CATEGORY:
Wandering Towards a Goal Essay Contest (2016-2017)
[back]
TOPIC:
Wandering with the Wind by MIROSLAW KOZLOWSKI
[refresh]
Login or
create account to post reply or comment.
Author MIROSLAW KOZLOWSKI wrote on Jan. 10, 2017 @ 21:51 GMT
Essay Abstract In this essay we, based on the real physicist experience in nuclear physics research, present the evident influence of the second reality on the work of physicist.
Author BioBio. I am Emeritus Professor , Warsaw University, Warsaw , Poland. At the beginning my work in physics I was engaged in the study of high energy nuclear reactions, next relativistic heavy ion reactions ( JINR- Dubna, PSI Villigen and CERN) and ultra- high intensity laser induced phenomena. In those fields I published above 200 papers and 6 monographs in USA and Germany. Recently I started the investigations of the physics of human brain and cancer. All my papers ( published) and scientific projects I am involved can be find out on Research Gate
Download Essay PDF File
Gary D. Simpson wrote on Jan. 12, 2017 @ 15:47 GMT
Miroslaw,
Indeed, serendipity is almost magic:-) Whether it be an apple on Isaac Newton's head or the wind turning the pages of one of your textbooks, sometimes it seems that the universe will help us to understand it. Perhaps the universe wants to be understood?
Best regards,
Gary Simpson
report post as inappropriate
Author MIROSLAW KOZLOWSKI replied on Jan. 12, 2017 @ 17:16 GMT
Dear Gary
Thank you very much for your comment.You are right Universe is waiting for us.
My best regards
Miroslaw
Joe Fisher replied on Jan. 14, 2017 @ 17:07 GMT
Dear Professor Kozlowski,
One real Universe must have only one reality. As I have thoughtfully pointed out in my brilliant essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY, the real Universe consists only of one unified visible infinite surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light. Reality am not a complicated.
Joe Fisher, Realist
report post as inappropriate
Author MIROSLAW KOZLOWSKI replied on Feb. 12, 2017 @ 10:15 GMT
Dear Professor Fisher
If we introduce Infinity then the structure of All is a rather complicated , is not?
Best regards
Mirosław
Steve Dufourny wrote on Jan. 22, 2017 @ 20:25 GMT
Hello Mr Koslowski,
Thanks for sharing your papper about your researchs and your discovery.
Best Regards
report post as inappropriate
Author MIROSLAW KOZLOWSKI replied on Feb. 12, 2017 @ 10:20 GMT
Dear Dr Dufourny
Thank you for reading my personal opinion on my research in nuclear physics
Regards
Mirosław
Steve Dufourny replied on Feb. 23, 2017 @ 17:39 GMT
You are welcome, Professor, doctor sir,...I liked your papper.
It is a good work.Well about me don't say dr ,I am a simple nursery man for plants .A simple little belgian nursery man.So like I am Young 41 years old,so tell hello steve.The simplicity always professor doctor.
But well we are not here to speak about psychology but about objective sciences.Like you have worked on relevant experiments about this stanbdard model and our nuclear forces apprently,so you encircle well this standard model in logic, you encircle the steps of encodings due to evolution.And so you understand that quarks gluons are the strongest forces of our standard model.You encircle so doctor that this electyromagnetic with photons are the weakest forces of our standard model.But well ok let'"s go more far now and let's analyse this quantum gravitation, this weakest quant force tending to infinity.So like you know persons at cern or this or that like you make experiments impiortant for humanisty apparently, so you can say me what are the expermiments to find this weakest quant force, My question is this one, do you consider this quantum gravity like an emergent electromagnetic force ? do you consider that this gravitation at this quantum scale is bosonic photonic if I can say to make simple? if yes explain me why ? I am always happy to learn new things.So from experts and professors doctors so you shall understand that I wait an answer relevant from you.
Steve nursery man, human on earth :)
Best Professor doctor , happy to have persons so skiliings on this contest,thanks for that.
report post as inappropriate
Steve Dufourny replied on Feb. 23, 2017 @ 18:03 GMT
I liked your little play of humility ,interesting Professor miroslaw,interesting.Lol
Don't forget to explain me this quantum gravitation,I will explain mine with humility ion front of this infinite entropy.
Best
report post as inappropriate
Author MIROSLAW KOZLOWSKI replied on Feb. 23, 2017 @ 19:45 GMT
Hello Steve
First of all I am of the opinion that in nearest days we will have not answer to your question. I suspect that gravitation is some special force which build up and keep together the Universe. And in my point of view Universe is not recognizable, so it is with gravitation. BTW in my young years I wrote a paper to Fundamental Physics Lettere in which I showed that the gravitation created time arrow in our Universe. So where I stand.
Be happy
Miroslaw
Steve Dufourny replied on Feb. 24, 2017 @ 10:00 GMT
:) interestinng answer professor.
