Dear Sir,

Though we understand the reason for your asking the question “Does pi (= C/D) exist before we discover it”, it can be misleading. The ratio implies the existence of circular objects. Thus, the question can mean “whether circular objects (and by extension; any object) exist before an observer observes it” – the famous observer created reality. As evidence and experience...

view entire post

Dear Sir,

Though we understand the reason for your asking the question “Does pi (= C/D) exist before we discover it”, it can be misleading. The ratio implies the existence of circular objects. Thus, the question can mean “whether circular objects (and by extension; any object) exist before an observer observes it” – the famous observer created reality. As evidence and experience show; the moon will exist even when we are not looking at it. The use of pi in mathematical equations is often manipulated, as its precise value is not yet known – hence probabilistic; and mathematics is a science of exactitude.

In ancient Indian literature (before 800 BC), a word was meant to convey “this (object or form) is like that (the concept or information conveyed by the word). Hence it is that”. Thus, perception required prior information (hence existence) about the object or form. Since mathematics describes the quantitative aspect of Nature, it would be universal – even for aliens, because the validity of a mathematical statement is judged by its logical consistency. But the same may not be true for the constants, as most of them depend on local factors. For example; the value of G changes every time with precision measurement. It may be different if measured from an alien planet.

Mathematics is not independent of human experience nor reality or forms; as numbers are perceived as a property of objects by which we differentiate between similars. If there are no similars, it is one. If there are similars, it is many; which can be 2,3….n, depending upon the sequence of perception of ‘one’s. This has been experienced as true – hence accepted as the quantitative description of reality. We have discussed the fallacies of mathematics used in relativity and the views of Wigner in our essay in this forum.

One problem with modern physics and mathematics is divesting numbers from reality to abstract imagination. The other is superstitious belief in ‘established theories’, even when they are known to be wrong based on current information. Space, Time and coordinates arise from our concept of interval and sequence. When the interval is related to objects, we call it space. When the interval is related to events, we call it time. When we describe inter-relationship of objects or events, we describe the sequence by coordinates. Directions are arrangements of the sequences of intervals of objects in space. Dimension is the perception of differentiation between the internal structural space and external relational space of objects. Since we perceive through electromagnetic interaction, where the electric and magnetic fields are perpendicular to each other and both move perpendicularly, we have three mutually perpendicular dimensions. These are invariant under mutual transformation (if we treat length as breadth or height, the object is not affected) and can be resolved into 10 different combinations. But even after more than a century of failures to find extra-large or compact dimensions; almost all scientists superstitiously subscribe to such fiction perpetuated by the novel FLAT LANDS. There is a need to review modern science based on current information and rewrite it.

Regards,

basudeba

view post as summary

Dear Mr. Peterson,

You quoted Alexia Auffeves and Phillipe Grainger’s guess that: “The goal of physics is to study entities of the natural world, existing independently from any particular observer's perception, and obeying universal and intelligible rules.”

Please behold my reality Mr. Peterson: Proof exists that every real astronomer looking through a real telescope has...

view entire post

Dear Mr. Peterson,

You quoted Alexia Auffeves and Phillipe Grainger’s guess that: “The goal of physics is to study entities of the natural world, existing independently from any particular observer's perception, and obeying universal and intelligible rules.”

Please behold my reality Mr. Peterson: Proof exists that every real astronomer looking through a real telescope has failed to notice that each of the real galaxies he has observed is unique as to its structure and its perceived distance from all other real galaxies. Each real star is unique as to its structure and its perceived distance apart from all other real stars. Every real scientist who has peered at real snowflakes through a real microscope has concluded that each real snowflake is unique as to its structure. Real structure is unique, once. Unique, once does not consist of abstract amounts of abstract quanta. Based on one’s normal observation, one must conclude that all of the stars, all of the planets, all of the asteroids, all of the comets, all of the meteors, all of the specks of astral dust and all real objects have only one real thing in common. Each real object has a real material surface that seems to be attached to a material sub-surface. All surfaces, no matter the apparent degree of separation, must travel at the same constant speed. No matter in which direction one looks, one will only ever see a plethora of real surfaces and those surfaces must all be traveling at the same constant speed or else it would be physically impossible for one to observe them instantly and simultaneously. Real surfaces are easy to spot because they are well lighted. Real light does not travel far from its source as can be confirmed by looking at the real stars, or a real lightning bolt. Reflected light needs to adhere to a surface in order for it to be observed, which means that real light cannot have a surface of its own. Real light must be the only stationary substance in the real Universe. The stars remain in place due to astral radiation. The planets orbit because of atmospheric accumulation. There is no space.

Warm regards,

Joe Fisher

view post as summary