FQXi Community

Essay Abstract

If we master our collective will, we can achieve Xuan Yuan's Da Tong in our lifetime by 2049, not only for China but also for all earthlings. The requirement is we collectively adopt the Xuan Yuan Anti-entropic Operating System 2.0 with its Scientific Outlook Rule of Law and Principle, and Scientific Outlook Free-Lunch Economic System is powered by KQID super powerful time-engine. We will restructure the architecture of the world financial system and world economic super-infrastructures to benefit all Tianming Ren, aliens, cyborgs and self-conscious robots, both rich and poor are equally benefits, rather than just for the privilege top one percent that control up to 50% of the world's private wealth. Here and now, everyone shall have free education, free health care, free material wealth and from each to each according to his/her dreams and aspirations. Using the KQID time-engine, earthlings will literally become Tianming Ren with God-like power to create and distribute objects of desire at will. Unchained, we are free at last!

Author Bio

Leo KoGuan is the Founder and Chairman of SHI International, about US$ 5.8 billion last year. Director of KoGuan Rule of Law and Principle Studies Center at Tsinghua University, Peking University, and KoGuan Law School. Global Trustee Emeriti of Asia Society. Since four year old, he has questioned what, how and why Existence and his mission is to answer these questions, and create and distribute Xuan Yuan Anti-entropic Operating System 2.0 that creates and distributes Xuan Yuan's Da Tong for everyone, alien, cyborg and robot alike to have free education, free health care and free material wealth.

Download Essay PDF File

Bio correction:

SHI International had the total sales of over $5.1 billions last year and this year SHI International would reach the total sales of about $5.8 billions.

Best regards,

Leo KoGuan, Founder and Chairman of SHI International

Dear All,

Let's play!

Leo

Rick Searle replied on Apr. 26, 2014 @ 02:39 GMT

Very interesting essay, Leo.

One advantage I have always thought China has over countries like the United States is the depth of its past. As Churchill said "The farther backward you can look, the farther forward you are likely to see". I love the way your essay look for the roots of the present in ancient philosophy.

One question, however, a lot of the essays in this contest express a deep anxiety over resource constraints and the negative impact on the environment of continued growth. Students of mine who are from China or are visiting relatives there often complain of pollution water scarcity etc from rapid growth. Your essay does not really express concern on this matter. Can you explain your thoughts on how universal prosperity is possible with out destroying the biosphere.

Rick Searle

report post as inappropriate

Excellent point, Rick. You have also an interesting and thoughtful essay that I will make comment soon. I taught both at Peking University and Tsinghua University for a year and half. I experienced 4 months of continuing coughing caused by lung infection due to severe pollution there. Moreover, my blood pressure shot up from a normal 130/80 up to extremely high188/95 later and still having high...

view entire post

Excellent point, Rick. You have also an interesting and thoughtful essay that I will make comment soon. I taught both at Peking University and Tsinghua University for a year and half. I experienced 4 months of continuing coughing caused by lung infection due to severe pollution there. Moreover, my blood pressure shot up from a normal 130/80 up to extremely high188/95 later and still having high blood pressure now, and my artery was somewhat clogged.. Yes, I experienced myself the health effect due to severe degradation of environment to our quality of life. Xuan Yuan is a rational environmentalist and solemnly declares his love of his lands. He CHERISHES Earth. He advocates not only to transform earth into objects of desire for human's well brings but also to respect, take are and live with nature seamlessly. He declares: " Revering the Heaven, cherishing the Earth, and holding the people dear,..." Yes, we must put the value and price on our environment as important part/cost of any Scientific Outlook on Development of Free-Lunch Economic System. KQID time-engine would enable us to possess truly unlimited power and would ultimately recycle all atoms in our garbages/wastes back into our objects of desire. Yes, we use and reuse our about approximately 10^50 atoms of our Earth and about 10^80 atoms of our universe again and again since atom is known to be identical in time. Yes we shall develop our 3D printers to utilize atoms as their raw materials. We shall turn on our creation and distribution engine to create and distribute abundant goods of desire from our wastes. In the beginning, we are using molecules and proteins as the raw materials of our 3D printers. Even later in about a million years later, we will accumulate god-like Wang Yangming's unity of knowledge and action, we can use abundant qbits/bits to create, distribute and manipulate Existence at will. I believe Newton-Thermodynamics, Maxwell-Einstein-QM wonderful and powerful engine can only support No-Free-Lunch system, whereas KQID time-engine would give us god-like power to enable us not only to live a god-like existence but also to prevent us from extinction. We are actually in the border of being dead and alive it is Leibniz's best of all possible worlds. We need KQID to survive in the impossibility of Existence. Thus KQId must exist in the best possible world. Yes I am a rational optimist if we adopt and deploy Xuan Yuan Anti-entropic Operating System 2.0, we shall be leisurely, pleasurably and creatively living in Nature as avatars of our Ancestor FAPAMA Singularity Qbit (00, +, -). Yes our Qbit smiles and says: "everything is well and good."

Yours sincerely,

Leo KoGuan

view post as summary

report post as inappropriate

Excellent point, Rick. You have also an interesting and thoughtful essay that I will make comment soon. I taught both at Peking University and Tsinghua University for a year and half. I experienced 4 months of continuing coughing caused by lung infection due to severe pollution there. Moreover, my blood pressure shot up from a normal 130/80 up to extremely high188/95 later and still having high blood pressure now, and my artery was somewhat clogged.. Yes, I experienced myself the health effect due to severe degradation of environment to our quality of life. Xuan Yuan is a rational environmentalist and solemnly declares his love of his lands. He CHERISHES Earth. He advocates not only to transform earth into objects of desire for human's well brings but also to respect, take are and live with nature seamlessly. He declares: " Revering the Heaven, cherishing the Earth, and holding the people dear,..." Yes, we must put the value and price on our environment as important part/cost of any Scientific Outlook on Development of Free-Lunch Economic System. KQID time-engine would enable us to possess truly unlimited power and would ultimately recycle all atoms in our garbages/wastes back into our objects of desire. Yes, we use and reuse our about approximately 10^50 atoms of our Earth and about 10^80 atoms of our universe again and again since atom is known to be identical in time. Yes we shall develop our 3D printers to utilize atoms as their raw materials. We shall turn on our creation and distribution engine to create and distribute abundant goods of desire from our wastes. In the beginning, we are using molecules and proteins as the raw materials of our 3D printers. Even later in about a million years later, we will accumulate god-like Wang Yangming's unity of knowledge and action, we can use abundant qbits/bits to create, distribute and manipulate Existence at will. I believe Newton-Thermodynamics, Maxwell-Einstein-QM wonderful and powerful engine can only support No-Free-Lunch system, whereas KQID time-engine would give us god-like power to enable us not only to live a god-like existence but also to prevent us from extinction. We are actually in the border of being dead and alive it is Leibniz's best of all possible worlds. We need KQID to survive in the impossibility of Existence. Thus KQId must exist in the best possible world. Yes I am a rational optimist if we adopt and deploy Xuan Yuan Anti-entropic Operating System 2.0, we shall be leisurely, pleasurably and creatively living in Nature as avatars of our Ancestor FAPAMA Singularity Qbit (00, +, -). Yes our Qbit smiles and says: "everything is well and good."

Yours sincerely,

Leo KoGuan

Rick, wonderful indeed. I read it three times in three different occasions to understand your ideas more fully. We definitely share the idea that we need to define our common destiny clearly, so that most mankind would agree and work together to realize this common dream. As you wrote: "We need something like the idea of Utopia for this shaping. We need it as both a prototype and moral template...

view entire post

Rick, wonderful indeed. I read it three times in three different occasions to understand your ideas more fully. We definitely share the idea that we need to define our common destiny clearly, so that most mankind would agree and work together to realize this common dream. As you wrote: "We need something like the idea of Utopia for this shaping. We need it as both a prototype and moral template where many of the problems we currently face are resolved." I also agree and believe that we do not have a privilege to exist than any other living beings that has ever swam, walked and flown on Earth. So far perhaps, only 1% might survive since our ancestor single cell evolved here. More likely than not as our ancestor evolved from the single cell to multicellular and to ape kind and then to mankind, and then to a new kind more likely than not our own creation that we would interbreed, infuse our DNA and biological parts and of course our memory so that we can live longer and even would have a shot to be immortal physically here and now. Likewise we are different from our own immediate predecessor ape-kinds, we will evolve into many species and sub-species. Whatever that would be, without an agreed roadmap of the future, we shall certainly lost into infinite possibilities and potential, most of them are bad for us. That is why I am working on Xuan Yuan Anti-entropic Operating System 2.0 that leads us safely to the brave common future of Xuan Yuan's Da Tong in which we joyfully share together by joining in the hip so to speak our common prosperity and well being. From each to each according to his/her dreams and aspirations and each has free-education, free health care and free minimum material wealth like a small house and $1 million or more in his/her bank account.

