This is a good but not great experiment. Similar to the time delays or gravitational deflection of quasars as a function of earth's orbit about the sun, this measurement will result in two correlated circles of time delay interferences superimposed on each other from each of the moons of Saturn.
This shows many references and also shows that these kinds of radiotelescope measurements have a great deal of noise, especially when the radiotelescope is close to the direction of the sun. It is not clear if these workers in this latest rendition will have enough signal to noise to actually do this measurement.
It is further not clear what new information about cosmic time delays it will reveal besides what has been amply demonstrated time and again, but what the heck...
The LISA pathfinder experiment that is heading out to L1 very soon will be much more fun. LISA's precise weighing of two very cold 2 kg Au/Pt cubes in a well controlled L1 orbit promises to reveal much more about the nature of our aether reality. The confusion of geodesics at L1 results in a gravity beamsplitter that should show quantum effects.
Will the cubes become entangled at L1 and show interference effects beyond the interferometry that will measure their masses? That would be a lot of fun...
Hello Mr Agnew,
I agree about this experiment, it is good but not really relevant considering that these waves are above the logic of our electromagnetic waves.
That said, it becomes relevant in inserting several parameters in this interfermotry of Michelson.The 75 per cent of Au and 25 per cent of Pl wawww,but is it relevant for this gravitomagnetism.
I have an idea, a spherical rotor with the good proportion of elements and of course more my humble équations about sphères,quant and cosmol.
With an algorythm permitting to sort the other cosmological perturbations.An other algorythm can be inserted with the volumes of cosmological sphères,we can so find the central main cosmological sphère and so its effects on the spacetime respecting the general relativity.
Just a thought
Regards
report post as inappropriate
Steve Dufourny replied on Sep. 7, 2015 @ 12:09 GMT
Matter and energy can be better understood with my equations.I am insisting.THE EQUATION OF SPHERISATION FIELDS with spherical volumes....AND THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELDS appear AND ALSO the cosmological constant must be imrpoved at my humble opinion.
Schrödinger and Maxwell should agree it seems to me :)
report post as inappropriate
Steve Dufourny replied on Sep. 7, 2015 @ 12:22 GMT
The quaNtum gravitation is so in the same line of reasoning.
I d like to find this constant linking all central quantum sphères at this central cosmological sphere. WHO has an idea for the correct mathematical formalism dear scientists ? The universal spherical constant :)
thought for souls ...
report post as inappropriate
Steve Agnew replied on Sep. 9, 2015 @ 03:30 GMT
For ideas, you have come to the right place...for answers, this place might keep your futures possible.
All particles have intrinsic spin and so the spinning sphere is a paradigm for all microscopic quantum charge bonding. All gravity objects likewise have spin and so the spinning sphere is likewise a paradigm for cosmic gravity bonding.
The relative phases of spins of microscopic particles determine how they bond to each other and three particles bonded with a pi phase are what we call a straight line while if those three particles have a pi/2 phase, we call that a right angle.
Our notions of Cartesian space and motion in space and even continuous time all come from the bonding actions of the spin phase of rotating spheres. On the cosmic scale, we see that a rotating Earth rotates around a rotating sun inside of a rotating galaxy as part of a rotating galaxy cluster.
Is that enough rotation of spheres for you?
The Earth rotation decays at 0.28 ppb/yr and the international prototype kilogram decays at twice that rate because time also decays, not just matter. Millisecond pulsars are rotating neutron stars and there rotation decays on average about 0.26 ppb/yr...is that enough cosmological spheres for you?
Rotating spheres are what make the universe work at quantum and cosmic scales.
report post as inappropriate
Steve Dufourny replied on Sep. 9, 2015 @ 10:04 GMT
thanks Mr Agnew, you have forgotten the rotating black sphères :) and also in my line of reasoning, the central cosmological black sphere does not turn and also the universal sphere does not turn.
So it was not enough in my line of reasoning.You have forgotten the gEnerality.
So you have no ideas for the mathematical formalism ?
Regards
report post as inappropriate
Steve Dufourny replied on Sep. 9, 2015 @ 10:17 GMT
You know I explain my theory since more than 5 yearson this Platform and more than 8years on net. But anybody have been able to formalize my reasoning. Perhaps it is just due to intrinsic vanity of people or the jealousy or perhaps the lack of generaliyy of these persons simply.
