If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at
forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.
Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the
"Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the
"Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.
Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use
Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.
By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide
by the Terms of Use
RSS feed | RSS help
FQXi FORUM
August 9, 2022
CATEGORY:
Show Me the Physics! Video Contest (2014)
[back]
TOPIC:
THE ‘ M’ IN M-THEORY by michael W muteru
[refresh]
Login or
create account to post reply or comment.
Michael muteru wrote on Aug. 12, 2014 @ 16:13 GMT
Video Image
Video URL http://youtu.be/vqlWuBMGTkgVideo DescriptionM theory is said to be a wild theory i display.the simplicity it holds.and hence remove the M IN m-THEORY THER ARE NO MORE MYSTERIES IN PHYSICS
Video Creator Bio i am a theoreticalphysicist.i work at home ,love nature alot,been working on M-theory for the past seven years .i publish on viXra.org.
Jonathan J. Dickau wrote on Sep. 14, 2014 @ 01:14 GMT
Thank you Michael,
Your ideas are enjoyed, but the pacing of your presentation could be better if it allowed one to read each panel before it disappears. Of course; it would have been nice to have a sound track with music or narration too. This video leaves me with some questions, and got me worried at one point. But hopefully the cat and bunny get along OK.
All the Best,
Jonathan
Teresa Mendes replied on Sep. 16, 2014 @ 14:42 GMT
Michael,
I agree with Jonathan: your video could be much easier to follow. You should redo it.
Thank you for your vote. You had mine too.
(11 dimensions? ok. QM was not refuted. (String Theory /M-theory can not be refuted). But Local Realism was not refuted also. Both theories can still be viable. So shouldn't physicists think about a solution with 3 spacial dimensions + time also?)
All the best
Teresa
Login or
create account to post reply or comment.