Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Geneva Gleason: on 6/9/18 at 18:19pm UTC, wrote very interesting , good job and thanks for sharing such a good blog. '...

Walt Hotson: on 5/31/18 at 8:35am UTC, wrote Thanks for adding me, great post you have. Couponstechie giving you the...

yify tv: on 3/7/18 at 9:48am UTC, wrote Thanks for sharing.I hope you continue to have such quality articles to...

Jane Smith: on 7/12/17 at 8:00am UTC, wrote Nice looking sites and great work. Pretty nice information. It has a better...

Dimi Chakalov: on 12/28/08 at 20:50pm UTC, wrote Regarding CTCs: I believe it was proven that any locally reflecting...

Ettore Minguzzi: on 12/28/08 at 13:59pm UTC, wrote Dear Dr. Chakalov, thank you for the appreciation and feedback. My...

Dimi Chakalov: on 12/26/08 at 2:31am UTC, wrote Dear Dr. Minguzzi, Reading your Essay is a joy. You have this utterly...

Ettore Minguzzi: on 12/23/08 at 13:43pm UTC, wrote References [13] and [14] have now been accepted for publication in CMP.


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Sabine Hossenfelder: "I have a bad memory for names. But it’s not equally bad for all names. I..." in SciMeter: A New Way to...

nancy lake: "Scientists can timidly entertain the concept of a universe with an infinite..." in Multiversal Journeys: The...

Lorraine Ford: "Georgina, For the purposes of this discussion, we can discount laws of..." in Agency in the Physical...

ahlinya benjolan: " ' target='new'>khasiat walatra propolis Qnc jelly gamat Walatra bersih..." in Constructive Suggestions...

ahlinya benjolan: " ' target='new'>khasiat walatra propolis Qnc jelly gamat Walatra bersih..." in Quantum Grantmaking

Georgina Woodward: "Lorraine, to get an outcome from the Stern Gerlach apparatus the particle..." in Agency in the Physical...

Akinbo Ojo: "Being extract from my thesis, An inquiry into the compressibility of the..." in Readers' Choice: Much Ado...

Simmy Chopra: "Thank to give us the best information. A really likeable article, ..." in The Complexity Conundrum


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Usurping Quantum Theory
The search is on for a fundamental framework that allows for even stranger links between particles than quantum theory—which could lead us to a theory of everything.

Fuzzballs v Black Holes
A radical theory replaces the cosmic crunchers with fuzzy quantum spheres, potentially solving the black-hole information paradox and explaining away the Big Bang and the origin of time.

Whose Physics Is It Anyway? Q&A with Chanda Prescod-Weinstein
Why physics and astronomy communities must take diversity issues seriously in order to do good science.

Why Time Might Not Be an Illusion
Einstein’s relativity pushes physicists towards a picture of the universe as a block, in which the past, present, and future all exist on the same footing; but maybe that shift in thinking has gone too far.

The Complexity Conundrum
Resolving the black hole firewall paradox—by calculating what a real astronaut would compute at the black hole's edge.


FQXi FORUM
July 16, 2018

CATEGORY: The Nature of Time Essay Contest (2008) [back]
TOPIC: On the global existence of time by Ettore Minguzzi [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Ettore Minguzzi wrote on Oct. 13, 2008 @ 09:42 GMT
Essay Abstract

The existence of a global time is often taken for granted but should instead be considered as a matter of investigation. By using the tools of global Lorentzian geometry I prove that, under physically reasonable conditions, the impossibility of finding a global time implies the singularity of spacetime.

Author Bio

Ettore Minguzzi is researcher of mathematical physics at the University of Florence, Italy. He has earned his PhD from Milano University in 2002. His main research interests are in general relativity and applied gauge theories. In the last years he has contributed to global Lorentzian geometry and causality theory in particular with the study of the "causal ladder of spacetimes". He is a member of SIGRAV "Società Italiana di Relatività Generale e Fisica della Gravitazione", SEGRE "Spanish Society on Relativity and Gravitation" and ISGRG "International Society on General Relativity and Gravitation".

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Ettore Minguzzi wrote on Dec. 1, 2008 @ 11:45 GMT
I inform the readers that recently, the technical papers on which this essay is based, namely reference [13] "Chronological spacetimes without lightlike lines are stably

causal" and [14] "K-causality coincides with stable causality" have received positive referee reports from Communications in Mathematical Physics (minor changes have been asked).

