Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Orenda Urbano Hernández: on 6/7/14 at 1:35am UTC, wrote Dear Petio, Fabulous way to compare the Nahuatl thinking with Hermes...

Christian Corda: on 6/6/14 at 9:02am UTC, wrote Reading your Essay was my pleasure dear Petio. Yes, let us keep in touch. ...

Petio Hristov: on 6/6/14 at 5:28am UTC, wrote Hi Christian, I sincerely thank you for your detailed comment and hope we...

Christian Corda: on 6/5/14 at 16:37pm UTC, wrote Hi Petio, Thanks, I am going to re-check my email. In the meanwhile, I...

Petio Hristov: on 6/5/14 at 15:18pm UTC, wrote Dear Christian, I have re-sended you my books. Best wishes, Petio.

Christian Corda: on 6/5/14 at 8:20am UTC, wrote P.S. Today I am going to read,comment and rate your Essay

Christian Corda: on 6/5/14 at 8:19am UTC, wrote Hi Petio, Thanks for your message in my FQXi webpage. Actually, I just...

Peter Jackson: on 6/4/14 at 16:09pm UTC, wrote Petio, Do advise if you can send in a format I can open. You also noted on...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Steve Dufourny: "Hi Eckard,you seems persuaded by your Words and thoughts.I don t understand..." in First Things First: The...

Eckard Blumschein: "In Darwinism/Weismannism there is no first cause, just a causal chain...." in First Things First: The...

Steve Agnew: "There are some questions that do not seem to have answers in the classical..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Steve Agnew: "Yes, there are two very different narratives. The classical narrative works..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Steve Dufourny: "lol no indeed it is not a lot,like I said I liked your general ideas.I have..." in The Demon in the Machine...

Steve Agnew: "There are three assumptions...is that a lot? The aether particle mass, the..." in The Demon in the Machine...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
October 14, 2019

CATEGORY: How Should Humanity Steer the Future? Essay Contest (2014) [back]
TOPIC: Life under ground Cosmic mystery and physical reality by Petio Hristov [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Petio Hristov wrote on Apr. 24, 2014 @ 14:33 GMT
Essay Abstract

I study the Universe by working and solving the materials in ancient books. In this I use laws discovered by myself such as the Law of Unity, the Law of Conversion, the Law of Time etc., and all these laws give the basis of a General theory of Unity. This new outlook upon the knowledge encrypted in ancient writings and images gives me the opportunity to find the hidden meaning in some myths and illustrations left from different ancient cultures. Comparing them I noticed that they complement each other and also that there are some contemporary scientific discoveries which confirm the knowledge of some ancient civilizations. The focus is on the path which humanity I destined to take in the future, based on that which has already happened. Remembering the principle of Hermes Trismegistus “That which is up is that which is down. That which is down is that which is up”, we could make out the future. And why not see the Universe as a living plant? A Galactic Plant if you will. Now we are at the beginning of two different Galactic cycles, bought of which predict the Galactic warming. So the Global warming is unavoidable, the lowering of the harmful emissions in the atmosphere which are a product of human activity would just slow the process without stopping it. Bearing this in mind we have to learn to construct cities of a totally different type.

Author Bio

For more than 25 years I’ve been searching and discovering physical laws. Such as the Objective laws – the basic duality in the Universe; a calculation of the space-time continuum, the basic principles in the Universe, the basic types of cycles in the Universe. Published books: The Law of Unity – 2001; The Universe’s harmony – 2004; The Fate of the World 21.12.2012 ancient knowledge of the cycles of time – 2012 From 1989 till now I own the publishing house “Five plus”. I’ve worked till 1989 as head specialist in the establishment and operation of calculative machinery.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Joe Fisher wrote on May. 1, 2014 @ 14:20 GMT
Dear Author Hristov,

I really enjoyed reading your hyper-imaginative abstractions filled essay and I do hope that it does well in the competition.

I do have a minor quibble about your essay that I hope you will not mind me mentioning. Reality is unique, once. There are no abstract laws of uniqueness. There are no abstract levels of uniqueness.

