Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

James Hoover: on 4/23/15 at 17:18pm UTC, wrote Leo, Thank you for taking the time to read my essay. Hope to see you for...

KoGuan Leo: on 4/23/15 at 2:29am UTC, wrote Dear James, I looked at your article, I could not find the sentence that I...

James Hoover: on 4/22/15 at 23:13pm UTC, wrote Leo, "Our Multiverse is infinite, it can not be constrained by limited...

KoGuan Leo: on 4/22/15 at 7:34am UTC, wrote Dear Marc, Thank you giving me your kind comment and rated my essay...

Marc Séguin: on 4/21/15 at 4:31am UTC, wrote Dear Leo KoGuan, Once again this contest you present us a with a...

KoGuan Leo: on 4/17/15 at 2:46am UTC, wrote Dear Rick, Thank you for your kind comment and your interest in my...

KoGuan Leo: on 4/17/15 at 2:28am UTC, wrote Dear R J, Yes, KQID is purely physical theory since it is physical monism,...

KoGuan Leo: on 4/17/15 at 2:13am UTC, wrote Dear Peter, Thank you for your kind complement. Yours I agree more...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Steve Dufourny: "Hi Ian Durham, Maybe still for the rankings and the links with this..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...

Steve Dufourny: "Georgina,in the past we have discussed about this Fith force after the 3..." in Alternative Models of...

Steve Dufourny: "I work about my theory of spherisation with quantum and cosmological..." in Alternative Models of...

Steve Dufourny: "An other point very important considering this nature.Ecology is so..." in Will A.I. Take Over...

janey hug: "Vape Juice Wholesale When it pertains to vape juice, you require to obtain..." in Ed Witten on the Nature...

Forever Fiances: "Welcome to Forever Fiances, an invitation company in San Diego. Since 2008,..." in Vita Nuova

Georgina Woodward: "The kind of time required, over which change is happening, is sequential..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Georgina Woodward: "In the many cat version as time progresses there are less and less cats..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
October 21, 2019

CATEGORY: Trick or Truth Essay Contest (2015) [back]
TOPIC: TianmingRen in the Cloud by KoGuan Leo [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author KoGuan Leo wrote on Mar. 7, 2015 @ 21:50 GMT
Essay Abstract

Our Ancestor FAPAMA Singularity Qbit (00, +, -) is the smallest with nothing inside and the largest with nothing outside that could be imagined, the Shakespearian actor performing itself on world’s stage by itself and for itself. The Qbit computes, simulates and projects Wang Yangming’s stored programs (Li) into consciousness, time and energy (Qi) that are represented as mathematical creature IΨ(CTE), meme actor performing on its relativistic stage of hologram Multiverse Ψ(iτL, Lm) obeying the Zeroth Law: ☰00☷=Ee^iτ=A+S=IΨ(CTE)⊆T=1 inbuilt Mathematical logic of Giving first Taking later as Dao. It is telling us its amazing and wonderful life story as it is unfolding. It evolves to become us, TianmingRen in the cloud, man of Heavenly mandate, who is constantly redefining who, what and why I am. The Qbit is the programmer, the stored programs and the infodynamics computer: the universal Turing machine U supplied with the infinite Tape that contains the stored programs of the machine M. The infinite Tape stored patterns (Li) as Plato’s Forms of all past, present and future in the Mind of Qbit, matrix of all matter, the enabling operating system software of machine U. Whereas Plato’s Copies of the Tape of infodynamics machine M consists of three Books: Book One (A), stored program (Li); Book Two (S), stored history (Qi); and Book Three (E) made of (A+S), time-present ever evolving and unfolding living patterns superimposing itself upon another flowing infodynamically obeying these relationships A=E-S⊆T, maximizing the flow of A, time-future bits-waves, minimizing the flow of S, time-past bits-waves and optimizing the flow of E (Qi), energetic time-present bits-waves function. U computes, simulates and projects M onto its 3D time screens in time.

Author Bio

Professor Leo KoGuan is the creator and distributor of KoGuan Quantum InfoDynamics (KQID), the Founding Director of KoGuan Rule of Law and Principle Studies Center at Tsinghua University, Peking University, and KoGuan Law School. KoGuan Law School is named in his honor. He is the Founder and Chairman of SHI International of about $6.8 billion in sales this year, the largest Asian American family owned private company in America, one of American Fortune 500 companies. He is serving as a Trustee Emeriti of Asia Society. His motto: Alive, we are in Heaven!