Bookmark and Share



Cristi Stoica wrote on Dec. 6, 2008 @ 12:03 GMT
Dear Dr. Minguzzi,

I read your essay, which I consider impressive, as it shows that in a Lorentz manifold the existence of singularities can be guaranteed under more relaxed circumstances than usual. I find interesting your main result concerning the existence of singularities in the absence of a global time without closed causal curves.

Best wishes,

Cristi Stoica

“Flowing with a Frozen River”,

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/322

Bookmark and Share



Ettore wrote on Dec. 6, 2008 @ 15:45 GMT
Thank you for the appreciation Cristi, it is nice to receive some feedback. Ettore

Bookmark and Share



Ettore Minguzzi wrote on Dec. 23, 2008 @ 13:43 GMT
References [13] and [14] have now been accepted for publication in CMP.

Bookmark and Share



Dimi Chakalov wrote on Dec. 26, 2008 @ 02:31 GMT
Dear Dr. Minguzzi,

Reading your Essay is a joy. You have this utterly professional skills to elaborate on the most intricate issues in GR -- the obvious, and deeply puzzling, fact that we observe mass with one "charge" only.

May I ask a question. You wrote: "Instead, only massless particles make sense, and thus the concept of non-singularity must be expressed from the ‘point of view’ of massless particles."

I wonder how you would explain the absence of Closed Timelike Curves (CTCs) from the ‘point of view’ of massless particles. CTCs are exactly what we should expect from GR (cf. W.B. Bonnor, Closed timelike curves in general relativity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D12 (2003) 1705-1708; gr-qc/0211051 v1). It seems to me that CTCs (and timelike naked singularities, cf. R. Goswami et al., gr-qc/0410041v1) are just like the ultraviolet catastrophe from 1905, which too has never happened.

Thank you for your (global) time.

Dimi Chakalov

Bookmark and Share



Ettore Minguzzi wrote on Dec. 28, 2008 @ 13:59 GMT
Dear Dr. Chakalov,

thank you for the appreciation and feedback.

My opinion is that spacetimes with chronology violating regions (CTC) are worth studying and should not be dismissed a priori. Nevertheless, in this work I assume that the absence of CTC could be physically justified at least in some limit. In reference [13] I considered the case in which the spacetime admits CTC. Thanks to a result due to Kriele, the main conclusion of my work does not change if the chronology violating region is of limited size (i.e. does not extend to infinity). It is sometimes speculated that future civilizations could perhaps produce chronology violating regions but in this case these regions would probably be limited (time machines). Thus in this case the consequences of the main theorem (i.e. the existence of a time function under null geodesic completeness) would still hold.

As for the presence of timelike naked singularity, their possible presence does not change the main result of this work since the cosmic censorship conjecture is not assumed. Indeed, assuming it for instance in the strong form would be equivalent to the assumption of global hyperbolicity which implies stable causality and hence the existence of a time function. Clearly, in this case it would be trivial to deduce the existence of a time function.

Best wishes,

E. Minguzzi

Bookmark and Share



Dimi Chakalov wrote on Dec. 28, 2008 @ 20:50 GMT
Regarding CTCs: I believe it was proven that any locally reflecting spacetime with a CTC is 'totally vicious', i.e. one with a CTC through every point (Jong-Chul Kim and Jin-Hwan Kim, Totally vicious space-times, J Math Phys 34 (1993) 2435-2439). A CTC is worse than the Ebola virus, as it is interwoven in the possible models of spacetimes permitted in GR. Yet there is no trace from any CTCs in the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation. No trace from any timelike naked singularity either. Ergo, we might be facing the kind of "ultraviolet catastrophe" I mentioned before, and need some really huge breakthrough to explain why all these nasty things have never happened.

I wish you best of luck with your work.

Dimi Chakalov

Bookmark and Share



Jane Smith wrote on Jul. 12, 2017 @ 08:00 GMT
Nice looking sites and great work. Pretty nice information. It has a better understanding. Thanks for spending time on it. survival games

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


yify tv tv wrote on Mar. 7, 2018 @ 09:48 GMT
Thanks for sharing.I hope you continue to have such quality articles to share with everyone! I believe there will be many people who share my views when they read this article from you!

- yify

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Walt Hotson Hotson wrote on May. 31, 2018 @ 08:35 GMT
Thanks for adding me, great post you have. Couponstechie giving you the best deals on lorextechnology,on which you could get best discount on security system camera. Buy lorextechnology Coupon and get best discount on your payment amount which you want to take.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Geneva Gleason Gleason wrote on Jun. 9, 2018 @ 18:19 GMT
very interesting , good job and thanks for sharing such a good blog.

Unblocked Games

superfighters unblocked

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.