With regards,

Joe Fisher

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Petio Hristov replied on May. 4, 2014 @ 18:12 GMT
Dear Joe Fisher,

I thank you that you looked into my essay. I agree with you that reality is unique, but the understanding of this uniqueness, especially the invisible uniqueness of reality has needs the developing of new theories. I have develop such a theory, based on the Law of Conversion and my thoughts concern the uniqueness of the digits and the perception that it is possible that some ancient civilizations have expressed figuratively the physical values.

Best regards

Petio Hristov

Bookmark and Share



Georgina Woodward wrote on May. 7, 2014 @ 11:41 GMT
Hi Petio,

I have read your fascinating, unusual essay. Unfortunately I don't think you paid attention to the evaluation criteria but wrote the essay you wanted to write outlining the findings of your personal research.From the evaluation criteria on the contest information page."(Note: While this topic is broad, successful essays will not use this breadth as an excuse to shoehorn in the author's pet topic, but will rather keep as their central focus the theme of how humanity should steer the future.)"

Your last paragraph was the only part of the essay that I could see as directly relevant to the essay question. Interestingly that we have both suggested that that might be a solution. Hopefully sharing your ideas is more important to you than winning. Regards, Georgina

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Petio Hristov wrote on May. 9, 2014 @ 07:31 GMT
Dear Georgina Parry

Thank you for the depth consideration of my essay and the high rate that you have given me.

I used the maximum of the given length for the clarification of a basic and unresolved cosmic question, which you also mention in your essay: Why and how entropy can possible exist and what are the consequences which it brings? Life underground isn’t a main purpose but an exit. The less time it takes for humanity to see this, the better it would be.

Best regards

Petio Hristov

Bookmark and Share


Georgina Woodward replied on May. 12, 2014 @ 09:10 GMT
Hi Petio,

I'm sorry if you feel I have not thought sufficiently about your essay.

I have not yet given any votes, preferring first to read as many essays as I feel able to read.

I have not talked about entropy in my essay.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Petio Hristov replied on May. 13, 2014 @ 06:48 GMT
Dear Georgina Parry

I'm sorry, that I forgot to mention in my reply the connection between Global warming, which you mention and entropy.

I hope this connection is made clear in my essay.

Best regards

Petio Hristov

Bookmark and Share



Vladimir Rogozhin wrote on May. 13, 2014 @ 11:16 GMT
Dear Petio,

I read your essay with a great interest. Your ideas are very original and modern. Yes, today it is important for overcoming of modern crisis of fundamental knowledge, "interpretation and representation crisis" (T.Romanovskaya), "understanding crisis" deep synthesis of all knowledge accumulated by Humanity, the ekzoteric and esoteric. The traditional knowledge gives new ideas. The ancient idea of cycles is extraordinary actual for modern fundamental science. The knowledge of ancient Egypt, India and China conceals in itself many riddles. Sources of mathematics lie in knowledge of Ancient Egypt and are even deeper. The Humanity is on the threshold of eonic thinking: «Aion is a child playing, playing checkers; power over the world belongs to the child.»(Heraclites). Problem of fundamental science it is to solve a mystery of "the game law" in Space.

Updating of concepts "law", "the nature law", "time" and their deeper understanding is very important also. Picture of the world of physics should be the same rich meanings of the «LifeWorld»(E.Husserl) as the world picture lyricists. Otherwise it will be difficult to steer the Future.My appreciation of your ideas.

Thank FQXi that brings together people for "brainstorming" on very important topics of modern Humanity and modern Science!

I invite you to comment on and appreciate my essay.

High regard,

Vladimir

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Petio Hristov replied on May. 15, 2014 @ 11:34 GMT
Dear Vladimir I. Rogozhin

Thank you very much for the high rate on my essay.

I hope you felt the new fundaments in the understanding of the Universe by which the cosmic mysteries find their meaning.

I believe that we still have much to talk about.