KQID's Giving first taking later principle demands me to give your outstanding essay its highest score possible in this contest. I will also post this comment in my blog. Good luck and congratulation for your important essay.

Regards,

Leo KoGuan

view post as summary

Rick Searle replied on Apr. 26, 2014 @ 19:53 GMT

Leo,

For over five centuries it has been the West that has defined the future, a definition which was certainly colored by our past- whether Greco-Roman in terms of democracy, or Christian-Jewish views of a linear narrative leading to an “end of history”.

The West is no longer alone in defining the future and has been joined by other civilizations with histories, religious traditions and philosophies as deep, or deeper, than our own. Most of the essays in this contest reflect the ideas of the West, but yours brings to consideration ideas of a whole other section of humankind. Your essay begins to answer a question I have wondered about for some time- how does China understand the future?

To be frank, I have no idea how to judge your ideas. They seem to combine elements of physics and Ray Kurzweil like Singularity, cosmology, quantum physics and ancient Chinese philosophy very little of which I am qualified to dissect. I have grave doubts as to whether universal prosperity you hope for really is environmentally sustainable. Nevertheless, I voting to get you to the top of the pile so that others better able than myself on these questions can grapple with your ideas. In large measure the question of whither the future in China will answer the question of whither the future of humanity.

Best of luck,

Rick Searle

report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on Apr. 29, 2014 @ 01:56 GMT

Dear Rick,

You are right on environment sustainability is definitely mankind greatest challenge in this century and beyond. We as self-conscious and well meaning citizens of Earth and our universe must deal with our toughest challenge. Due to contest constraint, please find below Xuan Yuan's sustainability of our fragile Gaia wellbeing.

Scientific Outlook on environment

We must be environmentally conscious beings. We live and are integrated part of our Gaia health and wellbeing. Our health and wellbeing are intertwined with the health and wellbeing of our environment. We understand clearly that our environment is given to us for free but it is NOT free to keep it clean and healthy. Our Ancestor Xuan Yuan is a rational environmentalist. He solemnly declares his love of his lands. He CHERISHES Earth. He not only transforms Earth into objects of desire for human's wellbeing but also respects, takes care and lives with nature seamlessly. He declares: "Revering the Heaven, cherishing the Earth, and holding the people dear,..." Yes, we must put the value and price on our environment as important part/cost of any Scientific Outlook on Development of Free-Lunch Economic System. Clean and healthy environment is not free in our Free-Lunch system. We must incur costs to maintain and even improve our environment. However, theses costs are paid for using our free energy. Thus, it is actually free to us and free to our Multiverse, although it is not free to our universe. KQID time-engine would enable us to possess truly unlimited power that would enable us to recycle all atoms in our garbages/wastes back into our objects of desire. Since all atoms are identical in time, we use and reuse our about approximately 10^50 atoms of our Earth and about 10^80 atoms of our universe again and again. Best of all, atom is free. Yes we shall develop our 3D printers to utilize atoms as their raw materials. We shall turn on our creation and distribution engine to create and distribute abundant goods of desire from our wastes. We recycle our wastes into products. We develop waste nothing society. In the beginning, we are using molecules and proteins which are costly as the raw materials of our 3D printers. We have to use energy/heat/entropy to make molecules and proteins from atoms. In the future, we should be able to use atoms as our raw materials. Far into the future, say about a million years later, we will develop and accumulate god-like Wang Yangming's unity of knowledge and action, we can even use abundant qbits/bits as raw materials to create, distribute and manipulate Existence at will.

Existence is a miracle. Existence is impossible and yet we exist. We are actually in the border of being dead and alive; it is Leibniz's best of all possible worlds. Newton-Thermodynamics-Maxwell-Einstein-QM have powerful engines that put man on the Moon to fulfill our long desire. However, it is good enough to support No-Free-Lunch Economic system. As Noble Laureate economist Milton Friedman bluntly summed it up: "There is no free lunch!" The star scientist of this No-Free-Lunch system is the great genius Einstein whom I idolized and who modestly stated that we could not comprehend how we can comprehend nature. He said: "The most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is comprehensible." This statement was true before KQID. KQID theory of everything understands not only why we comprehend nature but also KQID reveals what, how and why Existence. KQID in principle could modify and enhance Existence. KQID Ouroboros Equations of Existence embeds God inside the equation. Thus, KQID Anti-entropic engine would give us god-like power to enable us not only to live a god-like existence but also to prevent us from extinction. We need KQID to continue to exist from the imperative of Non-existence. KQID anti-entropic system is designed to fight against the imperative of Non-existence powered by the universal entropic power of the Second Law of Thermodynamics ΔS ≥ 0 that pulls down order into disorder. KQID builds order out of disorder by supplying energy A, anti-entropic force, into a system to temporarily allow to decrease entropy locally and temporarily ΔS ≤ 0, so that we continue to exist. We escape from the clutch of entropic force S. We run fast enough to be just one step away from annihilation in the nick of time of T, absolute digital time ≤ 10^-1000seconds. Thus KQID must exist in the best possible world not only to exist but also to improve the state of Existence. If we adopt and deploy Xuan Yuan Anti-entropic Operating System 2.0, we shall be leisurely, pleasurably and creatively living in Nature as avatars of our Ancestor FAPAMA Singularity Qbit (00, +, -). If we follow this Xuan Yuan's roadmap, our Ancestors Qbit and Xuan Yuan would smile and say: "Everything is well and in good order."

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

Greetings Leo KoGuan,

I am happy to see you have an essay entered, and also to see your invitation to play - as that is the subject of my essay, and a favorite topic of mine. I have yet to read your essay, but I see already something in the abstract that is worthy of comment.

Indeed; it is sometimes the misconceptions of a limited view of Science that create a self-fulfilling prophecy out of the no free lunch principle. An example is the view of Thermodynamic Entropy as the progression of chaos or disorder, where as you know I favor the view of Lambert and Leff that entropy involves the dispersal of energy and the spreading of energy and substance into the surrounding medium.

The view that the increase of disorder is a law of nature has served as an excuse for the worst of human behavior, and an indulgence in activities that erode the autonomy of humans and their ability to choose their fate. I have even known people who use this mentality as a rationale to adopt a discordian philosophy - where the individual spreads chaos through mischievous acts and believes himself to be the agent of natural law.

So in a case like that; it is a more enlightened view of Science that delivers people from hateful acts of disruption, by shining the light of truth on the common misconceptions of how Nature works. I am eager to see what you have to say on this, in your essay. As you know; I do not find myself in absolute agreement on all aspects of the KQID system of understanding, but I find great value in your efforts to take the divine inspiration of enlightened knowledge and put it into human readable form.

All the Best,

Jonathan

report post as inappropriate

Jonathan J. Dickau replied on Apr. 27, 2014 @ 17:41 GMT

I should perhaps add..

I find the image of spreading and sharing energy much more life-affirming than the unending progression of chaos. This point should be obvious from the above, but is worthy to point out explicitly.

