CATEGORY:
How Should Humanity Steer the Future? Essay Contest (2014)
[back]
TOPIC:
Incompleteness of Control theory in resolving, ‘How Should Humanity Steer the Future?’, while Universe itself is a Real-time Control system by Jayakar Johnson Joseph
[refresh]
Login or
create account to post reply or comment.
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph wrote on Apr. 17, 2014 @ 20:25 GMT
Essay AbstractWhile ‘Steer’ is the control in real-time, Control theory is considered as the tool to find solution for, ‘How Should Humanity Steer the Future?’, in that the Universe itself is a Real-time control system. Though Humanity is causal for the ecological imbalance in Biosphere, it is out of the Real-time control system of Universe and thus the remnants on error correction by the Sequential feedback control system of Universe effects Climate change that has an impact on Humanity. As the feedback loop of a control system is within a time domain, describing Universe with Sequential feedback control system needs an alternative cosmological paradigm that has different nature of time adaptable for this scenario and thus a paradigm, ‘Eigen-rotational Clusters of String-matter Universe (ECSU)’ is been explored to solve this. In this paradigm, as matter is ascribed as eigen-rotational string-matter continuum; the dynamics of universe is described with discrete cyclic-time in holarchical reference time. Being the universe as an infinite sequence of feedback loops in holarchical reference-time, defining an external control system in Real-time is not plausible. Thus a finite state sequential feedback control strategy is proposed for Humanity to adapt on this object and it is not a Real-time control system. This indicates that the Control theory is incomplete in providing Real-time solutions on this object, as the Universe itself is an Infinite sequential feedback control system. This incompleteness of Control theory on this object is due to the limitations in building Real-time reference data from Universe that is holarchical in dynamics. Thus in this strategy, a Virtual real-time data of Universe is proposed as the Reference data to delay the metamorphosis of earth, while the destruction of Humanity in the future is not preventable.
Author Bio1977: Completion of medical graduation; 1979–1995: Private medical practice and software designing in Healthcare; 1988: Enrolled for post graduation study in General Surgery; 1995 onwards: Research in alternative cosmology; 2000: developed a generic methodology, ‘Triplet clustering and computing the Heterogeneous-matters of Universe’; 2006 onwards: Teaching faculty in Medical Radiological Physics, Optometry, Medical Biophysics; 2009: Completed a course on Diploma in Astronomy and Astrophysics; on 2010: Published patent applications on ‘Coherently-cyclic Cluster-matter universe model’; 2013: Updated as the paradigm, ‘Eigen-rotational Clusters of String-matter Universe (ECSU)’. Work abstract at, http://www.clustermatteruniverse.net
Download Essay PDF File
Vladimir Rogozhin wrote on Apr. 18, 2014 @ 10:00 GMT
Dear Jayakar,
Very interesting and profound essay with new original ideas exactly very topical theme of the contest. Indeed, a new paradigm and new deep ideas, especially new eyes on the Universe as a whole, to make Humanity more clearly and firmly over his Future to the benefit of New Generations, has been building a Global System of Existential security. It is necessary to constantly study and discussion of global risks at all levels and especially at the UN level. Need to build an entirely new system of broad research and maximum overcoming global risks. For this it is necessary to raise the value of the UN, to create new structures. Suffice it to recall 50-60 years of the 20th century, when Humanity lived with new hope for the Future.
With kind regards and best wishes,
Vladimir
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Apr. 18, 2014 @ 17:20 GMT
Thank you dear Vladimir,
With all encouragements and guidance from you and other, I think this work has reached to have some applicability. I need some more time to make it more descriptive before submitting to UN.
With best regards and thanks
Jayakar
John C Hodge wrote on Apr. 19, 2014 @ 03:04 GMT
“Being the universe as an infinite sequence of feedback loops…”. I agree and have said so in my
entry (section 2). It is the time element of the movement of matter in cooling flows that provides the temperature of the universe.