Best regards

Petio Hristov

Bookmark and Share


Vladimir Rogozhin replied on May. 18, 2014 @ 20:24 GMT
Dear Petio,

Thank you very much for your comment and the invitation to the group of associates. I am pleased to inform you my address ideabank@yandex.ru

Best regards,

Vladimir

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Petio Hristov replied on May. 19, 2014 @ 06:04 GMT
Hi Vladimir,

Thank you very much that you have responded to my invitation to include yourself in the group in support of the Theory of Unity.

I will send you the books via e-mail.

Regards,

Petio H

Bookmark and Share



James Dunn wrote on May. 19, 2014 @ 03:14 GMT
Joe Fisher,

Regarding your quote: "Reality is unique, once. There are no abstract laws of uniqueness. There are no abstract levels of uniqueness."

Anything can be disputed, but common sense is based in using all the information available to us for our greatest long-term benefit.

Inspiration comes from diverse sources. My own model of relativity came from being asked "What is nothing?" by Ludwig several years ago; what should have been an elusive and esoteric question.

The purpose of Axiom of Choice is to define a unique quality as the minimum foundation under which mathematics is causally possible. Fundamental unique causal properties that repeat. The purpose of "Axiom of Choice extended to include Relativity" is to define a unique quality as the minimum foundation under which all of "physics" is causally possible (QESdunn).

The uniqueness is not that there is a oneness of something in all the universe, but that the universe is composed of many identical entities; i.e. quantum causality. This does NOT mean that these causal entities themselves cannot be further refined in understanding.

I have not as yet read Petio's essay, my comment is only based upon your expression related to uniqueness. To assert there is no uniqueness also asserts that mathematics is without purpose related to physics.

James Dunn

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

James Dunn replied on May. 19, 2014 @ 12:10 GMT
Correction: "To assert there is no uniqueness also asserts that mathematics is without purpose related to physics."

To assert there is no uniqueness also asserts that mathematics is without purpose related to physics related to the foundations of cosmology.

Obviously mathematics is highly related to engineering and science where in terms of repeatable practices probability and error analysis provide useful "perspectives and relationships within limits".

James Dunn

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Petio Hristov replied on May. 19, 2014 @ 14:16 GMT
Dear James Dunn,

I thank you for your e-mail.

Uniqueness is in the idea for the creation of the whole. The uniqueness of the idea is in its ability to renew in its continues manifestation. The driving force of this renewing is in the unity of the opposites which are set in it.

The mathematical formulas and physical laws are relative and day show the manifestation of the idea.

The basic principles of the idea reflect its uniqueness.

Regards,

Petio H

Bookmark and Share



Anonymous wrote on May. 19, 2014 @ 04:44 GMT
Petio,

Interesting relationships related to what we consider an ancient civilization. Egyptian tech took place beginning around 3000 BC; a few thousand years ago. About 1000 years after the first historical writings became available. At the time, Persia was considered the center of intellectual activities. My wife is a descendant of King Mirmiran who ruled around that same time and her...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Petio Hristov replied on May. 19, 2014 @ 14:23 GMT
Dear Michael Muteru,

I thank you for your e-mail,

The Beginning of the forth “day” called Kali Yuga in which we live now according to the Hindu calendar was 17th/18th of February 3102 years BC (from the Julian calendar), and according to the Maya the beginning, or as they called it the Great cycle, had started on the 11th of July 3114 years BC. Before that there was “night” (according to the ancient cultures), which was with a duration of 1,728 million years. The night is known with the fact that it doesn’t leave any traces.

The invitation which I have sent is connected with my wish to introduce you with the Universal model which I have suggested. I believe that this model can answer some cosmic mysteries.

The General theory of Unity is a physical theory; “extracted” form the Cabala, Hinduism, Egyptian myths and Mayan myths. From these sources I learned that the pedigree of the Universe is one of the keys in its understanding.

I cannot send you the book on the address which you have given me. If you are not acquainted with the theory I cannot comment. If you wish you can send me your e-mail address.

