Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

Teresa Mendes: on 9/16/14 at 14:42pm UTC, wrote Michael, I agree with Jonathan: your video could be much easier to follow....

Jonathan Dickau: on 9/14/14 at 1:14am UTC, wrote Thank you Michael, Your ideas are enjoyed, but the pacing of your...

Michael muteru: on 8/12/14 at 16:13pm UTC, wrote Video Image Video URL ...


Lorraine Ford: "So what exactly is WRONG with physics, apart from the fact that physics..." in The Present State of...

Georgina Woodward: "The perception generated of time difference relates to the potential..." in Anatomy of spacetime and...

Steve Dufourny: "Hello Jim, yes indeed in a sense we have these motions and we have invented..." in The Quantum Clock-Maker...

Jim Snowdon: "Hi Steve, Clearly we have motion in our Universe. It is not..." in The Quantum Clock-Maker...

Steve Dufourny: "You are welcome, thanks too for your words. I have never lost the faith..." in The Present State of...

Georgina Woodward: "For completeness: Concerning The curved spacetime of GR. Alteration of the..." in Anatomy of spacetime and...

Georgina Woodward: "Thank you. Good luck." in The Nature of Time

Lorraine Ford: "Rob, As you have not replied, I take it that you now concede that the..." in 16th Marcel Grossmann...

click titles to read articles

The Quantum Clock-Maker Investigating COVID-19, Causality, and the Trouble with AI
Sally Shrapnel, a quantum physicist and medical practitioner, on her experiments into cause-and-effect that could help us understand time’s arrow—and build better healthcare algorithms.

Connect the Quantum Dots for a New Kind of Fuel
'Artificial atoms' allow physicists to manipulate individual electrons—and could help to reduce energy wastage in electronic devices.

Can Choices Curve Spacetime?
Two teams are developing ways to detect quantum-gravitational effects in the lab.

The Quantum Engine That Simultaneously Heats and Cools
Tiny device could help boost quantum electronics.

The Quantum Refrigerator
A tiny cooling device could help rewrite the thermodynamic rule book for quantum machines.

September 16, 2021

CATEGORY: Show Me the Physics! Video Contest (2014) [back]
TOPIC: THE ‘ M’ IN M-THEORY by michael W muteru [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Michael muteru wrote on Aug. 12, 2014 @ 16:13 GMT
Video Image

Video URL

Video Description

M theory is said to be a wild theory i display.the simplicity it holds.and hence remove the M IN m-THEORY THER ARE NO MORE MYSTERIES IN PHYSICS

Video Creator Bio

i am a theoreticalphysicist.i work at home ,love nature alot,been working on M-theory for the past seven years .i publish on

Bookmark and Share

Jonathan J. Dickau wrote on Sep. 14, 2014 @ 01:14 GMT
Thank you Michael,

Your ideas are enjoyed, but the pacing of your presentation could be better if it allowed one to read each panel before it disappears. Of course; it would have been nice to have a sound track with music or narration too. This video leaves me with some questions, and got me worried at one point. But hopefully the cat and bunny get along OK.

All the Best,


Bookmark and Share

Teresa Mendes replied on Sep. 16, 2014 @ 14:42 GMT

I agree with Jonathan: your video could be much easier to follow. You should redo it.

Thank you for your vote. You had mine too.

(11 dimensions? ok. QM was not refuted. (String Theory /M-theory can not be refuted). But Local Realism was not refuted also. Both theories can still be viable. So shouldn't physicists think about a solution with 3 spacial dimensions + time also?)

All the best


Bookmark and Share

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.