Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

games Fans: on 11/12/18 at 20:20pm UTC, wrote Your article is very interesting. I think this article has a lot of...

Lara Johnson: on 8/4/17 at 6:41am UTC, wrote I have gone through this publication and feels that it is really helpful...

Luca Valeri: on 4/13/15 at 21:23pm UTC, wrote Dear Tung Ten Yong, Congrats. A really short and pregnant essay. Your...

RJ Tang: on 4/12/15 at 19:53pm UTC, wrote I agree that all knowledge is local and conditional. It is impossible to...

Joe Fisher: on 4/10/15 at 14:43pm UTC, wrote Dear Tung, I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein was...

Sujatha Jagannathan: on 4/1/15 at 11:55am UTC, wrote Some more synthesis is needed to the collected purport. -Sincerely, Miss....

Tung Ten Yong: on 3/15/15 at 5:31am UTC, wrote Interesting. All I can think of now is such a general method (that checks...

Tung Ten Yong: on 3/15/15 at 5:10am UTC, wrote Thanks. It is not easy. But maybe we can see clearer by questioning the...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Steve Dufourny: "lol REVOLUTION SPHERISATION everywhere at all scales,REVOLUTION..." in Alternative Models of...

Georgina Woodward: "The kind of time required, over which the material change is happening, (to..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Steve Dufourny: "after all like Borh has made,this universe and its spheres for me are like..." in Alternative Models of...

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

Lorraine Ford: "With the “A.I. Feynman” software, Silviu-Marian Udrescu and Max Tegmark..." in Will A.I. Take Over...

Georgina Woodward: "Coin toss co-state potentials: With the measurement protocol decided, in..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Steve Dufourny: "If we correlate with the consciousness, can we consider that all is..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
October 23, 2019

CATEGORY: Trick or Truth Essay Contest (2015) [back]
TOPIC: Copernican Principle and Theory by Tung Ten Yong [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Tung Ten Yong wrote on Mar. 12, 2015 @ 19:02 GMT
Essay Abstract

In thie essay I applies Copernican Principle to our possible theories of Universe and reaches a startling conclusion - realism of Scientific theories is not tenable. We also discuss its implication to the status of Mathematics and Mathematical Platonism.

Author Bio

Name: Tung Ten Yong Date of Birth: 8/9/1980 Country: Malaysia Education: Physics, National University of Singapore

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Christophe Tournayre wrote on Mar. 12, 2015 @ 20:13 GMT
Dear Tung Ten Yong,

I like your proposal of shifting perspectives. I wish you also proposed alternatives like Copernic.

Regards,

Christophe

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Tung Ten Yong replied on Mar. 15, 2015 @ 05:10 GMT
Thanks.

It is not easy. But maybe we can see clearer by questioning the status of symmetries in theories of physics as fundamental.

Just as pre-Copernican theories of the heaven posited one epicycle after another to fit the observational data, we are currently positing symmetries after symmetries in fundamental theories of Nature.

Maybe at the most fundamental level there is no symmetry and symmetries are just emergent phenomena.

Bookmark and Share



Jonathan Khanlian wrote on Mar. 13, 2015 @ 15:14 GMT
Your thought that "... if there is a general method to find out if a theory truly represents reality, we can use this method to search for the true theory of the universe, and this would violate the Copernican Principle as applied to theories!" sort of reminded me about about the halting problem and how an arithmetic formal system can't prove its own consistency. Do you see any relationship to those ideas and what you are trying to express?

Please check out my Digital Physics movie essay if you get a chance.

Thanks,

Jon

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Tung Ten Yong replied on Mar. 15, 2015 @ 05:31 GMT
Interesting.

All I can think of now is such a general method (that checks if one theory truly represents reality) must itself be arrived at inductively from comparisons of our previous theories and its successes in explaining and predicting observational data. If it comes from induction then we cannot be sure about the method itself as we are sure about analytical truths.

In short, the general method itself could also be revised by future observations and thus fails to be a general method at all.

Bookmark and Share



Sujatha Jagannathan wrote on Apr. 1, 2015 @ 11:55 GMT
Some more synthesis is needed to the collected purport.

-Sincerely,

Miss. Sujatha Jagannathan

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe Fisher wrote on Apr. 10, 2015 @ 14:43 GMT
Dear Tung,

I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein was wrong about abstract space/time, and Hawking was wrong about the explosive capability of NOTHING.

All I ask is that you give my essay WHY THE REAL UNIVERSE IS NOT MATHEMATICAL a fair reading and that you allow me to answer any objections you may leave in my comment box about it.

Joe Fisher

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


RJ Tang wrote on Apr. 12, 2015 @ 19:53 GMT
I agree that all knowledge is local and conditional. It is impossible to have a theory for something humans never experienced. And this is a distinct possibility!

Therefore I call for humility and open mindedness. Another thing is, mathematics suffer from human's reasoning logic. We are not certain if our human logic is a universally applicable logic system.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Luca Valeri wrote on Apr. 13, 2015 @ 21:23 GMT
Dear Tung Ten Yong,

Congrats. A really short and pregnant essay.

Your essay reminds me what Freud called the 3 wounds humanity suffered: earth not at the center, men not at the center of creation and ego not master in its own house. I would say, that this supports your thesis on the Copernican Principle of theories. Shall we call it a forth wound?

Anyhow I think you draw interesting conclusions from this principle. I specifically like, that you do not deny the success of the physical theories. In that sense the success seems really miraculous. But that makes it an interesting working thesis for future physical research.

In my essay I use a milder form of Platonism, saying that the language empirical knowledge must be platonic (ie. mathematical).

Best,

Luca

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Lara Johnson wrote on Aug. 4, 2017 @ 06:41 GMT
I have gone through this publication and feels that it is really helpful for students who wish to learn about this theory and how to apply this theories in real cases. Keep up the effort and publish more.

I am writer from essay order online

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


games Fans wrote on Nov. 12, 2018 @ 20:20 GMT
Your article is very interesting. I think this article has a lot of information needed, looking forward to your new posts. Get permission to share:

Keto Side Dishes

Dr Symptoms

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.