STOE correspondence to general relativity and quantum mechanicsFine tuning is not needed.
I suggest your paper also suggests the universe cannot be adiabatic.
“Thus the control theory is applicable only to assign guidelines for Humanity to ‘Steer the Future’ and not provides absolute solutions.” I think so, too. Therefore, steer means set goals and organization and let the feedback loops run.
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Apr. 19, 2014 @ 11:47 GMT
Thank you Dear John,
As per this paradigm the Universe in entirety, is adiabatic; whereas its holarchical segments are diabatic.
With best regards
Jayakar
Georgina Woodward wrote on Apr. 21, 2014 @ 11:11 GMT
Hi Jayakar,
I'd just like to let you know I have read your essay. I'm afraid I didn't understand much of it but its good that you have brought new ideas to the table that might help with the task of steering the future in a way suitable for human survival.
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Apr. 21, 2014 @ 15:30 GMT
Thank you dear Parry,
This difficulty exists as this assignment is based on a new paradigm and any clarification shall be furnished.
With best regards,
Jayakar
Jeffrey Michael Schmitz wrote on Apr. 21, 2014 @ 22:30 GMT
Jayakar,
Thank you for the interesting essay. Many years ago I worked with PID controllers and your paper brought back memories. I understand that we are inside this control loop and therefore cannot change it. What is on the outside? Why would this loop exist in the first place? It was very hard to get my PID for an industrial chiller to work, it is difficult to understand how this just happen.
We can control feed-back systems that we are within. When you put on a coat when you are cold you are changing your body's temperature control system.
All the best,
Jeff Schmitz
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Apr. 22, 2014 @ 17:42 GMT
Thank you dear Jeffrey,
Human is internal to the feed-back control system of the universe whereas Humanity is external to the system as it is not with the cause effect chain of the universe. Thus Humanity with the Universe is a Boundary value problem in that change in boundary condition is the Climate change that is equivalent to the remnant on error correction by the control system of the Universe. In this, the PID controller algorithm is also applicable to interpret the Virtual real-time data, while the Boundary value problem is a differential equation.
When you are in a coat, the coat became a part of you as it preserves the boundary values, while the neuro-endocrine feedback system controls the body temperature, unless there is pathogenesis of external cause; whereas in the Universe, Humanity changes boundary values.
With best regards,
Jayakar
Joe Fisher wrote on Apr. 22, 2014 @ 15:28 GMT
Dear Doctor Jayakar,
Although I did not understand any of your essay; I am sure that the judges of this essay contest will, and they will score it highly. I do have a minor quibble that I hope you will not mind me mentioning.
Your entire essay concerns perfect abstract speculation. Reality is not speculative. Reality is unique. There are no perfect straight lines, perfect triangles, perfect circles or perfect squares anywhere in the real Universe. As I have thoughtfully mentioned in my essay, REALITY, ONCE, it is impossible for identical conditions to exist. Yet here you are using identical graphic seemingly perfect straight lines, perfect triangles, perfect circles, perfect squares and perfect identical abstract mathematical equations. Reality is quite simple sir. Reality only takes place here and now. All abstractions are extremely complicated.
With the utmost regard,
Joe Fisher
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Apr. 23, 2014 @ 07:28 GMT
Thank you dear Joe,
It is true that an eigen-rotational string-segment cannot be in perfect straight line in real-time, in that the T-brane is only a model of abstract algebraic structure in a time domain. Tetrahedral transformation of an eigen-rotational string-segment in time evolves with String dilation; substituting the Length contraction in Time dilation, measured by an observer in Corpuscularianism.
Though in reductionism it appears as if identical, while in real-time uniqueness exists with every eigen-rotational string-segment in the holarchy and thus 'Reality Once' is true.
