Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home


Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discusswinners

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fund.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

James Hoover: on 6/10/14 at 1:24am UTC, wrote Sridattadev, Thanks for reading my essay and your kind comments. Jim

sridattadev kancharla: on 6/7/14 at 21:15pm UTC, wrote Dear Jim, I congratulate you on a wonderful masterpiece detailing several...

James Hoover: on 6/6/14 at 3:13am UTC, wrote Sridattadev, An extended metaphor and symmetry math, perhaps tells it...

sridattadev kancharla: on 6/5/14 at 12:30pm UTC, wrote Dear Jonathan, Thank you I. Love.

Jonathan Dickau: on 6/5/14 at 2:42am UTC, wrote Thank you Sridattadev, A pleasure to read your short essay, and of course...

KoGuan Leo: on 5/3/14 at 11:59am UTC, wrote Dear Sri, Your essay is simple to the point. There is no extra word...

sridattadev kancharla: on 5/1/14 at 14:16pm UTC, wrote Dear Peter, Thank you for your comments and congratulations on your...

Peter Jackson: on 4/30/14 at 20:52pm UTC, wrote Srittadev, I now always look forward to your interlude of tranquility. An...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Steve Dufourny: "I must explain what is the real meaning of Spherisation in my theory.It is..." in Mass–Energy Equivalence...

Georgina Woodward: "Hi Robert, thank you. I now understand the difference between decisions and..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Robert McEachern: "Making a decision, means selecting between discrete, a priori established..." in Schrödinger’s Zombie:...

Steve Dufourny: "Hi Eckard,you seems persuaded by your Words and thoughts.I don t understand..." in First Things First: The...

Eckard Blumschein: "In Darwinism/Weismannism there is no first cause, just a causal chain...." in First Things First: The...

Steve Dufourny: "lol no indeed it is not a lot,like I said I liked your general ideas.I have..." in The Demon in the Machine...

Steve Agnew: "There are three assumptions...is that a lot? The aether particle mass, the..." in The Demon in the Machine...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

First Things First: The Physics of Causality
Why do we remember the past and not the future? Untangling the connections between cause and effect, choice, and entropy.

Can Time Be Saved From Physics?
Philosophers, physicists and neuroscientists discuss how our sense of time’s flow might arise through our interactions with external stimuli—despite suggestions from Einstein's relativity that our perception of the passage of time is an illusion.

Thermo-Demonics
A devilish new framework of thermodynamics that focuses on how we observe information could help illuminate our understanding of probability and rewrite quantum theory.

Gravity's Residue
An unusual approach to unifying the laws of physics could solve Hawking's black-hole information paradox—and its predicted gravitational "memory effect" could be picked up by LIGO.

Could Mind Forge the Universe?
Objective reality, and the laws of physics themselves, emerge from our observations, according to a new framework that turns what we think of as fundamental on its head.


FQXi FORUM
October 15, 2019

CATEGORY: How Should Humanity Steer the Future? Essay Contest (2014) [back]
TOPIC: Any Body Can Do - Everything For Good by sridattadev kancharla [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author sridattadev kancharla wrote on Apr. 18, 2014 @ 16:03 GMT
Essay Abstract

Let’s start a big bang of sharing, caring and loving each other to the point we forget our false identity as separate independent beings and till we realize that we are all but one interdependent being, singularity. This can be started by anybody, anywhere and anytime. All one has to do is help a couple of people unconditionally and ask them to help 2 more people when they get a chance and to convey the same message. This creates an exponential chain of caring and loving and soon it will reach all the human beings on this planet in a very short span of time. This is very much possible now using the latest technological advances of social networking.

Author Bio

I am your alter ego, we are just one. Singularity.

Download Essay PDF File

Bookmark and Share



Author sridattadev kancharla wrote on Apr. 18, 2014 @ 21:37 GMT
Dear All,

As you might have noticed, I have kept the essay brief but provided a link with in it for a full blog with videos created by wonderful people to demonstrate the universal truth of our self and love. I request you all to please visit the blog as well @

Any Body Can Do - Everything For Good.

Please use this custom category search engine and portal of portal website with a message of universal truth of love on a regular basis and share it with all your loved ones. I hope this way we can reach many people with the universal truth of love, while helping them do their routine searching online. Please do suggest some videos or websites you would like to be included in our site by sending an email in the contact section. I want us to grow and reach as many of our kind as possible forever and ever.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share


Ram Kunwar Bansal replied on Apr. 19, 2014 @ 01:35 GMT
Dear Mr Dattadev,

I appreciate your generous way of loving all and doing everything good. But its implementation has problems not only today but since the beginning of human history. Humanity has always been divided into bad and good people. While the good may stand on their goodness, the bad never leave their bad traits and take undue advantage of the goodness good people stick to. Thus, there establishes the rule of bad people over the good people.

Loving all is a good sermon, but impractical to implement.

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Apr. 19, 2014 @ 12:51 GMT
Dear Ram Kunwar,

I am not denying the nature of duality which is good and bad. I am trying to raise the awareness of singularity of love which is the root of both.