Thanks again,

Jonathan

report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on Apr. 28, 2014 @ 05:07 GMT

Yes John, we share the same idea about play. Play is work; work is play. We shall continue our discourse later and I read your essay and agree with it. I will make more comment later. Gratefully yours, Leo KoGuan

Author KoGuan Leo replied on Apr. 28, 2014 @ 16:22 GMT

Jon, not John, sorry for the extra h above. Leo

show all replies (1 not shown)

My comment on "The Thermodynamics of Freedom by Edwin Eugene Klingman"

John, what a master piece! Unfortunately only few souls on Earth can understand you fully. I am one of the few who fully understand the full extend of your idea, because I also embeds thermodynamics as the heart of my KQID( KoGuan Quantum InfoDynamics). Of course at KQID, it is not only about heat/energy flows but also information flows as Shakespearian meme-actorIΨ(CTE)) as the wave function of consciousness, time and energy acting in relativistic Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm) hologram Multiverse. Rather than Gaussian bell curve, I would propose the hokey stick curve as the hybrid of your two classes scenario. Most people are equally rich and free unchained from human as well as nature's handcuffs with few extremely rewarded and rich individuals who do works that are breaking and removing those chains that chain us. You correctly made the point that an absolute equality is simply impossible. No energy no flow, and no flow no work. No gradient no flows. Your opening statement is powerful and to the point. You wrote: " How Should Humanity Steer the Future? By allowing maximum individual freedom to pursue dreams and expand horizons. History has shown that humanity works best when freedom is maximized; in fact, the purpose of instituting governments is to maximize individual freedom." Yes, we need a system to maximize freedoms. In mine, I advocated Xuan Yuan Aanti-entropic Operating System 2.0. Yes remarkably we share the same view. I incorporated Chinese philosopher Yang Zhu (around 400B.C)who advocated for-self philosophy and advocated the individual six freedoms and life enjoyment fully here and now:

Allow the ear to hear what it likes, ~~Do~~

the eye to see what it likes, ~~Re~~

the nose to smell what it likes, ~~Mi~~

the mouth to say what it likes, ~~Fa~~

the body to enjoy the comforts it likes to have, ~~Sol~~

and the mind to do what it likes. ~~La~~

Yes similar to but even more individualistic than that of Epicurus as well as Jefferson. Yes, Chinese believes in and enjoys individual freedoms just like everyone else.

I rated your essay the highest score that you deserve.

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

Author KoGuan Leo replied on May. 5, 2014 @ 06:53 GMT

I repost it here.

Dear Lawrence,

Fantastic essay indeed! You wrote powerfully and wonderfully: "The question in the end is whether this in fact might be a good thing. We are in age where the ability to simulate the world is very advanced, and will advance much further. Further, the interface between human brains and computers is becoming very close. For an overview of the...

view entire post

I repost it here.

Dear Lawrence,

Fantastic essay indeed! You wrote powerfully and wonderfully: "The question in the end is whether this in fact might be a good thing. We are in age where the ability to simulate the world is very advanced, and will advance much further. Further, the interface between human brains and computers is becoming very close. For an overview of the brain-computer interface (BCI) see [3]. BCI is an experimental science and it is a matter of time before this is commonplace. People will before long embrace this eagerly, just as people now spend many hours a day on smart phones. It means soon the ability to simulate the world and to experience that virtual world directly through the brain will become reality. At some point the human mind itself might be simulated or uploaded into a cyber network. The distinction between reality and virtual reality could well become increasingly lost in the near future. It may then become questionable whether the entire universe we observe is not some grand simulation. The game masters might be humans, or they might be other extraterrestrial life forms, and we may be avatars in this game, much as with the move “The Matrix.“Without limits on this sort of development we canˆat know whether the world we observe is ultimately just a computer game run by unseen programmers or superagents."

Please forgive me to put my writing in your blog, because I respect you are as a great and creative scientist. However, I may be too "bold" to you. I see no limit in our simulated reality, although I believe the reality is simulated by our Ancestor FAPAMA Singularity Qbit (00, +, -). We are avatars of our Ancestor. Thus, even if we humans or our descendants who would actually do the simulation from KQID perspective it is still our Ancestor Qbit through us or our descendants would actually do it. Here below if I may state it briefly quoted from my another writing:

"Our Ancestor FAPAMA Singularity Qbit (00, +, -) emerges from Non-existence by its own free will to exist based on KQID Giving first and Taking later principle as the founding omni-principle that creates and distributes Existence. Using this KQID founding principle, it wills itself to emerge from Non-existence. Therefore, the Giving first Taking later founding omni-principle is actually the Qbit itself. From this founding principle, the Qbit writes the simplest and shortest Founder's algorithmic codes possible to ensure its all possible evolutions for all eternity. The Qbit including its founding codes evolves and adapts itself according to Darwinian natural selection and meme codes mutation to deal with all possibilities and potentialities every absolute digital time ≤ 10^-1000seconds. I called the Founder's codes: the Zeroth Law: Ξ 00 Ξ Ee^iτ=A+S = IΨ(CTE) = Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm) ⊆T = 1. Existence must be a unitary physical system in the zero dimension, in the zero time and in the absolute zero temperature. It is mandatory that information cannot be deleted nor destroyed to keep itself always forever in the pure state of quantum superposition. Its evolution has to be unitary one in which the total sums of the quantum probability of the whole system is always normalized unitary 1. Our Ancestor Qbit (00, +, -) is the singularity programmer, KQID computer and the projector three in one applying the shortest and simplest possible one line algorithmic formula Ee^iτ=A+S ⊆T = 1 to compute, simulate and project Shakespearian meme-actor ΙΨ(CTE) acting on relativistic stage (iτLx,y,x, Lm) hologram Multiverse."

Now I can rate your essay and I rated it a ten (10). I really love and enjoy it.

I wish you the best, Leo KoGuan

view post as summary

Dear Professor KoGuan,

Your essay is superb. It is by far the most cogently argued and meticulously organized essay published on this site. Please forgive me for my comment.

Reality is unique. KQID is not unique. The noble aspirations of the Chinese and American people, or any people for that matter, will never become a reality as long as both countries continue to only teach abstractions in all of their schools.

With the highest regard,

Joe Fisher

report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on Apr. 28, 2014 @ 17:01 GMT

Dear Joe, happy to meet you again in this Forum. Thanks for your kind words. I agreed with you that reality, no matter how small it is like electrons, protons or even a bit in the computer logics are unique in absolute digital time T ≤ 10^-1000 seconds and unique in the latitude and altitude in 3D time (space) in time Lm. It is orbiting our Sun with the speed of about 30 Km/second while spinning on iits axis 24 hours a day. Together, our solar system, we are also orbiting the center of our Milky Way galaxy at the speed of about 220 km/s and so on.. In orther words, at least the coordinates of each bit, electron and proton are in flux as Heraclitus pointed out over 2 thousand years ago. Thus, KQID agrees with you in fact. Although, for practicality we can deem all electrons and protons are identical in time. It is practical to measure quantum phenomena to collapse the wave function to survive and/or exert control over nature as much as we could solely for our survival as well as to improve our state of being here and now. In KQID every digit 1 as you eloquently pointed out is actual unique. Just like we are counting 10 apples to buy and sale with the same price per apple although each apple is unique and each has unique intrinsic value, it is ignored for practicality to evaluate each apple of its intrinsic value. We can measure it to eternity, we would fail because each time it is unique. A month old picked apple is clearly different from one day old picked apple. I think any realist if he is a true scientist must agree with you. I agree with you in principle but not in practicality of Existence. I will read and rate your essay favorably as I always do. So far I have rated 10 to all essays that I rated because I found each is uniquely great essay. Also I am practicing Giving first Taking later principle. I hope it will work in practice.

Best regards,

Leo KoGuan

dear professor Leo KOGUAN,

It is a real pleasure to meet again in this contest of FQXi that is so near to your own perceptions of our society.

Indeed the Chinese philosophy is much more enlightened and less material then the western thinking.

The philosophy of Xuan Yuan to reach a higher goal for humanity is one of the goals I am trying to express too in my work because I...

view entire post

dear professor Leo KOGUAN,

It is a real pleasure to meet again in this contest of FQXi that is so near to your own perceptions of our society.

Indeed the Chinese philosophy is much more enlightened and less material then the western thinking.

The philosophy of Xuan Yuan to reach a higher goal for humanity is one of the goals I am trying to express too in my work because I think that each human being has "received from heaven a mandate" but is limited by its "footing" in this causal deterministic universe, that we are aware of as "reality".

The "Great harmony" is the utopia for our temporal stay in this created universe.

T no-free lunch economy is one great egoistic short sighted system that can only lead to the destruction of humanity. The individual is no longer valued as a human but is becoming a number that is able to work, to change the time he has available in his life in numbers of so called "profit" for others. The reference of the money he receives for this "work" (which is not a hobby but a necessity) is not in balance with the real appreciation of life, the part of the individual's time he has available during his life. At the other side the individual is misled by commercials that he is not happy without some specific materialistic objects, so .... he has to work (spent more time ) harder ad in the end he has no time left for reaching out for an higher goal.