I am not here to laugh you know, I search competent collaborators.We are not here to tell the same thing that we know already
Regards
report post as inappropriate
Steve Dufourny replied on Sep. 9, 2015 @ 10:57 GMT
You know Mr Agnew, My theory is not Fallen from the sky like that. For your information I class animals and vegetals since the age of 17 years,I am 40 years old now,I have read so many books and physics is my passion.I classed also a little of all.It is in classing that I have had this eureka if I can say in all humility,it is not forbidden it seems to me.I am going to tell you the day where I...
view entire post
You know Mr Agnew, My theory is not Fallen from the sky like that. For your information I class animals and vegetals since the age of 17 years,I am 40 years old now,I have read so many books and physics is my passion.I classed also a little of all.It is in classing that I have had this eureka if I can say in all humility,it is not forbidden it seems to me.I am going to tell you the day where I have had this theory.I classed and in clissaing the brains in an evolutive line.I have compared the brains of animals, selacians....fishs....reptils....inferior mammalians.....Superior mammalians....I show you with a very simple resume of course, I cannot put all my classings since millions years of course. And there I have said me,oh my god even the brain is on the road of spherisation.It was this day that I have said me,the universe is a sphere and the spherisation is a general truth.After I have seen all others correlated truths. It was simple in fact, in all humility do you know the wordsof Feynman"one we shall see all the truth, and we shall say, oh my god but how is it possible that we have not seen that before"It was only simple than this Mr Agnew,in classing a little of all.You know the complexity always returns to simplicity. Look around you and you should see the real meaning of my theory of spherisation.Even the favorite sports of humans are with sphères,the waves are sphericla, the planets, the particles,the stars,the fruits and seeds are always in this line of reasoning also, spheroids.
In fact, it is logic that universe is a sphere and black holes also.Our eyes also,the virus, bacterias,or this or that in majority are always in this line of reasoning.They build these quantum sphères Mr Agnew,quantum sphères evolution spherisation ......even the lifes created HCNO ...NH4 CO2 H2OHCN......AMINOACIDS.PROTEINS....and this and that..... YOU SEE NOW HOW THEY ROTATE NO? and build on this time line .....AND US NOW THE HUMANS LIVING ON A SPHERE,TURNING AROUND A SPHERE,composed by sphères and this and that .....
ps the generality Mr Agnew is better than details
Best Regards
view post as summary
report post as inappropriate
Steve Agnew replied on Sep. 19, 2015 @ 13:38 GMT
We are here discovering how the universe really works and first of all, that discovery must have some limited number of axioms. Axioms must be first of all be self evident and your black spheres are not self evident.
Matter is self evident, time is self evident, and action is self evident. To everyone else on this planet except me, continuous space and motion are also self-evident notions. However, since continuous space and motion do not describe all objects in the universe, like black holes and dark matter, it is apparent that continuous space and motion are simply not universal notions and are rather limited.
Once you have your primal beliefs as axioms, then you can have any number of math bases that allow you to predict the futures of objects, which is what discovery is all about. Science then measures those futures and compares to the predictions and if there is a good match, the theory is useful. Continuous space and motion are notions that are quite useful for nearly all of our local reality and space and motion only fail at very large and very small scales.
A theory cannot be just about a hypothetical basis set of black spheres and there needs to be more meat on the bones.
report post as inappropriate
Steve Dufourny replied on Sep. 19, 2015 @ 13:58 GMT
You are a comic , a vanitious and you lacks of generality.
Now answer to my questions,
Howdo you see a BH central to galaxies for example? a square ,or perhaps a wormholes or a KK theory giving the M THEORY,
How do you see a particles? A triangle self evident perhaps
How do you see our universe ? A spacetime with what Mr Agnew, a BB with what a whorholes also with decoherences and revesrsibility of times???
How do you see our atoms Mr Agnew??? and its bosonic encodings and black sphères ????
How do you see the planets and stars Mr Agnew ? Why we should have an other form for our BH ???
See with your eyes(spherical) the generality of our universe Mr Agnew and perhaps you shall understand what is dark matter and dark energy produced by these black cosmological sphères above our lecromagnetism.
What is the aether ? A electromagnetic wave perhaps??? Any sense , it ispurelly limited like reasoning, you forget the essentials, the foundamentals.And don't say methat the medium has answered to you ??
How are the foundamentals Mr Agnew??? Pentagon? Oor perhaps that fruits, cells and virus and favorita sports of humans are also with squares?
