Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

ship ren: on 6/15/17 at 2:18am UTC, wrote Do la mot su khac biet khi ban tim hieu mau truyen nguoi lon ve co giao...

Patrick Tonin: on 4/22/15 at 18:48pm UTC, wrote Dear Malcolm, I don't agree with everything you propose but I like the way...

Joe Fisher: on 4/7/15 at 15:36pm UTC, wrote Dear Malcolm, I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein...

Malcolm Macleod: on 3/8/15 at 20:22pm UTC, wrote Thanks Ted, Consolations over your loss. I am now reading about...

Joe Fisher: on 3/7/15 at 21:19pm UTC, wrote Dear Dr. Macleod, I wish I had had a better understanding of mathematics...

Ted Erikson: on 3/5/15 at 14:49pm UTC, wrote Kudos and congratulations. I think that we are on the same wave length. I...

Malcolm Macleod: on 3/5/15 at 1:45am UTC, wrote Essay Abstract In the “Trialogue on the number of fundamental...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Robert McEachern: "Coins always have two sides. Always. The fact that some observer has..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Georgina Woodward: "Robert, Re.measurement being considered the cause of subsequent effect; I..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Eckard Blumschein: "Steve, Darwin contradicted to the view of Parmenides, ..., and Einstein..." in First Things First: The...

Steve Dufourny: "Joe,do you understand that the universe is finite like our series of..." in First Things First: The...

Steve Dufourny: "this second law is so important,my theory of spherisation and these quantum..." in Mass–Energy Equivalence...

Steve Dufourny: "I must explain what is the real meaning of Spherisation in my theory.It is..." in Mass–Energy Equivalence...

Steve Dufourny: "lol no indeed it is not a lot,like I said I liked your general ideas.I have..." in The Demon in the Machine...

Steve Agnew: "There are three assumptions...is that a lot? The aether particle mass, the..." in The Demon in the Machine...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
October 16, 2019

CATEGORY: Trick or Truth Essay Contest (2015) [back]
TOPIC: 3 constants MTP; a Mathematical Universe Hypothesis - Digital mass M=1, Circular time T=2π, Analog momentum P=Ώ by Malcolm J Macleod [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Malcolm Macleod wrote on Mar. 5, 2015 @ 01:45 GMT
Essay Abstract

In the “Trialogue on the number of fundamental constants” [1], Michael J. Duff, Lev B. Okun and Gabriele Veneziano debated the number of fundamental dimensioned constants in physics. L Okun maintained that 3 basic units were required and offered M=mass, T=time, L=length. In this essay I suggest MTP where P is the sqrt of momentum as from these 3 units we may derive and solve as simple geometrical shapes formulas for G, h, c, e, me, kB, μ0… to a precision limited only by the precision of the fine structure constant alpha. Results are consistent with CODATA 2010. I then demonstrate how we may assign M=1, T=2pi, P=Ώ, Ώ^2 = π^e/e^(e-1) [2], and use these values to solve the same electron frequency formula fe. This is rationalized by the premise that the numerical value for fe = .4184896589…e-22 is independent of the set of MTP units used and thus may be used to verify the validity of any chosen set of MTP.

Author Bio

Malcolm Macleod is a radio engineer presently authoring a text on the philosophy and physics of Plato's Allegory of the Cave (The Republic) in the context of mathematical realism as a universe of mathematical forms. This paper forms part of that discussion.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Ted Erikson wrote on Mar. 5, 2015 @ 14:49 GMT
Kudos and congratulations. I think that we are on the same wave length. I believe that yours and mine (being processed under the name, "Duality: The War of Existence", Ted Erikson) which should appear on line soon, as both 10's!

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Malcolm Macleod replied on Mar. 8, 2015 @ 20:22 GMT
Thanks Ted,

Consolations over your loss.

I am now reading about Panpsychism, thanks for the tip... I can include aspects in my book. I rationalize the simplicity of our universe, if it can be reduced to a point and circle (the proposed MTP), by comparing it to biological systems which can create complex structures from simple initial conditions... suggesting that our universe may be 'growing' according to the same biological 'mathematics' that govern organic systems... this is the focus of my thoughts now.

If you have other articles to recommend...

Cheers,

Malcolm

Bookmark and Share



Joe Fisher wrote on Mar. 7, 2015 @ 21:19 GMT
Dear Dr. Macleod,

I wish I had had a better understanding of mathematics so that I could have understood your fine essay. I do hope that it scores well with the judges of this competition.

Very Warm Regards,

Joe Fisher

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe Fisher wrote on Apr. 7, 2015 @ 15:36 GMT
Dear Malcolm,

I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein was wrong about abstract space/time, and Hawking was wrong about the explosive capability of NOTHING.

All I ask is that you give my essay WHY THE REAL UNIVERSE IS NOT MATHEMATICAL a fair reading and that you allow me to answer any objections you may leave in my comment box about it.

Joe Fisher

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Patrick Tonin wrote on Apr. 22, 2015 @ 18:48 GMT
Dear Malcolm,

I don't agree with everything you propose but I like the way you bodly put forward your unorthodox ideas.

Just for that you deserve a better score.

If you have a spare moment you can take a look at my essay, I also put forward some unorthodox ideas.

All the best,

Patrick

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


ship ko ren wrote on Jun. 15, 2017 @ 02:18 GMT
Do la mot su khac biet khi ban tim hieu mau truyen nguoi lon ve co giao thao se la rat can thiet de ban biet duoc thong tin cung nhu nhung van de cua nhung thanh nien tuoi moi lon hien nay.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.