Bad is a narrow band width of love, where a person is extremely selfish of their relative body and self centered in their mind and ignorant of true nature of the absolute self.

Good is a mega band width of love, where a person is selfless and considers every body a part of the self.

Love is universal frequency range, bad and good are just different zones of it.

Any system will consist of these differences and tries to balance these frequencies to maintain equilibrium and this is the process of duality. The system itself is singular.

I am just trying to increase the awareness among all about this universal truth of love. Every body is free to choose their frequency range as the show must go on.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share



Georgina Woodward wrote on Apr. 19, 2014 @ 05:04 GMT
Hi Sridattadev,

its a nice Utopian idea but not everyone is as nice as you. I agree more caring, sharing and loving would make the world a better place, so its a good direction to steer. Love, Georgina

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Apr. 19, 2014 @ 12:56 GMT
Dear Georgina,

Our existence itself is an utopian idea if we can see the whole picture, irrespective of the good and the bad, they are just a part of a script in the show of universal dance of duality. I am only trying to add a little more to the script of this universal dance in the way I am meant to in this life and so are you and that is the idea.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share



Wilhelmus de Wilde de Wilde wrote on Apr. 19, 2014 @ 14:31 GMT
Dear Sri,

Your love is always a warm welcome in any thread ...

If there were more people like you the world would be less egoistic.

I am also trying to make mankind aware of its positive powers , and it is not easy to achieve even a little progress for the "good".

You are giving now "numbers" that are indicating our actual position in life.

Any number is only representing a "moment" so is already a moment in memory...

Let us go forward to create more beautiful moments in memory...

Please take some memory moments to read my contribution to the future of a better being [:link] and maybe leave a comment or give me a rating that is in conformity with your appreciation/love.

best regards

Wilhelmus

report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Apr. 19, 2014 @ 23:22 GMT
Dear Will,

I love your essays and the depth and knowledge of consciousness you share in them and as you know I consider you as my alter ego and I know that you feel the same way too. I totally agree with you that we need to nurture our children with this knowledge of consciousness and love for all which is the essential property of consciousness. Internet is the best medium to achieve this level of communication of free unlimited knowledge about all aspects of life and hence I chose to create a website that would provide information to all those who seek it in a easier way.

Please see Any Body Can Do - Everything For Good which is a custom category search engine and a portal of portals.

I have also blogged about the consciousness and included several videos on that topic in the everything section of the site. This is my way of contributing to the world of a tool to assist our children to gain the awareness for a better future on this planet in this duality of existence.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share



Vladimir Rogozhin wrote on Apr. 19, 2014 @ 19:32 GMT
Dear Sridattadev,

Your idea of "exponential spiritual chain" is very interesting. Indeed, the Internet creates a completely new situation in the world, when the understanding of the world as a whole can come to mankind as a "big bang." I agree with you: «Everything From Geometry». But we must see the "beginning of geometry", which will allow to draw a model of the world as a whole.

«The truth should be drawn and should be presented to "an unlimited circle"of spectators.»( Alexander Zenkin in the Science counterrevolution in mathematics

I wish you good luck!

All the Best,

Vladimir

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Apr. 19, 2014 @ 23:44 GMT
Dear Professor Vladimir,

I thank you for supporting the idea of "exponential spiritual chain" and I like your take on how to approach infinity in mathematics and how all the great mathematicians and philosophers worked on it. The truth lies in understanding the infinity and there is none as such, hence zero is the only absolute infinity. All that there is i, and zero = i = infinity.

On the lighter funny side of life, please enjoy the videos and jokes at

Any Body Can Doodle - Everything For Giggles.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share


Vladimir Rogozhin replied on Apr. 20, 2014 @ 19:05 GMT
Dear Sridattadev,

Thank you for your kind comment on my essay! Yes, indeed, mathematics, which is going to "close the physics", itself has no essential foundation. And this problem for over a hundred years ... Also a problem for a unified picture of the world of physicists and poets today very current.. Physical picture of the world must gives meaning the «LifeWorld» (E. Husserl), otherwise how can safely steer the ship named "Earth" in a joyful Future ...???

Thank you for your joyful link!

I wish you good luck!

All the Best,

Vladimir

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


KoGuan Leo wrote on Apr. 20, 2014 @ 09:25 GMT
Dear Sri, short but powerful! I agree and share with everything you wrote. I want to be one of many who would be an agent of change to improve our state of being here, now and everywhere in our Multiverse. I believe we exist here for a purpose that it is our mission not only to experience and enjoy the wonder of Existence but also to improve the state of being of Existence for the One itself. In my KQID theory, this One is nothing other than our own Ancestor FAPAMA Singularity Qbit (00, +, -).

Best wishes,

Leo KoGuan

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Apr. 20, 2014 @ 12:53 GMT
Dear Leo,

Thank you and I hope you will do the needful for all those in need as you are bestowed with the resources to do so with FAPAMA in your heart.

Love,

Sri.