Regards,

Petio H

Bookmark and Share



Joe Fisher wrote on May. 19, 2014 @ 13:48 GMT
Dear Petio Hristov,

Evidently, you have not read my essay carefully enough, and you have not read my Theory of Inert Light that I have posted in the comments boxes of several of my fellow essayists. I will repost my Inert Light Theory in your assay's comments box. There is no need for you to form a group "to gain knowledge of the General Theory of Unity." Only unique reality is unified,...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Petio Hristov replied on May. 20, 2014 @ 06:55 GMT
Dear Joe Fisher,

I thank you for your post,

Uniqueness means unity.

Uniqueness is in the idea for the creation of the whole. The uniqueness of the idea is in its ability to renew in its continues manifestation. The driving force of this renewing is in the unity of the opposites which are set in it.

The mathematical formulas and physical laws are relative and day show the manifestation of the idea.

The basic principles of the idea reflect its uniqueness.

The General theory of Unity gives the opportunity of any theory to find its place in the common on one hand and to connect whit the other theories on the other.

I sincerely hope that the General Theory of Unity will be helpful those with good intentions.

Regards,

Petio H

Bookmark and Share


Author Petio Hristov replied on May. 20, 2014 @ 07:03 GMT
Dear Joe Fisher,

P.S. The General theory of Unity works with the idea, with the development of the idea, with interrelationship between different parts of the idea, the principle of the idea, the realization of the idea.

Regards,

Petio H

Bookmark and Share


Joe Fisher replied on May. 20, 2014 @ 14:41 GMT
Dear Petio H,

The abstract "The General theory of Unity works with the idea, with the development of the idea, with interrelationship between different parts of the idea, the principle of the idea, the realization of the idea." does not work with reality. Only reality is unified as I have pragmatically proven with my theory of Inert Light.

Joe Fisher

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Alexander M. Ilyanok wrote on May. 19, 2014 @ 17:40 GMT
Dear Petio, Thank you very much for your invitation to the working group of associates and I wait for the books for understand the General Theory of Unity.

Best regargs, Alexander Ilyanok a-ilyanok@hotmail.ru

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Petio Hristov replied on May. 19, 2014 @ 18:09 GMT
Hi Alexander,

Thank you very much that you have responded to my invitation to include yourself in the group in support of the Theory of Unity.

I will send you the books via e-mail.

Regards,

Petio H

Bookmark and Share



Gyenge Valeria wrote on May. 19, 2014 @ 21:23 GMT
Dear Petio!

Thank you for your respect and invitation to take part of your group. I'm glad to accept.

I have similar approach as you write. Furthermore, I'd been engaged on dealing with 'divine mysteries' too, however in the meantime I've turned my attention focusing on how those might be closely describable by contemporary theoretical physics.

I'm about to read your essay, and I will come back giving some comments and rate.

I'm awaiting for your ebooks to my e-mail given in my essay, and where this group will be available.

High regards,

Valeria

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Petio Hristov replied on May. 20, 2014 @ 06:57 GMT
Hi Valeria,

Thank you very much that you have responded to my invitation to include yourself in the group in support of the Theory of Unity.

I will send you the books via e-mail.

Regards,

Petio H

Bookmark and Share



Lawrence B Crowell wrote on May. 19, 2014 @ 21:26 GMT
Dear Petio,

My email address is lcrowell@swcp.com. I can give this group of yours a look.

Cheers LC

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Petio Hristov replied on May. 20, 2014 @ 06:58 GMT
Hi Cheers LC,

Thank you very much that you have responded to my invitation to include yourself in the group in support of the Theory of Unity.

I will send you the books via e-mail.

Regards,

Petio H

Bookmark and Share



James Lee Hoover wrote on May. 19, 2014 @ 22:39 GMT
Petio,

Perhaps an imaginative mythology such of this can point a path of steerage as well as any real-world plan, considering the intransigence of too many Earthlings in promoting needed change. Your bridging ancient, imaginative times is a metaphorical solution the short-sighted might buy.

Your essay is entertaining, Petio.

Jim

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Petio Hristov replied on May. 20, 2014 @ 07:01 GMT
Jim,

I thank you for your post,

Regards,

Petio H

Bookmark and Share


James Lee Hoover replied on May. 27, 2014 @ 00:18 GMT
Jonathan,

Time grows short, so I am revisiting essay I've reviewed to make sure I've rated them. I find that I rated yours on 5/19.

