Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

ronald gruber: on 9/17/14 at 18:35pm UTC, wrote well done good presentation, clear and easy to understand controversial...

Michael muteru: on 9/13/14 at 12:02pm UTC, wrote hi all a very thought provoking video.i would not love to jump into...

Al Schneider: on 9/11/14 at 11:58am UTC, wrote You got my vote. After reviewing your comments I realize that we both are...

Al Schneider: on 9/11/14 at 11:53am UTC, wrote Your post is most kind. I am aware of other arguments. I have read that...

Norman Cook: on 9/11/14 at 5:03am UTC, wrote Well done, Al! There are other grounds for skepticism about the Big Bang,...

Al Schneider: on 9/8/14 at 18:08pm UTC, wrote I have asked you before. Please do not communicate to me.

Al Schneider: on 8/22/14 at 18:52pm UTC, wrote Video Image Video URL ...


Kevin Pryor: "If you take panpsychism seriously then all fundamental particles are..." in More on agency from the...

Lorraine Ford: "If you don’t correctly analyse a problem, then you won’t be able to see..." in More on agency from the...

Jason Wolfe: "There are two facts that have been established. First, the universe is..." in First Things First: The...

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

Jason Wolfe: "Hi Steve, It sounds like we have similar interpretations of quantum..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Steve Agnew: "Yes indeed, a wavefunction represents a superposition of locations as well..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Jason Wolfe: "Science is motivated to sever the connection with Deity. They use fluff,..." in Constructing a Theory of...

Robert McEachern: ""But what do scientists hope quantum computers will be good for,..." in What Will Quantum...

click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

November 23, 2019

CATEGORY: Show Me the Physics! Video Contest (2014) [back]
TOPIC: Is the Big Bang a Hoax by Al Schneider [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Al Schneider wrote on Aug. 22, 2014 @ 18:52 GMT
Video Image

Video URL

Video Description

The Big Bang theory depends on Hubble's law to demonstrate the universe is expanding. That theory was advanced before the QED concepts were known. This video examines how QED concepts changes our understanding of light and the effect those ideas may have on our present ideas of stars moving away from planet earth

Video Creator Bio

Al Schneider graduated from Wayne State University with a B. S. in Physics in 1969. Professionally, he he was a contract programmer concentrating on industrial and scientific projects. His side interests were wide including sleight-of-hand magic, karate, sword fighting, skiing, and theoretical physics. There, his main interest was special relativity and quantum mechanics.

Bookmark and Share

Norman D. Cook wrote on Sep. 11, 2014 @ 05:03 GMT
Well done, Al!

There are other grounds for skepticism about the Big Bang, but yours is the clearest.

Please follow up on your insight… and don't let a sacred cow or two slow you down.


Bookmark and Share

Al Schneider replied on Sep. 11, 2014 @ 11:53 GMT
Your post is most kind.

I am aware of other arguments.

I have read that approximately 40% of the established community do not believe in the present theory of the Big Bang.


Bookmark and Share

Michael muteru wrote on Sep. 13, 2014 @ 12:02 GMT
hi all

a very thought provoking video.i would not love to jump into things but using simple physics we have an immutable law called the conservation of enrgy that states ENERGY CANNOT BE CREATED NEITHER BE DESTROYED IT CAN ONLY BE CONVERTED INTO FORMS.Energy is a critical part of the universe it is also the same side of the coin as matter according to einstein.So any statement detailing the creation of such is falsifiable.the big bang theory may only suffice as a conversion process among the very many.I voted your video,we need some votes to get out of the can vote my for simple video here-

Bookmark and Share

ronald peter gruber wrote on Sep. 17, 2014 @ 18:35 GMT
well done

good presentation, clear and easy to understand

controversial but that is commonplace


Bookmark and Share

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.