Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Robert Moores: on 2/16/17 at 8:01am UTC, wrote Today in essential science there is a profound emergency of comprehension,...

Michel Planat: on 4/23/15 at 8:46am UTC, wrote Thanks Angel, I don't understand the tricks of your game. But is sounds...

Angel Doz: on 4/22/15 at 18:59pm UTC, wrote Dear Michel: Inflation tpk= Planck time ...

Michel Planat: on 4/22/15 at 9:03am UTC, wrote Dear Angel, If you put your two equations together you get the logarithm...

Angel Doz: on 4/21/15 at 17:26pm UTC, wrote Dear Michel : The fibonacci spiral is there. Galaxies, plants, human body,...

Michel Planat: on 4/21/15 at 12:04pm UTC, wrote Dear Angel, OK, with Phi=(Sqrt(5)+1)/2 your equation is fine. A remarkable...

Angel Doz: on 4/20/15 at 20:48pm UTC, wrote Ah¡¡ Phi is the golden ratio

Angel Doz: on 4/20/15 at 20:46pm UTC, wrote Dear Michel: I do not understand where the problem is, I gave the answer....


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Eckard Blumschein: "Steve, As mandatory precondition of my promotion almost half a century..." in First Things First: The...

Eckard Blumschein: "Robert, You referred to "Philosophers On a Physics Experiment that..." in First Things First: The...

Robert McEachern: "Superpostions are irrelevant to any description of a thing "as it is"; they..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Georgina Woodward: "What exists unobserved is relevant to QM. Whether it is modeled..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Steve Dufourny: "this second law is so important,my theory of spherisation and these quantum..." in Mass–Energy Equivalence...

Steve Dufourny: "I must explain what is the real meaning of Spherisation in my theory.It is..." in Mass–Energy Equivalence...

Steve Dufourny: "lol no indeed it is not a lot,like I said I liked your general ideas.I have..." in The Demon in the Machine...

Steve Agnew: "There are three assumptions...is that a lot? The aether particle mass, the..." in The Demon in the Machine...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
October 16, 2019

CATEGORY: Trick or Truth Essay Contest (2015) [back]
TOPIC: mathematical tricks of today. physical truths of tomorrow: the symmetry, the queen of the physics. by Angel Garcés Doz [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Angel Garcés Doz wrote on Feb. 9, 2015 @ 21:57 GMT
Essay Abstract

Abstract. The beginning of the mathematical physics goes back to the investigations, principally, of Newton and Leibniz. With the development of the differential and integral calculus, the physics turned into an exact science. Newton, the excellent physicist of the whole history, could apply this calculation newly developed; to obtain the props of the kinematics and the clarification of the planetary movements with the law of the universal gravitation. Name all the physicists and mathematicians who from Newton have contributed of notable form to the advance of both disciplines, this one out of the area of this essay. But the names like Legendre, Gauss, Abel, Galois and a long list. Up to our days with: Schrödinger, Planck, Einstein, De Broglie, Lorentz, Feynman, Higgs, Nin Yang, Robert Mills, Edward Witten,... Abstract. All of them have had to use or invent new mathematical tools that have contributed to both disciplines. Sometimes the direction of mathematics to physics and vice versa. This essay will examine the mathematical concept of symmetry and its fundamental importance both current and in the classical physics. This small study on the symmetry will be relations with the existence of dimensional constants as Planck's constant, the speed of light, gravitational constant, etc. Likewise the symmetry, as already demonstrated Emmy Noether, expresses that any differentiable symmetry of a physical system, has its corresponding conservation law. Finally we will establish profound relations of symmetries with dimensionless constants or pure numbers. Abstract. These symmetries will come from the hand of groups of Lie and especially the possibility of connection of the order of the Monster group with the laws of physics. We will devote a small section to the partition function, obtained with imaginary parts non trivial zeros Riemman zeta function. Some of the mathematical tricks, of this essay, perhaps may be a day truths

Author Bio

Physicist and mathematician, amateur

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Sujatha Jagannathan wrote on Feb. 16, 2015 @ 06:30 GMT
Mathematics conceptions conveys fine ideas from different experts broadening the concept in more detailed manner.

Best of Luck!

Respectfully,

Miss. Sujatha Jagannathan

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Anonymous replied on Feb. 17, 2015 @ 00:08 GMT
Thank you very much for your assessment

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Michel Planat wrote on Mar. 9, 2015 @ 08:50 GMT
Dear Angel,

You should be congratulated to put so many good things in your essay.

The only point is that one is a bit lost in the jungle.

I see that the Monster Groups is your cup of tea as is mine and many others.

Good luck,

Michel

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Angel Garcés Doz replied on Mar. 9, 2015 @ 10:05 GMT
Thanks Michel

Planck mass = mpk

Electron mass = me

Order Monster group = O(GM)

Order Baby Monster group = O(GBM)



Bookmark and Share



Jayakar Johnson Joseph wrote on Mar. 28, 2015 @ 16:04 GMT
Dear Garcés Doz,

Present universe is finite while time is asymmetry and thus symmetry and asymmetry coexists in this infinite universe, in that the energy that is causal for the origin of dynamics of the universe itself is asymmetry.

