Dear Vladimir!

At first let me apologize my longer comment, but because I keep important these thoughts putting here and relevant for the content we are speaking of, I hope, I do not overload you.



I found your essay one of masterpieces among lot of very good essays I could read until. You are giving very clear listing of the existential risks of the present state of...

view entire post

Dear Vladimir!

At first let me apologize my longer comment, but because I keep important these thoughts putting here and relevant for the content we are speaking of, I hope, I do not overload you.



I found your essay one of masterpieces among lot of very good essays I could read until. You are giving very clear listing of the existential risks of the present state of humanity (at least meant homo sapiens sapiens), and also minimum program instructions how-tos addressed to at least for two of non-governmental structures.

Your essay establishes well-formed review from a forward look (time)arrow how the consciousness should had developed from the senses and evolutionary stages of early human and how those steps became a crisis of our contemporary science and understanding.

However, I'm a bit missing from your essay mentioning our next or back step being - ' homo sapiens sapiens sapiens' - (some says smarter human, some should say divine being :) in our human evolution, and their impact upon us and the present situation.

That almost recurrently fascinated and make us curious, as far as I could construe about such questions in my essay:

'...Are there natural or what kind of type (e.g. supposed divine) beings existing before present us, who have more advanced knowledge suggesting they are years ahead after present us? Are they very natural being, probably humans from the future or from the past or just they are in very PRESENT? ....'

Putting such type of questions and answering them being understandable for a broader audience are far going yet even in our present, and there are much controversial speculations about the 'true human origin'. However much had been answered by ancient philosophers. "...Asinine! What rot to think! As though the earlier non existent could born or might disappear fully what ever was. Since the never existent never would become existent, furthermore if it can completely pass away what exists it is not in the reality it is not in the thought. It is impossible owing to it contradicts with the law..."(Empedokles). Heraclitus argued in a paradox that the world constantly changes, and put the existence into that simplified formula 'everything goes on its course'.

You may be reading about homo divinus and some relevant information coming from controversial sources, however being freely present for our open-minded considerations.

Let me put here some notes too concerning your notes (focusing on the importance of the 'structure' an the ontology of mathematics, but keeping in mind the simplest secure guidelines freewill, faith, hope, love) put on my essay page reconciling with your one:

I hope, I'm not in misunderstanding of your meaning '..Only language of geometrical representations could become the language in which it would be possible to construct such Eidos...' But, I argue a bit, the word in English 'Eidos' meant in anthropological manner, on the contrary this statement also should entail a conclusion to dismiss a living human body capable of thinking itself as a possible analogy to model a working of a healthy social system too.

I feel the cause of "...Process of certainty loss began in the middle of the 19th century simultaneously in mathematics and physics..." much rather arising from a 'creational crisis' which entail a quite important added point to your listing of existential risks. [b[That is OUR IDENTITY CRISIS which for a long time had set in our very bodily genetic and our both individual and social or group consciousness - we should call noosphere.

How ways can be this IDENTITY CRISIS put into a right direction by only OPEN FREE SOURCE SCIENCE AND BUSINESS movement without an adequate pressing on the governmental structure too, I'm not able to construe with an eligibility at the moment.

I should like pointing out to you here too, I disseminated a lot of thoughts-stuff considering them toward for me and the overall process we are trying to resolve for a long time. If you have a passion and time and keep thoughts interpreted by me interesting and relevant, so you can find the links of essays to where I put relevant comment posts at the end of this post.

No to distract yon from the thread I want to mention with relevancy here however, I need to emphasize a similar essay to yours and quote some parts of my note put on.

*** The Tip of The Spear by George Gantz

I ought to think, the expression - humanity - need to be clarified first. Whether that is true or not, it seems to be a fact (as James Lee Hoover writes in his essay and Turil also brings forth a very diverse extra-ultra brains database conception) our species and population here on our present Earth are quite diverse, even may be intentionally genetically engineered either for a kind of betterment, or conveying lowered capacity being kept under a direction of some ones in charge. My very personal opinion is, all tremendous speculation about this huge topic is not an extra terrestrial matter of things at all. I had found someone's indication in his comment - we may be the creators of our own evolution even conceptualizing GOD or GODs. I can feel similar, therefore I conclude much rather we need to finely discern the operating of Natural evolutionary processes, and a probable consciously and intentionally engineered steerable evolutionary mechanism.