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Author KoGuan Leo wrote on Mar. 8, 2015 @ 05:47 GMT
Greeting to all Earthlings,

We are living in "Alice in Wonderland". But we may tell ourselves: "We are not mad people." Lewis Carroll told us his wonderful story ""Alice in Wonderland" with his magic pen: "'But I don't want to go among mad people,' said Alice. 'Oh, you can't help that,' said the cat. 'We're all mad here.'"

As they say, If it acts like bit, moves like bit, talks like...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share



Author KoGuan Leo wrote on Mar. 8, 2015 @ 07:52 GMT
Dear Community

Rule of ranking, all essays here are deserved at least a score of 6, the lowest of 10, the highest. Be fair to our fellow writers and respectful to their respective ideas. Diversity of ideas is life, whereas uniformity of ideas is death. I am for life and am against death. I promise to rank every essay from 6 to 10. Agree?

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

Bookmark and Share



Vladimir Rogozhin wrote on Mar. 8, 2015 @ 12:19 GMT
Dear Leo KoGuan,

Extremely original ideas. Yes, we need today a new paradigm - The Universe as a whole. But why not in your system the "magic matrix Lo Shu" (Chinese Simplified. 洛 书, exercise. 洛 书, pinyin: luò shū) «magic square is a 3 × 3"?

Kind regards,

Vladimir

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author KoGuan Leo wrote on Mar. 8, 2015 @ 12:59 GMT
Dear Vladimir,

Thanks for your generous comment. I will read and comment on yours ASAP.

Best regards,

Leo KoGuan

Bookmark and Share



Jacek Safuta wrote on Mar. 11, 2015 @ 13:58 GMT
Dear Leo,

It was pleasure to read your essay as this is something new for me.

Our views differ greatly, but that is science - to differ beautifully. Progress is born of diversity.

The participants of contest usually study the essays that seem to support their concept so they deprive themselves of potential inspiration.

My essay: http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2452

I would appreciate your comments. Thank you and good luck!

Jacek

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on Mar. 14, 2015 @ 10:26 GMT
I post my comment I made in your site.

Dear Jacek,

I congratulate as you wrote a brilliant essay. I enjoyed reading it from the beginning until the ending.You described your theory well and I would say it is NOt contradictory to KQID but it is KQID in different clothing with its different symbols, and story. Beneath it, we are in complete agreement. You should read carefully my essay again and you will discover similarity like below statement in which KQID has identical proposition.

You wrote:

"We propose the evolution of information concept. To explain it very shortly, we have to apply the theory of Darwinism beyond its original sphere of organic evolution on Earth. The organic evolution refers to some pieces of DNA (a kind of information) and not to species (what is the most common misconception). Going further beyond information carried by pieces of DNA (that are sets of molecules), we observe only the waves (information) possessing long-term existence and stability."

If I may add we must fight for diversity, tolerance and inclusivity and we must fight against uniformity, intolerance and exclusivity. We are for "harmonious unity" or unity in diversity of ideas, races, languages, cultures and civilizations,

Best wishes and hope you will do well and I vote according to my favorable view,

Leo KoGuan

Bookmark and Share



Joe Fisher wrote on Mar. 13, 2015 @ 15:54 GMT
Accurate writing has enabled me to perfect a valid description of untangled unified reality: Proof exists that every real astronomer looking through a real telescope has failed to notice that each of the real galaxies he has observed is unique as to its structure and its perceived distance from all other real galaxies. Each real star is unique as to its structure and its perceived distance apart from all other real stars. Every real scientist who has peered at real snowflakes through a real microscope has concluded that each real snowflake is unique as to its structure. Real structure is unique, once. Unique, once does not consist of abstract amounts of abstract quanta. Based on one’s normal observation, one must conclude that all of the stars, all of the planets, all of the asteroids, all of the comets, all of the meteors, all of the specks of astral dust and all real objects have only one real thing in common. Each real object has a real material surface that seems to be attached to a material sub-surface. All surfaces, no matter the apparent degree of separation, must travel at the same constant speed. No matter in which direction one looks, one will only ever see a plethora of real surfaces and those surfaces must all be traveling at the same constant speed or else it would be physically impossible for one to observe them instantly and simultaneously. Real surfaces are easy to spot because they are well lighted. Real light does not travel far from its source as can be confirmed by looking at the real stars, or a real lightning bolt. Reflected light needs to adhere to a surface in order for it to be observed, which means that real light cannot have a surface of its own. Real light must be the only stationary substance in the real Universe. The stars remain in place due to astral radiation. The planets orbit because of atmospheric accumulation. There is no space.