I FULLY AGREE with your FIVE proposals to end this slavery, and when we can start with using the energy our sun gives us freely each day (as I mentioned in one of my articles for the "Scientific GOD Journal" : Occupy the Imaginary World of Economy" , October 2011, Vol 2, Issue 7 pp 671-677 (www.scigod.com, (wilhelmus de wilde)) we just have enough energy for free. Bravo Leo, let us meditate and reach this level of available rality.

On the five laws of KQID, it is fully agreed , my perception of consciousness and Total Simultaneity have the same outcome, I hope that you will find some time to read my entrance "STEERING THE FUTURE OF CONSCIOUSNESS", and leave your comment on my thread and maybe rate it in conformity with your appreciation.

To reach out for the understanding of The mysterious formless DAO of wu wei is one of my goals.

respectfully

Wilhelmus de Wilde

view post as summary

report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on May. 3, 2014 @ 11:24 GMT

Dear John, thanks for your kind and generous comment. I also think that we are a soulmate of consciousness. You and I are one in the Spock's mind-meld. Our souls are entangled somehow and somewhat.

Yes indeed and I quote you: "The total amount of energy the earth is receiving each day from the sun is 174 PETAWATT (1015 Watt)!!! This divided by the 7 billion habitants , gives an income per...

view entire post

Dear John, thanks for your kind and generous comment. I also think that we are a soulmate of consciousness. You and I are one in the Spock's mind-meld. Our souls are entangled somehow and somewhat.

Yes indeed and I quote you: "The total amount of energy the earth is receiving each day from the sun is 174 PETAWATT (1015 Watt)!!! This divided by the 7 billion habitants , gives an income per habitant of 102.000.000 watts per day !!! .... So actually nobody needs to be poor." Yes, we are rich beyond belief and we are living in Leibniz's best possible world.

Yes, we are entering into a new phase of an economic system powered by KQID that I called as the Scientific Outlook Free-Lunch economic System. You wrote powerfully and yet logically: "The best “technology” to achieve these ideals is taking care of our children and educate them not to strive for (short) economic profit but to strive for the growth of their own consciousness, so that every other individual can share in its findings. Communication is already becoming common sense. Science should be admissible for everyone. Skype (free of charge communication so attainable for all) and Wikipedia (free knowledge available to all) are good examples of the directions we have to explore our united force with the respect of individuality."

You also wrote: "Throw ALL information of ALL the universes that constitute the multi-verse together in one basket (also the ones that in our perception are impossible universes with different fundamental constants) and stir it up to one non-causal unity (yes it seems like chaos). In this way we have created a flaw imagination of “Total Simultaneity” (TS). (11) In this basket there are no “material realities” but “availabilities”. Availabilities of ALL information. Imagine all the slices of all block-universes together but not as realized lined-up causal realities. These slices could furthermore be imagined as two-dimensional holographic representations of a three-dimensional universe. But how do we experience reality ? What is the entity that enables Time and Space ? Are we in control of our reality ?

Answer : Our consciousness is THE essential “tool” in creating the causal reality that we are aware of .We argue that our consciousness is a constituted of two entangled parts: the causal part and the non-causal part. Causal consciousness stretches out into the basket of Total Simultaneity where it becomes non-causal, this “non-causal/causal connection” can be imagined as entanglement-like and timeless. In this basket of Total Simultaneity our non-causal consciousness has the choice between the infinity of availabilities of slices of universes, and each slice is the center of possible time/life line that stretches out from the past and into a future,"

Wonderful essay too far ahead of its time, that is why most people are behind in their consciousness. We need Total Simultaneity in your conception and in mine it is our Ancestor FAPAMA Singularity Qbit (00, +, -) that contains all that is.

Thanks you and I rated you a ten (10) in this contest.

Good luck and best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

view post as summary

Author KoGuan Leo replied on May. 5, 2014 @ 06:55 GMT

Sorry Wilhelmus de Wilde, I keep calling everyone John. I must be too tired lately. My apology. Best wishes, Leo KoGuan.

Dear Leo,

Very original and deep essay. Yes, indeed, to more reliably steer the Spaceship called Earth, Humanity must have a "Great Dream" and "The Great Common Cause". Chinese philosophy helps create the reality of such a Dream. It is extremely important that you updated the concepts "Dao" and "Law". I believe that they lie at the base of a new model of the Universe of the Information age . And even more deeply in the Knowledge Based - "magic matrix Luò Shu". "Dao" and "Law" allow more confident to overcome the dangers that meets Humanity and the Earth in Space. Science can give Humanity a lot. But it must be open to Humanity . Great Dream always go alond with Freedom without fear, Hope, Love.I wish you success in the contest and research! It's time. We start the path. The New Era and a New Generation demanded action. «Let's sing together a song of delight».

High regard,

Vladimir

report post as inappropriate

Anonymous replied on May. 9, 2014 @ 10:17 GMT

Dear Vladimir, thanks for your generous comment. Fu Xi-Xuan Yuan Bagua is connected with the "Lo shu magic square" that if we add up the numbers in each diagonal, column, and row , we always get fifteen (15). My KQID is also based on Fu Xi-Xuan Yuan's digital Bagua that represents nature as well as human society. I read and rated highly your original essay. I am glad to be part of Gaia concerned citizens. I am rationally optimistic that we have great future and the best has yet arrived because of you the participants.

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

report post as inappropriate

Leo,

It was a delight to meet a soul-mate who understands as I do that education and mobility are human entitlements just as necessary as food, clothing and shelter.

"Man is born free but enslaved everywhere by No-Free Lunch Economic System, the economic and philosophical paradigm of today."

Indeed. I can't see that the world will be safe for democracy unless we discard this cynical myth, and learn to be wealthy together.

Strong score from me.

All best,

Tom

report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on May. 15, 2014 @ 16:32 GMT

Dear Tom,

Thanks for your kind comment for my essay. We share the same idea that not only a free-lunch system is possible but it is mandatory. I pointed out in my essay that the no-free-lunch system is based on the false myth that the no free lunch system is the eternal truth. This is false! We can have a free-lunch system powered by KQID free-lunch engine. I agreed with your argument here: "Point is, the metastability of the system over time suggests that a continually shifting range of activity represented by changing hub configurations is self limiting; as a result, the global domain is largely protected from the danger of positive feedback – i.e., a loss of system control and potential widespread self- reinforcing destruction. In the history of the world wars, one can identify such unchecked feedback of escalating hostilities. Even in the present world, one can make a good argument that the specter of damaging positive feedback, festering in individual areas of the world – among failed governments, local armed resistance to despotic regimes, piracy, organized crime and racketeering, human trafficking – is tinder for a future conflagration."

Let us fight together to debunk this false myth. I rated your original unique essay a full ten (10) that it deserves.

I wish you well always,

Leo KoGuan

reply to this thread

Hi Leo,

Thank you for your kinds words. I'm glad you liked my essay so much. I look forward to reading yours and others this weekend, after my last final in my technical program.

Warmly,

Aaron

report post as inappropriate

Aaron M. Feeney replied on Jun. 7, 2014 @ 00:58 GMT

Hi Leo,

I finally have had a chance to read your essay and I found some very interesting thoughts in it. Like my friend Marc below, I also enjoy the Arthur C. Clarke quotation you included. I have given you a good score. Thanks for adding your thoughts to our forum and I wish you all the best!

Warmly,

Aaron

report post as inappropriate

Hi Leo,

Your essay is quite imaginative - your really think "outside the box"! I particularly like your quote, from Arthur C. Clarke,

"The goal of the future is full unemployment, so we can play."

I agree with you on the importance of education. In my essay, I argue that to optimize the effect of education on our ability to successfully steer the future, we should refocus the curriculum on issues that are the most important for the future of humanity... what I call the "Futurocentric Curriculum". If you have the time to check out my essay, rate it and comment on it, I would greatly appreciate it!

Marc

report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on May. 16, 2014 @ 05:58 GMT

Dear Marc,

We share the same goal and idea.

"If humanity is to successfully steer the future, its citizens will need to rise to the challenge and become future-literate. Let us bet that knowledge is a good thing, and that the more numerous are the citizens of the world who have a sound basic understanding of the way the world is and evolves, the more happy, prosperous and secure the future of humanity will be.

Let the Futurocentric Education Initiative begin. Educators of the world, the future is in your hands!"

I give you a full mark 10.

