If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Previous Contests

**What Is “Fundamental”**

*October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018*

*Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation*

read/discuss • winners

**Wandering Towards a Goal**

How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?

*December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017*

Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

read/discuss • winners

**Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics**

*Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation*

Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discuss • winners

**How Should Humanity Steer the Future?**

*January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014*

*Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American*

read/discuss • winners

**It From Bit or Bit From It**

*March 25 - June 28, 2013*

*Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American*

read/discuss • winners

**Questioning the Foundations**

Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?

*May 24 - August 31, 2012*

*Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American*

read/discuss • winners

**Is Reality Digital or Analog?**

*November 2010 - February 2011*

*Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American*

read/discuss • winners

**What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?**

*May - October 2009*

*Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams*

read/discuss • winners

**The Nature of Time**

*August - December 2008*

read/discuss • winners

Previous Contests

read/discuss • winners

How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?

Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.

read/discuss • winners

Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

read/discuss • winners

Forum Home

Introduction

Terms of Use

RSS feed | RSS help

Introduction

Terms of Use

*Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.*

RSS feed | RSS help

RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

**Joe Fisher**: *on* 4/6/15 at 15:41pm UTC, wrote Dear Jayakar, I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein...

**Vladimir Rogozhin**: *on* 4/3/15 at 10:10am UTC, wrote Dear Jayakar, I'm glad to see you again on the forum. I invite you to see ...

**Jayakar Joseph**: *on* 3/10/15 at 5:36am UTC, wrote Thank you dear William. Both the finite string-segment and the infinite...

**William Carine**: *on* 3/9/15 at 18:27pm UTC, wrote Dear Joseph, If i understand right, you are saying that math and physics...

**Jayakar Joseph**: *on* 3/7/15 at 19:38pm UTC, wrote Yes my dear Vladimir; in our perspectives on eternal, the Mysterious...

**Joe Fisher**: *on* 3/7/15 at 17:02pm UTC, wrote Huh? Joe Fisher

**Vladimir Rogozhin**: *on* 3/7/15 at 11:16am UTC, wrote Dear Jayakar, I read with great interest your depth analytical essay. Your...

**Jayakar Joseph**: *on* 3/7/15 at 2:21am UTC, wrote Thank you, Dear Joe. I think the reality in abstract is 1 rather than 0....

RECENT FORUM POSTS

**Joe Fisher**: "Dear Steve Agnew, Naturally provided VISIBLE realty am not a silly humanly..."
*in* Can Time Be Saved From...

**James Putnam**: "Light bends because it is accelerating. It accelerates toward an object..."
*in* Black Hole Photographed...

**Steve Agnew**: "Stringy and loop quantum are the two big contenders, but neither has a..."
*in* Can Time Be Saved From...

**Robert McEachern**: "Lorenzo, The nature of "information" is well understood outside of..."
*in* Review of "Foundations of...

**Georgina Woodward**: "Steve, Lorraine is writing about a simpler "knowing " rather than the..."
*in* The Nature of Time

**Steve Agnew**: "Knowing information necessarily means neural action potentials. Atom and..."
*in* The Nature of Time

**Douglas Hemmick**: "begin{quote} For example, in his chapter on Bell's theorem, he concludes..."
*in* Review of "Foundations of...

RECENT ARTICLES

*click titles to read articles*

**Can Time Be Saved From Physics?**

Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

**Thermo-Demonics**

A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

**Gravity's Residue**

An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

**Could Mind Forge the Universe?**

Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

**Dissolving Quantum Paradoxes**

The impossibility of building a perfect clock could help explain away microscale weirdness.

RECENT FORUM POSTS

RECENT ARTICLES

Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

The impossibility of building a perfect clock could help explain away microscale weirdness.

FQXi FORUM

May 19, 2019

CATEGORY:
Trick or Truth Essay Contest (2015)
[back]

TOPIC: Before the Primordial Geometric origin: The Mysterious connection between Physics and Mathematics by Jayakar Johnson Joseph [refresh]

TOPIC: Before the Primordial Geometric origin: The Mysterious connection between Physics and Mathematics by Jayakar Johnson Joseph [refresh]

Though the connection between Physics and Mathematics is much obvious from the phase of Geometric origin of the universe, the Physics of the beginning of universe is causal for the Mysterious nature of this connection. Thus we have analysed this with two models of Universe; one is with Quantum Mechanics dominated Particle scenario by Standard Model and Standard Cosmology; and the other is a Continuum Mechanics dominated String-matter scenario that is by an alternative paradigm of Universe. As the physics of the origin of universe is not geometrically descriptive in Initial singularity, we argue this as an inherent mathematical Trick in Particle scenario; whereas this Mysterious connection is a Truth, while we explore with String-matter scenario, in that the Physics of dynamics originated with time, instantaneously before the instant of plausible Mathematical notation. As dynamics is inherent with Physics, we would like to say, ‘Physics is causal for Mathematics’, that is the Truth in this context, while the ‘Causality of Physics’, is the Mysterious connection.