Warm regards,

Joe Fisher

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Joe Fisher replied on Mar. 13, 2015 @ 15:57 GMT
oops, I forgot to paste the opening of my comment.

Dear Honorable Professor KoGuan,

For one time in my life, I wish to indulge in “TianmingRen as one who practices Giving first Taking later. “ I hereby give you my truth about how the real Universe is occurring.

Ruefully,

Joe Fisher

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on Mar. 14, 2015 @ 03:56 GMT
Dear wonderfully unique, one and only Joe Fisher in our Multiverse,

Yes, TianmingRen is a man of Heavenly Mandates who is Shakespearian actor acting in the global stage by Giving first Taking later. He/she is well endowed with Humanity, Justice, Yangzhu's Six Freedoms(DoReMiFaSolLa), Wang Yangming's unity of Rights and Duties, and a regulated but free and open Market System.

I can agree with you that "There is no space." stated above but for a different causation in which that in KQID, space is a mere 3D time in time. Hence 4D time. Space is the creature of time and it is time in disguise. As Smolin pointed out that I concurred that time is real and fundamental. However, he confesses that he does not know what is time, how and why time exists the way we perceive and imagine it to be. KQID proclaims to the whole Multiverse that time is pregnant with space (3D time) and space (3D time) is the fetus of time, being fed through umbilical cord of mother time.

Joe is unique, Leo is unique. Each is unique. Each has his/her unique thought that we all cherish and celebrate life. Diversity of ideas and various names and forms are life itself. We must against nihilism and uniformity that denies diversity of all things. Diversity is Existence, uniformity is info-equilibrium without any energy, time and consciousness. Dead as dead is. Life is for Existence and for diversity of myriad things.

Existence is So Wonderful, I want to sing a happy song, let's sing together this happy song: DoReMiFaSolLa.

Let's celebrate this wonderful life together despite of all goods and evils in our world, we are living in Leibniz's best possible world.

Truly yours,

Leo KoGuan

Bookmark and Share



Author KoGuan Leo wrote on Mar. 15, 2015 @ 03:47 GMT
I repost my comment on Sara Walker's essay in this thread

Dear Sara,

Yes, I agree with your conclusion stated below: "Our ability to use mathematics to describe, and more importantly manipulate, the natural world may not be an anomaly or “trick”, but instead could be an intimate facet of the structure of physical reality." In my essay TianmingRen in the Cloud, I advanced that the initial state: everything is connected that bit is it, and the final state and all in between: everything is still connected that it is bit. Hope you can comment and rate my essay.

Best of luck,

Leo KoGuan

Bookmark and Share



Author KoGuan Leo wrote on Mar. 15, 2015 @ 03:56 GMT
I repost my comment here

Dear Torsten,

Great essay! I learned from you. Very enjoyable reading, brief and yet packed with information. You covered Turing, Plato and many others. I also covered Turing and Plato. I also covered number theory briefly. I also concur with Pythagoras that "all things are numbers" and in KQID, it is Einstein complex coordinates Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm). However, I started with a premise that everything, yes everything is infinite qbit(00, 1, -1) or Qbit(00, +, -). The infinite contains both finites and infinites. Similarly, finite contains infinites. Because both are governed by infinite law(KQID). Finite law cannot govern infinite entity like the Qbit. Furthermore, as you pointed out everything including the Qbit or our Creator is evolving. Please review and comment on my essay.

Best wishes for the contest and I vote your essay highly,

Leo KoGuan

Bookmark and Share


Torsten Asselmeyer-Maluga replied on Mar. 17, 2015 @ 10:18 GMT
Dear Leo KoGuan,

thanks for reading my essay and for the vote.

Your essay is a little bit unusual but interesting. I like your first law. Information is really conserved and your claim is logical. I also like global views to problems and your approach do it in a philosophical manner.

I also vote your essay highly.