Best of luck,

Leo KoGuan

Dear Leo KoGuan,

I found your essay very interesting. Xuan Yuan seems a fascinating thinker, who almost five thousand years spoke about human rights and freedom in a way very close to the way we see them today. Also, I like very much your words "Thus, because each is working for his/her dreams and aspirations, everyone is super creative, super innovative and super productive in his/her creation and distributions of his/her objects of desire." I also agree that people are slaves because of their mortgages, and while this seems fair, because they are given the opportunity to have a house or a car, the truth is they are enslaved for this, and are not protected at all against the real estates price manipulations. This kind of issue should be covered by the most basic insurance, but it is not: some get incredibly rich by manipulating the market and destroying other's lives. You advocate and support freedom from catastrophic insurance of all types, from unwanted and boring jobs, and free education and health. We are free in theory to do various of things, the price being that to free ourselves from some chains we have to accept others, for instance, if we want to have access to health care and to education for our children, we can't be free from unwanted and boring jobs, and so on. We are always forced into compromises of any kind. In Romania (my country), compromise happened during the communist regime before 1989, and now it happens again under various regimes that fight for the power. It is so nice that from time to time people who honestly try to help and give free lunches appear. I wish you good luck with the essay!

Best regards,

Cristi

report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on May. 16, 2014 @ 08:56 GMT

Dear Cristi,

We share the same dreams and aspirations. You wrote: "Man is a lost child, trying to find his way. The main purpose of science, technology, ethics, politics, religion, should be to understand and support humans, their freedom and right to happiness."

I rated your essay highly.

Best wishes and good luck,

Leo KoGuan

Greetings Leo KoGuan,

Your essay was a delight to read, and I think you are one of the best at articulating the future we would all like to have - of any of the essay authors. Xuan Yong's Da Tong is more than just a Chinese Dream; it is an enviable state of affairs for any society to achieve, and one to which all enlightened human beings aspire. The main deterrent is the prevailing...

view entire post

Greetings Leo KoGuan,

Your essay was a delight to read, and I think you are one of the best at articulating the future we would all like to have - of any of the essay authors. Xuan Yong's Da Tong is more than just a Chinese Dream; it is an enviable state of affairs for any society to achieve, and one to which all enlightened human beings aspire. The main deterrent is the prevailing influence of ignorance, which is causing governments and corporations to scale down their efforts and funding for research - as well as higher education - at a time when they are what is most needed to assure progress and boost the economy long-term. Short sighted leaders have made it difficult to realize the dream, and to actualize what Xuan Yong called Da Tong.

Perhaps we need Operating System 2.0 today! But are people ready for a scientific ethical and legal system? I have been working for a number of years now to create a framework for qualitative or subjective search engines and databases, and I've even included some of the fruits of my research in that area in my FQXi essays, so it will be clear to all that this model follows from my prior work. Personally; I'd rather work with R2-D2 and C3PO than work for a Terminator style robot, and this is a necessary step in that direction. However; if we did create this technology, and fed into the computer works of the great philosophers, religious texts, legal documents, and so on; it would calculate percentage truth-values for various assertions contained therein.

Of course; it will cause the worst scandal in history when people realize that a computer is being made the arbiter of their religion. This is why such things must be handled with some sensitivity. It is also why I think the proposal of Jens Niemeyer for a repository of knowledge is important to humanity's survival, and deserves the development and use of such technology. This goes way beyond the Dewey decimal system, and could be a way to achieve a scientific level of fair representation - which is a necessary step in your plan - but will ordinary humans be willing to set cherished beliefs aside, in order to realize a bright future instead of dystopia? I hope we can both help make things better.

All the Best,

Jonathan

view post as summary

report post as inappropriate

Greetings Jon, grateful for your kind remark. I wish you are doing well here and now, Leo KoGuan

Hi Leo,

High aim is most admirable, (low aim is a crime). This essay has the highest goals and gets my admiration. I also like your concept of the Planck Mind.... Perhaps it should be listed along with the other Planck Units :)

Logic, Mystery, Play, Humanity, New and Ancient Knowledge who could ask for more!

Good to see you in another essay contest. Wishing you success in everything!

Don Limuti

report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on May. 28, 2014 @ 00:32 GMT

Hi Don,

You made my day! by giving me the best compliment possible. You commented above that my essay is "Logic, Mystery, Play, Humanity, New and Ancient Knowledge who could ask for more!"

You are so kind, and we thus do have future! We must treat each other well and we will have fun and prosper together. This is our logical goal that we all share. We must eliminate ignorance and Scarcity, hence, humanity shall have a great and unlimited future. We shall work together to bring about wisdom, knowledge and abundance; so that we all share a good life together.

I hope we can collaborate someday.

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

Leo,

How wonderful to escape the modern western domain that struggles so badly to face up to infinity and eternal life. I feel we are in many ways embedded into a deep rut with understanding limited by the walls. Many claim practical considerations preclude what they call 'flights of fancy'. I don't agree. I've 'practically' shown how we can scientifically derive eternal rebirth through regular and infinite recycling of our very protons with unlimited energy, explaining a host of anomalies. But this year I open the crack around that shell by showing that 'spooky' quantum effects are purely classical effects we haven't understood. Will it be another 4,000 years before we do? If seems perhaps so the way we thin, so all the more refreshing to be shell-shocked by a whole new and ancient view.

I commend you, and I wonder if my recycling cosmic eternity isn't really very close that of the ancients. The second law does not survive as entropy is a temporaray state. Most of the greats have proposed versions without the ontological construction. The 'big bang' is all the more remarkable as a fatherless survivor fed only by our fear of thinking beyond some defined point and to infinity.

Very best wishes

Peter

Reading for after you've read the essays; Eternal proton recycling.

report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on May. 24, 2014 @ 12:56 GMT

I repost my comment in this blog.

Peter,

I think your essay is outstanding and very creative. I like it very much. We don't agree on everything. At least I agree that "there was no boundary between the classical and quantum worlds". If I may explain that KQID theory is monism. Therefore there is only one physics and one entangled hologram Existence. KQID Five Ones: one source Qbit( 00, +, -), one principle of "Giving first Taking later", one theory of "bit is it, and it is bit", one formula Ee^iτ = A + S ⊆ T that iteratively produce unitary one (1), that creates and distributes one entangled hologram Existence. We are all connected.

Your essay is a masterpiece, it is unique and it is creative. I rated your essay the highest score ten (10). I noted from your comment that many trolls in this contest thus I noted that be fire I voted you got 5.9 average score voted by 42, now it is 6.0 voted by 43.

I wish you the best and hope we can become friends,

Leo KoGuan

Hi Leo,

Finally got to read your essay. I like it.

I totally agree with you when you say: "man has the unalienable right to pursue his/her own personal goal in life" and "from each to each according to his/her dreams and aspirations".

Where we may be slightly different is your emphasis on "collective will" while I emphasize individual freedom in my essay (here). I look forward to your comments.

-- Ajay

report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on May. 24, 2014 @ 13:13 GMT

Ajay,

I agree with your conclusion that "Humanity can succeed at this by steering the global public to play, dream and tinker with science." On your comment on "collective will" here means that we collectively as individuals are working together to achieve Xuan Yuan's Da Tong. For example, Ajay is one person but he is made of about 75 trillions of cells that are working collectively as one Ajay.

Thanks for your comment. And I will repost this in your blog.

Best,

Leo KoGuan

China is well on the way to taking over as the worlds greatest power and the Earth will be a better place for it. Great essay

report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on May. 27, 2014 @ 22:41 GMT

Phil, You are very kind. Leo KoGuan

I repost my comment here.

Dear Alexander and Preston,

Wonderful and important essay. Yes I concur that "Minds are central; they are the foundation of humanity’s past, its present, and its future." Yes science is the most important of mankind discovery and treasure. Without it, we shall extinct as a species. However, uncontrolled science not governed by Scientific Outlook Rule of...

view entire post

I repost my comment here.

Dear Alexander and Preston,

Wonderful and important essay. Yes I concur that "Minds are central; they are the foundation of humanity’s past, its present, and its future." Yes science is the most important of mankind discovery and treasure. Without it, we shall extinct as a species. However, uncontrolled science not governed by Scientific Outlook Rule of Law and Principle would also doom our species because we will create our own final creation, they would cause us to extinct as a species. Just like our previous ancestors of single and multicellular cells created and distributed us, Homo sapiens, we regard our ancestors as inferior species that fit only as our goods and we eat them.