We also should not be unobservant in that of an actual group or social consciousness is mainly determined at institutional levels and may be conditioned by lead forces consisting individuals with service to self or service to others interest being unbalanced in them and even they may be also a kind of groups too. However, mainly they are who own yet presently those peculiar technologies (high energy or subtle energy manipulations with which possible to encroach into the natural matter and energy flowing and allows reality and consciousness manipulations)

***

We need to realize first there may be ones intentionally making or engineering a 'process of uncertainty' on the grounding sciences which would give us an intellectual proof making our awareness clear - how our creative energy and informal forces working behind our thinking process. The contemporary theoretical physics and philosophy of mind and physics is much more and rather would be a possible framework much scientifically speaking and describing the former esoteric mentioning about the layers of energy bodies and chakra system, the spiritual energy and information flow in a genetically arranged physical body in the meantime and both incorporate even at a higher structure level -we call planetary systems - those processes can form a complex cosmical organism.

However, as

*** ...Who Should Be Their Guides into the Future? by David Brown writes and put some question also need to be answered

"...Arthur C. Clarke suggested that a sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic..."

"...Does artificial intelligence have far more connection with molecular biology than with mathematics and foundational issues in physics? .."

"...Do foundational issues in physics have profound connections with psychology and religion?..."

***

You have pointed out in your essay too, the 'Vector of consciousness' and albeit, I can accept the code may be in fundamental patterns and VECTOR EQUILIBRIUM and more about

structural cosmometry, and also the concept of the isotropic vector matrix [cited: "...As Fuller states, because of this it is the zero-phase from which all other forms emerge (as well as all dynamic energy events.."] even it is controversial in itself [cited: '...According to Bucky Fuller, the VE is more appropriately referred to as a “system” than as a structure, due to it having square faces that are inherently unstable and therefore non-structural..."]

I deem, taking a fine discernment between the two notions 'system and structure.' A system may be composed of structure(s) however in broader mathematical sense not all structure can be automorf. Sometimes structures should become too rigid to keeping a system in working, and not necessarily can trasform into itself with an adequate manner. I mean, much about to deal with here the crystal symmetries and its transformations, how the artificially made crystals can substitute and elevate a system ...etc. That is a huge topics.

Albeit, as a present IT expert personally I did not deal either with Artificial Intelligence and probablehistory simulations

, I was intended writing my essay for ones who are seriously dealing with however such possible creational concepts.( Referring back to Empedokles as written above, if there were not such a possibilities ever in the thought it should not never had been in the thought.) However, I pointed out also in my essay the original creational technology being adequate for running a kind of simulations not necessary lays on a ground of a contemporary meant computer technology.

There are so much high topics involved here to put them into right order and context in our mind for our understanding and our present biosphere and noospehere is so constrained yet, there is truly a risk for loosing both our natural human and even any kind of artificially created characteristic which should drive us into a total devastation.

I keep my focus put on

*** history simulationsHow to Hack Human History by John Brodix Merryman

... working with: The - thoughts - the utmost capability for the MAN!

Explanation: The thought is energy and information (on many structured levels, even our emotions, deep senses are as much thoughts we are able to consciously formulate into being been intellectually aware, we should say a man is composed of his thoughts and his way for living in healthy organism and organization keeping his thoughts both intellectually and emotionally balanced. ) which allows us to create, to materialize around us our ideas, desires, will etc., independently from the existence exists in any kind of form we can conceive about it. The thought both local and non-local and exist neither in time and space and as much as the existence exists. So that above comprehension is what makes us to be a higher order being.

We are on the way to work out an utmost 'philosophy' at which apex should be the science about - physics of thoughts -! Used for our mutual benefit and health not for being our own autocratic oppressor!