Best

Torsten

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on Mar. 17, 2015 @ 19:58 GMT
Dear Torsten,

Thank you for your comment and vote. I am especially happy that you like my First Law and you think it is logical and information is conserved. The First Law is the byproduct of the Zeroth Law, so if the First Law is wrong, the Zeroth Law is falsified. If the First Law is correct, the Zeroth Law must be also correct and verified. Because the First and Zeroth Law are really one law; each is the byproduct of the other.

Thank you,

Leo KoGuan

Bookmark and Share



Author KoGuan Leo wrote on Mar. 15, 2015 @ 04:27 GMT
I repost my comment here

Dear Jonathan,

I am glad you were able to finish your fine piece. I totally agree with you especially on Hooft's explaination. I totally agree with him except I do think Qbit is the smallest possible and the largest possible Multiverse. Qbit is the atomic unit that describes its bigger self. To quote your quotation from the great physicist Hooft: “What does the calculating? Do we need Planck-sized atoms of space?” And he said “We don’t need atoms of space or whatever, because the laws of nature do the calculating for us.” I do believe information is everything and information is describing information. Alternatively, math describes math universe. It is a self referential system of information that is bootstrapping itself into what we feel and see as our Existence. You have been the last 30 years as an independent researcher to view this new paradigm of math.

I invite you to review mine and as usual you wrote a great essay and I rate it accordingly.

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

Bookmark and Share



Author KoGuan Leo wrote on Mar. 15, 2015 @ 06:31 GMT
I repost here

Dear Christian,

As usual you wrote an interesting essay. I also believe with your conclusion remark that "Mathematics is Truth instead of Trick". However, I do subscribe that Geometry is also a "Force" like Newton's gravitational Force. In my essay, KQID prescribes that Existence is geometrical and it is a mere Einstein complex coordinate points(numbers as in Pythagoras') or in this mathematical expression Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm). I am surely derived my theory from a very different paradigm however the outcomes must be about the same especially in our experiences and scientific experiments. KQID must also be able to explain and predict more than the dominant paradigm of today.

As usual, well deserved high score and best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

Bookmark and Share



Jonathan J. Dickau wrote on Mar. 17, 2015 @ 04:29 GMT
An interesting read Leo KoGuan..

A beautiful philosophical journey, Sir; and it would be wonderful to see that philosophy in action more broadly. Perhaps this essay is not exactly what the FQXi editors asked for, because it is not precisely about how Maths relate to Physics. Instead; it is a wonderful excursion into how Maths tell us how the spiritual realm relates to the physical, which is arguably knowledge of even greater value. I thank you for sharing your wisdom with us once more.

All the Best,

Jonathan

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on Mar. 17, 2015 @ 05:10 GMT
Dear Jonathan,

Thanks for your generous comment. Thanks for your friendship. Yes, I advocate philosophy in action. KQID advances even beyond Tecmark's MUH, because KQID prescribes that our creator itself is the omni-mathematician Qbit (00, +, -) who is applying the Zeroth Law of Existence to compute, simulate and project its mathematical objects/creatures from its zeroth dimension to 3D time in time (4D of time dimensions) in which the 3D time is moving perpendicularly/orthogonally with time in time in the zeroth dimension. Everything is bit in the form of KQID IΨ(CTE) as Shakespearian meme actors acting in our world's holographic and relativistic stage Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm). Therefore, Existence IΨ(CTE) is the fetus of time Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm) and time is pregnant with Existences or mathematical objects/living things.

Truly yours,

Leo KoGuan

Bookmark and Share



Christian Corda wrote on Mar. 18, 2015 @ 11:32 GMT
Dear Leo KoGuan,

As I told you in my Essay page, I have read your intriguing Essay. Here are my comments:

1) Although I am a collector of Einstein's aphorisms, I did not know the one "Pure mathematics is, in its way, the poetry of logical ideas". It is very beautiful, thanks for signalling it.

2) Concerning KQID, you could be interested to this paper.

3) Does your statement "KQID is purely monism of physicalism" imply that Mathematics is Trick rather than Truth?

4) I think your Essay was suitable also for previous FQXi Essay Contest "It From Bit or Bit From It".

5) You could be interested that I have recently shown that also black hole evaporation is governed by Schrödinger’s bits-waves function in this recent result which completes my 2013 FQXi Essay.