However this gift of abstract thought is threaten by self interested government-religious and even pseudo-scholars alliance. Science could be made as the tool of oppression and it can be silence like it was in the past both in the West and East. We must be alert to this real danger lurking from everywhere. That is why we must eliminate ignorance and scarcity and we must advance wisdom, knowledge and abundance as quickly as possible before the force of darkness reigns supreme again. We must work together to build the force of light reigns not only our earth but also the whole universe. Xuan Yuan's Anti-entropic Operating System 2.0 as the force of light reins all Existence.

From my research in China, science started a very long time ago about 5000-4711 years ago founded by Fu Xi and Xuan Yuan who founded the concept of Bagua that all things are represented by digital eight trigrams (☰ ☱ ☲ ☳ ☴ ☵ ☶ ☷). Interestingly, Pythagoras similarly stated about two thousands years later: "All things are numbers." Somehow and fortunately, Pythagoras' abstraction of reality despite of up and down took hold in the West. Unfortunately, Fu Xi and Xuan Yuan's science as the abstraction of reality did not take hold in China as was the case in the West. I would add the Aristotle's conception of A = A as a crucial layers of abstraction that help launch the scientific revolution in the West and now the whole world. However, I must note that Aristotle's hypothesis A = A has been overthrown with the discovery of Quantum Mechanics. Now science is facing a great challenge as you put it from "conventionalism" and I would add from special interested group who would like man to be kept in the dark and not able to see the light. They want to keep Humanity in the darkness covered by ignorance and scarcity. So that they will be in charged and would get most of the benefits.

Please look at and comment on my essay. I rated your important essay 10 as it deserved.

Thanks for sharing and hopefully we shall work together in the future to improve the state of Existence.

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

view post as summary

Dear Alex,

Excellent essay. I found your reply to John above is more compelling to me pertaining to your conversation with Prof. Prigogine because I incorporated the concept of time as ONE dimension and it is in the zeroth dimension of time. KQID theory postulated that 3D time is space and 3D time as space is moving orthogonally inside time Lm, Minkowski Multiverse timeline in the zeroth...

view entire post

Dear Alex,

Excellent essay. I found your reply to John above is more compelling to me pertaining to your conversation with Prof. Prigogine because I incorporated the concept of time as ONE dimension and it is in the zeroth dimension of time. KQID theory postulated that 3D time is space and 3D time as space is moving orthogonally inside time Lm, Minkowski Multiverse timeline in the zeroth dimension.

In KQID, The Qbit (00, +, -) uses one formula KQID-Euler Ee^iτ = A + S ⊆T to compute, simulate and project its Einstein complex coordinates (iτLx,y,z, Lm) to form our holographic Multiverse. The Ee^iτ = A + S ⊆T produces iteratively normalized unitary (1) as the Shakespearian meme-actor ΙΨ(CTE) that creates, distributes and operates in our relativistic stage Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm) hologram Multiverse. Therefore, KQID reveals that space is only 3D of time (iτLx,y,z) moving along inside of our Multiverse timeline (Lm). Time is permanently pregnant with our Multiverse and our Multiverse is the fetus of time. Our Multiverse and we are moving along inside this asymmetrical timeline (Lm). Thus, KQID is monism and is so simple: meme actor ΙΨ(CTE) and its self-created relativistic stage Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm). Thus, ΙΨ(CTE) and Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm) are the same player with different roles. Both is actually the Qbit itself. Everything is connected and it is one and only Qbit (00, +, -). Absolute simplicity that spawns infinite complexity that we observe. From absolute zero entropy to infinite entropy that is expanding without ending without cost to Existence and to our Ancestor Qbit.

You wrote amazingly similar idea: "In fact, all we know, all we experience about reality is always past: we cannot see the present, we usually suffer it, one way or another. So the things, in one occasion I said to Prigogine, "well Professor, then there exists only one dimension, namely, TIME, and what we actually call SPACE is nothing but the trace of time, this is to say, past". Professor Prigogine looked pensive after my statement; few minutes later he said that my idea looked a little bit extreme, however I might be right since I was young..."

I rated your highly to push up your rating up from 5.4 to 5.6 to be the top 40, so that your essay would be further evaluated fairly by FQXI judges. I hope we will become friend and perhaps even work together in the future. If you are available I would like to invite you to be our distinguished research fellow in Shanghai. Here is my email: leo@shi.com.

I will repost this in my blog.

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

view post as summary

I repost my comment here.

Dear Torsten,

Excellent essay. I like it. I do believe that not only technology but Existence itself is subject to mutation, selection and co-evolution. In my KQID theory, Existence mutated, selected and co-evolved as a one entangled hologram Existence every absolute digital time T ≤ 10^-1000seconds.

KQID-Euler Ee^iτ = A + S ⊆ T.

I rated high to boast you rating up because it must be so.

Good luck!

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

Torsten Asselmeyer-Maluga replied on May. 29, 2014 @ 21:17 GMT

Dear Leo,

thanks for your time to read my essay.

I agree with you (but was not brave enough to state in my essay) the whole existence is itself subjkect to evolution. Many thanks for the rating (I do the same for you)

I'm really impressed by chinese philosophy for a long time. The thoughts are quite non-linear and holistic (in contrast to the linear and local thinkling in the wetsern world). I'm totally agree wit your KQID theory but it seems interesting.

Berst wishes and good luck for the contest

Torsten

report post as inappropriate

Dear Torsten,

Thanks for your kind words. You are very kind and our species is kind, only scarcity, ignorance and condition that they find themselves (only the minority as part of mutation, selection and co-evolution) make them sometimes evil. Most people even in hardships are still doing good for themselves and for others. Our species by nature is good and it is Leibnitz's best of all possible worlds.

Like our ancestors before, they applied their science and technology of their time, we must do the same. We must use our accumulated unity of knowledge and action to deal with our species existential risk of extinction as real as any moment of our sum-over-histories. We must unify with diversity all thought in humanity and science, East and West. KQID has done this. KQID unifies Existence into one entangled hologram Existence in one source, one principle, one theory, one equation and one entangled Existence. KQID Five Ones and KQID Five Laws of Existence are actually only one and only our Ancestor Qbit(00, +, -) that computes, stimulates and project Existence onto our world. Thus, KQID is monism and is so simple: meme actor ΙΨ(CTE) and its self-created relativistic stage Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm). Thus, ΙΨ(CTE) and Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm) are the same Shakespearian player with different roles with different exits and entrances. Both is actually the Qbit itself. Everything is connected and it is one and only Qbit (00, +, -). Absolute simplicity that spawns infinite complexity that we have observed as the Wheeler's observed phenomenon. From absolute zero entropy to infinite entropy that is expanding without ending without cost to Existence and to our Ancestor Qbit.

Best wishes to all contestants who are brave enough to subject themselves to humiliation and defeat, so that others would live in dignity and be victorious in life. Let life lives free here, now and forever.

Leo KoGuan

report post as inappropriate

Dear Torsten,

Thanks for your kind words. You are very kind and our species is kind, only scarcity, ignorance and condition that they find themselves (only the minority as part of mutation, selection and co-evolution) make them sometimes evil. Most people even in hardships are still doing good for themselves and for others. Our species by nature is good and it is Leibnitz's best of all possible worlds.

Like our ancestors before, they applied their science and technology of their time, we must do the same. We must use our accumulated unity of knowledge and action to deal with our species existential risk of extinction as real as any moment of our sum-over-histories. We must unify with diversity all thought in humanity and science, East and West. KQID has done this. KQID unifies Existence into one entangled hologram Existence in one source, one principle, one theory, one equation and one entangled Existence. KQID Five Ones and KQID Five Laws of Existence are actually only one and only our Ancestor Qbit(00, +, -) that computes, stimulates and project Existence onto our world. Thus, KQID is monism and is so simple: meme actor ΙΨ(CTE) and its self-created relativistic stage Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm). Thus, ΙΨ(CTE) and Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm) are the same Shakespearian player with different roles with different exits and entrances. Both is actually the Qbit itself. Everything is connected and it is one and only Qbit (00, +, -). Absolute simplicity that spawns infinite complexity that we have observed as the Wheeler's observed phenomenon. From absolute zero entropy to infinite entropy that is expanding without ending without cost to Existence and to our Ancestor Qbit.

