Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Aden Williams: on 11/8/14 at 11:50am UTC, wrote http://bit.ly/1zC84Kx

Aden Williams: on 11/8/14 at 11:34am UTC, wrote Let go through some of the basics of Physics Video Url ...

Kristen Hamilton: on 9/8/14 at 21:43pm UTC, wrote Hi Seth, This was a great choice of topics! Your explanation was concise,...

madeleine richter: on 9/8/14 at 5:53am UTC, wrote Hi Seth, I liked the animation you used for your video a lot and the way...

Seth D.: on 7/17/14 at 21:04pm UTC, wrote Video Image Video URL ...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Jason Wolfe: "Hi Georgina, Steve, What is reality? The humorous answer, almost at the..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Jason Wolfe: "Joe, What you are saying sounds like mathematics. But mathematics doesn't..." in First Things First: The...

Joe Fisher: "Jason, You can only unnaturally make an infinite number of finite written..." in First Things First: The...

Jason Wolfe: "As for religious fundamentalists, I would rather deal with them, then with..." in More on agency from the...

Jason Wolfe: "The best we can do with the environment is to plant more trees and..." in More on agency from the...

gmail login: "Thanks a lot for the post. It has helped me get some nice ideas. I hope I..." in Bonus Koan: A Lake of...

Georgina Woodward: "Steve, I don't think the quantum representation of the hydrogen atom is an..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

SAJ Real Estate: "Nice one. Real Estate Sales St Kitts" in A Close Encounter


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
November 17, 2019

CATEGORY: Show Me the Physics! Video Contest (2014) [back]
TOPIC: Physics of the nerf gun #FQXiVideoContest2014 by Seth Dacio [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Seth D. wrote on Jul. 17, 2014 @ 21:04 GMT
Video Image





Video URL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ML9-UoqB_jg



Video Description

Did you know that their is physics involved in a nerf gun? There is physics involved in a nerf gun and to learn more about it, check out this video. #FQXiVideoContest2014

Video Creator Bio

Seth Dacio, is a filmmaker who has been making videos ever since he was 10 years old. When he found out about this contest, he decided to talk about the physics of the nerf gun.

Bookmark and Share



madeleine richter wrote on Sep. 8, 2014 @ 05:53 GMT
Hi Seth,

I liked the animation you used for your video a lot and the way you explained how physics is involved in firing of a Nerf-gun bullet. Not many people manage to make what you did: make a educative, clever and really funny video without ever being pretentious or self-important. Next time I get my hands on a Nerf-Gun (which hopefully isn't in the far future) I will remember your video and what I otherwise mindlessly neglect: gravity, air pressure, friction or Newton's law of motion.

I wish you good luck and hope to see more of your videos,

Madeleine

Bookmark and Share



Kristen Hamilton wrote on Sep. 8, 2014 @ 21:43 GMT
Hi Seth,

This was a great choice of topics! Your explanation was concise, and your physics seems sound. Good luck!

If you could watch and rate my video, "The Cool Physics of Refrigeration," that would be great. Thanks!

David

Bookmark and Share



Aden Williams wrote on Nov. 8, 2014 @ 11:34 GMT
Let go through some of the basics of Physics

Video Url

http://bit.ly/1zC84Kx

Description

Verification of Archimedes' Principle

Archimedes' Principle:

Archimedes' principle states that when as body is totally or partially immersed in a fluid, it experiences an upthrust equal to the weight of the fluid displaced.

Experimental verification Archimedes' principle

Materials required to verify Archimedes' principle are:

Eureka can, Stone, Beakers, Measuring jar and Spring balance

Arrange the eureka can and the beaker on the table as shown here. Pour water into the eureka can till the water starts overflowing through the spout. When water stops tripping replace the beaker by another beaker of known mass. Suspend a stone with the help of string from the hook of the spring balance and record its weight. Gradually lower the stone into the eureka can containing water and record the reading of the spring balance when the stone is completely immersed in water. The weight of the stone is found to be less than its weight in air i.e., the apparent loss of weight. We observe that the water overflows through the spout of the eureka can. Pour water into the measuring jar and note the reading. The observed reading gives the volume of water displaced. The volume of water displaced is equal to its weight as the density of the water is equal to 1. The apparent loss of weight of stone in water is equal to the weight of the water displaced by it. This proves the Archimedes' principle.

Bookmark and Share


Aden Williams replied on Nov. 8, 2014 @ 11:50 GMT
http://bit.ly/1zC84Kx

Bookmark and Share



Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.