6) Is your statement "our multiverse is the projected hologram living inside itself or nothing other than our singularity" the holographic principle in your KQID?

7) I find intriguing that KQID’s picture of time is that time is both analogue and digital continuum. Does it mean that time has a wave-like nature?

8) Has the KQID variable speed of light issue some connection with the theory by Moffat ?

9) I see that the Bit Bang goes beyond the Planck scale. This is not simple to be understood. Can you clarify this point?

In any case, reading your Essay gave me lots of fun. Thus, I am going to give you a very high score.

I wish you best luck in the Contest.

Cheers, Ch.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on Mar. 21, 2015 @ 09:25 GMT
Dear Christian,

It is a pleasure to meet an open minded scientist. I answer your questions one by one briefly.

1. Yes, Einstein is also my idol. I am doing what I am doing partly to continue his search for the ToE. In KQID, math is idea and idea per Maxwell and Landauer is physical. Hence, the universe and the idea of that universe are physical. The object and the description of that...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share


Christian Corda replied on Mar. 23, 2015 @ 15:31 GMT
Dear Leo KoGuan,

Thanks for the interesting replies. Here are some more comments:

I agree that maths is truth.

If our 4-D Universe is a holographic Existence, the Ancestor Qbit should be a 5-D world. Am I correct?

It seems that KQID's principle comprises the principle of information preserving. This also explains why you replace "Big Bang" with "Bit Bang".

What does it happen before the first 10^-147seconds? In other words, does KQID theory remove the initial singularity?

Cheers, Ch.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author KoGuan Leo wrote on Mar. 23, 2015 @ 16:40 GMT
Dear Christian,

Thank you for your comments and questions which are penetrating and profound.

1. You wrote : "I agree that maths is truth." KQID prescribes paradoxical Existence that it is fiction but real. Hence the math is truly mapping one to one to this holographic Existence that is fiction but real. In short, Math is truth in fiction. Interestingly Dr. Richard Shoup's essay :...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share



Christian Corda wrote on Mar. 24, 2015 @ 11:33 GMT
Dear Leo KoGuan,

Thanks for clarifying and also for signalling the Essay by Richard Shoup. I am going to read, comment and score it asap. The issue that "Maths is Truth in fiction" seems to mean that Maths is an intermediate step between Truth and Trick. Concerning your last reply 4. now my question changes a bit: what does it happen before the first 10^-1000 seconds?

Cheers, Ch.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on Mar. 25, 2015 @ 06:13 GMT
Dear Christian,

1. You have the habit of asking so demanding questions that no one on Earth and also in our universe can answer these questions except KQID. Only ToE can answer what is before the Bit Bang or before the first 10^1000seconds and before the first baby universe 10^-57meters. As I pointed out earlier, KQID is the only theory now that can calculate the first moment of the Bit...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share



Author KoGuan Leo wrote on Mar. 26, 2015 @ 02:30 GMT
I repost my comment on Ken Wharton's great essay here

Dear Ken,

Great read and very well argued piece and very instructive discussion on time. I really enjoyed your craft. If you allow me to indulge myself to integrate your concept with KQID below. You wrote on option B that I choose to discuss: "(B) Only t is ordinary time; T is not." KQID: time t (iτLx,y,z) is relativistic times according to KQID relativistic and holographic Multiverse Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm), whereas T (Lm) is absolute digital time T ≤ 10^-1000seconds in which everything is in the state of block NOW where time-past-present-future merged. And T is the clock rate of our Existence computed, simulated and projected by Qbit (00, +, -) as the omni-mathematician, the Grand Wizard Merlin, Planck's matrix of all matter and KQID-Maxwell's infinite being with infinite memory. This hologram Existence is the 3-D relativistic (t) as the fetus of time, and T is permanently pregnant with 3-D time as Existence. In other words, t is inside T and we only experience relative times in 3D time simply because T is ticking regularly in asymmetrical Minkowski's Multiverse timeline as history. it is really 3-D in the 0-D or Lm(Tn…) where space is 3-D time moving perpendicularly in 0-D T. Yes, as you inferred Existence is infinite, that requires infinite math and physics that is deeply paradoxical in its nature (see Richard Shoup's essay) and it must follow its own self-consistent "mathematical rules that seem strange and esoteric to us humans."

Extremely fine jewelry craftsmanship, I would vote highly and please comment and rate my piece.