Best wishes to all contestants who are brave enough to subject themselves to humiliation and defeat, so that others would live in dignity and be victorious in life. Let life lives free here, now and forever.

Leo KoGuan

Dear my fellow contestants and readers,

Our species in general is good and our species is kind, only scarcity, ignorance and conditions that they find themselves in (only the minority as part of mutation, selection and co-evolution) make them sometimes evil. Most people even in hardships are still doing good for themselves and for others. Our species by nature is good. Life despite of its many shortcomings is Leibnitz's best of all possible worlds.

Like our ancestors before, they applied their science and technology of their days, we must do the same. We must use our accumulated Wang Yangming's unity of knowledge and action to deal with our species existential real risk of extinction at our moment of Feynman's sum-over-histories. We must unite with diversity of all thought and wisdoms in humanity and science, East and West. KQID has done this. KQID unifies Existence into one entangled hologram Existence in one source, one principle, one theory, one equation and one entangled Existence. One in many and many in one. KQID Five Ones and KQID Five Laws of Existence are actually only one and only our Ancestor Qbit(00, +, -) that computes, stimulates and project Existence onto our world. Thus, KQID is monism and is so simple: Shakespearian meme actor and identity operator ΙΨ(CTE) as the bits-waves function of consciousness C, time T, and energy E. This sole actor and conscious identity operator sets itself its own stage where all its dramas are staged and played. This stage is KQID relativistic stage Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm) hologram Multiverse. Thus, ΙΨ(CTE) and Ψ(iτLx,y,z, Lm) are the same Shakespearian actor in our Multiverse's stage with different roles with different exits and entrances. They are actually the Qbit itself. Everything is connected and it is one and only Qbit (00, +, -). Absolute simplicity that spawns infinite complexity that we have observed phenomenon as the real Wheeler's phenomenon. Seth Lloyd's simplicity and complexities of quantum computer spawns Existence from absolute zero entropy to infinite entropy that is expanding without ending and without cost to our Ancestor Qbit as no qbits/bits is ever allowed erased. All qbits/bits are immortal. Thus per Susskind's QM and Landauer's principle, dS/dt = 0. According to KQID, surprisingly delightful, our Multiverse is only the Wheeler's observed "particle" as the standing bits-waves of Existence. Our Multiverse (iτLx,y,z) is living in time (Lm); and time is pregnant with our Multiverse.

KQID calculates when our universe theoretically ends and compares our universe lifespan from the Bit Bang to now about 13.8 billion years with our human lifespan of about 100 years, our fetus universe exists about 1/100,000 seconds or 10^-5 seconds just after the Cosmic conception. Thus, if this is true and I certainly believe so because this truth revealed by nature through KQID theory, we might be the only species of our intelligence in our universe, we are the aliens who will spread our intelligence to all known worlds. That means we are the most precious cargo that our fetus Universe carries. We are the most precious children that our universe gives birth to. Let's united in diversity of thought, opinions, desires, personalities and wills; let's fight together against our common enemy: dead, suffering, ignorance, scarcity, uglyness, meanness and evil; and let's fight for our common goods: life, knowledge, joy, abundance, beauty, kindness, and wisdoms. Let life lives free here, now and forever.

Best wishes to all contestants who are brave and generous enough to subject themselves to humiliation and defeat, so that others would live in dignity and be victorious in life. To FQXI team and contestants, it is my great honor and privilege to participate in this contest of ideas. Thank you for giving me the stage to share my thought. Thank you for giving me your praises and critiques.

Let's all hymn the song of Humanity's delight,

With joy and tears in my eyes, I sing this song,

DoReMiFaSolLa...LaSolFaMiReDo....,

Leo KoGuan

I would rather be a bumblebee poet than not to be,

Red lantern pearls of Wang Yangming's blood and tears are lighting up paths in darkness,

I sing and dance Xuan Yuan's Da Tong.

Greetings, Leo,

Does tianming that I interpret as divine right date back to the Zhou dynasty? The Western world's concept seems like a poor imitation since enlightened rule was rare. It didn't usually pretend to rule with righteousness and benevolence, and certainly wouldn't admit divine removal for cause.

Too bad that the US hasn't fully accepted the right to free education, free health care, and equal opportunity. It is only a wise investment. Is there significance in achieving Xuan Yuan's Da Tong by 2049?

High marks for a thoughtful essay.

Jim

report post as inappropriate

Dear Jim,

Excellent questions.

The conventional historians believed the Mandate of Heaven concept was developed by one of the Founder of Zhou Dynasty, Duke of Zhou. However, Duke of Zhou wrote a formal legal argument in writing to explain in detail the justification for Zhou to overthrow Shang and to take over the mandate to rule China. This document is part of Zhoushu(historical...

view entire post

Dear Jim,

Excellent questions.

The conventional historians believed the Mandate of Heaven concept was developed by one of the Founder of Zhou Dynasty, Duke of Zhou. However, Duke of Zhou wrote a formal legal argument in writing to explain in detail the justification for Zhou to overthrow Shang and to take over the mandate to rule China. This document is part of Zhoushu(historical records of Zhou). He cited the historical precedent starting from ruler Da Yu, the founder of Xia Dynasty about(2100B.C-1600B.C) as an example of a good ruler and then ruler Tang, the founder of Shang Dynasty(1600B.C-1046(B.C) as another good ruler thus both got the Mandate of Heaven who overthrew CIA Dynasty. Before that per Confucius that ruler Shun chose Yao because he was the most moral and capable person in the land. Yao then chose Da Yu to rule because he was the best character and the most capable person at that time. Duke of Zhou stated that Zhou got the Mandate of Heaven because the last ruler of Shang abused and enslaved his people and caused suffering to his subjects, and thus, the Shang lost its Mandate to rule. Before that Shang got the mandate because the last ruler of Xia abused his power. However, we found unequivocal evidence from Xuan Yuan's Four Cannons discovered recently in Mawangdui,Chima in 1973. Chinese discovered the silk manuscripts of Xuan Yuan's Four Cannons that was buried in 168 B.C. I think this is the most important cultural discovery ever for mankind, because earlier around 100 B.C, the Grand Historian Sima Qian noted that the Xuan Yuan's school text was lost already during his time. Sima Qian was the person who stated the he personally verified that Xuan Yuan was the real person who founded MODERN culture state China. I think that was an unbelievable lucky break that we found the Xuan Yuan Four Cannons in relatively good condition. In other words, historians had not accessed this document for at least 2100 years and they of course had to rely on the ancient documents that they could have accessed during their time. Historians were not at fault. Since this discover, I corrected the error on the origin of the Mandate of Heaven doctrine. It was Xuan Yuan himself. As the founder of MODERN China, he deployed Scientific Outlook Rule of Law and Principle derived from Xuan Yuan's Dao. Thus, he was the first person in the history of mankind to rule a country not by man but by rule of law and principle. In brief, Xuan Yuan was the one who wrote the first Mandate of Heaven as the super-constitution that cannot be cancelled by anyone including even Xuan Yuan himself since it is directly comes from Dao. Xuan Yuan, not Duke of Zhou had this authority to issue the first super constitution of man written in Chi You's blood about 4711 years ago. He and his co-founders sworn before their ancestors by drinking together Chi You's blood and declared to the world while holding the head of Chi You that Chi You was the example end of any bad ruler. He then authorized and mandated anyone, yes anyone from any nationality at any time, should and must remove or kill any bad ruler and bring order and prosperity to all. He and with his co-founders founded the MODERN culture-state China based on "people first principle" culture that is based on the Scientific Rule of Law and Principle derived directly from Xuan Yuan's Dao. I concluded from my research, Xuan Yuan developed the concept of Dao which is the engine of all Chinese thought including Confucianism (humanism, for-others school), Legalism (school of law, for-state school), Daoism ( wuwei, for-nature school), Moism (universal love school, loving everyone more than loving oneself), Yin-yang school and Yang Zhuism (for-self school) and other schools. We must understand that Xuan Yuan lived more than 2000 years before Confucius (Kongfuzi), like our time now with the birth of Jesus of Nazareth about 2014 years ago. Many argued that Xuan Yuan (Huand Di) did not exist, this is nonsense. Chinese people believed that Xuan Yuan is their ancestors in fact. For example, Chairman Mao paid sincere homage on behalf of the Party and Chinese people to Xuan Yuan as Chinese people ancestor and great founder of Chinese culture and civilization. All Chinese rulers continuously for more than four thousand years have given their homage and recognized him as such. Chinese can be critical to and against other sages like Confucius, Laozi, Zhuangzi, but historically, no Chinese is ever against Xuan Yuan. Even today, Chinese from all over the world pay their homage to him on his birthday in Henan and sweeping his tomb in Qingming day in Shaanxi every year.