Medical graduate by profession. Research in alternative cosmology since 2000 and developed a paradigm of, ‘Eigen-rotational Clusters of String-matter Universe (ECSU)’. An application on this in healthcare, ‘Molecular Dynamics Synchronized Manipulator system to Repair Biomolecules’ is on development. Work abstract at, http://www.clustermatteruniverse.net Biography at (ORCID ID): http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2936-8231

Thank you, Dear Joe. I think the reality in abstract is 1 rather than 0. Thus the origin of string-segment as line segment from pre-existed continuously deformed static string-matter in curves, is the geometric origin for three dimensional structures in universe. A line segment is 1, whereas the point particle is 0, in space.

With best regards, Jayakar

attachments: Transformation_of_String-curve.png

With best regards, Jayakar

attachments: Transformation_of_String-curve.png

Dear Jayakar,

I read with great interest your depth analytical essay. Your ideas are very interesting and original. Yes, the secret connection between the two fundamental sign systems, Mathematics and Physics - in the primordial structure of the Universum, which should be considered*sub specie aeternitatis.*

Kind regards,

Vladimir

report post as inappropriate

I read with great interest your depth analytical essay. Your ideas are very interesting and original. Yes, the secret connection between the two fundamental sign systems, Mathematics and Physics - in the primordial structure of the Universum, which should be considered

Kind regards,

Vladimir

report post as inappropriate

Yes my dear Vladimir; in our perspectives on eternal, the Mysterious connection between Physics and Mathematics is the Truth that is beyond our imaginations.

With best regards & thanks

Jayakar

With best regards & thanks

Jayakar

Dear Jayakar,

I'm glad to see you again on the forum. I invite you to see my analysis of the philosophical foundations of mathematics and physics, the method of ontological constructing of the primordial generating structure, "La Structure mère" as the ontological framework, carcass and foundation of knowledge, the core of which - the ontological (structural, cosmic) memory.

Kind regards,

Vladimir

report post as inappropriate

I'm glad to see you again on the forum. I invite you to see my analysis of the philosophical foundations of mathematics and physics, the method of ontological constructing of the primordial generating structure, "La Structure mère" as the ontological framework, carcass and foundation of knowledge, the core of which - the ontological (structural, cosmic) memory.

Kind regards,

Vladimir

report post as inappropriate

Dear Joseph,

If i understand right, you are saying that math and physics are only possible when their is a geometrical structure to the physicality or universe. This geometry started at a singularity and that is when math and physics starting entwining. Before that it is mysterious. I agree about it being mysterious, but speaking for myself all of it is mysterious, even after geometry was possible after the 'start of things.' I've intuitively questioned the role of the point and discussed it with whomever wants to use breath on such out there/abstract matters. But lines do sit better with me and in a geometrical view of the world. I don't really think this entails string theory though. Perhaps a newer dress of relativity could somehow use a maths or understanding more 'in line with' the geometrical nature of this universe. Thank you for connecting your thoughts! the smaller paragraphs helped me greatly.

Best wishes,

william amos

report post as inappropriate

If i understand right, you are saying that math and physics are only possible when their is a geometrical structure to the physicality or universe. This geometry started at a singularity and that is when math and physics starting entwining. Before that it is mysterious. I agree about it being mysterious, but speaking for myself all of it is mysterious, even after geometry was possible after the 'start of things.' I've intuitively questioned the role of the point and discussed it with whomever wants to use breath on such out there/abstract matters. But lines do sit better with me and in a geometrical view of the world. I don't really think this entails string theory though. Perhaps a newer dress of relativity could somehow use a maths or understanding more 'in line with' the geometrical nature of this universe. Thank you for connecting your thoughts! the smaller paragraphs helped me greatly.

Best wishes,

william amos

report post as inappropriate

Thank you dear William. Both the finite string-segment and the infinite continuously deformed string are mathematically expressional, and the finite line segment and the infinite line also. Whereas the transformation of a curved string segment into a string line segment is the origin of dynamics in the Universe. Thus the energy that is causal for this transformation is the Mysterious connection between Physics and Mathematics. In this context, strings are not theoretical but real structures and thus the string theory that evolved from field theories may bridge the particle interactions with the direct contacts of eigen-rotational string-segments, for the integration of both models.

With best regards, Jayakar

With best regards, Jayakar

Dear Jayakar,

I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein was wrong about abstract space/time, and Hawking was wrong about the explosive capability of NOTHING.

All I ask is that you give my essay WHY THE REAL UNIVERSE IS NOT MATHEMATICAL a fair reading and that you allow me to answer any objections you may leave in my comment box about it.

Joe Fisher

report post as inappropriate

I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein was wrong about abstract space/time, and Hawking was wrong about the explosive capability of NOTHING.

All I ask is that you give my essay WHY THE REAL UNIVERSE IS NOT MATHEMATICAL a fair reading and that you allow me to answer any objections you may leave in my comment box about it.

Joe Fisher

report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.