Thank you,

Leo KoGuan

Bookmark and Share



Author KoGuan Leo wrote on Mar. 26, 2015 @ 02:37 GMT
I repost my comment on Richard Shoup's profound essay here

Dear Richard,

Excellent and profound essay! I enjoyed reading yours. I do believe we need at least two to start an exchange between two fundamental element that is actual one element that splits itself up into two so that it can evolve and exchange with each other to fo-evolve and so one. It is bootstrapping itself. It is pure magic.

I agree with you that "Mathematics is generative, dynamic, and alive." Yours deserved a high score and please look at mine and yes it is true we are searching for the fundamental truth.

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

Bookmark and Share



Author KoGuan Leo wrote on Mar. 26, 2015 @ 02:40 GMT
I repost my comment on Richard Shoup's great essay here

Dear Richard,

Xuan Yuan about 4712 years ago already stated in The Four Canons, 11 explains how things come into beings, from the "Void" without distinction: "All things had been one whole before the Heaven and Earth split... with no distinction of day and night, Yin and Yang. Since Yin and Yang were not separated yet, it was...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share



Edwin Eugene Klingman wrote on Mar. 31, 2015 @ 21:39 GMT
Dear Leo KoGuan,

In my earlier essays, of a more universal nature, the links between our essays were more obvious. My current essay is tightly focused on a specific problem, so there is less overlap visible. Nevertheless I always enjoy reading your essays and relish your attitude that, with Leibniz, we are living in the best possible world. As a younger man I spent quite a bit of time trying to figure out, were I God, how to improve on Creation. I'm sure you know that I never found anything I could change to make it a better world. Any evil that I tried to remove, also removed a good. Therefore we must simply keep the mix but change the balance. I live on a ranch near the California coast. Every day when I awake I say "Another day in Paradise." This is in total harmony with your motto: "Alive, we are in Heaven!."

You say "the Qbit is everything and everything is the Qbit." I believe the nature of reality is one substance; this substantial reality incorporating consciousness and matter as unified unfolding of structure and awareness of structure. I also like your focus on 'Giving first, Taking later' which has elsewhere been described as the essence of capitalism: invest time and money and effort on the faith that the universe is just and rewards will follow.

I invite you to read my essay and welcome your comments.

Warm regards,

Edwin Eugene Klingman

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on Apr. 17, 2015 @ 01:31 GMT
Dear Edwin,

I always enjoy reading your erudite essays that combine humanity and science. Yes, we do have similar worldview that I think is simply logical, rational and shockingly simple. I agree with you that reality is a brute force one cannot ignore: you put it bluntly: "The physical world does exist, as anyone can prove by jumping from a high place." Another I also believe in: "Specifically, what should we do when map logic conflicts with our physical intuition? I believe that the physical world can be trusted."

I know community find my essay is too abstracts with many Chinese, Shakespearian and Greek philosophy that difficult to understand but actually it is so simple based on reality as it is like yours. I believe in nature is infinite, thus, everything is paradoxically true like both local and non-local communications and events of nature. I describes this phenomena in KQID. Therefore, your conclusion that Bell's non-local entanglement could be explained also in local causality make sense to me. I believe this is correct. You have done great work and path a new insight of nature as it is.

Let us work together to make our world a better place for all, including aliens, cyborgs and self-conscious robots and androids. I would like to visit your Caligornia sunny hut and together every morning we declare: we are in paradise!

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

Bookmark and Share



Member Rick Searle wrote on Apr. 3, 2015 @ 14:00 GMT
Dear Leo KoGuan,

Though I find your ideas very difficult to understand they are fascinating. I often write for the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technology (http://ieet.org/) which covers topics such as trans-humanism and the Singularity. Although I am not sure how your ideas relate to those, I think the audience there would be fascinated with a Chinese perspective on these issues and your own philosophy.

Is there any chance you would be willing to do an interview with me in the next few months?

As a side note, I am in the contest this year as well. Please check out my essay and give me the vote you think I deserve if you have not done so already.

