I have thought a lot about évolution.We see on this Arrow of time that life is an emergent reality of encodings implying an increasing mass.We know 4,5 billions years ago the primitive soap with CH4 NH3 HCN H2C2 H2O ...have given amino acids and after unicells after pluricells sponges fishs reptilians mammalians hominids homo sopiens sapiens to make short in resume.We see that life evolves and...

view entire post

I have thought a lot about évolution.We see on this Arrow of time that life is an emergent reality of encodings implying an increasing mass.We know 4,5 billions years ago the primitive soap with CH4 NH3 HCN H2C2 H2O ...have given amino acids and after unicells after pluricells sponges fishs reptilians mammalians hominids homo sopiens sapiens to make short in resume.We see that life evolves and that complexification is a reality.The brains also evolve and of course the consciousness seems correlated in a general point of vue.Of course now if we analyse at this moment the homo sapiens sapiens and the number of 7,5 billions of humans,and that we analyse the emotions and the cognitive sciences and the psychology.And if we insert the evolutive parameters ,that becomes a big puzzle considering the human comportments.The parameters of human comportments are complex.Sometimes I say me but why we have had these wars or why we have this evil, this unconsciousness ? Is it due to our reptilain brains ? the evil in this logic is dedicated to disappear when we correlate with this said universal consciousness.We can rank indeed these informations and it exists many informations even for emotions.But the universalism and altruism shall be in increasing like the mass.We evolve and the parameters of encodings and cognitive interactions are so numerous that it needs a real ranking.But what is a ranking ? how can we consider the importance of an information ? the spherical volumes perhaps ? If now we analyse more far in inserting this quantum gravitation,this weakest force and that we consider gravitational informations, so it becomes relevant about the Arrow of time.That is why I beleive that we die electromagnetically not gravitationally.Of course this analyse is a philosophical point of vue,but after all matter and energy are our only one reality.If the consciousness is correlated with our gravitational singularity, so the spherical volumes indeed could help for the importance of an information.A little like the postulates and universal laws,they are proved and verified.c G and h are constants proved.We could so give an imrportance in function of volumes for a rational thought.The degrees of freedom so could be ranked with these volumes.What do you think ?

view post as summary

Fair objection, Jack. I have this to say.

1.- No neuroscientist has yet proven causal relationship between cognition and brain activity, but only a correspondence relationship at best. That is why the two-century-long efforts by neuroscientists, physicists and others to unravel the mechanisms within the central nervous system that are responsible for the production of thoughts. In the lack...

view entire post

Fair objection, Jack. I have this to say.

1.- No neuroscientist has yet proven causal relationship between cognition and brain activity, but only a correspondence relationship at best. That is why the two-century-long efforts by neuroscientists, physicists and others to unravel the mechanisms within the central nervous system that are responsible for the production of thoughts. In the lack of the above, the maps that you report, known ever since Cajal with little improvement over the decades, have no more solid experimental basis than the atlas of cognition that I have proposed.

2.- My aim was not to propose a model of cognition based on neuronal anatomy, which is not the subject matter of assignment, but to present the structure of pure human cognition according to a fitting mathematical formalism, as I understand the subject matter to be.

3.- The mentation atlas that I presented is not merely “populated after the fact with affective terms” as you put it. It is what you end up with when you attempt to normalize the repertory of human thoughts according to their phenomenological qualities, in almost the same manner as the normalization of population data, blood pressure in a population, individuals heights, IQ scores, etc. gives you a (normal) Gaussian Distribution. The latter stands for the most universal form of distributions, and it is amply grandfathered by the Quanto-Geometric Model I propose. I recognize that such novelty may and will meet resistance.

4.- The encompassing cognitive triplet structure of conscious/semi-conscious/unconscious is universally recognized in all schools of psychology, while at the same time every human individual can attest to it from their own daily mental experience. I show how it can be narrowly apprehended from specific mathematical categories that are consistent as well with the distribution of thoughts, emotions and intentions. My vision only asks of anyone for recourse to introspection for corroboration and calls NOT for the sacrifice and torture of a single cat’s brain.

Now, if I wanted to present a correlated neuro-anatomical atlas to my mentation atlas, I could very eloquently do so based on experimental outcomes. But I would have been off-topic, don’t you think, Jack?

Again, I earnestly wish you good luck in this contest and appreciate the serious effort that you have shown in your essay.

Joseph

view post as summary

Dear JJJ

I want you to ask you to please have a look at my essay, where ……………reproduction of Galaxies in the Universe is described. Dynamic Universe Model is another mathematical model for Universe. Its mathematics show that the movement of masses will be having a purpose or goal, Different Galaxies will be born and die (quench) etc…just have a look at the essay… “Distances,...

view entire post

Dear JJJ

I want you to ask you to please have a look at my essay, where ……………reproduction of Galaxies in the Universe is described. Dynamic Universe Model is another mathematical model for Universe. Its mathematics show that the movement of masses will be having a purpose or goal, Different Galaxies will be born and die (quench) etc…just have a look at the essay… “Distances, Locations, Ages and Reproduction of Galaxies in our Dynamic Universe” where UGF (Universal Gravitational force) acting on each and every mass, will create a direction and purpose of movement…..

I think intension is inherited from Universe itself to all Biological systems

For your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other.

Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example ‘Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary’ (1994) , ‘Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe’, About “SITA” simulations, ‘Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required’, “New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations”, “Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background”, “Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.”, in 2015 ‘Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, ‘Explaining Pioneer anomaly’, ‘Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets’, ‘Observation of super luminal neutrinos’, ‘Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up’, “Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto” etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.

With axioms like… No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.

Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain

Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and its blog also where all my books and papers are available for free downloading…

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/

Be
st wishes to your essay.

For your blessings please…………….

=snp. gupta

view post as summary