Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

Teresa Mendes: on 9/16/14 at 14:42pm UTC, wrote Michael, I agree with Jonathan: your video could be much easier to follow....

Jonathan Dickau: on 9/14/14 at 1:14am UTC, wrote Thank you Michael, Your ideas are enjoyed, but the pacing of your...

Michael muteru: on 8/12/14 at 16:13pm UTC, wrote Video Image Video URL ...


Robert McEachern: ""But what do scientists hope quantum computers will be good for,..." in What Will Quantum...

Zeeya Merali: "Over the past couple of months there’s been renewed interest, and quite..." in What Will Quantum...

Jason Wolfe: "If I could write an unconventional model of reality, it would come with a..." in Alternative Models of...

Steve Dufourny: "the fuzzy spheres are very relevant in fact ,they are non commutative, I..." in Alternative Models of...

Jason Wolfe: "You should consider that wave functions describe the possible position and..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Jason Wolfe: "I wonder why there is no interpretation of QM that says the wave function..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Jason Wolfe: "Joe Fisher, I'm not sure reality is sensible. But the NDE/ghost stuff is..." in First Things First: The...

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.

November 21, 2019

CATEGORY: Show Me the Physics! Video Contest (2014) [back]
TOPIC: THE ‘ M’ IN M-THEORY by michael W muteru [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Michael muteru wrote on Aug. 12, 2014 @ 16:13 GMT
Video Image

Video URL

Video Description

M theory is said to be a wild theory i display.the simplicity it holds.and hence remove the M IN m-THEORY THER ARE NO MORE MYSTERIES IN PHYSICS

Video Creator Bio

i am a theoreticalphysicist.i work at home ,love nature alot,been working on M-theory for the past seven years .i publish on

Bookmark and Share

Jonathan J. Dickau wrote on Sep. 14, 2014 @ 01:14 GMT
Thank you Michael,

Your ideas are enjoyed, but the pacing of your presentation could be better if it allowed one to read each panel before it disappears. Of course; it would have been nice to have a sound track with music or narration too. This video leaves me with some questions, and got me worried at one point. But hopefully the cat and bunny get along OK.

All the Best,


Bookmark and Share

Teresa Mendes replied on Sep. 16, 2014 @ 14:42 GMT

I agree with Jonathan: your video could be much easier to follow. You should redo it.

Thank you for your vote. You had mine too.

(11 dimensions? ok. QM was not refuted. (String Theory /M-theory can not be refuted). But Local Realism was not refuted also. Both theories can still be viable. So shouldn't physicists think about a solution with 3 spacial dimensions + time also?)

All the best


Bookmark and Share

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.