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2391

All the best,

Rick Searle

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on Apr. 17, 2015 @ 02:46 GMT
Dear Rick,

Thank you for your kind comment and your interest in my thought. I don't know about an interview for I have never given any before. KQID is based on Xuan Yuan's DAO concept that it is the substance that creates and distributes everything that is. Dao as Giving first Taking later (Love) has been unfolding itself from its first emergent out of Non-existence by its own free will by itself and for itself. As I mentioned in my blog, this Philosoy has its theory, equations and numbers like that can be falsified or verified in scientific experiments or by everyday life experiences. As mentioned here, KQId is the only terry right now that can calculate with numbers precisely the size of our baby universe at birth, its temperature and its speed.how c evolve from the creation to the present light speed in the vacuum within 5 thousand years after the Bit Bang.

I looked at your essay and thought very highly and rated it accordingly,

Let us continue our discussion and I believe in strongly the symphony of ideas,

Sincerely yours,

Leo KoGuan

Bookmark and Share



Joe Fisher wrote on Apr. 7, 2015 @ 15:54 GMT
Dear Leo KoGuan,

I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein was wrong about abstract space/time, and Hawking was wrong about the explosive capability of NOTHING.

All I ask is that you give my essay WHY THE REAL UNIVERSE IS NOT MATHEMATICAL a fair reading and that you allow me to answer any objections you may leave in my comment box about it.

Joe Fisher

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Peter Jackson wrote on Apr. 11, 2015 @ 22:10 GMT
Leo,

I enjoyed improving my familiarity with KQUID theory, which I love. Someone called my essay 'beautiful', but I think that word far better applies to yours. Unfortunately it seems many still struggle to understand it. I suspect the different way of thinking between east and west doesn't help. I feel the 'western' science of the last few centuries lacks much empathy with nature.

I take a practical view, trying to communicate with those schooled in current western doctrine by focusing on very direct physical matters. As that doesn't seem to work either maybe your way is best! None the less in practical terms I strongly agree 'absolute' time, and that that any 'multiverse' is temporally sequenced, although also propose there are physical dimensions beyond our detectability. You may recall my discrete regions of space can move relatively, (including like planets and atmospheres) in 'virial' systems from a particle to a universe. I recall we established KQID does not conflict with such hierarchical sequences. I hope you'll read my new revelations supporting that hypothesis. (I also certainly preclude time travel!)

Though probably hard to read and understand for any westerner yours is a beautiful approach and essay, worthy of a lot higher placing. Well done and very best of luck in the contest.

Peter

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on Apr. 17, 2015 @ 02:13 GMT
Dear Peter,

Thank you for your kind complement. Yours I agree more beautiful than my essay. I join in this essay contest to learn and join the celebration of beautiful ideas of our great bits-beings civilization with all wonderful and colorful ideas. I like them all. Yes, I combine not only Greek, Shakespearian but also Chinese philosophy that amazed me that we share common bond in ideas. People look for differences but I look for similarity and beauty of all ideas. Your red and green socks picture are really wonderful and simple to understand to explain complicated ideas. Well done! Let us celebrate diversity and enjoy many varieties foods for thought as presented here.

On serious note, our Multiverse is infinite, it can not be constrained by limited rule this or that. It must be both this and that simultaneously. We must have both relativistic time as described by KQID pictures using Lorentz's inverse transformation to KQID-Newton's absolute time that is clocking at Multiversal time clock per absolute digital time ≤ 10^-1000seconds. Believe me or not KQID has also discovered from it's equations how light speed c evolved from the Bit Bang to our present light speed c. So wonderful right if it is true. We can know Newton's mass as we know Eintein's equation of mass = E/c^2 that eluded Einstein. He did not know what is energy because he did not what is c.

Let us celebrate diversity of ideas and all bits-beings human as well as self-conscious robots and cyborgs. Let us live forever here and now in harmony and after this precious life that we have. No wars but Giving first Taking later in a regulated but free and open market of ideas.

On math, KQID picture is that math is fiction but real or real but fiction. It is both a trick and a truth. Any way, I rated your essay as usual to what it deserved a full score. Thank you again for your kind comment on my essay.