With best regards,
Jayakar
Tetrahedral transformation with string dilation that evolves T-brane in real-time, is illustrated in the following pregeometry sketches, is attached herewith:
attachments:
Tetrahedral-brane.pdf
Joe Fisher replied on Apr. 23, 2014 @ 14:46 GMT
Dear Jayakar,
I wish I had your gracious tactfulness.
Joe
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph wrote on Apr. 27, 2014 @ 07:53 GMT
Dear Readers,
Thought experimentation to declare the axioms of this paradigm is been described in the attached file, for more clarity.
Thank you.Jayakar
attachments:
Experimentation_on_Holarchical_discreet_cyclic-time.pdf
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on May. 3, 2014 @ 03:19 GMT
Dear Reader,
For better clarity on this work, you may read my comments with the following essays.
(1.) 2016, (2.) 2034, (3.) 2035, (4.) 2049, (5.) 1982, (6.) 2124, (7.) 2130
Thank you.Jayakar
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on May. 12, 2014 @ 02:53 GMT
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on May. 13, 2014 @ 13:01 GMT
Dear reader,
Further discussions posted at the following essay pages:
(8.) 2141, (9.) 2139, (10.) 2128, (11.) 2127, (12.) 2122, (13.) 2120, (14.) 2119, (15.) 2118
Thank you. Jayakar
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on May. 21, 2014 @ 02:45 GMT
Dear reader,
For better clarity, illustration showing the metamorphosis on the life cycle of Earth; is been attached with this post.
Thank you.Jayakar
attachments:
Life_cycle_of_Earth.pdf
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on May. 30, 2014 @ 03:16 GMT
Dear reader,
More discussions posted at the following essay pages:
(16.) 2115, (17.) 2114, (18.) 2113, (19.) 2112, (20.) 2080, (21.) 2077, (22.) 2002, (23.) 2081, (24.) 2064, (25.) 2104
Thank you. Jayakar
hide replies
Cristinel Stoica wrote on Apr. 28, 2014 @ 07:01 GMT
Dear Jayakar,
I find very important that mankind is an open system, deeply connected with the rest of the universe. Nice application of control theory.
Best regards,
Cristi
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph wrote on Apr. 28, 2014 @ 09:56 GMT
Thank you dear Cristinel
With best regards,
Jayakar
Hoang cao Hai wrote on May. 15, 2014 @ 16:34 GMT
Dear Uncle Jayakar
An interesting solution with a sincere desire and the expressions very extensive - it is still very familiar style of uncle as the previous times - 10 points to express admiration for the love to science of uncle .
Hải.CaoHoàng
report post as inappropriate
Peter Jackson wrote on May. 24, 2014 @ 16:39 GMT
Jayakar,
I see most have steered clear of your essay. Such is the fate of alternative cosmologies however weak the present patch up. As an astronomer and observational cosmologist also with other professional qualifications we may be somewhat alike. I certainly agree your cosmological model has significant merit and is indicative of the long term future. I've recently had a paper on an alternative cyclic galactic and cosmological model accepted and after the contest I'd like us to compare notes as there appears to be good potential commonality. A preprint is here;
A Cyclic model of Galaxy Evolution, with Bars.
That model leaves the way open for escape routes as long as we advance technologically. The present rut theory is stuck in needs to be escaped! which is what my essay is about, applying the same mechanism to show how physics can be unified. I hope you'll agree both our essays are worth top marks. I greatly look forward to your comments.
Well done and best wishes in the contest. I look forward to looking more closely.
Peter
report post as inappropriate
Peter Jackson replied on May. 30, 2014 @ 11:41 GMT
Jayakar,
Thanks for your note on my blog about the two modes of time you employ, which I agree. I responded as follows;
"Interesting. As 'displacement' is always 'relative' (everything is at rest in it's own rest frame) I wonder then if you can't then also describe that relative time as 'apparent' time? i.e. A clock moving towards or away from you always appears to run faster or slower simply due to the Doppler shift of it's emissions. Your model then looks not only very self consistent but also consistent with a 'Truth Function Logic' (hierarchy) based approach."