With best wishes, Jayakar

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Joe Fisher wrote on Apr. 2, 2015 @ 14:40 GMT
Dear Angel,

I thought that your engrossing essay was exceptionally well written and I do hope that it fares well in the competition.

I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein was wrong about abstract space/time, and Hawking was wrong about the explosive capability of NOTHING.

All I ask is that you give my essay WHY THE REAL UNIVERSE IS NOT MATHEMATICAL a fair reading and that you allow me to answer any objections you may leave in my comment box about it.

Joe Fisher

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Angel Garcés Doz replied on Apr. 2, 2015 @ 16:38 GMT
thank you very much dear Joe, for your comment.

I read your essay carefully. But I have to tell you in advance that I disagree in principle his proposal that the universe is not mathematical

Bookmark and Share



Vladimir Rogozhin wrote on Apr. 7, 2015 @ 11:27 GMT
Dear Angel,

I totally agree with you that the idea of symmetry, invariance, and the fundamental constants - are keys to understanding the deep ontological connection mathematics and physics. I believe that Tradition tells us a principle that substantiates the symmetry and asymmetry in nature and directs the search to the single base of fundamental knowledge.

Today in fundamental science there is a deep crisis of understanding, crisis of representation and interpretation. This profound existential crisis of basic science - universal human problems. Mathematics and physics require a deep ontological justification (basification).

I invite you to see my analysis of the philosophical foundations of mathematics and physics, the method of ontological constructing of the primordial generating structure, "La Structure mère" as the ontological framework, carcass and foundation of knowledge, the core of which - the ontological (structural, cosmic) memory and information - polyvalent phenomenon of the ontological (structural) memory of Universum as a whole. I believe that the scientific picture of the world should be the same rich senses of the "LifeWorld"(E.Husserl), as a picture of the world poets and philosophers.

Kind regards,

Vladimir

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Branko L Zivlak wrote on Apr. 19, 2015 @ 19:27 GMT
Dear Garcia,

some tricks, some brilliant ideas, some speculation, a lot of courage - the result is 8. I invite you to comment on the idea in my essay.

Regards,

Branko

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Angel Garcés Doz replied on Apr. 19, 2015 @ 19:47 GMT
Thank you very much for your appreciation. Current physics, urgently needs to introduce the theoretical empirical concept of an acceleration caused by the energy of the vacuum. With this phenomenon can be calculated correctly anomalies in the solar system; as anomaly eccentricity orbit of the Moon; U.A increasing the sun, etc. Will comment on their work. Humbly thank you very much dear Branko.

Bookmark and Share



Michel Planat wrote on Apr. 20, 2015 @ 20:32 GMT
Dear Angel,

I see that you woke up may be busy with other things. There is a small problem with the reply you gave me above: I leave you time to thing about it. Meanwhile I am giving you my vote and encourage you to continue your quest about the fundamental contants of physics.

All the best,

Michel

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Angel Garcés Doz replied on Apr. 20, 2015 @ 20:46 GMT
Dear Michel: I do not understand where the problem is, I gave the answer. The equation is correct. If you can be more concise, I appreciate it. Regards

Bookmark and Share



Author Angel Garcés Doz wrote on Apr. 20, 2015 @ 20:48 GMT
Ah¡¡ Phi is the golden ratio

Bookmark and Share


Michel Planat replied on Apr. 21, 2015 @ 12:04 GMT
Dear Angel,

OK, with Phi=(Sqrt(5)+1)/2 your equation is fine. A remarkable approximation. Thanks. I am curious to understand what it means, if it is just a trick or a truth.

Michel

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Angel Garcés Doz wrote on Apr. 21, 2015 @ 17:26 GMT
Dear Michel : The fibonacci spiral is there.

Galaxies, plants, human body, etc, etc

The golden ratio is connected to E8 group and more,including inflation factor of the universe and its rotation.





137.035999173 = inverse fine structure constant to zero momentum.

Truth.

What do you think?

Bookmark and Share



Michel Planat wrote on Apr. 22, 2015 @ 09:03 GMT
Dear Angel,

If you put your two equations together you get the logarithm of the order of the monster in terms of pi and phi (about 124), a strange equation that you would have to explain.

Michel

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Angel Garcés Doz replied on Apr. 22, 2015 @ 18:59 GMT
Dear Michel:

Inflation

tpk= Planck time





max. amount of information-entropy of the Universe Order Monster group

Unification gravity electromagnetism

+-e = elementary electric chargue

Gn = Newton constant = 6.67384 x 10^-11 N x m^2/Kg^2

Tau mass, muon mas, electron mass and proton mass







Best regards

Bookmark and Share


Michel Planat replied on Apr. 23, 2015 @ 08:46 GMT
Thanks Angel,

I don't understand the tricks of your game. But is sounds exciting.

Michel

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Robert Moores wrote on Feb. 16, 2017 @ 08:01 GMT
Today in essential science there is a profound emergency of comprehension, emergency of portrayal and understanding. This significant existential emergency of essential science - general human issues.

The symmetry and invariance, and the crucial constants are keys to comprehension of the custom writing company the profound ontological association arithmetic and material science. I trust that Tradition reveals to us a rule that substantiates the symmetry and asymmetry in nature and guides the hunt to the single base of basic learning.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.