The problem is not the 'money'! But, - How to change our thoughts about to be anything in our possession! Nothing and no one is in our possession in the Nature! However everything is at our disposal to live, work with it and using it, even researching with it to further develop. However,our ability is that too, drawing limits to ourselves - what is worth to know and steer, truly.

So who is entitled to own and steer anyone's thoughts by any means - magic, technology even any kind of ideology? This is a deep conflict yet between the higher intellect and emotions and all about how the free-will may be achieved and maintained in a socially organized living systems - a.k.a. kept in a living history database of our many lives memory under scrutiny yet.

***

My essay body content was not quite unfolding what its abstract suggested owing to the given 9 page was not sufficient for that huge topics. I focused much rather on the message given in the title. However, I truly think missing the crown of the physics of thought or at least its reconciliation with a re-considered philosophy being the utmost underlying ideological framework describing nature, society, and generally the most principal all-pervasive laws of the thinking process, with much simpler terms being - understandable - comprehesible for anyone. (For example as the notion philosppy exerts a [Latin-Greek: 'Philo' = (in composition) partake in, savant + 'Sophia' = wisdom of life] , but giving such enough geometry explanations which eligible for our understanding too living our life in the meantime as an average human.

I gladly contribute or participate in a kind of FREE OPEN project.

I look forward for hearing from you even to continue our conversation in the given e-mails, if you feel so.

Sincerely,

Valeria

---- My comment conversions threads put on essays

REALITY, ONCE by Joe Fisher

How Should Humanity Steer the Future? An interview with Einstein in Heaven by Vladimir F. Tamari

The Spiritual Big Bang: Origin of Universe by Damon Joseph Sproc

How Can People Plan for the Technological Future and Who Should Be Their Guides into the Future? by David Brown

How to Hack Human History by John Brodix Merryman

The Tip of The Spear by George Gantz

Planetary Procreation by Turil Sweden Cronburg

view post as summary

Dear Vladimir,

It was a very deep essay examining the human psyche. I think it is a little harder for me to follow analysis of human introspection because is isn't as discrete as the logic of mathematical equations, but I did give you a high rating. Personally I view the human body as a biochemical-vessel that interfaces to the human soul (which I believe is a form of subspace matter). I...

view entire post

Dear Vladimir,

It was a very deep essay examining the human psyche. I think it is a little harder for me to follow analysis of human introspection because is isn't as discrete as the logic of mathematical equations, but I did give you a high rating. Personally I view the human body as a biochemical-vessel that interfaces to the human soul (which I believe is a form of subspace matter). I think this is compatible with your views as well.

It is interesting that you bring up Neanderthals. A theory of mine is that I have the same neurobiology as Einstein, which stems from Neanderthal genetics. If you research it, you will find that the back of his head was misshapen (read the volume dedicated to him in Times Magazine). I believe he had a Occipital Protuberence (like me), which is a genetic, anatomical trait. I also believe that Asperger's Syndrome is the psychological diagnosis of Neanderthal Neurobiology. It seems that many Neanderthal gene-traits appear to be recessive. My own genetic background is not Jewish as my surname comes from Viking Royalty. However, I believe that an ancient root connects Jews and Vikings together as many sources believe that Vikings descended from the Tribe of Benjamin. I notice your writings seem infused with Christian beliefs. I don't see contradictions from true Science and the Holy Bible, I just think a correct interpretation of the inherent symbolism is necessary to see the truth. I kinda wonder about translations and whether the Nephilim are connected to Neanderthals because Evolutionary Theory and the Bible do not seem to peacefully co-exist. While the Nephalim are considered evil, I see that fallen-angels used-to-be angels and that mankind has great capacity for either good or evil depending upon our choice (since God gave us the capacity to decide for ourselves). I know I have read about Giants being a mistranslation of fallen or sub-species of humans (in one of the Naked Archeologist's documentaries). I do believe that such roots yield knowledge to mankind that are important in the understanding of intellectual ability. I think it has to do with memory and neuro-processing architecture. My oldest son takes after me with a high Logical-IQ whereas my younger son seems more Crow Magnon (since he takes after my wife's traits of higher Emotional-IQ). My older son put it best when he said J.D. learns better than I do but I think better than him. I believe that IQ is highly misunderstood by society. Anyways, it is something to think about. I wish you great luck!

