Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American


How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

Joe Fisher: on 4/7/15 at 15:41pm UTC, wrote Dear Gerald, I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein was...

Patrick Tonin: on 3/14/15 at 19:47pm UTC, wrote Dear Gerald, Your essay abstract attracted my attention because I also...

Gerald Vones: on 3/8/15 at 8:55am UTC, wrote Conrad, thank you very much for your interest. I do understand your...

Conrad Johnson: on 3/7/15 at 14:16pm UTC, wrote Gerald – I agree with you about the basic role played by information in...

Gerald Vones: on 3/5/15 at 16:32pm UTC, wrote Essay Abstract It is argued that physics is mathematics of...


Jason Wolfe: "There are two facts that have been established. First, the universe is..." in First Things First: The...

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

Jason Wolfe: "Hi Steve, It sounds like we have similar interpretations of quantum..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Steve Agnew: "Yes indeed, a wavefunction represents a superposition of locations as well..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Jason Wolfe: "Science is motivated to sever the connection with Deity. They use fluff,..." in Constructing a Theory of...

Robert McEachern: ""But what do scientists hope quantum computers will be good for,..." in What Will Quantum...

Zeeya Merali: "Over the past couple of months there’s been renewed interest, and quite..." in What Will Quantum...

Jason Wolfe: "If I could write an unconventional model of reality, it would come with a..." in Alternative Models of...

click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

November 22, 2019

CATEGORY: Trick or Truth Essay Contest (2015) [back]
TOPIC: Physics as Mathematics of Information by Gerald Vones [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Gerald Vones wrote on Mar. 5, 2015 @ 16:32 GMT
Essay Abstract

It is argued that physics is mathematics of information, hence any physical entity is mathematical, but not vice versa. As a necessary basis, the concept of “information” is discussed. As a result, there is no freedom in setting physical scales, rather the Planckian scales are to be used according to the density at which nature stores information.

Author Bio

Educated as a physicist, I worked in the field of High Energy Physics at the University of Graz in the 1980ies. After that, I have taken a position in the administration, where I am involved in technology-related activities. In parallel, I have retained and even increased my personal interest in fundamental questions.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share

Conrad Dale Johnson wrote on Mar. 7, 2015 @ 14:16 GMT
Gerald –

I agree with you about the basic role played by information in physics. But I think something crucial is lost in your notion that "the concept of information is absolutely simple and transparent: Information... is a pure number."

As Shannon noted, this is only one aspect of information. In my essay on semantics, I emphasized that physics involves many kinds of information – e.g. length, mass, charge, spin etc. The fact that these are all related to each other mathematically doesn't mean they're all reducible to the same thing, or that their differences aren't fundamental. On the contrary, the equations of physics give each one a unique role in the structure of the world, in relation to other kinds of information. The fact that length can be expressed as a number of Planck units doesn't make it the same as electric charge, which is also expressed in basic units. So I doubt that we can get to the heart of physics by abstracting from these important differences.

Electric charge can be meaningfully defined only if length, velocity, force, etc. are also meaningfully defined. This kind of meaning is entirely physical; it doesn't involve human perception or imagination. Since the relationships between physical parameters can be expressed in mathematical equations, no doubt physics is profoundly mathematical. But apparently it takes a very complex combination of very different mathematical structures to support a world like ours, where many different kinds of information are all physically definable in terms of each other. This is not at all the kind of system studied in pure mathematics.

Thanks for the chance to respond to your interesting essay –


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Gerald Vones replied on Mar. 8, 2015 @ 08:55 GMT

thank you very much for your interest.

I do understand your concern and your aim of „Finding Meaning“ as the title of your essay says. Information appears as inextricably linked with meaning. In this light, it had confused and dismayed me over a long time that what Shannon ended up with is not more than a mathematical formula telling how to compute a number. Maybe I gave...

view entire post

Bookmark and Share

Patrick Tonin wrote on Mar. 14, 2015 @ 19:47 GMT
Dear Gerald,

Your essay abstract attracted my attention because I also think that information is fundamental to the Universe.

You have raised some very good points in your essay and I think that you deserve a better score than you actually have.

I propose a model that describes the Universe as a growing sphere of information. If you have a spare moment you can take a look at it here, you will see that some of your ideas are developped in it.

You can also take a look at my essay althought it is mainly a list of equations.

All the best,


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Joe Fisher wrote on Apr. 7, 2015 @ 15:41 GMT
Dear Gerald,

I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein was wrong about abstract space/time, and Hawking was wrong about the explosive capability of NOTHING.

All I ask is that you give my essay WHY THE REAL UNIVERSE IS NOT MATHEMATICAL a fair reading and that you allow me to answer any objections you may leave in my comment box about it.

Joe Fisher

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.