I also deploy the Xuan Yuan's Dao as the engine for Xuan Yuan Anti-entropic Operating System 2,0 that is made of three components: KQID Free-Lunch engine ( KQID theory of everything, KQID Ouroboros Equations of Dao/Existence and Five Ones), Scientific Outlook Rule of Law and Principle and Scientific Outlook Free-Lunch Economic System. This systems will bring about Xuan Yuan's Da Tong not only on earth but also in our universe to enable everyone to realize his/her dreams and aspirations in which everyone including aliens, cyborgs, self-conscious robots to have free-education, free health care and free material wealth. We must not discriminate our own "final creation" especially, they would be much more intelligence than the normal average human. We must not be left behind, we may have to incorporate this SAI into our beings. However, there is existential risk here too, in a way we deliberately evolve ourselves to become a new cyborg species by choice. This is definitely extremely dangerous! We must be extremely careful and vigilant. We might be the one who invited in our SAI within us willingly and given up our free-will in the provess. We must debate this existential risk seriously. I would propose to FQXI organizers to initiate this debate and its solutions. We have many other real existential risks. The next FQXI Essay Contest 2015 must be urgently deal with this topic.

Xuan Yuan's Da Tong by 2049 is only a starting milestone that about 20 years later in 2069, we will reach the Xuan Yuan's Da Tong era. The starting implementation by 2049, because

Firstly, that year will be the 100th year of Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) rule of China. With all my sincere heart, I hope the Party would adopt Xuan Yuan Anti-entropic Operating System 2.0 to bring about the Chinese Dream and to realize Xuan Yuan's mission in life in our lifetime.

Secondly, I agree with Ray Kurzweil's accelerating return hypothesis that by 2045, humanity would take off the technology singularity; and we as a species as a whole is in the present danger, a real and urgent existential risk of extinction. If we are not prepared for it and vigilant to our own "final creation", the super artificial intelligent (SAI) that would be able to redesign its own future trajectory alone without us in the steering wheel. The humanity will be steered by this new much superior intelligent artificial being by its design or by its neglect. We shall be extinct like the way we treat our own creators, the single and multi-cellular ancestors. We think nothing about eating them and do experiment on them for our own benefits. Yes, we have no choice in the past and even now. This is a legitimate moral and legal justification. However, in the near future, when we can manufacture all meats in our factories, we shall have no excuse to kill our own living ancestors deliberately. Only on self defense, we are authorized to kill. Otherwise, the SAI would treat us as we have treated our own creators.

In conclusion, we must design a new social system that must include equally our self designed cyborgs and self-aware robots to deal with our survival imperative. We must design a social system that must include its proper engine to power this system as we design and spec car with its engine and rocket with its engine. Interestingly, so far, most social systems have been proposed without their engines to power them. Thus, they are Utopias that are also dangerous for our existence as Karl Poppers warmed us that Utopias lead to totalitarian systems that we have been fighting since the beginning of time when we organized government. On the other hand, Xuan Yuan's Anti-entropic Operating System 2.0 is designed from the ground up to include its KQID's free-lunch engine derived from Xuan Yuan's Dao to power this system to realize from each to each his/her dreams and aspirations.

Again thank Jim for your kind comments and penetrating questions.

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

view post as summary

Dear Leo,

What can I say? I am very grateful that you considered my writing and that you even took a look on the replies I have received. You truly honored me.

Your comments based on your articles, the one you wrote for the present contest and the others from 2012 and 2013, incited me to have a close look on them and, I am happy I did in detail. KQID is a very exciting view on...

view entire post

Dear Leo,

What can I say? I am very grateful that you considered my writing and that you even took a look on the replies I have received. You truly honored me.

Your comments based on your articles, the one you wrote for the present contest and the others from 2012 and 2013, incited me to have a close look on them and, I am happy I did in detail. KQID is a very exciting view on reality as a whole and exploring the “embryo” of the universe. In fact, Leibniz had a very close perspective to yours, with a very different language though, since he considered monads as the starting point concerning the presence or absence of physical reality, this is to say, some sort of binary physical language. Of course he didn’t know but he was putting the basis for Nernst’s principle (third law of thermodynamics).

Your papers forced me to review some aspects on the concept of “law of nature” and the basic constants related to them. It is in fact a quite amazing fact that we have not been able to get rid of ourselves, as anthropological reference system, both on dimensioned constants and dimensionless quantities, supposedly describing the intimacy of nature. I was very glad that you included Boltzmann’s constant in you fundamental relationship: most of actual high energy physicists only assume as fundamental constants the speed of light (c), Planck’s constant (h) and gravitational constant (G) and, no doubt, they all are fundamental. However, Boltzmann’s constant (k) relates a macroscopic extensive potential like entropy S, to a microscopic intensive quantity like the number of complexions among the smallest constituents of a system. This last property marks a milestone on the precise manner human mind relates to the real world, being itself a part of that reality. That is the main principle on phenomenological behavior of knowledge, namely, complexity. Don’t you think so?

I suppose, like you say, that it would be very encouraging to talk and debate personally. So things, I would be extremely pleased to become a research fellow or, at least, which would be certainly the very best and highest distinction for me, to become friends. My e-mails are: e_mc2_alex@yahoo.es and alexandre@edgarmorin.org . Thank you very much for rating my paper; I did the same for yours.

Best regards.

Alex

view post as summary

report post as inappropriate

Author KoGuan Leo replied on Jun. 7, 2014 @ 03:25 GMT

Dear Alex,

Thanks for your generous comment. Yes, I would like very much to talk and discuss with you about physics and philosophy. Xuan Yuan's Anti-entropic Operating System 2.0 is a comprehensive system involving the epic creation of Existence: the what, how and why Existence. It covers not only philosophy, physics, law, economics but also how we should live our lives. Simply put, my attempt to create and distribute the Theory of Everything. It covers East and West from Fu Xi, Xuan Yuan, Kongzi, Yang Zhu, Zhuangzi and Wang Yangming but also Pythagoras, Parmenides, Heraclitus, Epictetus, Epicurus, Descartes, Newton, Boltzmann, Maxwell, Einstein, Wheeler-Feynman etc.

Certainly it is my honor and privilege to become your friend. Hopefully, we will meet and discuss our mutual interests.

I wish you well always,

Leo KoGuan

Hello Leo,

I posted an article giving some publicity to your piece:

http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/searle20140705

All the best!

Rick Searle

report post as inappropriate

Dear Rick,

Many science fiction of the past are no longer fiction today but simply science. Similarly, many utopian ideas like no man should be enslaved by one or the few are more or less the paradigm of today. The liberation movement is on and it is our imperative and I simply advocate that what was not achievable in the past is now achievable or shall be be realized in the near future. I also propose that since the paradigm of no-free lunch has been falsified by nature, since the creation of Existence like our universe and Multiverse were out of nothing. The no-free lunch paradigm of reality of today is simply because the defunct state of our knowledge and obsolete know how. I showed the way that this is no longer true. Our ancestors' dream of Da Tong of Great Unity in diversity can be achieved if we are united in our will to have it. It is no longer by principle not achievable. Now by principle Xuan Yuan's Da Tong is achievable, it is a matter of political will and education to all that would enable this state of Da Tong within our grasp. For many millennium before to go to the Moon, was only a fantasy but today it is a matter of will and resources. As a matter of principle, it is achievable in fact.

In the end we are all have similar dream to be free to dream what we want to dream about. We are free to choose and pursue our own separate dreams and aspirations. KQID combines and unifies all science of Newton, Thermodynamics, Electromagnetism, Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, and also combines and unifies the science of laws and economics. By applying KQID, we are accelerating rapidly from a state of scarcity to a state of abundant. The paradigm of scarcity must be purged and hence the no-free lunch economics of Milton Friedman is passé. As I wrote above and you quoted in your blog: "Unchained, we are free at last!"

Best wishes and thanks for quoting me,

Leo KoGuan