Do comment. I also appreciate your response the Christian's questions below, and particularly your agreement of a cyclic cosmology. I'm pleased my score can move your total up. There do seem to be more consistencies in our descriptions than superficially apparent. I wonder how much more consistent than the standard model do derivations have to be before mainstream doctrine will release it's grip?
I hope you'll now make it into the final cut.
Peter
report post as inappropriate
Christian Corda wrote on May. 26, 2014 @ 12:42 GMT
Hi Jayakar,
It is a pleasure to re-meet you here in FQXi. Congrats, you wrote is an interesting and peculiar Essay. Here are my comments/questions:
1) Your statment that the Universe itself is a Real-time control system looks consistent with the anthropic principle.
2) Why do you claim that “considering the universe as a control system that regulates itself in entirety and not in isolated localities contradicts the Big Bang cosmology”? In fact, the Big Bang is NOT an explosion in a point in the space. It is the whole spacetime which was originally reduced in infinitesimal form instead.
3) There are at least 3 kinds of Riccati equations. Which one are your considering here?
4) You claim that “the Singularity theory on Big bang and Big Crunch does not support Spontaneous feedback control of Universe and this indicates that the dynamics of universe is in Holarchical cyclic-time”. Actually, there are cyclic universes which admit both of Big bang and Big Crunch.
5) I do not understand why you use Planck time unit if you does not admit the existence of singularities. Actually, the Planck scale is used in order to take into account quantum effects when classical singularities are approached.
6) Your statement that “the Universe is a control system of infinite feedback loops and the impact of Humanity on universe disseminates through its infinite sequential feedback control loops while the remnants on error correction by the feedback control effects as Climate change” is in full agreement with the anthropic principle.
7) Concerning environmental regulations, which is the role of nuclear energy in such regulations?
In any case, you wrote a very beautiful Essay. I will give you an high score.
I wish you best luck in the Contest.
Cheers,
Ch.
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on May. 27, 2014 @ 11:28 GMT
Thank you dear Corda for your interest on this work,
1. Though this paradigm is in consistent with the anthropic principle, the multiverse scenario is not in correspondence with the holarchical segments of tetrahedral-branes by eigen-rotational string-matter continuum. Also the atypical earth, expressional by this paradigm is in favour of Fermi paradox.
2. This paradigm is not an...
view entire post
Thank you dear Corda for your interest on this work,
1. Though this paradigm is in consistent with the anthropic principle, the multiverse scenario is not in correspondence with the holarchical segments of tetrahedral-branes by eigen-rotational string-matter continuum. Also the atypical earth, expressional by this paradigm is in favour of Fermi paradox.
2. This paradigm is not an alternative to Big bang cosmology, whereas it is an adjuvant that modifies standard cosmology while particles together with fields is defined as string-matter segments in monad notations and thus matter cannot be infinitesimal in any condition. Whereas in this scenario space-time is applicable only with the dynamics of isolated objects of clusters of string-matter segments that are on disconnect and reconnect with their environment while on dynamics and thus any object on isolation is a cluster of eigen-rotational string-matter segments.
3. Matrix differential Riccati equations seem to be useful to describe the emergence of discrete cyclic-times with the transformation of eigen-rotational cycles of string-segments into tetrahedral-branes.
4. In a feedback control system all actions are within a time domain, in that the flow of time continues; whereas the History of time begins with Big bang and may end with Big crunch. Discrete cyclic flow of time that emerges on eigen-rotation of string-segments, requires reference time and thus Holarchical cyclic-time is imperative.
5. While we assume matters as eigen-rotational string-matter continuum, the fundamental string-segment length corresponds to Planck length while the period of its eigen-rotational cycle corresponds to Planck time and with this we may update the dimensional analysis to define an unit of eigen-rotational energy to integrate with mainstream physics.
6. Though this paradigm is apparently in agreement with anthropic principle, the universe does not seem to have an age as it is eternal and cyclic.