Regards

Jim

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

James Lee Hoover replied on May. 27, 2014 @ 00:23 GMT
Sorry, Petio. Age overtakes me.

Jim

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Saurav Chhawchharia wrote on May. 20, 2014 @ 12:00 GMT
Hi Sir,

Thanks for your invitation and I am very much glad to join the group.

Here's my e-mail

g7saurav@gmail.com

Although I am a student and I emphsise more on my studies than these researches as the studies are more life-describing, at this time of my life, than these researches; but I am sure, I will always find time for "Science"!

Thanks

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Petio Hristov wrote on May. 20, 2014 @ 14:08 GMT
Hi Saurav Chhawchharia,

Thank you very much that you have responded to my invitation to include yourself in the group in support of the Theory of Unity.

I will send you the books via e-mail.

Regards,

Petio H

Bookmark and Share



Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde wrote on May. 20, 2014 @ 15:13 GMT
dear Petio,

I also have a great respect for ALL that is available for our consciousness through writing, of course including the OLD WISDOM.

In my perspective however WE are the creators of our history through the creation of reality by our consciousness.

I thank you for your invitation,( my e-mail is wilhelmus.d@orange.fr) but I am also aware that you wrote ths invitation without reading the essay I wrote (for else you would have seen already my e-mail)

So I hope that you as a respected author will find also some time to read and comment it in congruence with your own wisdom, I would really appreciate that because I like very much your philosophical perceptions.

best regards

Wilhelmus

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Petio Hristov replied on May. 21, 2014 @ 08:07 GMT
Hi Wilhelmus,

Thank you very much that you have responded to my invitation to include yourself in the group in support of the Theory of Unity.

I will send you the books via e-mail.

Regards,

Petio H

Bookmark and Share



John-Erik Persson wrote on May. 20, 2014 @ 18:26 GMT
Petio H

Thanks for the invitation. My e-mail is.

john.erik.persson@gmail.com

From John-Erik

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Petio Hristov replied on May. 21, 2014 @ 08:09 GMT
Hi John-Erik,

Thank you very much that you have responded to my invitation to include yourself in the group in support of the Theory of Unity.

I will send you the books via e-mail.

Regards,

Petio H

Bookmark and Share



Raymond Law wrote on May. 22, 2014 @ 11:58 GMT
Hi Petio,

Please drop me a line or two at my lym2000r at yahoo dot com, for I have a few question for you. Many thanks !

Raymond Law

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Petio Hristov wrote on May. 22, 2014 @ 13:12 GMT
Hi Raymond Law,

Thank you very much that you have responded to my invitation to include yourself in the group in support of the Theory of Unity.

I will send you the books via e-mail.

Regards,

Petio H

Bookmark and Share



Gyenge Valeria wrote on May. 22, 2014 @ 17:37 GMT
Dear Petio!

It seems me the content of your essay is a fragment or abbreviation from your larger works or your book you mention - General Theory of Unity.

Albeit you have tremendous (probably even secret) knowledge and understanding behind, and your work deserves for greater rating, unfortunately your essay may get lesser one, because without reading your book and the knowing the...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Petio Hristov replied on May. 25, 2014 @ 07:15 GMT
Hi Valeria,

Thank you very much that you have responded to my invitation to include yourself in the group in support of the Theory of Unity.

The essay is a completely new fragment which adds to the General theory of Unity. It is true that whit this essay I have used a limited amount of the theory and in it there are many new ideas.

When we study the universe we see it as whole, but the processes that go on in it are quite different and that is why I have divided it in different levels. In each level the cyclic processes are similar.

The General theory of Unity deals whit the idea id creation of the universe and of its separate levels (see the book). The processes I express with laws and principles.

I alone cannot understand all the different fields of science and that is why I invite specialists to take part in this project or at least to have the opportunity to see their own field through the general laws and principles.

I am sorry that I will be quite busy these upcoming weeks but around the 12th of June I will most certainly read your essay more thoroughly.

I wish you luck in the competition.