But the gravitation has so many scales.
We have G, g,g' for others mass but we have an unknown ,this quantum weakest force in fact.This force does not converge with our standard model.There are several problems.It is this quantum gravitation which intersts me ,not the universal gravitation that we know well and that we can explain with m1m2 G r² or the newtonian mechanics with F=ma or applied to mg and this and that.The quantum gravitation is different ,in the same newtonian proportioons but different.The uantum gravitaion is searche and we search also answers for blacks holes ,dark matter, dark energy.The whole must be unified in fact simply.Gravitation is more than we can imagine, it is the main chief orchestra at my humble opinion.
all the best
report post as inappropriate
Steve Dufourny replied on Feb. 25, 2017 @ 11:00 GMT
let's go farer.let's analyse the generality of our universe Professor doctor.We have our standard model and the 3 main forces, elecrtropmagnetism, weak interactions, and nuclear forces strong.We have a problem with this gravitation tending to infinity.We cannot explain this weakest quantum force with our our standard model.The real question so how can we understand this quantum force.The works on...
view entire post
let's go farer.let's analyse the generality of our universe Professor doctor.We have our standard model and the 3 main forces, elecrtropmagnetism, weak interactions, and nuclear forces strong.We have a problem with this gravitation tending to infinity.We cannot explain this weakest quantum force with our our standard model.The real question so how can we understand this quantum force.The works on thermo
and heat and electromagnetism are not sufficient to understand this gravity at quantm scale.We can make all what we want we have a problem.Now let's see the whole in its most simple explaination.We must consider that all quantum serie or cosmological serie of spherical volumes posses a central singularity, physical.That is why we can superimpose the gravity to our standard model when we consider for example that our universal sphere possesses a central singularity implying a gravitational aether in producing particles cold of gravitation.See that this singularity is connected with all quant singularities, the central Black holes.Now imagine that we have a serie of quantum BHs with forces stronger than our nucleaor gluonic quarks forces if I can say to make simple.And that we have also parrticles of gravitation, I named them the spherons proportional in linear vel with the spherical volumes of the BHs where they come from.These particles speeder not relativistic nor baryonic than photons and in the cold are encoded also in our nuclei with forces them weaker than our electromagnetism with photons.All this to explain professor that the standard model is encircled by this cold gravitation,and that the aether is gravitational from this central cosm singularity, the biggest BH in logic producing the speedest particdles of gravitation.So now if we consider a serie finite for the spherical volumes and that you insert my equation E=mc²+ml² so you can see that we have the linear l velocity of particles of gravitation before encodings if I vcan say like the photons.Now let's try to see the primordial fractalisation of this central cosm sngularity.We have so a finite seriez, the groups and the padics number make me crazzy but the problem is not there.All this to tell you that we can like that consider that a photon is a spheron coded ,so a serie primordial of spherical volumes;That permits to imply the tehrmodynamical properties.Like I said that the gravitation by this cold is the main chielf orchestra.You can easily professor understand that the quantum weakest force is ex^plained, like the dark matter and BHs.The paradox is that this force which is the weakest is also the strongest.Now let's go farer in inserting the works of Prof Tegmark and multivers that I consider like multispheres.So we have an interesting plays of maths for the singularities implying the spherical gravitational aetheres in function of the spherical volumle of the singularity of allo systems in its finite serie.That implies that we return at this unquenss for the main central sphere of the sphere.That implies that we cvan play with the constants of each universe because the main center implies its intrinsic aether,gravitational.So G,c,h ,alpha fine structure cst.....are different for each aethers,gravitational.You can see easily that the aether is not luminiferous.It is just a photonic sphere.Hope that helps professor
Regards
view post as summary
report post as inappropriate
Mirek replied on Feb. 26, 2017 @ 14:25 GMT
Hello Steve
I think that the gravitation as the cosmic force is only partially seen by objects in our Universe In another word gravitation leaked off of our Universe. In our Universe we detected only that shape of gravitation which resembles the electromagnetic force and not for example weak forcese . This is main problem dual nature of gravitation
Be happy Mirosław
report post as inappropriate
Steve Dufourny replied on Mar. 2, 2017 @ 21:36 GMT
Hi doctor ,
Interesting ......but forget this electromagnetism for this gravity.The bosons cannot answer like the gravitons for example.This quantum weakest force cannot be an emergent electromagnetic force.The cold DOCTOR :)encircling the heat .....
report post as inappropriate
hide replies
Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Feb. 8, 2017 @ 21:21 GMT
It is a Good discovery sir …..” Alpha particle inside 9Be* nucleus”….. guided by consciousness…
Your essay is not in simple language, but how this goes to aims from math is not clear...
report post as inappropriate
Author MIROSLAW KOZLOWSKI replied on Feb. 12, 2017 @ 10:23 GMT
Dear DrSatyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta
Thank you for your comment. . I am of the opinion that theoretical nuclear physics is guided by Mart!, Is noat?
