international standard for time. However, this experimentally measured value corresponds to the speed of light in vacuum that is in fact not exactly empty,...

view entire post

The standard value of the speed of light in vacuum is now considered a universal physical constant, and its exact value is 299,792,458 meters per second. Since 1983, the length of the meter has been defined from this constant as well as the international standard for time. However, this experimentally measured value corresponds to the speed of light in vacuum that is in fact not exactly empty, since it may have virtual particles or what is known as quantum foam. The true speed that should be considered as the upper Cosmological Speed limit is the speed of light in “void” rather than vacuum. Vacuum still has some energy that may interact with light, but void is real “nothing”. Of course, even vacuum is very hard to achieve in labs, so void is really impossible.

The speed of light in the theoretical void is the absolute speed of the Single Monad that is necessarily in void, because it is the whole existence, and nothing is outside. In the Single Monad Model, the ultimate Cosmological Speed should be an exact integer ratio that is equal to “3”, and it has no units because both space and time originate from the same revolution of the Single Monad that performs six basic revolutions to create the three dimensions of space, and then one revolution to display it as a single frame, and start anew. Because we naturally distinguish between space and time, this speed must be measured in terms of meters per second, and it should be therefore exactly equal to 300,000,000 meters per second. The difference between this value and the standard measured value, 299,792,458 meters per second, is what accounts for the quantum vacuum in contrast to the absolute void that cannot be excited.

Of course this all relates to how actually the “meter” and “second” are initially defined, which may look just as a result of local convention. The division of the day into hours, minutes and seconds is based on the sexagenarian system that was used by the Babylonians and can be also traced back to the Sumerians, while the “meter” is known to have been originally defined in 1793 as one ten-millionth of the distance from the equator to the North Pole, and then redefined or calibrated several times until it was fixed in 1983 as the length of the path travelled by light in a vacuum during a time interval of 1/299792458 of a second. The Babylonian sexagenarian system is built around metaphysical principles that start by dividing the celestial orbs into twelve zodiac signs each of which takes thirty degrees which make a total of 360 degrees in the circle. The division of the day into 24 hours will need even more metaphysical reasoning which is beyond this discussion. It may suffice to mention here that “infinity” according to some Quantum Field Theories is considered equal to 1/12. Furthermore, although the definition of the meter has a completely different story but it looks also closely related to the above sexagenarian system, because for example a one-meter-long simple pendulum will have a period of two seconds when it oscillates in an arc of 30 degrees. Additionally, there are various speculations that connects the meter to the royal cubit that also equals the length of the above arc of 30 degrees when the radius of the circle is equal to one meter. All this within a possible small error because these definitions varied slightly over time.

However, apart from the above admittedly insufficient reasoning, we can reasonably ask why the current standard value of the speed of light is so close to 300,000,000 meter per second! The difference is only 0.0006918 %. If the meter and second are only defined conventionally, which happened well before the exact measurement of the speed of light, then how could they fit this big number within such a very small margin. Furthermore, we know now that vacuum is not all empty, so it must also have a small refraction index, since it may absorb light due to various reasons. This will bring the actual speed of light in void, rather than vacuum, even closer to 300,000,000 meter per second. Although we admit that all these speculations are not at all scientifically adequate, but it is clear that the speed of light in vacuum is related the ratio of three that the ratio of the three spatial over one temporal revolution of the Single Monad.

This the best I could say in this regard, and I admit that it is not scientifically rigorous yet.

view post as summary

Here you can read more about this book () which is actually based on the same idea presented in this essay.

The conceptual conflict between the Quantum and Relativity theories is the modern version of the recurring ancient philosophical competition between the continuum and discrete views of matter. The problem is that these two contrasting views are mutually exclusive, yet each one alone...

view entire post

Here you can read more about this book () which is actually based on the same idea presented in this essay.

The conceptual conflict between the Quantum and Relativity theories is the modern version of the recurring ancient philosophical competition between the continuum and discrete views of matter. The problem is that these two contrasting views are mutually exclusive, yet each one alone is not capable of describing the whole reality.

Therefore, any successful Theory of Everything must not rely on either the continuum or discrete space-time. Rather, these two contrasting views must be the product of such theory, and they must become complementary in the microscopic and macroscopic scales. The only contestant that may fulfill this criterion is “Oneness”, because on the multiplicity level things are either discrete or continuous, there is no other way.

view post as summary

Thank you dear Patrick for your positive comment.