Bookmark and Share


KoGuan Leo replied on May. 3, 2014 @ 11:59 GMT
Dear Sri,

Your essay is simple to the point. There is no extra word necessary to express your idea of how to spread Love to all humans here and now. It is doable just a simple "2^33=8,589,934,592 ". You concluded and I concur: "We have crossed the worlds current population of 7 Billion by now. A mere 33rd exponential of 2 can connect us all on this planet earth, we have to realize that this is the norm of the universe, inflation at the beginning of big bang. In no time one who started this chain will be at the receiving end of the chain and then one can start the process all over again and it becomes self-sustaining sphere of love."

Yours and mine are identical. Yours is 0 ≥ i ≤ ∞ and mine is 00 ≥ IΨ(CTE) ≤ ∞. This is a distinction without difference.

I rated you a ten (10), because there is one and only one grade is possible.

Wishing you the best,

Leo KoGuan

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Ryoji Furui wrote on Apr. 21, 2014 @ 16:20 GMT
Dear sridattadev kancharla,

Interesting essay, personally i think we will have some of people can't find next 2 connections in 33rd exponential of 2, however i am surprised that we can reach to total population with just 33 order.

regards,

ryoji

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Apr. 21, 2014 @ 17:34 GMT
Dear Ryoji,

Thank you. You are right about that not every one will be able to find the next 2 in the chain, that is the reason why some of us who are more capable should help more than just 2 to fill up that gap and that is actually how things work. For every one that cannot help to 2 more, there will be some one who can help 4 others.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share



Hoang cao Hai wrote on Apr. 23, 2014 @ 02:54 GMT
Dear Sridattadev - Glad to see you back here again

Too short but still enough for people to understand your message - that's my first choice : I always liked the most : love.

Best wishes with the highest score for your love - Hải.CaoHoàng

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Apr. 23, 2014 @ 12:02 GMT
Dear Hai,

Thank you for your best wishes and love as always.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share



Joe Fisher wrote on Apr. 23, 2014 @ 15:31 GMT
Dear Guru Kancharla,

I found reading your brief essay absolutely delightful. Please act as my alter ego forever.

With the greatest esteem,

Joe Fisher

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Apr. 23, 2014 @ 19:05 GMT
Dear Joe,

Yes, I "is" your true alter ego forever.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share



Peter Jackson wrote on Apr. 30, 2014 @ 20:52 GMT
Srittadev,

I now always look forward to your interlude of tranquility. An island refuge in a turbulent sea.

This year I wrote a romance, a modern romance, with a cliffhanger ending. Bt it takes the reader away from Earth centricity to open new beautiful and simple understanding of weird quantum sillyness. I hope you read and can understand it.

Love

Peter

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on May. 1, 2014 @ 14:16 GMT
Dear Peter,

Thank you for your comments and congratulations on your story, I will definitely read it.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share



Jonathan J. Dickau wrote on Jun. 5, 2014 @ 02:42 GMT
Thank you Sridattadev,

A pleasure to read your short essay, and of course I agree. It is always nice to be reminded how simple it could be to change the world for the better.

As always we are one. I am I, as you are I, and we are I, and I is pervasive, as you know.

All the Best,

Jonathan

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Jun. 5, 2014 @ 12:30 GMT
Dear Jonathan,

Thank you I.

Love.

Bookmark and Share



James Lee Hoover wrote on Jun. 6, 2014 @ 03:13 GMT
Sridattadev,

An extended metaphor and symmetry math, perhaps tells it best. Words do not become action (flesh) without singular action toward a viable future. Better yet, mixed with the ingredient of common good and sharing, the Higgs suspends gravity, and we are weightless and uniform in purpose.

The folly of an approach that is not holistic, I discuss, creating ludicrous commercials, for example: "Even now, over 65 years after atomic energy, scientific vision is more focused, now at molecular-level problems and solutions, but not always holistic. Pharmaceuticals often demonstrate our cosmetic priorities and limited precision in targeting ailments – treatments for ED, toenail fungus, and diabetes, for example -- most evidenced by TV ads that pitch drugs with ludicrous litanies of side effects, ending with rapidly-stated murmurs of possible death"

I would like to see your thoughts on my essay: http://www.fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2008

Jim

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate

Author sridattadev kancharla replied on Jun. 7, 2014 @ 21:15 GMT
Dear Jim,

I congratulate you on a wonderful masterpiece detailing several accomplishments of human civilization at times tainted with greed and short sightedness. If only we could expand our conscious horizon and see that we are not just a small part that exists for a little time, but rather that we are the entire being trying to enjoy it self, would we become altruistic and strive for the continued survival of our kind.

Success of civilization will be decided by a few great altruistic leaders who will enable quantum leaps of evolution. The question is do we have at least few of them to come along before it is too late for our kind, irrespective of whether we make it or not as human beings, life will continue to exist in the best sustainable form in the universe. Nevertheless, human form of experience is an exalted state of being and I wish up on all the beings to go through this experience once in an eternal life cycle.

Love,

Sridattadev.

Bookmark and Share



James Lee Hoover wrote on Jun. 10, 2014 @ 01:24 GMT
Sridattadev,

Thanks for reading my essay and your kind comments.

Jim

Bookmark and Share
report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.