Regards,

Petio H

Bookmark and Share


Gyenge Valeria replied on May. 25, 2014 @ 12:18 GMT
Dear Petio!

Thank you for your answer.

I understand your essay is a fragment of your larger works. I'm also able to understand "The General theory of Unity deals whit the idea id creation of the universe and of its separate levels (see the book)". (I'm awaiting for sending me your book).

I do not want to force you to read my essay before the date you have scheduled. However,...

view entire post


Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Peter Jackson wrote on May. 23, 2014 @ 17:45 GMT
Petio,

Interesting essay and proposition. I have a policy of studying and assessing all such work. I also certainly agree that nature is unified and science can be, as my essay shows, uniquely I hope. Use; peter.jackson53@ymail.com

Best wishes

Peter

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Peter Jackson replied on May. 23, 2014 @ 17:49 GMT
P.S. If you study my previous essays you'll see I too derive a hierarchical structure to nature likened to Russian dolls, also as Truth Function Logic (see 2012 essay). Your score is lower than it should be, mine will help. I hope you get to read, score and comment on mine too. I also hope to to find further unity in our models.

Peter

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Petio Hristov replied on May. 25, 2014 @ 08:50 GMT
Hi Peter,

I thank you for the high rate which gave me.

I have gone over your essay and I am interested and impressed by your ideas and believe that it disserves a high rate. Unfortunately I will be quite busy these upcoming weeks and we will have to postpone our discussion. After the 12th of June I will give you a more detailed feedback regarding your essay.

Best regards,

Petio H

Bookmark and Share



Author Petio Hristov wrote on May. 24, 2014 @ 06:55 GMT
Hi Peter,

Thank you very much that you have responded to my invitation to include yourself in the group in support of the Theory of Unity.

I will send you the books via e-mail.

Regards,

Petio H

Bookmark and Share


Peter Jackson replied on May. 26, 2014 @ 12:56 GMT
Petio,

Thanks. Do you have pdf's or links to other formats? I couldn't open the epubs without importing a propriatory 'registry cleaner' programme which I've had problems with before.

Thanks also for your post on my blog. I hope you'll get to rate and possibly also comment prior to the imminent scoring deadline. Note that my recursive quantum spin gauges are equivalent to your Russian Dolls.

Best wishes

Peter

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Peter Jackson replied on Jun. 4, 2014 @ 16:09 GMT
Petio,

Do advise if you can send in a format I can open. You also noted on my blog (18th May) that you'd read my essay but couldn't respond until after 12th June. I look forward to that and discussing your papers, but hope you might at least rate mine before the deadline if possible. It still seems to be suffering from many '1' ratings with no posts!

Thanks and Best wishes

Peter

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Ryoji Furui wrote on May. 25, 2014 @ 00:58 GMT
Dear Petio Hristov,

Interesting essay. Ancient knowledges preserved by today would still have many elements we haven't understood yet nor obtain interpretations we need. I would like to read your ebook so it would be nice to have your email address to let you know mine at http://www.ryoji.info/comments.html

regards,

ryoji

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Author Petio Hristov wrote on May. 25, 2014 @ 09:02 GMT
Hi Ryoji,

I thank you for the high rate which gave me.

Thank you very much that you have responded to my invitation to include yourself in the group in support of the Theory of Unity.

My e-mail is. 545new@gmail.com

Regards,

Petio H

Bookmark and Share



Orenda Urbano Hernández wrote on May. 31, 2014 @ 21:33 GMT
Dear Petio,

Fascinating since the beginning your words reminded me the quote of Nicola Tesla: “If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.” I also share this point of view to try to understand in the form of energy or vibration the universe and when this is achieved the comprehension widens.

I share with you the ancient books as a source of Immanence to live and new discoveries as an understanding how this information can unfold its hidden dimensions but I am also aware of the power of human kind spirit. I perceive ourselves as compasses, blue printers, and designers of cosmos dimensions and matter.

The key point for “Life under ground Cosmic mystery and physical reality” shares with Black Sky Thinking is Immanence and for both cases Human Kind is the crossroad to achieve this goal. Also we share the need of Theosophy like a field of development and a key point to create an accurate solution to the technocratic system.