I read your essay, and although it is very short but it does actually touch on the basic reality, though it requires further analysis.

In my openion althogh everything is essentially predestined, but since we do not know the destination we need to work in order to arrive to it. So you see it is all about knowledge and information as...

view entire post

Thank you dear Patrick for your positive comment.

I read your essay, and although it is very short but it does actually touch on the basic reality, though it requires further analysis.

In my openion althogh everything is essentially predestined, but since we do not know the destination we need to work in order to arrive to it. So you see it is all about knowledge and information as you said. The best way to understand this is to take two points of view, or two refernces as in Relativity.

So with respect to someone moving at the speed of light, everything exits all at once (and this is obtained by Relativity itself; a photon encounters no space-time), so everything is known, but with respect to an inertial observer, he/she need to move through space and time in order to realize more potential information.

In my original model as described in my other articles/books, I explain how one could attain these high states of realization. In summary this has to be by giviing away or giving up mass. This can even be seen through the equations:



And then integrate from m to zero when dv=0:



I hope the latex equations work!

Best Regards

Mohamed

view post as summary

The essential underlying principle in this model is that no two entities can ever co-exist together in a real single instance of time, so the physical multiplicity can only emerge by the sequential multiplication of a metaphysical monad through the inner level of time, and then evolve throughout the outer level. This can even be proved with simple logic, as follows: Because of the three...

view entire post

The essential underlying principle in this model is that no two entities can ever co-exist together in a real single instance of time, so the physical multiplicity can only emerge by the sequential multiplication of a metaphysical monad through the inner level of time, and then evolve throughout the outer level. This can even be proved with simple logic, as follows: Because of the three dimensional structure, we can conceive of seven different instances of space: < up| right | front | here | down | left | back >. The observer who is at a particular instance of space, denoted as < here >, cannot realize any of the other six instances without moving through time. So, with regard to the observer, what actually exists of space at every instance of time is only < here >. Time, on the other hand, is made from three different instances: < future | now | past >. The future does not yet exist at the present moment, which is denoted by < now >, and the past has already ceased. Therefore, what exists "here" and "now" is all what exists at the real moment for any particular observer, and this is not physical because it has no extension in space or time, i.e. it has no dimensions. Dimensions and other physical properties are a consequence of the recurrence of this metaphysical reality that exists alone at every single instance of the real now of time, and is only multiplied with the now of the inner level of time, creating space and matter which then evolves over the outer time dimension.

view post as summary

Dear Tejinder;

I would like to thank you for your encouraging comment.

As a quick answer to your question (Is there a mathematical development of the `Single Monad Model'?): Not yet, but it is in the oven.

I believe that physics should come first, and mathematics can often be misleading in many ways. First, not all accurate mathematical models describe the reality. For...

view entire post

Dear Tejinder;

I would like to thank you for your encouraging comment.

As a quick answer to your question (Is there a mathematical development of the `Single Monad Model'?): Not yet, but it is in the oven.

I believe that physics should come first, and mathematics can often be misleading in many ways. First, not all accurate mathematical models describe the reality. For example: Ptolemy's astronomical model of epicycles was able to explain the retrograde motion but it was wrong. Second, most of the times mathematics is based on approximations that could be legitimate in some domains but may lead to huge errors in other domains without being always able to tell what is wrong.

Therefore, if we were able to reach a philosophical model that explains the various puzzling phenomena, it would be easier to device the correct mathematical model later.

I believe that the Single Monad Model does solve almost all major problems in the current models of physics and cosmology, for example:

- why the speed of light is constant and invariant in all directions and all inertial reference frames?

- why the speed of light is the maximum cosmological speed limit?

- how nonlocal quantum mechanical phenomena can happen in nature without breaking the light speed limit?

- what is the real nature of the wave-particle duality?

- how the wave function collapses into the eigenstate?

- the SMM can prove the existence of the magnetic monopole and explains why it can not be observed.

- the SMM can prove the existence of the mass gap.

- the SMM can solve the vacuum catastrophe.

And others.

Due to the words limits of this contest I could not analyze all these problems. A more rigorous analysis is now being prepared for publication which includes preliminary mathematical formulation. I hope that this will develop further in the near future, and I am seeking to collaborate with interested researchers.

I would appreciate it if you have any suggestions in this regard.

Thank you again for reading and commenting.

Mohamed

view post as summary