If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.
Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.
Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.
Contests Home
Previous Contests
What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss • winners
Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discuss • winners
Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discuss • winners
The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discuss • winners
Previous Contests
What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss • winners
Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discuss • winners
Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discuss • winners
What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discuss • winners
The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discuss • winners
Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use
RSS feed | RSS help
Introduction
Terms of Use
Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.
By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC
ABDELWAHED BANNOURI: on 4/22/15 at 9:48am UTC, wrote Dear Alexander: I argue with you The physical realtiy can be described...
Christopher Horton: on 3/27/15 at 20:53pm UTC, wrote "Can the universe be described in terms of pure numbers?" Before we can...
Yuri Danoyan: on 3/7/15 at 18:24pm UTC, wrote Dear Sasha Physical reality can be described algebraically in terms of...
Alexander Balatsky: on 3/6/15 at 16:17pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract The paper argues that the physical reality can be...
RECENT FORUM POSTS
Eckard Blumschein: "In Darwinism/Weismannism there is no first cause, just a causal chain...." in First Things First: The...
Steve Agnew: "There are some questions that do not seem to have answers in the classical..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...
Steve Agnew: "Yes, there are two very different narratives. The classical narrative works..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...
Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...
Steve Dufourny: "lol no indeed it is not a lot,like I said I liked your general ideas.I have..." in The Demon in the Machine...
Steve Agnew: "There are three assumptions...is that a lot? The aether particle mass, the..." in The Demon in the Machine...
RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles
First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.
Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.
Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.
Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.
Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.
ABDELWAHED BANNOURI: on 4/22/15 at 9:48am UTC, wrote Dear Alexander: I argue with you The physical realtiy can be described...
Christopher Horton: on 3/27/15 at 20:53pm UTC, wrote "Can the universe be described in terms of pure numbers?" Before we can...
Yuri Danoyan: on 3/7/15 at 18:24pm UTC, wrote Dear Sasha Physical reality can be described algebraically in terms of...
Alexander Balatsky: on 3/6/15 at 16:17pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract The paper argues that the physical reality can be...
RECENT FORUM POSTS
Eckard Blumschein: "In Darwinism/Weismannism there is no first cause, just a causal chain...." in First Things First: The...
Steve Agnew: "There are some questions that do not seem to have answers in the classical..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...
Steve Agnew: "Yes, there are two very different narratives. The classical narrative works..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...
Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...
Steve Dufourny: "lol no indeed it is not a lot,like I said I liked your general ideas.I have..." in The Demon in the Machine...
Steve Agnew: "There are three assumptions...is that a lot? The aether particle mass, the..." in The Demon in the Machine...
RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles
First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.
Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.
Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.
Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.
Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.
FQXi FORUM
October 14, 2019
CATEGORY:
Trick or Truth Essay Contest (2015)
[back]
TOPIC: The Universe in Numbers by Alexander N Balatsky [refresh]
TOPIC: The Universe in Numbers by Alexander N Balatsky [refresh]
Essay Abstract
The paper argues that the physical reality can be described algebraically in terms of pure numbers united by common laws of relationships. This approach allows us: (i) to define analytical form of the fine structure constant and explain its cosmological meaning; (ii) to reveal analytical relation describing the fundamental interactions and explain origin of time; (iii) to show how the conclusions presented match empirical data; and in conclusion, the paper briefly discusses the relevance of the approach as regards evolution in general.
Author Bio
The author is a research analyst specializing in general information, has a degree in applied mathematics, lives and works in Moscow, Russia.
Download Essay PDF File
The paper argues that the physical reality can be described algebraically in terms of pure numbers united by common laws of relationships. This approach allows us: (i) to define analytical form of the fine structure constant and explain its cosmological meaning; (ii) to reveal analytical relation describing the fundamental interactions and explain origin of time; (iii) to show how the conclusions presented match empirical data; and in conclusion, the paper briefly discusses the relevance of the approach as regards evolution in general.
Author Bio
The author is a research analyst specializing in general information, has a degree in applied mathematics, lives and works in Moscow, Russia.
Download Essay PDF File
Dear Sasha
Physical reality can be described algebraically in terms of pure numbers
For example http://vixra.org/abs/0907.0008
report post as inappropriate
Physical reality can be described algebraically in terms of pure numbers
For example http://vixra.org/abs/0907.0008
"Can the universe be described in terms of pure numbers?"
Before we can even seriously address this question we need to be answer the questions "what is a number" and what do we mean by "describing".
You might want to check out the entry "The Mathematics of Science" by Robert MacDuff.
report post as inappropriate
Before we can even seriously address this question we need to be answer the questions "what is a number" and what do we mean by "describing".
You might want to check out the entry "The Mathematics of Science" by Robert MacDuff.
Dear Alexander:
I argue with you The physical realtiy can be described algebraclly with a pure math.
I think "the universe is an hyper-equation "a mathematical structure inside of another and depends on another external"
In my opinion,mathematics that reflects reality, remains a priority for the current science.The Bi-iterative calculation could be the right one, because it has all the characteristics of a pure mathematics.
“NUMBERS”
first are integers
second are geometric shapes
third are physical entities, with infinite degrees of freedom
fourth maintain always the aspect ratio
fifth are elastic ... ..
Sixth are compact, and unseverable by two egual part.
We take an example:
1 + 5 + 7 + 12 =
= 1 + 5 + 7 + (6 + 8 + 10)
= 1 + 5 + 7 + (3 + 4 + 5) + 8 +10)
= 1 + 5 + 7 + (3 +4 +5) + (1 + 6 - 9) + 10
= 1 + 5 + 7 + (3 +4 +5) + (1 + 6 - 9) + 10
= 1 + 5 + 7 + (3 +4 +5) + (1 + (3 + 4 + 5) - 9) + 10
= 13
= 2197
This is a mathematical structure, as you see, is elastic. means a "string" ,it can be lengthened or shortened.
Inside this structure could coexist other independent structures (3 + 4 + 5) and (3 + 4 + 5).
Sincerly yours
Bannouri
report post as inappropriate
I argue with you The physical realtiy can be described algebraclly with a pure math.
I think "the universe is an hyper-equation "a mathematical structure inside of another and depends on another external"
In my opinion,mathematics that reflects reality, remains a priority for the current science.The Bi-iterative calculation could be the right one, because it has all the characteristics of a pure mathematics.
“NUMBERS”
first are integers
second are geometric shapes
third are physical entities, with infinite degrees of freedom
fourth maintain always the aspect ratio
fifth are elastic ... ..
Sixth are compact, and unseverable by two egual part.
We take an example:
1 + 5 + 7 + 12 =
= 1 + 5 + 7 + (6 + 8 + 10)
= 1 + 5 + 7 + (3 + 4 + 5) + 8 +10)
= 1 + 5 + 7 + (3 +4 +5) + (1 + 6 - 9) + 10
= 1 + 5 + 7 + (3 +4 +5) + (1 + 6 - 9) + 10
= 1 + 5 + 7 + (3 +4 +5) + (1 + (3 + 4 + 5) - 9) + 10
= 13
= 2197
This is a mathematical structure, as you see, is elastic. means a "string" ,it can be lengthened or shortened.
Inside this structure could coexist other independent structures (3 + 4 + 5) and (3 + 4 + 5).
Sincerly yours
Bannouri
Login or create account to post reply or comment.