7. Relocation of radio-active substances alters the cosmic connectivity of localities with respect to their environment and thus the biochemical regulations in bio-systems is interfered in that localities, resulting malformation of ecosystem. Subsequently the bio-transportation of both the cause and effect spreads across the globe that is causal for the widespread malformations in the bio-systems. Degradation of biosphere by this impaired bio-systems have significant impact on the universe on its self-regulations due to alterations in the chemical potentials of the Earth.
With best regards,
Jayakar
view post as summary
Christian Corda replied on May. 27, 2014 @ 12:29 GMT
Dear Jayakar,
Thanks for your kind clarifications.
I hope you will take a change to read and comment my Essay.
Cheers,
Ch.
report post as inappropriate
Gyenge Valeria wrote on Jun. 3, 2014 @ 10:29 GMT
Dear Johnson Joseph! (I guess those are your given names)
I read your essay with curiosity! Albeit what you had written in your essay is a bit too technical, I think it deserves for a higher score due to its relevancy and written quality. (What conditions was predetermined for the rating policies at this contest.) I'm opposed to lower someone's score just because one who reads an essay...
view entire post
Dear Johnson Joseph! (I guess those are your given names)
I read your essay with curiosity! Albeit what you had written in your essay is a bit too technical, I think it deserves for a higher score due to its relevancy and written quality. (What conditions was predetermined for the rating policies at this contest.) I'm opposed to lower someone's score just because one who reads an essay doesn't understand it exactly or that do not fit into his views.
Your premise is "..While ‘Steer’ is the control in real-time, Control theory is considered as the tool to find solution for, ‘How Should Humanity Steer the Future?’, in that the Universe itself is a Real-time control system. "
I think, 'to steer' something doesn't directly depend on whether there is 'Control system' established or not. 'To steer' means rather leading (going, proceeding or going in advance; showing the way), moving, going etc. into one direction. The 'Control system' is a tool to get a conscious confirmation about how the things go well or not during 'steering', and a possibility to step in.
I'm curious: Which Universe do you esteem to be a Real-Time working system? (We need to discern a system can proceed, work without control)
I also wonder whether what would be your opinion of
my essay, which also mention ."The mind conscious conceptualization works real-time and instantaneously imprints the results both on the body and mind thus in this kind of state of existence everything can happen just in time factually without time dilatant. One should know all and act instantaneously, but he is not able to consciously estimate the effects of his deeds and is not able to remember only for short time. One has no conscious awareness and so called long time memory reading back and forth capability even if just all one experiences impressions are imprinted and written instantaneously in one's genes and also his mind or so called light-bodies imprint"
I think, we need to further elaborate on: What would the LIVING IN a Total Simultaneity mean in the context of reincarnation (= until it has been an unscientific term, - but the contemporary string and M-theory may be near to describe it -, for one's, ones' experiences, memories as a consciousness imprints having folded and recorded into subtle energy light bodies, and how the fabric of Time and Space, Space and Time frameworks created truly for being been not only a holographic representation of several of 3D alternative realities as probabilities patterns, but factually arranged ones too into physical/genetically coded bodies, who think probably for answering to them selves: What and how to control our reality creation, what is desirable to steer.) and being fully aware of what we should do, how to decide in the Right NOW MOMENT, so the created Technologies by us basically for our well-being there not be an Existential Risk!
Let me mention also what the 'eigen' would mean in the origin of word. (By http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eigenvalue,_eigenvector_and_eig
enspace:
The prefix eigen- is adopted from the German word eigen for "self-" or "unique to", "peculiar to", or "belonging to" in the sense of "idiosyncratic" in relation to the originating matrix.)