Sincerely,

Stephen Tuck

view post as summary

FQXi Essay Contest in 2014 with the theme «How Should Humanity Steer the Future?» Is extremely important . 100 years have passed since the beginning of The First World War. The death toll -11,440,310 person.

75 years have passed since the beginning of The Second World War. The death toll 46,733,062 person.

During the Cold War period 1946-1991 was 108 local...

view entire post

FQXi Essay Contest in 2014 with the theme «How Should Humanity Steer the Future?» Is extremely important . 100 years have passed since the beginning of The First World War. The death toll -11,440,310 person.

75 years have passed since the beginning of The Second World War. The death toll 46,733,062 person.

During the Cold War period 1946-1991 was 108 local wars and military conflicts. Over the last 23 years - 23 war and conflict . Here is a message to start a new Cold War.

What to do? How to save the World and Humanity?

War always started politics, not people. Therefore, one way out: the transition from "Democracy 2.0" to a deeper democracy of the Information Era - "Democracy 3.0".

Necessary creation of a new scientific picture of the World of the Information Era in the spirit of the great philosophers of the 20th century, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin and Edmund Husserl, which will include the deep meanings of the "LifeWorld " and Man: «The true physics is that which will, one day, achieve the inclusion of man in his wholeness in a coherent picture of the world." Central category, semantic attractor new scientific picture of the World - Ontological (Cosmic) Memory. Humanity must go to Aeonics thinking: «Aion is a child playing, playing checkers; power over the world belongs to the child »( Heraclitus ). That the Earth is not paused, Homo sapiens sapiens has no right to transform into Homo ludens ludens. WarGames man in a new Era - a very dangerous games. We need to hear the voice of the Earth, voice of the People

to give up Hope to New Generation of Earthlings. Let's keep the Peace, save the World and the Earth together! Time to start the new path.

view post as summary

Dear Vladimir

I loved reading your clever article. However, I crucially disagree with your institutionalized solution. Although build on the idea of the individual, institutions inevitably transform in the negation of individuality. In order to maintain themselves, they grow into increasingly heavy tail of retardation, constructed on ever more obsolete arguments, or none arguments at all....

view entire post

Dear Vladimir

I loved reading your clever article. However, I crucially disagree with your institutionalized solution. Although build on the idea of the individual, institutions inevitably transform in the negation of individuality. In order to maintain themselves, they grow into increasingly heavy tail of retardation, constructed on ever more obsolete arguments, or none arguments at all. Waving with flags and phrases like "In the name of Humanity, in the name of democracy, in the name of God, in the name of our children, In the name of the new world order..." they condition living individuals to fall ever deeper in the whole of unnatural uniformity, non-living sensibility, hypnotic mass stupidity and ever growing polarization. Institutionalized science, founded by non-living institutions called "states", "religions" or "corporations"... turned out to be a practical tool to bold the above hypnotic phrases with a hypnotic phrase like "according to scientists"...

Without the official seal of the official science, state, corporation, religion... regardless of their truth and simplicity, ideas and descriptions of the world, which don't fit or threaten the existence of such institutions are marginalised, neglected, rejected or burned. As we witness, in all aspects of our institutionalized society, the problems are maintained and created. This knotted matrix of problems iterates itself... maintaining and creating the age of problems. Like Jupiter moons observed by Galileo, simple and intuitive truth is the greatest threat to complicated and unintuitive lie.

The knowledge of the truth is the information, not learned by heart, but understood by heart. The path of that knowledge is certainly not the unconscious repeating of some local, contradicting, man-made scientific or religious paradigm. The tool of the universal truth is sharp, precise, irrefutable and universal. And as you pointed out, the simple truth is drown in geometry.

Regards,

andrej

view post as summary

Dear Vladimir,

one thing that came into my mind by reading your essay and especially by reading the comments above is the following.

