CATEGORY:
Trick or Truth Essay Contest (2015)
[back]
TOPIC:
Before the Primordial Geometric origin: The Mysterious connection between Physics and Mathematics by Jayakar Johnson Joseph
[refresh]
Login or
create account to post reply or comment.
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph wrote on Mar. 4, 2015 @ 17:23 GMT
Essay AbstractThough the connection between Physics and Mathematics is much obvious from the phase of Geometric origin of the universe, the Physics of the beginning of universe is causal for the Mysterious nature of this connection. Thus we have analysed this with two models of Universe; one is with Quantum Mechanics dominated Particle scenario by Standard Model and Standard Cosmology; and the other is a Continuum Mechanics dominated String-matter scenario that is by an alternative paradigm of Universe. As the physics of the origin of universe is not geometrically descriptive in Initial singularity, we argue this as an inherent mathematical Trick in Particle scenario; whereas this Mysterious connection is a Truth, while we explore with String-matter scenario, in that the Physics of dynamics originated with time, instantaneously before the instant of plausible Mathematical notation. As dynamics is inherent with Physics, we would like to say, ‘Physics is causal for Mathematics’, that is the Truth in this context, while the ‘Causality of Physics’, is the Mysterious connection.
Author BioMedical graduate by profession. Research in alternative cosmology since 2000 and developed a paradigm of, ‘Eigen-rotational Clusters of String-matter Universe (ECSU)’. An application on this in healthcare, ‘Molecular Dynamics Synchronized Manipulator system to Repair Biomolecules’ is on development. Work abstract at, http://www.clustermatteruniverse.net Biography at (ORCID ID): http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2936-8231
Download Essay PDF File
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph wrote on Mar. 7, 2015 @ 02:21 GMT
Thank you, Dear Joe. I think the reality in abstract is 1 rather than 0. Thus the origin of string-segment as line segment from pre-existed continuously deformed static string-matter in curves, is the geometric origin for three dimensional structures in universe. A line segment is 1, whereas the point particle is 0, in space.
With best regards, Jayakar
attachments:
Transformation_of_String-curve.png
Joe Fisher replied on Mar. 7, 2015 @ 17:02 GMT
Vladimir Rogozhin wrote on Mar. 7, 2015 @ 11:16 GMT
Dear Jayakar,
I read with great interest your depth analytical essay. Your ideas are very interesting and original. Yes, the secret connection between the two fundamental sign systems, Mathematics and Physics - in the primordial structure of the Universum, which should be considered
sub specie aeternitatis.Kind regards,
Vladimir
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Mar. 7, 2015 @ 19:38 GMT
Yes my dear Vladimir; in our perspectives on eternal, the Mysterious connection between Physics and Mathematics is the Truth that is beyond our imaginations.
With best regards & thanks
Jayakar
Vladimir Rogozhin replied on Apr. 3, 2015 @ 10:10 GMT
Dear Jayakar,
I'm glad to see you again on the forum. I invite you to see my analysis of the philosophical foundations of mathematics and physics, the method of ontological constructing of the primordial generating structure,
"La Structure mère" as the ontological framework, carcass and foundation of knowledge, the core of which - the ontological (structural, cosmic) memory.
Kind regards,
Vladimir
report post as inappropriate
William Amos Carine wrote on Mar. 9, 2015 @ 18:27 GMT
Dear Joseph,
If i understand right, you are saying that math and physics are only possible when their is a geometrical structure to the physicality or universe. This geometry started at a singularity and that is when math and physics starting entwining. Before that it is mysterious. I agree about it being mysterious, but speaking for myself all of it is mysterious, even after geometry was possible after the 'start of things.' I've intuitively questioned the role of the point and discussed it with whomever wants to use breath on such out there/abstract matters. But lines do sit better with me and in a geometrical view of the world. I don't really think this entails string theory though. Perhaps a newer dress of relativity could somehow use a maths or understanding more 'in line with' the geometrical nature of this universe. Thank you for connecting your thoughts! the smaller paragraphs helped me greatly.
Best wishes,
william amos
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Mar. 10, 2015 @ 05:36 GMT
Thank you dear William. Both the finite string-segment and the infinite continuously deformed string are mathematically expressional, and the finite line segment and the infinite line also. Whereas the transformation of a curved string segment into a string line segment is the origin of dynamics in the Universe. Thus the energy that is causal for this transformation is the Mysterious connection between Physics and Mathematics. In this context, strings are not theoretical but real structures and thus the string theory that evolved from field theories may bridge the particle interactions with the direct contacts of eigen-rotational string-segments, for the integration of both models.
With best regards, Jayakar
Joe Fisher wrote on Apr. 6, 2015 @ 15:41 GMT
Dear Jayakar,
I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein was wrong about abstract space/time, and Hawking was wrong about the explosive capability of NOTHING.
All I ask is that you give my essay WHY THE REAL UNIVERSE IS NOT MATHEMATICAL a fair reading and that you allow me to answer any objections you may leave in my comment box about it.
Joe Fisher
report post as inappropriate
Login or
create account to post reply or comment.