All the people who look to have a deep spiritual comprehension of cosmos and how to be assertive with our field of creation will be gifted with wider and deep comprehension of it’s true nature. I felt this comprehension that you consider your discovery: “the Universe in its otality is a living organism”. You will also be glad to realize that many of inner comprehensions that seem unreasonable to many they are true and confirmed by science: http://www.social-consciousness.com/2013/01/physicists-find-
evidence-that-universe-is-conscious.html?m=1 It is amazing to realize that the fact of being a human beings is a field of possibilities to be closer to truth. I also share with you the concept that Human kind expressed with the word God the comprehension of energies or fields.

Wish you good luck in the creation of a source of evolvement for human kind through “Life under ground Cosmic mystery and physical reality”.

Kindly,

Orenda Urbano Hernández

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Petio Hristov replied on Jun. 1, 2014 @ 20:12 GMT
Dear Orenda

Thank you for your comment. The key in the understanding of the Universe lies within our own knowledge meaning that we have to not only discover new laws and principles but rather relook known ones form a different point of view. The ancient cultures have left us a great mass of knowledge that is gust waiting to be interpreted and understood.

I will look into your essay as soon as I can.

Best wishes,

Petio

Bookmark and Share


Orenda Urbano Hernández replied on Jun. 7, 2014 @ 01:35 GMT
Dear Petio,

Fabulous way to compare the Nahuatl thinking with Hermes Trismegistus. It is the comparison of Quetzalcoatl with Trismegistus both spiritual leaders of how to manage space and time where the atoms we may lead are developing their actions. As you say we may pay attention of the repercussions of our actions in cosmos.

One thing I find fascinating is the capability of flexibility of cosmos:

1. It is perceived individually according to the understanding capabilities of each person

2. The possible solutions that can be provided are immense, flexible and functional (not in its 100% but it works).

3. Just the previous two points makes one think that the “eter or plasma” where we are it is amazingly flexible, modifiable and a field for creation, innovation and transformation.

Hope to keep learning from your interesting points of view. I appreciate your kindness to participate in my essay.

Wish you success for your essay.

Regards,

Orenda

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Christian Corda wrote on Jun. 5, 2014 @ 08:19 GMT
Hi Petio,

Thanks for your message in my FQXi webpage. Actually, I just checked my email and I did not find your message with the attached book. Please, can you kindly re-send it? My email is cordac.galilei@gmail.com.

Thanks again.

Cheers,

Ch.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Christian Corda replied on Jun. 5, 2014 @ 08:20 GMT
P.S.

Today I am going to read,comment and rate your Essay

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author Petio Hristov replied on Jun. 5, 2014 @ 15:18 GMT
Dear Christian,

I have re-sended you my books.

Best wishes,

Petio.

Bookmark and Share


Christian Corda replied on Jun. 5, 2014 @ 16:37 GMT
Hi Petio,

Thanks, I am going to re-check my email.

In the meanwhile, I have just read your nice and original Essay. Here are my comments:

1) I appreciate the philosophy of Hermeticism, thus, I find good that you cited Hermes Trismegistus.

2) Your statement that the Universe in its totality is a living organism is in agreement with anthropic principle.

3) I am passionate of ancient myths and legends. Thus, I appreciate the various connections with them in your Essay.

5) I think it could be a good thing to connect your Law of Conversion with the principle of conservation of information.

6) I agree with you that emissions in the atmosphere from human activity are not the principal cause of Global warming. But I also think that our opinion on this issue is minority.

7) Constructing towns underground in places fit to sustain the needs of humans looks an interesting and healthy idea.

8) It looks that your General theory of Unity is a geocentric theory. I hope you will agree that it will be nice if your idea can be mathematically related [via dynamical laws] to the existing theories of quantum mechanics and general relativity.

As I previously told you, I find this Essay beautiful and original. Thus, I give you an high rate accordingly.

I hope you will find the time to read, comment and rate my Essay.

Good luck in the Contest.

Cheers,

Ch.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.