Most people today are not interested in philosophy, based on my experience at least in the european countries. What is taught in schools is primarily oriented to give practial benefits for the later working life of a teenager. In a certain sense they...

view entire post

Dear Vladimir,

one thing that came into my mind by reading your essay and especially by reading the comments above is the following.

Most people today are not interested in philosophy, based on my experience at least in the european countries. What is taught in schools is primarily oriented to give practial benefits for the later working life of a teenager. In a certain sense they are drilled to be productive in their future. An exception from the rule is surely the school subject "religion". But this subject is usually overloaded with connotations like sin, guilt, eternal decisions and the theodicy problem.

The theodicy problem is surely also a philosophical problem, but beaten down in the framework of the school subject "religion", it gets too abstract to be really evaluated by teenagers.

So my thought is that people schould be trained already in school to also think in philosophical terms, because many questions and problems of humanity are of philosophical/ethical nature. There are way to less considerations to make people not only fit for producing profits in their later working life, but also to give them the mental ability to reflect their thoughts and actions by a wider scale of outlooks than they do today. As Sabine Hossenfelder emphasizes, most people make their decisions on grounds of locally and self-centered reasons. I think therefore education - what is demanded by many essay authors - should necessarily imply the disciple of philosophy.

I like your essay and the impetus that generated it. You are in search for a better and more fair world and you contribute with your essay for this goal. I am not sure if your proposals to conform the various institutions to organize themselves into more global risk evaluation/prevention can be successfull in the next decades, because all that must be achieved in the first place via money - and the change of thoughts. Noboday wants to spend his/her time for free and there would be needed thousands of highly educated stuff to bring those institutions in line with what would be necessary. This would also be a political issue as well...

The first step would be (IMHO) to adress the most urgent issues that endanger humanity to the science community and the network of their most prominent representatives. As long as the public isn't informed as well as we are here at fqxi, there will be no mentionable changes. Second, the science community has to act as the bad conscience for the politicians - worldwide. So the politics would be more driven to act in the direction to serve humanity as a whole and not only national interests. Why are most politicians NOT trained in philosophy - because no real philosopher would decide for him/herself to take part in some dirty work. Philosophs do what they are convinced to do, must do, namely serving humanity (is this "must" a lack of freedom...? - i wouldn't say so). If we had more people of this species, a lot (but surely not all) would have been achieved!

Good, deep and serious essay, Vladimir! And i liked much the mentioning of your daughter Victoria and am convinced that you like children in general because they do still know what's good and bad and are honest. Its only the systemic circumstances that can change a human's heart to a dark realm. We should learn again to forgive each other and to discover the own child within us. Then we would be able to see behind another one's curtain and treat him/her more emphatically and truly.

Best wishes,

Stefan

view post as summary

Dear Vladimir,

Delightful harmonious notes prelude of a new state of matter: self-consciousness of Noosfera. The vector of untangible world of consciousness is restructuring the current reality into designed reality. Fascinating and elegant path of words to explain the inevitable Noosfera’s inmanent nature: innovation, evolution and self-transformation. Unveiling the field of...

view entire post

Dear Vladimir,

Delightful harmonious notes prelude of a new state of matter: self-consciousness of Noosfera. The vector of untangible world of consciousness is restructuring the current reality into designed reality. Fascinating and elegant path of words to explain the inevitable Noosfera’s inmanent nature: innovation, evolution and self-transformation. Unveiling the field of information and time that has been the path of the biophoton. Listening the silent field of awareness that like a wave remains its energy in the atoms of your brain. The architecture of your thinking follows the light of possibility and transcendence mixed with the eternal human search for a meaning of existence.

Inspired by the most powerful promise of transcendence, your daughter, you grasp the field of reality to find real answer, the most noble reason to create.

