Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

Adam Washington: on 9/18/14 at 21:08pm UTC, wrote Dear Franklin Hu, I appreciate your hard work and the simplicity of how...

Ian Harris: on 8/7/14 at 16:31pm UTC, wrote Although an interesting concept I feel as if the presentation of it was...

Franklin Hu: on 5/27/14 at 20:24pm UTC, wrote Video Image Video URL ...


jim hughes: "I'm not a mathematician. So what I see here is some smart people who..." in Consciousness and the...

Steve Dufourny: "Hello FQXi, the members and all, I try to do my best to unite and convice..." in Global Collaboration

Lorraine Ford: "The idea of a smooth mathematical evolution of “the wave function”, and..." in Consciousness and the...

Georgina Woodward: "Broken machine: What do[es] I see next? The I that was, E.I, has not been..." in The Room in the Elephant:...

Lorraine Ford: "Hi Stefan, I hope that a good leader, and a good political party, is..." in The Present State of...

Lorraine Ford: "We live in an age of computing. But physics, mathematics and philosophy,..." in The Present State of...

Georgina Woodward: "I've copied the comment to the thread where it belongs. This orphan can be..." in The Room in the Elephant:...

Georgina Woodward: "Thank you John. What did you think about the questioning whether altitude..." in The Nature of Time

click titles to read articles

Good Vibrations
Microbead 'motor' exploits natural fluctuations for power.

Reconstructing Physics
New photon experiment gives new meta-framework, 'constructor theory,' a boost.

The Quantum Engineer: Q&A with Alexia Auffèves
Experiments seek to use quantum observations as fuel to power mini motors.

The Quantum Clock-Maker Investigating COVID-19, Causality, and the Trouble with AI
Sally Shrapnel, a quantum physicist and medical practitioner, on her experiments into cause-and-effect that could help us understand time’s arrow—and build better healthcare algorithms.

Connect the Quantum Dots for a New Kind of Fuel
'Artificial atoms' allow physicists to manipulate individual electrons—and could help to reduce energy wastage in electronic devices.

September 28, 2021

CATEGORY: Show Me the Physics! Video Contest (2014) [back]
TOPIC: The Cubic Atomic Model - Could Rutherford be wrong? by Franklin Hu [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Franklin Hu wrote on May. 27, 2014 @ 20:24 GMT
Video Image

Video URL

Video Description

Is it possible that blocks covered with Velcro can tell us anything about how atoms are really constructed? The answer is YES! In a radical departure from quantum mechanics and the Rutherford planetary atom, we treat protons, neutrons and electrons as simple building blocks. As we build up these blocks, we find we can explain why different atoms bond with only a limited number of other atoms in particular geometric arrangements without using electron shells. This model allows us to simplify and build up atoms intuitively like connecting Lego bricks or tinker toys. Finally, a model that allows easy visualization of heavy atoms that even a child can understand. Does this represent a radical new reality for the atom? You decide. Paradigm shift time....

Video Creator Bio

Franklin Hu is an independent amateur scientist living in Bothell WA. He is a graduate of MIT and works in software engineering as a profession.

Bookmark and Share

Ian C Harris wrote on Aug. 7, 2014 @ 16:31 GMT
Although an interesting concept I feel as if the presentation of it was lacking and not nearly as interesting as the idea suggests. My attention was lost several times throughout the course of the video - I think that if the presentation was a bit more intriguing this problem could be easily solved. I like the idea though, it takes guts to express your own ideas on such theoretical concepts.

Bookmark and Share

Adam Washington wrote on Sep. 18, 2014 @ 21:08 GMT
Dear Franklin Hu,

I appreciate your hard work and the simplicity of how you presented the information in your video. I gave you 3 stars. Would you mind looking at my submission “The Escape - Physics & Fairytales”? We took the classic story of Cinderella and presented where she was trying to escape through the prism of physics. We would really appreciate a vote from you. Thanks.

Bookmark and Share

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.