So we need to put much focus on the 'self-transformation' of one or ones: who
(probably quite natural humans, but with an advanced knowledge about the Nature and its interrelation with thoughts about it) had already created 'a special kind of original simulation' which is factually a thought (or thinking/learning trial how to steer what is desirable) experiment, a consciousness (i.e. subtle energy bodies) engineering (what our present theoretical physics can already almost well describe), and that presently not yet understood ' original simulation' is able transform one(s)' (as his/their self likeness) and our genes (also involved due to an unfortunate mixing) from/into an until naturally gained body forms through a process of reincarnation (the latter has been until an unscientific term). That is the question of my essay whether need they - who need to understand being been their own fragmented or gathered likeness by this process - overcome themselves and us creating artificial bodies?
There is much problem with the 'control system' you write. "Finite state sequential feedback control by the Humanity to ‘Steer the Future’ is incomplete as Humanity is out of the infinite control system of Universe "
Yes, I agree the "Humanity is out of the (my addition here: real-time) system of Universe (my addition here: and their thoughts) ". And I think , there is only a cyclical negative feedback looping for error correction (?) which is factually too energy consuming.
There is much deel with it being the (thought) control system more refined or finally abandoned. A fully advanced human has conscious intent to steer his course, has an adequate retention to think over the possible outcome of his thoughts no to act real-time. Even further he has the capability against a quantum computer ( which can fail even if it is programmed no to do any fault it can hesitate between two of states while a human has a capacity) to decide real-time either making error or not. The latter allows much development into a right direction which can be at best balanced between two of states but keeping a human attitude and look
I don't know whether you know about Marina Shaduri works: She maintained a site which has not work yet. But you read her previous work - Life cycling of a Whole - cached on the wayback machine (here is the link just copy that http://web.archive.org/web/20090902000614/http://bioholograp
hy.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/life-cycling-of-a-who
le.pdf ) and her another work
The Holographic Principle and Emergence ... - InTechI'm look forward hearing from you. Keep in tuch if you feel so, my email given in my essay.
Kind regards,
Valeria
--- if my writing will be a bit chaotic, it is because I can't see the Preview Post text ---
view post as summary
report post as inappropriate
Gyenge Valeria replied on Jun. 3, 2014 @ 10:41 GMT
Hi I drop the link again...
http://web.archive.org/web/20090902000614/http://bio
holography.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/life-cycling-
of-a-whole.pdf
Life cycling of a Whole
report post as inappropriate
Toby Asher Lightheart wrote on Jun. 4, 2014 @ 08:06 GMT
Hi Jayakar,
You have written an interesting essay. I do see some tenuous connection with my entry discussing reinforcement learning and Markov decision processes in the context of morality.
I have a couple of questions I would be interested in having some plain English answers to.
Have you taken a literal interpretation of the phrase "steer the future" to mean something like "control the flow of time"?
Your virtual real-time control, that places humanity in the system as the controller, is interesting. I would say that humanity is a part of the Earth system and environment too.
Do you see practical implications of your findings/discussion in how society should govern itself or what sort of society we should strive for?
Cheers,
Toby
report post as inappropriate
Author Jayakar Johnson Joseph replied on Jun. 5, 2014 @ 20:31 GMT
Dear Toby,
Thank you for your interest on this essay.
While time evolves with the dynamics of eigen-rotational string-matter continuum, the discrete holarchical cyclic-time is the intrinsic property of the universe, in that Humanity has impact on the occurrence time of events and not on the flow of time. Thus "steer the future" is the control of occurrence time of events in the Earth system.
Humanity cannot control the universe instead the Universe controls Humanity by natural disasters.
There is no 'virtual real-time control' described in this paradigm. Virtual real-time data is the observation data of events in discrete holarchical cyclic-time; that provides reference data to assign a control strategy (not control system) for the environment to delay the impact of Humanity with the Universe that effects climate change, in that Humanity is out of the earth system and not a controller.
While on implication of environmental regulations by this control strategy, improved forecasting and minimising climate change are the definitive benefits out of this.
With best regards,
Jayakar
Login or
create account to post reply or comment.