Totally agree with your fundaments of “LifeWorld” (“LebensWelt”), in fact the blind trust of human kind in science is a pitiful symptom of the lackness of wisdom and the not extended understanding that science is the human capability to comprehend the nature of cosmos. Science is a continuous exercise that has entertained human kind in its path in universe. The only way to increase knowledge is by expanding consciousness of the field. Systematization is a tool for complexity. As you state: Humanity yet didn´t realize all depth of global existential risks. Science is a tool for Humanity and not a ruler. The comprehension of the nature of humanity needs to be expanded, it is at this point of non-return to comprehend the power of human kind to understand its responsabilities and create flexible-adaptable-intelligent new systems of interaction with cosmos.

As Protogeometry clearly develops the cybernetics of passing from exsitencial point “Alpha” to “point of Omega” to create the possible field of Absolute spirit: waves of rises and fallings of the genus Homo. This part of your work reminds me the book: “La vida, el tiempo y la muerte” of Fanny Blanck-Cerejido and Marcelino Cerejido where they explain the nature of cosmos and in which I based Black Sky Thinking:

“Cada nivel jerárquico fue Nuevo alguna vez y surgió como el producto de la interacción entre los niveles que ya estaban y el medio ambiente, que incluye también a otros individuos y a otras especies. Los nuevos niveles tienen menor grado de restricción que los inferiores y tienen por lo tanto mayor ámbito para el error y la creatividad. En la etapa actual, el superior y más reciente parece ser el mental. El pensamiento está enhebrado por la noción del tiempo; por ello deberemos incluir una descripción de los modelos más en boga, aquellos con los que el psicoanálisis trata de entender la estructura y el modo de operar del aparato psíquico.”

The Cerejido couple are describing neuroendocrine processes but at the same time they are describing the operating systems of universe. It would be interesting to provide exactitude to this systems by measuring in terms of time (our Brain is hardwired to time concepts) the mathematical period of duration of each system. This could lead to accuracy into the use of fields of interaction in cosmos and the duration of innovative and creative processes and the duration of structuralizing fields. There might be flexible and self-adaptative systems of interaction between Human Kind and the environment.

Protogeometer and Black Sky Thinking propose of leading the bio-architecture to follow the “Omega Point”.

Respectfully I may differ that the first tool and the first weapon were the manual cut or so-called chopping –tools, the first tool and weapon was a bio-tool and bioweapon: the thumb. It seems the Noosfera field is “floating” in the universe like a dimension of possibility, biology slowly connects with this fields and creates architecture to follow its complicated rules, meanwhile bio-architecture follows mathematics, physics, chemistry, geometry, etc… the Noosfera field is encrypted in higher language that biology deals with its complexity. I agree with Protogeometer that the eidos of the thumb was the initial constituting act, the first sign and the first knowledge. From Black Sky Thinking view the first “mathematical act” and it continuous to be: the family. When we need to think in another human being, in its well-being there is transcendence. Wherever the human consciousness is focused in transcendence the tools to make it real will come to them. We are a group of atoms interacting under the rule of different systems, this systems grow in complexity when they may become adaptive to other group of systems (another human being).

I would love to continue this dialogue with your fabulous dialogue with the fields of existence and the philosophy of geometry but I can not abuse of the gentilesse of your attention and the virtual space of FxQi. It is fascinating to grasp into your mind architecture and your consciousness structure. Wish you good luck but most of all wish you to materialize this wonderful work in the well-being of Human Kind.

Kindly,

Orenda Urbano Hernández

view post as summary

show all replies (1 not shown)

hide replies

FQXi Contest 2012-2014. General conclusions.

Extremely hot topic of the Contest FQXi Essay 2014 "How Should Humanity Steer the Future?" gives the chance to sum up the results of Cotests 2012-2014 and discussions in which I took part.

Today is a very serious time for Humanity. 100 years passed since the beginning of the 1st World war. 75 years passed since the beginning of...

view entire post

FQXi Contest 2012-2014. General conclusions.

Extremely hot topic of the Contest FQXi Essay 2014 "How Should Humanity Steer the Future?" gives the chance to sum up the results of Cotests 2012-2014 and discussions in which I took part.

Today is a very serious time for Humanity. 100 years passed since the beginning of the 1st World war. 75 years passed since the beginning of the 2nd World war. For the period of "Cold war" 1946-1991 occurred 108 local wars and the military conflicts. For the last 23 years - 23 wars and the conflict. In 1962 the Mankind endured "Caribbean Crisis". Here is a message to start a new Cold war .