How do you see the evolution ?? A squarization in 10 dimensions where our foundamentals sooses their universal meanings?
Is it a joke mr Agnew , you lack of generality and it is not with your vanity that you are goingtounderstand really what is the SR and thegeneral relativity.Even the timesyou do not understand it ?
The universe is a sphere in spherisation , with a central sphere(BH SPHERE)
Ourparticles also are sphères because they turn Mr Agnew.
You do not understand the entropy and the encoding of informations.
Black sphères particles are logic and rational in the encoding of evolution, like the bosons.
It is sad Mr Agnew that you do not see the generality,so learn and stop your stupid ironical extrapolations.
Self evident, yes of course and meI am the queen of england.
report post as inappropriate
Steve Dufourny replied on Sep. 19, 2015 @ 14:04 GMT
And you insist furthermore with your" we are here to find howthe universe works"?
Is it a joke Mr Agnew, your technical analyzes are pure irony.
How could you explain a thing that you do not understand???
What are your inventions Mr Agnew, your innovations???You repeat always the same things about a thing that you do not understand ?
So where are we going , in a squarisation of your mind simply.
report post as inappropriate
Steve Dufourny replied on Sep. 19, 2015 @ 14:09 GMT
We are here on a wonderful Platform , and my rule is to show what are the foundamentals!
If people reads or learns, they must be well diriged.
It is not a bad interpretation of the aether or the entropy or the encoding of informations that they are going to understand how this universal sphere works you know.
Mr Corda is competent,Mr Ellis also, it is them who must speak , not you and your friends.
Determinism and empirism must be there.And it is not you who shows the determnistic road you know.Let me laugh frankly.I have not finished , be sure.
To you poor thinker.
report post as inappropriate
Steve Dufourny replied on Sep. 19, 2015 @ 14:16 GMT
You do not understand, so don't teach,really, but learn?
You know me I learn all days the good sciences when they are foundamental and accepted by the global sciences community.
If I have made errors in my theory, I will improve it without vanity.It is not your case.What is your theory?
I am persuaded that real generalists have seen my rational reasoning and it is withthem that I am going to improve my works, not with people who confounds all?
It is logic in fact.
report post as inappropriate
Steve Dufourny replied on Sep. 19, 2015 @ 14:21 GMT
Even maths you bad utilize them.
Technical, yes of course and a time machine and also a warp drive perhaps????
report post as inappropriate
Steve Dufourny replied on Sep. 19, 2015 @ 14:38 GMT
And for your information, an axiom in maths must be well utilised. The black sphères are logic ,if an axiomatic formalismmust be made, I will do with rationalism and empirism in respect of the scholl of Copenaghen.
At this moment I have not seen a good mathematician to help me on this Platform.
I just see a kind of play of vanity without generality.
It is not you you know who are going to helpme to formalize my works nor your friends.Mr hawking or Mr Corda, them are competent.So frankly let's be serious when we speak about how our universe works.
report post as inappropriate
Steve Agnew replied on Sep. 19, 2015 @ 15:00 GMT
Gee, you do not need to get all upset. Your questions and statements do not seem very technical and so it is not clear whether you want more math or more examples or both.
This forum is all about words and discourse with words. If you want to know about the technical side of aethertime, there are lots of detailed technical papers. But you do not seem to have a technical background and have a very intuitive approach instead.
So there is a blog with a little more
wordsy discourse, but somehow it does not seem like discourse is what you are after...
Universal_Quantum_Action_in_the_Matter-Time_Universe
BLACK_HOLES_AS_BOSON_STARS_BOUND_BY_AN_ETERNALLY_COLLAPSING_
OBJECT_WITH_MATTER_TIME_METRICVariation_of_the_Fine_Structur
e_Constant_over_Time_in_the_Matter_Time_UniverseGALAXY_ROTAT
ION_WITHOUT_DARK_MATTER_IN_THE_MATTER-TIME_UNIVERSECorrelati
on_of_Solar_Sunspot_Cycle_with_Nearby_Stars_Procyon_and_61-C
ygniDecay_of_the_International_Prototype_Kilogram
report post as inappropriate
Steve Dufourny replied on Sep. 19, 2015 @ 15:29 GMT
All is said I have said
your tezchnical analyses don't interest me, it is just Wind.
You don't understand I am repeating the gravitational Aether, the entropy and the encoding of informations.
So don"t insist ,it will be my last post perhaps with you.You are nor technical, nor general.
report post as inappropriate
hide replies