Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Sorana Stoica: on 9/25/14 at 10:39am UTC, wrote Your video is very interesting, and I loved it! My video is A universe in...

Matthew Marsden: on 9/14/14 at 20:09pm UTC, wrote Hi Michael,(Sorry again,ignore other posts,FQXI doesn't let u edit or...

Matthew Marsden: on 9/14/14 at 20:04pm UTC, wrote HI Michael, ( sorry, re post with correct header) re - hi matt i...

Matthew Marsden: on 9/14/14 at 19:52pm UTC, wrote ps , to see why i think relativity i.e “on the electrodynamics of moving...

Matthew Marsden: on 9/14/14 at 19:44pm UTC, wrote hi matt re - hi matt i think timelessness is the same as eternity...

Michael muteru: on 9/14/14 at 13:53pm UTC, wrote hi matt hi matt i think timelessness is the same as eternity and thats...

Matthew Marsden: on 8/22/14 at 18:05pm UTC, wrote Video Image Video URL ...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Jason Wolfe: "I wonder why there is no interpretation of QM that says the wave function..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Georgina Woodward: "Re.macroscopic objectivity: How an outcome is to be called, the method..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Jason Wolfe: "Joe Fisher, I'm not sure reality is sensible. But the NDE/ghost stuff is..." in First Things First: The...

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

Jahangir kt: "A great website with interesting and unique material what else would you..." in Our Place in the...

Steve Dufourny: "I am going to tell you an important thing about the aethers. I thought that..." in Alternative Models of...

halim sutarmaja: "dewapoker hadir untuk semua pecinta game poker dengan teknologi terbaru dan..." in New Nuclear "Magic...

Jason Wolfe: "As for religious fundamentalists, I would rather deal with them, then with..." in More on agency from the...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
November 20, 2019

CATEGORY: Show Me the Physics! Video Contest (2014) [back]
TOPIC: Time Travel,Timeless Answers to Prof Brian Cox's Science of Dr WHO by matt welcome marsden [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Matthew Marsden wrote on Aug. 22, 2014 @ 18:05 GMT
Video Image





Video URL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ii3gxxn2reA



Video Description

Professor Brian Cox gave an excellent lecture of the science of Dr Who, The world famous BBC Time Travel Sci-Fi series. In his lecture professor Cox explained how current interpretations of Einstein’s Relativity suggest time travel may make sense. However a careful check of the actual contents of "on the electrodynamics of moving bodies" shows that Einstein in no way proved at all that there is a thing called time that "clocks" measure - but instead only "assumed" time exists, and termed Relativity as if time existed. Most scientists seem to assume relativity proves "time" dilation, and thus that time exists, and that space and time may be combined. But without any actual proof of a past, a future, and/or time, Relativity may possibly be seen as showing only that matter may exist, move, and change at "dilated" "rates"... not over a thing called "time" but just where it is, and if it is moving relative to an observer. This interpretation is examined fully in my "Time Travel, Timeless Answers to Prof Brian Cox's Science of Dr WHO", and alternative (possible) understandings, interpretations, and solutions to the ideas and paradoxes professor Cox suggests are progressively explained. Resulting in an interpretation of Relativity that (imo) may resolve all of the issues the professor raises, but does not rely at all on the existence of unnecessary, unseen, and unproven “phenomena” such as “the past”, “the future”, and “time” itself. (Matthew Marsden, auth “A Brief History of Timelessness”)

Video Creator Bio

Matthew Marsden is a profession stand up (Matt Welcome)and also a science geek and the author of “A Brief History of Timelessness”. His investigation rigorously examines the possibility that perhaps matter "just" existing, moving, interacting and transforming (as directly observed), may be enough to mislead us into wrongly assuming that a "past", or "future" may exist, and thus that a thing called "time" may exist. Examining this possibility thoroughly leads to a simpler interpretation of Relativity, that holds true the core of the work, while not relying on unproven assumptions.

Bookmark and Share



Michael muteru wrote on Sep. 14, 2014 @ 13:53 GMT
hi matt

hi matt i think timelessness is the same as eternity and thats what the universe is.our perception is just a geometric illusion conjured by our brains which are virtual simulators,hence life itself may just be a simulation,hence time travel is a reality .Please take time to please vote for my video here- http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2223.meanwhile i just voted for yours.thanks.All the best

Bookmark and Share


Matthew Marsden replied on Sep. 14, 2014 @ 19:44 GMT
hi matt



re - hi matt i think timelessness is the same as eternity and thats what the universe is.our perception is just a geometric illusion conjured by our brains which are virtual simulators,hence life itself may just be a simulation,hence time travel is a reality .Please take time to please vote for my video here- http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2223.meanwhile i just...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share


Matthew Marsden replied on Sep. 14, 2014 @ 19:52 GMT
ps , to see why i think relativity i.e “on the electrodynamics of moving bodies", seems to “assume” but in no way prove the existence of a thing called time.

see https://sites.google.com/site/abriefhistoryoftimelessness/sp
ecial-relativity/the-electrodynamics-of-moving-bodies

or the FQXI vids

Time Travel,Timeless Answers to Prof Brian Cox's Science of Dr WHO

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2243

Does Time exist? How 'Time travel Paradoxes' can't happen without "the past".

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2245

Time travel, Worm hole, billiard ball' paradox, Timelessly. (re Paul Davies- New scientist article)

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2244

mm

Bookmark and Share


Matthew Marsden replied on Sep. 14, 2014 @ 20:04 GMT
HI Michael, ( sorry, re post with correct header)



re - hi matt i think timelessness is the same as eternity and thats what the universe is.our perception is just a geometric illusion conjured by our brains which are virtual simulators,hence life itself may just be a simulation,hence time travel is a reality


Thank you for your vote and comment, ill check out...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share



Sorana Dana Stoica wrote on Sep. 25, 2014 @ 10:39 GMT
Your video is very interesting, and I loved it!

My video is A universe in a cup of water, I hope you will like it too.

I wish you success!

Victor

Bookmark and Share



Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.