The world and Humanity is again on the verge of a split that could lead to nuclear war, "nuclear winter", death of humanity and all life on Earth. Homo ludens again prepares the "big game", as Homo sapiens sapiens was asleep again. Humanity must remember today all earthlings killed in all the wars in history.

In basic science "crisis of representation and interpretation" (T.Rmanovsaya), "crisis of understanding" (K.Kopeykin).

FQXi Essay Contest 2014 gives the chance to answer a question immemorial and especially actual today: "What to do?"

I. Global security. Creation of new Global System of Existential security on the new principles, overcoming of the closed block mentality XVI-XX centuries. Restart the UN from "UN 2.0" to "3.0 UN.". Revitalization of the UN towards global nuclear disarmament, national cultures, international cooperation and public diplomacy. Creation of the World Programme of joint exploration of outer space and the World Ocean. Introduction of Esperanto as the official language of the UN and the international language. Relocation of the UN headquarters in Iceland. Deepening of democracy, conscious transition from "Democracy 2.0" to "Democracy 3.0" - democracy of the Information age. Creation of system of global existential taboos. I completely agree with Flavio Mercati "U-turn or u die".

II. Science. Refouding of Knowledge. The transition from "Paradigm parts" ("paradigm segment") to integrative paradigm ("over generalizing") - "The whole paradigm" ("The Great Paradigm"). New return to the sources and primordial senses: logos-topos-ontos-eidos-ethos-nomos, "grasp" primordial structure of space, understanding the nature of time and information. Ontological (structural, cosmic) memory - core, the semantic attractor of the new conceptual structure of the Universum. Creation of the "general framework structure"(D.Gross, an interview "What is in the space-time") establishes ontological foundation, framework and carcass of knowledge. Creation of a new eidos of the Universum ("Sky eidos"), new scientific picture of the world of the Information age in the spirit of the great philosophers of the 20th century Pierre Teilhard de Chardin and Edmund Husserl, which will include the limit meanings of the "LifeWorld" and Human: «The true physics is that which will, one day, achieve the inclusion of man in his wholeness in a coherent picture of the world." Overcoming the semantically poor picture of the world based on the hypothesis "In the Beginning was Big Bang ..." and the transition to the picture of the world on the basis of ontological Superaxiom "In the Beginning was Logos ..." ("Metalaw," «Universal law». «The law of laws", "Law sky"). Conscious transition from "Closed science" to "Open Science" with open competitive basis and principles aimed at accelerating the development of knowledge.

III. Education. The transition from the medieval closed system of education to the creative open education system of the Information age, forming an open ethical personality. Introduction of the principle of historicity in fundamental education. Philosophy and Ethics should be basic disciplines in the education system. I support the great idea of «the Worldwide Futurocentric Education Initiative» by Marc Séguin.

IV. Economics. Transition from an economy of existential chaos, opposing Nature to Ethical Eco-Economics, that saves the environment and people.

V. Europe - peace outpost. Creation of a New European Security System on new existential principles, promotion and development of the idea of "Greater Europe" as a "union of the peoples"(E.Kant) from the Azores in the west to the east of the Diomede Islands.

John Wheeler and Henry David Thoreau left all Earthlings good covenants to more reliably steer the Future: "Philosophy is too important to be left to the philosophers". "It is by a mathematical point only that we are wise, as the sailor or the fugitive slave keeps the polestar in his eye; but that is sufficient guidance for all our life. We may not arrive at our port within a calculable period, but we would preserve the true course."

We need a Big Dream and Great Common Cause for reliable steer the Future, to save Peace, Nature and Humanity. Great Dream always go alond with Freedom without fear, Hope, Love, Justice.

Philosophy is very good and faithful navigator on the way. New "Generation SkyPe» says all Humanity: "We start the path...".

I thank all the contestants, FQXI's team and Contest Partners for the opportunity to participate in the Contests.

Sincerely,

Vladimir Rogozhin

view post as summary