Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Marc Séguin: on 9/11/14 at 23:37pm UTC, wrote Cristi, Congratulations on reaching 10 votes! You left comments on the...

Cristinel Stoica: on 9/11/14 at 16:32pm UTC, wrote Dear Mr. Roth, Thank you for watching my videos. For both of them, you can...

Alexander Roth: on 9/11/14 at 15:59pm UTC, wrote Dear Mr. Stoica, Congratulations on a very fine entry. Your use of...

Cristinel Stoica: on 9/11/14 at 5:41am UTC, wrote Thanks Garrett. I also liked your talk very much. Best regards, Cristi

Cristinel Stoica: on 9/11/14 at 5:41am UTC, wrote Thanks Jonathan, and good luck to you too! Cristi

Antony Lisi: on 9/11/14 at 3:05am UTC, wrote Nice animations. Voted this video up.

Jonathan Dickau: on 9/11/14 at 3:05am UTC, wrote I enjoyed this Cristi, The graphics were great, but I wish the narration...

Marc Séguin: on 9/9/14 at 2:37am UTC, wrote Cristi, Interesting video, with a lot of elaborate graphics! It gets...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Georgina Woodward: "The kind of time required, over which the material change is happening, (to..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Steve Dufourny: "after all like Borh has made,this universe and its spheres for me are like..." in Alternative Models of...

Steve Dufourny: "Thanks for sharing Georgina,it is nice.Friendly" in Alternative Models of...

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

Joe Fisher: "Today’s Closer To Truth Facebook page contained this peculiar piece of..." in First Things First: The...

Lorraine Ford: "With the “A.I. Feynman” software, Silviu-Marian Udrescu and Max Tegmark..." in Will A.I. Take Over...

Georgina Woodward: "Coin toss co-state potentials: With the measurement protocol decided, in..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Steve Dufourny: "If we correlate with the consciousness, can we consider that all is..." in Measuring Free Will: Ian...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
October 23, 2019

CATEGORY: Show Me the Physics! Video Contest (2014) [back]
TOPIC: Can a black hole keep a secret? by Cristinel Stoica [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Cristinel Stoica wrote on Aug. 8, 2014 @ 21:22 GMT
Video Image





Video URL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8SErmAxLDU



Video Description

Objects falling into black holes reach a singularity. They seem to vanish at the singularity, and together with them, any information they carry. This is very bad for Quantum Mechanics. I present a proposed solution, based on recent advances in the geometry and physics of singularities. The video aims to explain the main ideas without equations, in a graphical and accessible manner. Technical details can be found in C. Stoica, Singular General Relativity, PhD Thesis, arXiv:1301.2231, and references therein.

Video Creator Bio

Cristi Stoica is currently mathematical physicist, former computer programmer, former math teacher. His main research interests are general relativity, quantum mechanics, and the connections between them.

Bookmark and Share



David Goehring wrote on Aug. 8, 2014 @ 21:29 GMT
Fascinating! Black holes are so interesting. Thanks for sharing.

Bookmark and Share


Cristinel Stoica replied on Aug. 9, 2014 @ 05:54 GMT
Thanks Dave! Glad you like it!

Bookmark and Share



Member Marc Séguin wrote on Sep. 9, 2014 @ 02:37 GMT
Cristi,

Interesting video, with a lot of elaborate graphics! It gets fairly technical near the end, but I could follow most of it and Penrose's way of representing an infinite spacetime by a finite area is certainly very interesting.

I hope the video creators vote more in the next few days, so more videos, like yours, can get to 10 votes... The 2nd and 3rd videos of my trilogy are still in need of votes, so if you haven't already done so, it would be great if you could leave an appreication.

Good luck in the contest!

Marc

Bookmark and Share



Jonathan J. Dickau wrote on Sep. 11, 2014 @ 03:05 GMT
I enjoyed this Cristi,

The graphics were great, but I wish the narration could have been more animated and a bit clearer sounding. I'm spoiled by having nice microphones, I know, but if the words are needed for comprehension, they must be conveyed clearly. I already like the work on which this is based, and I almost like this video.

Good luck in the contest!

Regards,

Jonathan

Bookmark and Share


Cristinel Stoica replied on Sep. 11, 2014 @ 05:41 GMT
Thanks Jonathan, and good luck to you too!

Cristi

Bookmark and Share



Member Antony Garrett Lisi wrote on Sep. 11, 2014 @ 03:05 GMT
Nice animations. Voted this video up.

Bookmark and Share


Cristinel Stoica replied on Sep. 11, 2014 @ 05:41 GMT
Thanks Garrett. I also liked your talk very much.

Best regards,

Cristi

Bookmark and Share



Alexander Roth wrote on Sep. 11, 2014 @ 15:59 GMT
Dear Mr. Stoica,

Congratulations on a very fine entry. Your use of graphics to illustrate some very complex features of black holes receives high praise. I have the same criticism as for your other video --- the narration going too fast and being too difficult to understand. However, because of the high quality of the graphics I am planning to return to it, several times, to attempt to fully appreciate the presentation which appears so interesting.

Thanks and good luck for the competition.

Alexander Roth

Bookmark and Share


Cristinel Stoica replied on Sep. 11, 2014 @ 16:32 GMT
Dear Mr. Roth,

Thank you for watching my videos. For both of them, you can enable subtitles on youtube. I wish you all the best in the contest!

Best regards,

Cristi

Bookmark and Share



Member Marc Séguin wrote on Sep. 11, 2014 @ 23:37 GMT
Cristi,

Congratulations on reaching 10 votes! You left comments on the first two parts of my trilogy "This Is Physics" (and presumably left a rating), but not on the third part,"Physics Into Darkness"... and since this video is still one vote short of getting 10 votes (the first two parts have at least 10 votes), I was wondering if you had left a rating as well?

I hope your second video soon gets to 10 votes... you've already got my votes! Good luck!

Marc

Bookmark and Share



Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.