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

Bookmark and Share



RJ Tang wrote on Apr. 12, 2015 @ 18:23 GMT
Is there any representation of KQID in the physical world? If the information is stored, then what is the mechanism to retrieve and represent it? It has intriguing possibilities but I'd like to know more.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on Apr. 17, 2015 @ 02:28 GMT
Dear R J,

Yes, KQID is purely physical theory since it is physical monism, everything is bit or bit is it and it is bit. It is a bit paradigm rather than a it paradigm. However, the bit paradigm is a newly evolved paradigm that does the thinking part like our neocortex brain and the it paradigm is doing the instinctive part of our senses like our mammalian brain. We need both to function well in our wotld, fiction but real. It has a vivid picture of Existence and it is the only theory right now that can calculate how our c emerged from the Bit Bang to our present light speed in the vacuum as we have observed. The size of our universe at the creation and its temperature and its light speed. It is falsifiable theory base on real equations with real numbers that can be verified or falsified easily by any thing, any living thing like virus, bacteria or human.

Please stay in touch and we can converse in real numbers based on real equations based on nature as it is.

Best regards and thanks for your comment,

Leo KoGuan

Bookmark and Share



Member Marc Séguin wrote on Apr. 21, 2015 @ 04:31 GMT
Dear Leo KoGuan,

Once again this contest you present us a with a puzzle-essay about the KQID "Bit Bang" cosmos. I must admit that I do not understand all the mysteries of KQID, but I agree with your comment to Peter Jackson above: "Our Multiverse is infinite, it can not be constrained by limited rule this or that. It must be both this and that simultaneously." In my essay, I argue that we live simultaneously in a potentially infinite number of larger realities that have equivalent observable consequences. By being everything, the multiverse sums up to nothing... but nothing splits back into everything, as the whole of physical reality is spawn by the whole of abstract mathematical existence.

I find your limitless enthusiasm about the sharing of ideas heart warming. Keep it up, and all the best!

Marc

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author KoGuan Leo wrote on Apr. 22, 2015 @ 07:34 GMT
Dear Marc,

Thank you giving me your kind comment and rated my essay highly. If I may differ with you a little but agree with you a lot in most fundamental way in which physics is math but this math is KQID Zeroth Law.

Physics = KQID Zeroth Law = math. This Zeroth Law is ☰00☷ = Ee^iτ = A+S= IΨ(CTE) = Ψ(iτLx,y,z, T) ⊆T=1. This is why we have an orderly universe that we have been observing as the privileged Anthropic Observers that create and distribute Anthropic principle. Thus we have many similarities but each is unique being. Each has infinite clones if physics = math. Furthermore, if physics = math, we will have so many bizarre realities which we have observed. I believe Existence must be "orderly" and "regular" infinite possibilities, Theregore, KQID Zeroth Law governed its evolution from its initial to its infinite potentialities. KQID has the bit paradigm that functions like our neocortex brain on top of the it paradigm that function like our mammalian brain. The bit rules over it whereas its manifested the bits in our realm.

I rated highly your essay and I wish you the best in this contest.

Leo KoGuan

reply to this thread

Bookmark and Share



James Lee Hoover wrote on Apr. 22, 2015 @ 23:13 GMT
Leo,

"Our Multiverse is infinite, it can not be constrained by limited rule this or that. It must be both this and that simultaneously."

Your quote reminds me of particle superposition, a state of coherence that many functions in the classical world depend on, some of which I cite in my essay: http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2345

Regards as always,

Jim

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on Apr. 23, 2015 @ 02:29 GMT
Dear James,

I looked at your article, I could not find the sentence that I wrote above with Peter Jacson on his article on Bell's non-locality that :

"Our Multiverse is infinite, it can not be constrained by limited rule this or that. It must be both this and that simultaneously. It must be both this and that simultaneously."

When I wrote "all this and all that" I had Zhuangzi and Huishi's picture of reality in mind that everything connecting as one. I found this idea is so beautiful and philosophically fullfiling as an earthling living in Sagan's blue dot within an immense Multiverse as the creation of our Ancestor Qbit in his Qbit-centric perspective of creation by itself, for itself and of itself. We and Existence are living in Qbit. Qbit is love with its operating system of Giving first Taking later (love) to create and distribute all that is.

I am glad you invited me to check on your article and I found your article indeed has similar idea as mine and it is well executed and beautiful and fresh. We are indeed connected. We are indeed one with diversity of ideas and myriads of characters. We are also unique in our own way. None is a clone of another. Similarity with a difference.

Best,

Leo KoGuan

Bookmark and Share



James Lee Hoover wrote on Apr. 23, 2015 @ 17:18 GMT
Leo,

Thank you for taking the time to read my essay. Hope to see you for the next contest.

Jim

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.