Regards
Mirosław
Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Mar. 18, 2017 @ 09:24 GMT
Dear sir,
I am not Dr...
Best wishes
=snp
report post as inappropriate
Peter Jackson wrote on Mar. 4, 2017 @ 11:10 GMT
Miroslaw,
Lovely essay to read, and I think with some important advancement to science (as my own!) but are most of academia and editors currently out wandering lost somewhere in the past?
I'm no nuclear physicist but am excited by your finding; "We discovered new type of light excited nuclei with excited alpha particle inside. This nuclei are unstable, with emission of p and t Will this be published? or is it too new to pass the gatekeepers (armed guards!) of theory.
How familiar are you with plasma?/Ions?/condensation of Fermion pairs? Do you agree the pairs may be identical just with opposite orientations? as with 'split' pairs in QM?
I do hope you may take a rigorous look at the simple momenta pair identified in my essay and confirm my derivation of the orthogonal cos2 curves of QM. established physicist run screaming rather than look and bury their heads in the sand or even a dung pile!
I'd also like to talk and think more about the 8-9Mev continuum energy recognised in nuclear physics. I think I referred to something similar in terms of the 'condensate', conceptually equivalent to Paul Dirac's 'new ether'. How 'recognised' is it and what is the interpretation. Any good links?
If I had to write an essay in
any foreign language it would be gobbledegook! Very well written but languishing too low so worth a top mark.
Best wishes
Peter
report post as inappropriate
Author MIROSLAW KOZLOWSKI wrote on Mar. 4, 2017 @ 11:58 GMT
Dear Peter.
Your letter was as glass of Armagnac( 10 y old). Paper with excited alpha particles inside nuclei was published in 1981 in Lettere al Nuovo Cimento. In my opinion we in that time found new type nuclei. These nuclei are precursor of hot spot nuclei - hot spot is excited alpha particle. In very old Times . two polish physicist Danysz and Pniewski discovered hyperfragments nuclei with lambda hyperon ( excited nucleon) in place nucleon. We find alpha excited in place of four nucleons).. I think both phenomena were important steps in developing nuclear physivc
Miroslaw
PS Peter I invited tou to my project on ResearchGate entitled Radiant Consciousness
Lettere al. Nuovo Cimento, vol 31 ( 1981), p.565
Héctor Daniel Gianni wrote on Mar. 12, 2017 @ 22:40 GMT
Dear Miroslaw Koslowski
I invite you and every physicist to read my work “TIME ORIGIN,DEFINITION AND EMPIRICAL MEANING FOR PHYSICISTS, Héctor Daniel Gianni ,I’m not a physicist.
How people interested in “Time” could feel about related things to the subject.
1) Intellectuals interested in Time issues usually have a nice and creative wander for the unknown.
2) They usually enjoy this wander of their searches around it.
3) For millenniums this wander has been shared by a lot of creative people around the world.
4) What if suddenly, something considered quasi impossible to be found or discovered such as “Time” definition and experimental meaning confronts them?
5) Their reaction would be like, something unbelievable,… a kind of disappointment, probably interpreted as a loss of wander…..
6) ….worst than that, if we say that what was found or discovered wasn’t a viable theory, but a proved fact.
7) Then it would become offensive to be part of the millenary problem solution, instead of being a reason for happiness and satisfaction.
8) The reader approach to the news would be paradoxically adverse.
9) Instead, I think it should be a nice welcome to discovery, to be received with opened arms and considered to be read with full attention.
11)Time “existence” is exclusive as a “measuring system”, its physical existence can’t be proved by science, as the “time system” is. Experimentally “time” is “movement”, we can prove that, showing that with clocks we measure “constant and uniform” movement and not “the so called Time”.
12)The original “time manuscript” has 23 pages, my manuscript in this contest has only 9 pages.
I share this brief with people interested in “time” and with physicists who have been in sore need of this issue for the last 50 or 60 years.
Héctor
report post as inappropriate
Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich wrote on Mar. 17, 2017 @ 18:08 GMT
Dear MIROSLAW KOZLOWSKI
I inform all the participants that use the electronic translator, therefore, my essay is written badly. I participate in the contest to familiarize English-speaking scientists with New Cartesian Physic, the basis of which the principle of identity of space and matter. Combining space and matter into a single essence, the New Cartesian Physic is able to integrate modern physics into a single theory. Let FQXi will be the starting point of this Association.
Don't let the New Cartesian Physic disappear! Do not ask for himself, but for Descartes.
New Cartesian Physic has great potential in understanding the world. To show potential in this essay I risked give "The way of The materialist explanation of the paranormal and the supernatural" - Is the name of my essay.
Visit my essay and you will find something in it about New Cartesian Physic. After you give a post in my topic, I shall do the same.
Sincerely,
Dizhechko Boris
report post as inappropriate
Login or
create account to post reply or comment.