Arthur,

Regarding: instantaneous processors and infinite memory not being possible

In any proof regarding observable physics momentum, force, energy, power ... are used as variables in demonstrating relationships that prove something. Relativity is based upon the speed of light and related relationship of meters/second, or space/time.

The problem with this is that all the...

view entire post

Arthur,

Regarding: instantaneous processors and infinite memory not being possible

In any proof regarding observable physics momentum, force, energy, power ... are used as variables in demonstrating relationships that prove something. Relativity is based upon the speed of light and related relationship of meters/second, or space/time.

The problem with this is that all the variables we routinely correlate are also based upon meters/sec and related inseparable space/time.

So by limiting the analysis of physics to inseparable space/time then mathematics limits causality to being composed of inseparable space/time relationships and the related energy.

What I am studying is the potential for a new way of relating to physics that allows for separable considerations that moderate space/time relationships.

An example of the feasibility of doing this is quantum entanglement. In relativity, anything not directly related to space, or not related to time, or not related to either space nor time, can produce observations that appear to be instantaneous though still causally connected.

Saying something is not possible, should be prefaced with "using currently mainstream relationships".

My interest is what fundamental characteristics moderate the ratios of physics.

E = 1/2 mv^2

What are the causal foundations for the functional relationships? I'm not as interested right now in the variables themselves.

"IF" space and time can be separately manipulated (non-relativistic causality), then energy-less causal manipulation becomes feasible.

A new physics based upon non-relativistic quantum causality.

These are just my interests, there is only minor experimental support thus far in the form of intuitively explaining duality, fringe patterns, observable quantum entanglement, decoherence, the Big Bang, alternate dimensional spaces...

If I figure out how to separate any observable feature of a space/time relationship, I'll probably keep it to myself until corruption can globally be eliminated. Imagine space/time manipulation tools in the hands of criminals !!

This is why I proposed making the NSA ethical to usefully monitor everything from the Top/Down:

http://eliminate-all-corruption.pbworks.com

And concurrently fighting corruption from the bottom/up through the teaching of common sense in my essay, from which has spawned a 501(c)3 for teaching common sense at:

http://www.ua-kits.com

The problem with technology is that it is most often used in conjunction with destroying eco-systems (uncontrolled population growth, mining, pesticides, herbicides ...). I do not believe anyone has put any significant effort into considering the broad devastation that space/time manipulation "can" represent.

view post as summary

My essay mentioned overpopulation four times but offered no solutions. Two friends said this needed to be addressed (they did not rate my essay). One friend wrote:

I personally think that population control is as important as anything in finding balance with the planet until humanity can expand outward. I think that this is difficult for people to talk about or accept but the "right to...

view entire post

My essay mentioned overpopulation four times but offered no solutions. Two friends said this needed to be addressed (they did not rate my essay). One friend wrote:

I personally think that population control is as important as anything in finding balance with the planet until humanity can expand outward. I think that this is difficult for people to talk about or accept but the "right to reproduce without bounds" is equal to "the right to consume without bounds". Clean energy can take a bite out of the effects of consumption (pollution, digging holes in the ground, etc.) but there is much more to consider I think. What about food, water, waste, etc.? I think that clean energy might help with these somewhat but not entirely. Free power doesn't even have a cost to consider. It is said that entire species are lost every day due to deforestation for farming and homes. Will ever expanding populations decide that it is OK to cram themselves into small spaces, or continue to pave the planet? I do not want a Logan's Run type of scenario but we all do live in a dome of sorts - only so much space - so maybe a cap on the number of children that people can have.

I believe that technology, clean energy, etc. can really help us overcome our planet's challenges. I just think that we can't rely on this alone, especially considering our track record of more technology = more consumption = more issues.

I think we need to learn to manage our planet properly and find a balance. If we can do this, we can prove that we are able to expand outward to other worlds and not destroy them. Equally important, it gives us the time to develop what we need to expand into the universe.

---

I wanted people to think about overpopulation but I offered no solutions because of these issues:

- There is a lot of uncertainty. How many people can Earth support with current technology? Between 4 billion and 16 billion. How many people will there be in 2100? Between 6 billion and 16 billion.

- The energy use per person is almost as important as population.

- The essay evaluation criteria says to touch on physics and cosmology, and an optimistic rather than dystopic future.

- Democratic governments like India and the U.S. cannot implement a cap on the number of children.

The only solutions seem to be birth control, increasing literacy and reducing poverty.

view post as summary

show all replies (3 not shown)

hide replies