Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Joe Fisher: on 4/8/15 at 15:51pm UTC, wrote Dear Gerry, I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein was...

Joe Fisher: on 3/17/15 at 16:15pm UTC, wrote Dear Mr. Klein, You wrote: “We have collectively, scientists, experts...

Gary Simpson: on 3/17/15 at 3:33am UTC, wrote Gerry, This is a very nice essay ... nothing fancy but very nice. As they...

Gerry Klein: on 3/10/15 at 15:39pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract ABSTRACT Physics (from Ancient Greek, “knowledge...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Georgina Woodward: "Hi Robert, thank you. I now understand the difference between decisions and..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Robert McEachern: "Making a decision, means selecting between discrete, a priori established..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Steve Dufourny: "Hi Eckard,you seems persuaded by your Words and thoughts.I don t understand..." in First Things First: The...

Eckard Blumschein: "In Darwinism/Weismannism there is no first cause, just a causal chain...." in First Things First: The...

Steve Dufourny: "lol no indeed it is not a lot,like I said I liked your general ideas.I have..." in The Demon in the Machine...

Steve Agnew: "There are three assumptions...is that a lot? The aether particle mass, the..." in The Demon in the Machine...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
October 15, 2019

CATEGORY: Trick or Truth Essay Contest (2015) [back]
TOPIC: MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS AT THE FOUNDATIONAL LEVEL THE WAY AHEAD IS TO KNOW ITS BASIS, ITS ORIGINS IN EMPIRICAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE NATURE WORLD by Gerry Klein [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Gerry Klein wrote on Mar. 10, 2015 @ 15:39 GMT
Essay Abstract

ABSTRACT Physics (from Ancient Greek, “knowledge of nature”) is the natural science that involves the study of matter and its motion through space and time, along with related concepts such as energy and force. More broadly, it is the general analysis of nature, conducted in order to understand how the universe behaves. ---from wikipedia. Mathematics (from Greek, “knowledge, study, learning”), often shortened to maths or math, is the study of topics such as quantity (numbers), structure, space and change. ---from wikipedia. With this definition in mind this essay will show that the reason mathematics as a tool to explore unknown territory, its ability to reveal new knowledge and prove or disprove existing knowledge about the natural world especially when combined with physics is so effective is because its original deductive premise, symbols 1,2,3 as the natural counting numbers, accurately represent at the foundational level a reality that our sensory perception and experience tell us really exists. Mathematics is mated to physics at the foundational level of both. The natural counting numbers correspond directly to one, two, three existing objects we intuitively subjectively and physical objectively perceive and touch. With a correct deductive premise and the certainty of the deductive logic the conclusions must be accurate and valid in the natural world. The world we say we exist in.

Author Bio

Gerry Klein is a retired Longshoreman, with an interest in understanding life.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Gary D. Simpson wrote on Mar. 17, 2015 @ 03:33 GMT
Gerry,

This is a very nice essay ... nothing fancy but very nice. As they say, with age comes wisdom. You have linked counting with awareness of counting. Further, you have linked confusion at the upper tiers of math and physics with a belief that there is a fundamental error somewhere in our collective thinking. Well done and likely true. Of course, that is the easy part. Finding the error is the hard part:-)

Best Regards and Good Luck,

Gary Simpson

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe Fisher wrote on Mar. 17, 2015 @ 16:15 GMT
Dear Mr. Klein,

You wrote: “We have collectively, scientists, experts and lay people alike in spite of intense effort by all have removed ourselves further and further from our everyday world by complex theories not sensory verifiable.”

You will find it easy to verify the following: This is my single unified theorem of how the real Universe is occurring: Newton was wrong about...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe Fisher wrote on Apr. 8, 2015 @ 15:51 GMT
Dear Gerry,

I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein was wrong about abstract space/time, and Hawking was wrong about the explosive capability of NOTHING.

All I ask is that you give my essay WHY THE REAL UNIVERSE IS NOT MATHEMATICAL a fair reading and that you allow me to answer any objections you may leave in my comment box about it.

Joe Fisher

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.